ERP migration

Migrate from Vault-ERP to Epicor Prophet 21

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Vault-ERP and Epicor Prophet 21. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Epicor Prophet 21.

Vault-ERP logo

Vault-ERP

Source

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Compatibility

93%

13 of 14

objects map 1:1 between Vault-ERP and Epicor Prophet 21.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Vault-ERP to Epicor ERP is a structural ERP migration that must respect the interdependency of financial, inventory, and HR data. Vault-ERP runs on a NetSuite-derived architecture with per-instance custom forms and fields, meaning no two deployments share an identical schema. Epicor Kinetic uses a purpose-built manufacturing data model with GL accounts, Part and PartTran records, UD (User-Defined) fields, and BAQ (Business Activity Query) reporting. We run a pre-migration schema discovery pass across the Vault-ERP instance to enumerate every custom field, then design the Epicor UD field configuration to absorb them. We load records in strict dependency order—accounts first, then customers and vendors, then items, then open AP/AR, then orders—to preserve foreign-key integrity. Historical transaction data above the agreed window is archived rather than migrated, consistent with Epicor migration best practices documented across the Epicor user community. Custom workflows, forms, and integrations in Vault-ERP do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of every automation requiring rebuild in Epicor Kinetic using BPMs (Business Process Management) and Kinetic Framework.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Vault-ERP logo

Vault-ERP

What's pushing teams away

  • Lack of transparent public pricing makes it difficult for prospective customers to budget; many leave before committing when they cannot get clear per-seat or per-module costs upfront.
  • The small team size and limited public documentation create uncertainty about long-term product support and roadmap stability, causing risk-averse buyers to choose more established ERPs.
  • Businesses with highly specialized industry workflows find the customization options insufficient once they scale beyond standard ERP patterns, leading them to platforms with deeper vertical features.

Choosing

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-specific design for wholesale distributors, not a general-purpose ERP repurposed for distribution — distributors choose P21 because it matches their replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Strong inventory control with automated replenishment, lot and serial tracking, and multi-warehouse management appeals to distributors with complex stock requirements and tight margin pressure.
  • Responsive customer support cited across G2 and Gartner reviews, with Epicor's 90% retention rate reflecting long-term customer satisfaction in a market where switching costs are high.
  • Cloud deployment on Microsoft Azure provides the flexibility to scale user counts and warehouse locations without on-premise infrastructure investment.
  • The Software Development Kit lets distributors personalize P21 to their specific business processes without modifying the application source code, preserving upgrade paths.

Object mapping

How Vault-ERP objects map to Epicor Prophet 21

Each row shows how a Vault-ERP object lands in Epicor Prophet 21, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Vault-ERP

Chart of Accounts

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

GL Account

1:1
Mapping required

Vault-ERP stores the full account hierarchy via its NetSuite-derived API. Epicor Kinetic uses a GL Account table with Account Type (Asset, Liability, Equity, Revenue, Expense), Posting Account flags, and a Company Assignment. We extract the Vault-ERP account structure with account number, name, type, and parent reference, then map it to Epicor's GL Account with the same posting semantics. Intercompany account mappings require additional configuration in Epicor's Multi-Company Journal entry setup if the destination spans multiple Epicor companies.

Vault-ERP

Customer

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Customer

1:1
Fully supported

Vault-ERP Customer records map to Epicor Kinetic Customer records with contact details, ship-to and bill-to addresses, credit limits, and payment terms preserved. The Vault-ERP customer class and region codes map to Epicor Customer Group and Territory fields. Any Vault-ERP custom classification fields require pre-migration UD field setup in Epicor before the Customer import batch begins.

Vault-ERP

Vendor

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Vendor

1:1
Fully supported

Vault-ERP Vendor records map to Epicor Kinetic Vendor records with address, payment terms, and bank account details. Vendor holds are preserved as a Vendor.ApprovalStatus field configuration in Epicor. Vendor-specific lead times and freight terms migrate to the Epicor Vendor PPP (Purchasing Terms) record.

Vault-ERP

Item (Inventory)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Part + PartBin

1:1
Fully supported

Vault-ERP Item records map to Epicor Kinetic Part records with Part Number, Description, Type (Stock, Non-Stock, Service), UOM (Unit of Measure), and cost information. Vault-ERP item classes map to Epicor Part Class codes. Current on-hand quantities from Vault-ERP transfer to Epicor PartBin records by warehouse. Custom item fields in Vault-ERP require UD field setup on Epicor's Part table before this import batch runs.

Vault-ERP

Item (BOM)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Part + PartMtl

1:many
Fully supported

Vault-ERP BOM (Bill of Materials) structures with multi-level assemblies map to Epicor Kinetic PartMtl (material) and PartOpr (operation) records. Each Vault-ERP BOM header becomes a Part record of Type MfgKit or Assemble; each component becomes a PartMtl row with qty-per, scrap percent, and material type flags. We preserve the BOM revision and effective date in Epicor's PartRev and PartRevDtl tables. Manufacturing routing data from Vault-ERP maps to PartOpr records with work center and cycle time assignments.

Vault-ERP

Open AP

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

APInvoice + APLnk

1:1
Fully supported

Open payable records in Vault-ERP carry vendor reference, invoice number, invoice date, due date, outstanding balance, and currency. These map to Epicor Kinetic APInvoice records with invoice line distributions mapped to GL accounts from the Chart of Accounts migration. We preserve the original AP invoice number in Epicor's Invoice Reference field. Prepayments and partial payments migrate as separate APTran entries.

Vault-ERP

Open AR

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

ARInvoice + ARLnk

1:1
Fully supported

Open receivable records in Vault-ERP map to Epicor Kinetic ARInvoice with customer reference, invoice number, invoice date, due date, and outstanding balance. Vault-ERP payment terms map to Epicor AR Terms codes. Deposit records and credit memos migrate as separate ARTran entries with transaction type flags. Currency and subsidiary assignments are preserved from the source records.

Vault-ERP

Sales Order

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

OrderHed + OrderDtl

1:1
Fully supported

Vault-ERP Sales Orders map to Epicor Kinetic OrderHed (order header) and OrderDtl (order detail). The customer reference and ship-to address resolve via the Customer mapping; line items resolve via the Part mapping. Vault-ERP order status (open, partial, complete) maps to Epicor OrderHed.OrderStatus. Custom fields on Vault-ERP order headers migrate to UD fields on OrderHed after UD field setup in Epicor. We flag any Vault-ERP order that references a discontinued part and hold it for customer admin resolution.

Vault-ERP

Purchase Order

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

POHeader + POLine

1:1
Fully supported

Vault-ERP Purchase Orders map to Epicor Kinetic POHeader and POLine records. Vendor resolves via the Vendor mapping; line items resolve via the Part mapping. POStatus, buyer assignment, and FOB terms migrate. Purchase order approvals in Vault-ERP do not transfer; Epicor's PO approval workflow is configured separately post-migration.

Vault-ERP

Employee

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

EmpBasic + EmpRouting

1:1
Fully supported

Vault-ERP Employee records carry job title, department, hire date, and effective-dated compensation changes. These map to Epicor Kinetic EmpBasic (name, address, contact, department, job code) and pay rate data. We extract the full effective-dated change log from Vault-ERP and load it into Epicor as a sequence of dated HR records, preserving audit continuity. Custom employee fields migrate to UD fields on EmpBasic after pre-migration UD field configuration.

Vault-ERP

Time Tracking Entry

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

LaborDtl

1:1
Fully supported

Vault-ERP time entries with billable and non-billable hours, project associations, and employee links map to Epicor Kinetic LaborDtl records. We map the Vault-ERP project reference to an Epicor JobNum or ProjectID, and the hours, labor type, and work date transfer to LaborDtl with the appropriate LaborType and LaborHrs values. Vault-ERP's configurable time entry layout requires a pre-migration review to identify which fields map to Epicor's fixed LaborDtl schema.

Vault-ERP

Bank and Cash Account

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

BankAcct

1:1
Fully supported

Vault-ERP bank account definitions and current balance snapshots map to Epicor Kinetic BankAcct records with bank code, account number, currency, and opening balance. We transfer the balance as of the migration effective date as an opening balance. Epicor's bank reconciliation module is configured separately; historical cleared transactions are not migrated as part of the standard scope.

Vault-ERP

Tax Code

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

TaxRegion + TaxConnect

1:1
Fully supported

Vault-ERP tax codes with jurisdiction-specific rates and rules map to Epicor Kinetic TaxRegion and TaxConnect configuration. Each Vault-ERP tax code becomes an Epicor TaxRegion with associated TaxDetail rows for rate, tax type, and effective date. Tax exemptions and tax group assignments migrate to Epicor TaxExempt records linked to Customer and Vendor.

Vault-ERP

Document and Attachment

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

DocumentReference

1:1
Fully supported

Vault-ERP file attachments linked to customers, vendors, orders, and items export as document records with binary content and metadata. We transfer the file content, original filename, and linked record reference. Every migrated attachment is verified post-transfer by SHA-256 checksum comparison against the source file; any mismatch is flagged for manual resolution. Epicor Kinetic stores these in its Document Management system with reference links back to the parent record.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Vault-ERP logo

Vault-ERP gotchas

High

Custom form and field variations across tenants

High

Referential integrity across ERP tables during migration

Medium

File storage integrity is not guaranteed across migrations

Medium

ERP transaction history is intermingled with current state

Medium

HR data carries effective-dated changes that must be preserved

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21 gotchas

High

Third-party bolt-on integrations complicate migration scope

High

Dirty data without standardized processes compounds migration risk

Medium

SDK customizations and BPMs may not survive platform upgrades

Medium

Report-based export only for non-technical users

Low

Per-user pricing model requires accurate user count before migration planning

Pair-specific challenges

  • Vault-ERP custom form schema requires per-tenant discovery

    Vault-ERP's core product promise is that users reshape forms and fields to match their own processes, meaning every Vault-ERP deployment has a unique schema of custom fields, modified standard fields, and custom objects. We run a pre-migration schema discovery pass that enumerates every custom field in the source instance and produces a field map before any data is touched. These Vault-ERP custom fields then need to be pre-created as UD fields on the corresponding Epicor tables (Part, OrderHed, EmpBasic, etc.) before the import batches run. Skipping schema discovery results in silent field loss on import—the records move but the custom data never arrives in Epicor.

  • Referential integrity constraints require strict load-order sequencing

    Vault-ERP records carry foreign-key dependencies that must be loaded in the correct order: GL accounts before customers and vendors; customers and vendors before orders; items before BOM structures; orders before line items; employees before time entries. Loading records out of sequence breaks Epicor's foreign-key constraints silently—the import batch fails or the record orphan-links to nothing. We enforce a migration load-order constraint that Epicor Kinetic's schema enforces at insert time. Any record that references a parent not yet in Epicor is held in a staging queue and retried once the parent is loaded.

  • Epicor UD field setup must precede data import batches

    Epicor Kinetic's UD (User-Defined) fields are defined in the UD Table maintenance screen and require a separate metadata deployment before any data import that references them. If Vault-ERP custom fields are mapped to Epicor UD fields, and the UD field does not yet exist in the Epicor company, the import batch fails with a schema validation error. We coordinate the UD field definition step as a prerequisite gate before every import batch that touches a mapped custom field. This adds one to three days to the Epicor configuration phase but prevents batch failures mid-migration.

  • Epicor migration performance degrades with decades of historical data

    Epicor environments that have run for a decade or more accumulate transaction history, production logs, WIP records, job histories, and thousands of attachments. Epicor migration specialists and community posts document that importing all historical data into a new Epicor Kinetic environment creates unnecessary load, inflates database size, slows down the new system, and increases implementation cost. We define a transaction window with the customer during scoping—typically the last 12 to 24 months of closed transactions plus all open records—and archive the remainder rather than migrate it. The archived data is delivered as a structured export for compliance and audit access without occupying the live Epicor environment.

  • File attachment transfer requires checksum verification to prevent silent data loss

    File migration in document-integrated ERP systems can result in silent data loss when file store servers and database servers are not migrated together atomically. This pattern is documented across the Autodesk Vault community and applies to any file-attachment-heavy Vault-ERP deployment. We export every file attachment with its original filename, MIME type, and source checksum, transfer it to Epicor Kinetic's Document Management storage, then verify by SHA-256 comparison. Any attachment where the destination hash does not match the source hash is flagged in the migration report with the original filename, record association, and failure reason for manual resolution.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Vault-ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 data migration

  1. Schema discovery and Epicor UD field pre-configuration

    We audit the Vault-ERP instance to enumerate every standard and custom field across Customers, Vendors, Items, Orders, Employees, and any custom objects. We cross-reference each Vault-ERP custom field against Epicor Kinetic's available UD field slots on the corresponding tables. We then pre-configure Epicor Kinetic UD fields (via the UD Table maintenance in Epicor) as a prerequisite gate before any import batch. The discovery output is a written field map and a UD field configuration manifest that the customer's Epicor admin approves before migration begins.

  2. Epicor environment configuration

    We work with the customer's Epicor admin to configure the base Epicor Kinetic environment: GL Account structure with account types and posting assignments, Part Classes and Part number format, Customer Groups and Vendor Groups, TaxRegion and TaxConnect jurisdiction setup, warehouse and bin structure, and production calendar. Epicor Kinetic deployment option (on-premise, private cloud, or Epicor SaaS Kinetic) is confirmed before this step because some configurations differ by deployment type.

  3. Data migration in dependency order

    We run the migration in strict record-dependency order: GL accounts and Bank Accounts (no dependencies), Customers and Vendors (depend on accounts), Tax Codes (depend on GL accounts and regions), Parts and BOM structures (depend on Part Classes), Open AP and AR (depend on Vendors, Customers, and GL accounts), Sales Orders and Purchase Orders (depend on Customers, Vendors, and Parts), Employees and HR records with effective-dated history (depend on department and job code setup), Time Tracking entries (depend on Employees and any project or job references), and Documents and Attachments last. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report; the next phase does not begin until the previous phase's reconciliation clears or exceptions are documented.

  4. BOM and manufacturing routing validation

    For Vault-ERP deployments that use BOM structures for assembly or manufacturing, we validate the multi-level BOM explosion before Epicor PartMtl import. We verify that every component Part exists or is created before its parent assembly, that quantity-per and scrap factors are numeric and within tolerance, and that any work center references in Vault-ERP's routing data map to valid Epicor Resource Groups. BOM validation errors are held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's engineering or operations team to resolve before the Epicor production environment is populated.

  5. File attachment transfer and checksum verification

    We export all Vault-ERP file attachments with their source SHA-256 checksums, transfer them to Epicor Kinetic Document Management storage with original filenames and MIME types, and verify by checksum comparison. Every file that fails verification is logged with the original filename, the linked Vault-ERP record (customer, vendor, order, part), and the checksum mismatch reason. Files that pass verification are linked to their parent records via DocumentReference entries. We do not migrate Vault-ERP's internal file store server configuration; we transfer file content only.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff

    We freeze Vault-ERP writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then mark Epicor as the system of record. We deliver a reconciliation report comparing Vault-ERP and Epicor totals for accounts, customers, vendors, items, open AP/AR, and employee headcount. We also deliver a written inventory of every Vault-ERP workflow, custom form logic, and integration that requires rebuild in Epicor Kinetic using BPMs, Epicor Functions, or Kinetic Framework. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Vault-ERP automations as Epicor BPMs inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Vault-ERP logo

Vault-ERP

Source

Strengths

  • All-in-one cloud ERP covering Accounting, HR, Sales, Inventory, and Manufacturing without requiring separate systems.
  • Customizable forms and fields allow non-technical users to reshape the interface to match their own processes.
  • Integrated time tracking with billable and non-billable hour categorization supports project-based billing workflows.
  • Single-platform data model reduces the need for third-party integrations and manual data reconciliation.

Weaknesses

  • Very limited public documentation, no public API reference, and minimal community presence make technical evaluation and integration planning difficult.
  • No transparent published pricing tiers; cost structure is opaque and requires direct sales contact to determine.
  • Small development team and recent founding date raise concerns about long-term support continuity and product maturity.
  • Custom form flexibility means every instance has a unique schema, increasing migration complexity and requiring per-tenant mapping work.
Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for wholesale distribution with industry-specific replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Multi-warehouse management with bin locations, cross-docking, and real-time inventory visibility across all warehouse locations.
  • Automated replenishment engine with demand-based and min-max planning reduces stockouts and overstock carrying costs.
  • AI-infused reporting via Epicor Prism provides Gen AI-driven insights into ERP data without requiring a BI team.
  • Strong customer retention at 90% and a 50-year track record in the distribution vertical provides long-term vendor stability.

Weaknesses

  • High total cost of ownership — per-user pricing of $150-200/month plus $10K-$500K implementation creates significant budget commitment for small and mid-market distributors.
  • Customization via SDK requires technical expertise and introduces upgrade risk when custom code conflicts with new P21 releases.
  • Report generation performance is a known pain point — multiple users report system freezes during large or complex report exports.
  • Third-party bolt-on reliance for functionality that competitors include natively increases integration complexity and total solution cost.
  • Limited public API documentation — developers building custom integrations report difficulty finding P21 API authentication methods and endpoint specifications.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard ERP migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Vault-ERP and Epicor Prophet 21.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Vault-ERP: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Vault-ERP doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Vault-ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Vault-ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Vault-ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Vault-ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for deployments under 15,000 items, 3,000 customers, 2,000 open AP/AR records, and a 12-month transaction window with no multi-level BOM structures. Migrations with large item catalogs, multi-level BOM routing, effective-dated HR history across hundreds of employees, or multi-entity Epicor Kinetic configurations move to eight to twelve weeks because of schema discovery scope, Epicor UD field configuration, BOM remapping, and parent-record resolution across Epicor's production tables.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Vault-ERP.
Land in Epicor Prophet 21, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day