ERP migration

Migrate from KeyedIn to Epicor Prophet 21

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between KeyedIn and Epicor Prophet 21. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Epicor Prophet 21.

KeyedIn logo

KeyedIn

Source

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Compatibility

79%

11 of 14

objects map 1:1 between KeyedIn and Epicor Prophet 21.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-8 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from KeyedIn to Epicor ERP is a structural migration that spans two fundamentally different data architectures. KeyedIn uses a standalone project portfolio management model with separate Deliverables and Task Plan Milestones that are not automatically synchronized; Epicor Kinetic embeds Work Breakdown Structure phases within Projects, with milestones managed as phase attributes or linked records rather than as independent objects. We resolve the Deliverables-versus-Milestone duplication during scoping, flatten KeyedIn Task Plans to Epicor WBS Phase hierarchies, treat financial data as a separate migration plane, and map KeyedIn custom fields to Epicor UD column definitions. Epicor does not expose a public REST API for bulk extraction, so we coordinate the extraction method during discovery using KeyedIn's managed export, Jitterbit connector, or on-premise database access. Workflows, automations, and reporting configurations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Epicor Kinetic.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

KeyedIn logo

KeyedIn

What's pushing teams away

  • Occasional users find the interface unintuitive — actions that should take one click require five, creating friction for team members who do not use it daily.
  • Reviewers report the system is glitchy — saved data disappears and the timesheet module requires workarounds for precise human resource budgeting.
  • A structural disconnect exists between Deliverables (milestones) and Milestones captured within Task Plans, forcing users to duplicate data entry in both places.
  • The UX is described as needing a refresh — the tool works functionally but feels dated compared to newer project management platforms.
  • Teams outgrow the tool when they need more flexible customization in reporting and data filtering for tailored views.

Choosing

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-specific design for wholesale distributors, not a general-purpose ERP repurposed for distribution — distributors choose P21 because it matches their replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Strong inventory control with automated replenishment, lot and serial tracking, and multi-warehouse management appeals to distributors with complex stock requirements and tight margin pressure.
  • Responsive customer support cited across G2 and Gartner reviews, with Epicor's 90% retention rate reflecting long-term customer satisfaction in a market where switching costs are high.
  • Cloud deployment on Microsoft Azure provides the flexibility to scale user counts and warehouse locations without on-premise infrastructure investment.
  • The Software Development Kit lets distributors personalize P21 to their specific business processes without modifying the application source code, preserving upgrade paths.

Object mapping

How KeyedIn objects map to Epicor Prophet 21

Each row shows how a KeyedIn object lands in Epicor Prophet 21, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

KeyedIn

Project

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Project

1:1
Fully supported

KeyedIn Projects map directly to Epicor Kinetic Projects. The Project Name, Status, Start Date, End Date, and Owner migrate as-is. Budget amounts from KeyedIn map to Epicor's Project Budget (Phase Budgets or direct Cost Category amounts). We validate total budget reconciliation after import because KeyedIn financial data may exist in a separate data plane from project task data.

KeyedIn

Task Plan

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Project + WBS Phases

1:many
Fully supported

KeyedIn Task Plans are standalone schedule entities attached to Projects. Epicor Kinetic has no separate Task Plan object; tasks live as WBS Phases within a Project. We map each KeyedIn Task Plan to the parent Project and its Tasks to WBS Phases. The Task Plan name is preserved as a Project Phase or WBS Group label. Epicor WBS supports two hierarchy levels (Project > Phase > WBS Task), so deeply nested Task Plans may require flattening at the lowest level.

KeyedIn

Task

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

WBS Phase / WBS Task

1:1
Fully supported

KeyedIn Tasks nested under Task Plans map to Epicor WBS Phases or WBS Tasks. Parent-child hierarchy is preserved by ordering records by parent reference and resolving the parent WBS Phase ID at migration time. Start/end dates, assignees, status, and percent complete migrate directly. Epicor's WBS does not support a three-level nesting equivalent to Project > Task Plan > Task > Subtask; we flatten Subtasks as child WBS Tasks under the parent Task Phase.

KeyedIn

Subtask

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

WBS Task

1:1
Fully supported

KeyedIn Subtasks nested under Tasks are mapped to Epicor WBS Tasks as the lowest hierarchy level. Epicor WBS Phase and WBS Task objects share the same Erp.BO.Project and Erp.BO.WbsSvc APIs, and WBS Tasks under a WBS Phase are the natural landing point for subtask records. The parent Task must be migrated first so that the WBS Phase reference is available when writing Subtask records.

KeyedIn

Resource (People/Pool)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Employee / Labor

1:1
Fully supported

KeyedIn Resources (People or generic pool entities) map to Epicor Kinetic Employee records. Resource-to-project assignments migrate as Labor entries with allocation hours, date, and billable flag. We resolve the Employee record by matching the KeyedIn resource email or name to the Epicor Kinetic employee table. If the Employee does not exist, we hold the record in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision the employee before labor allocation migration proceeds.

KeyedIn

Portfolio

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Project Group

1:many
Fully supported

KeyedIn Portfolios group related Projects for executive visibility. Epicor Kinetic does not have a native Portfolio object; we map Portfolio-to-Project associations to Epicor's Project Group feature or attach a custom Project Tag field to each Project record. The customer chooses the grouping strategy during scoping. Multiple KeyedIn Portfolios that reference the same Project are preserved as separate Project Group memberships.

KeyedIn

Deliverable

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

WBS Phase Milestone or Project Issue (resolution required)

1:1
Fully supported

KeyedIn standalone Deliverables are milestone records at the project level. Epicor Kinetic does not have an equivalent standalone Deliverable object. We map Deliverables to WBS Phase Milestone attributes where the destination WBS Phase structure supports milestone flags, or to Project Issue records with a milestone-type classification for cases where Epicor's Issue/Risk tracking is used for milestone governance. If the same milestone exists as a Task Plan Milestone, we flag it as a duplicate for customer resolution before migration.

KeyedIn

Task Plan Milestone

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

WBS Phase Milestone

1:1
Fully supported

KeyedIn Milestones embedded within Task Plans map to Epicor WBS Phase Milestone attributes. The milestone name, due date, and status migrate as Phase milestone fields. We validate that the parent Task Plan (mapped to WBS Phase) exists before writing the milestone. Deliverables that represent the same milestone are flagged for deduplication against Task Plan Milestones.

KeyedIn

Time Entry

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Labor Transaction

1:1
Fully supported

KeyedIn Time Entries logged against Tasks or Resources migrate to Epicor Kinetic Labor transactions (Erp.BO.LaborSvc). Hours, date, labor type, and billable flag map directly. The Labor Transaction is linked to the resolved WBS Phase (from the KeyedIn Task) and Employee (from the KeyedIn Resource). If the destination uses project-specific labor entry approval workflows, we flag these for configuration after migration.

KeyedIn

Financial Budget

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Project Budget / Cost Category

1:1
Fully supported

KeyedIn Enterprise financial budgets (amounts, cost codes, period breakdowns) migrate to Epicor Kinetic Project Budgets and Cost Categories. We treat financial data as a separate migration plane from task data because KeyedIn stores budgets not always co-located with Project and Task records. Budget amounts are reconciled to the parent Project total after migration. Currency mismatches or missing cost codes are flagged before write.

KeyedIn

Risk

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Project Risk

1:1
Fully supported

KeyedIn Risks logged at the Project level with severity, status, owner, and description map to Epicor Kinetic Project Risk records. We preserve the link to the parent Project and validate that the Project record exists in Epicor before writing the Risk. Epicor Kinetic uses the Erp.BO.RiskAndIssueSvc for Risk and Issue records.

KeyedIn

Issue

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Project Issue

1:1
Fully supported

KeyedIn Issues logged at the Project level map to Epicor Kinetic Project Issue records via Erp.BO.RiskAndIssueSvc. Status, priority, owner, description, and related Project are migrated directly. Issues that reference a KeyedIn Task Plan or Task are linked to the corresponding WBS Phase after hierarchy migration completes.

KeyedIn

Document / Attachment

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

DocStar Attachment or URL Link

1:1
Fully supported

Documents attached to KeyedIn Projects or Tasks are stored with file name, URL reference, and metadata. We migrate file metadata and URLs as Epicor DocStar attachments or as URL-type links on the Project record. Actual file blob migration depends on the Epicor edition's document management configuration. We flag the document storage approach during scoping.

KeyedIn

Custom Field

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

UD Column

lossy
Fully supported

KeyedIn custom fields on Projects, Tasks, and other objects are tenant-specific with no standard field registry. We perform a full field discovery scan during scoping to enumerate every custom field, map each to an Epicor Kinetic UD Column definition, and deploy UD fields before record migration. Complex custom fields that require BPM logic (such as cascading values or cross-object derivations) are flagged for post-migration Epicor developer configuration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

KeyedIn logo

KeyedIn gotchas

Medium

Deliverables vs Task Plan Milestone duplication

Medium

Financial data stored separately from tasks

Medium

Custom field schema varies per tenant

High

No publicly documented bulk export or API

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21 gotchas

High

Third-party bolt-on integrations complicate migration scope

High

Dirty data without standardized processes compounds migration risk

Medium

SDK customizations and BPMs may not survive platform upgrades

Medium

Report-based export only for non-technical users

Low

Per-user pricing model requires accurate user count before migration planning

Pair-specific challenges

  • Deliverables and Task Plan Milestones can represent the same milestone

    KeyedIn maintains two separate milestone tracking mechanisms that are not automatically synchronized: standalone Deliverables at the project level and Milestones embedded within Task Plans. When migrating, we encounter records in both systems representing the same milestone. We flag these as duplicates, present them to the customer for resolution, and migrate only the resolved canonical record to Epicor. Failing to deduplicate results in double-counting in project progress reporting and phase completion percentages.

  • Epicor UD columns require BPM logic for complex field derivations

    Epicor Kinetic custom fields (UD columns) require explicit mapping via UD Column Map, and complex derivations require Business Process Management (BPM) code. A field like mapping a ShipTo Zip to OrderHed requires a BPM to populate the UD field with conditional logic. We pre-create UD column definitions during schema deployment and flag any custom fields that require BPM logic so the customer's Epicor developer can implement them post-migration before data goes live.

  • Financial data in KeyedIn Enterprise is not always co-located with tasks

    KeyedIn Enterprise stores financial budgets, cost codes, and financial line items in a separate data plane from Project and Task records. We treat financial data as a separate migration plane and validate that financial amounts reconcile to the parent Project budget totals after migration. Currency mismatches, missing cost codes, and orphaned financial line items without a parent Project reference are flagged before write to prevent silent budget discrepancies in Epicor.

  • Epicor WBS supports only two hierarchy levels, not three

    KeyedIn supports a three-level task nesting: Project > Task Plan > Task > Subtask. Epicor Kinetic WBS supports Project > Phase > WBS Task (two levels). KeyedIn Subtasks require flattening to the WBS Task level, which may result in a flatter project schedule than the source. We validate the deepest nesting depth during discovery and discuss the flattening strategy with the customer's project management team before migration.

  • KeyedIn has no public bulk export or REST API

    KeyedIn does not publish a public REST API or bulk export endpoint in standard documentation. Data extraction typically requires a managed export from within the application, a Jitterbit connector (for integration customers), or direct database access for Enterprise on-premise deployments. We coordinate with the customer to identify the available extraction method during discovery, factor the extraction approach into the migration timeline, and adjust the toolchain accordingly. This is the highest-risk item in the pair because it directly affects data accessibility.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful KeyedIn to Epicor Prophet 21 data migration

  1. Discovery and extraction method identification

    We audit the source KeyedIn environment across tier (Team, Professional, Enterprise), custom field schema, Task Plan structure depth, resource allocation volume, financial data presence, and document attachment count. We identify the available extraction method (managed export, Jitterbit connector, or on-premise database) with the customer's KeyedIn administrator. The discovery output is a written migration scope, extraction plan, and Epicor edition recommendation based on the customer's manufacturing and financial management needs.

  2. Deliverables deduplication and milestone reconciliation

    We extract all standalone Deliverables and Task Plan Milestones, compute the overlap by name and due date, and present the duplicate set to the customer's PMO lead for resolution. We use a canonical milestone rule: if a Deliverable and a Task Plan Milestone share the same name, due date, and parent project, we hold one for customer decision. The resolved canonical set becomes the migration target. This step prevents double-counting in Epicor's WBS phase completion tracking.

  3. Epicor schema preparation and UD field deployment

    We create Epicor Kinetic UD column definitions for every KeyedIn custom field, deploy them via Epicor Kinetic REST API into a Sandbox environment, and validate that the column types map correctly (string, integer, date, dropdown). We map KeyedIn Task Plans to Epicor Projects and WBS Phase structures, and map KeyedIn Deliverables to WBS Phase Milestone attributes or Project Issue records based on the customer's chosen milestone governance approach. Any custom fields requiring BPM logic are flagged for the customer's Epicor developer to implement before production migration.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into Epicor Kinetic Sandbox using representative data volume. The customer's project management and finance leads reconcile record counts (Projects in, WBS Phases in, Labor transactions in, Budget amounts reconciled), spot-check 25-50 random records against KeyedIn source data, and validate that WBS hierarchy depth matches the flattening strategy. Any schema corrections happen in Sandbox before production deployment.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Epicor Employees (provisioned manually, validated), Projects (base container), WBS Phases (from KeyedIn Task Plans and Tasks), Labor Transactions (from KeyedIn Time Entries), Financial Budgets (from KeyedIn Enterprise financial data, reconciled to Project totals), Project Risks and Issues, and Document metadata. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Epicor DMT handles CSV-based bulk imports; complex records use the Epicor Kinetic REST API with batch chunking.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff

    We freeze KeyedIn writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of records modified during the migration window, then enable Epicor Kinetic as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of KeyedIn automations, report configurations, and workflow triggers requiring rebuild in Epicor Kinetic for the customer's admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve reconciliation issues raised by the project team. We do not rebuild KeyedIn workflows as Epicor Kinetic BPMs inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or internal Epicor developer task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

KeyedIn logo

KeyedIn

Source

Strengths

  • End-to-end project portfolio management connecting strategic prioritization to resource allocation and financial tracking.
  • Robust resource management with forecasting, allocation, and capacity planning across project portfolios.
  • Collaboration Hub enables document sharing and team coordination integrated with project data.
  • Enterprise-grade features including financial management, risk management, and compliance reporting in higher tiers.
  • Multi-language and multi-currency support in the Manufacturing ERP product enables global deployments.

Weaknesses

  • The user interface is not intuitive for occasional users, requiring more clicks than necessary for common actions.
  • Known structural disconnect between Deliverables and Task Plan Milestones forces duplicate data entry.
  • The timesheet module and overall UI have been described as glitchy, with saved data occasionally disappearing.
  • Reporting and data filtering for customized views are limited and require UX improvements.
  • Steep implementation cost ranging from $1,000 to $10,000 plus subscription fees creates a significant upfront commitment.
Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for wholesale distribution with industry-specific replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Multi-warehouse management with bin locations, cross-docking, and real-time inventory visibility across all warehouse locations.
  • Automated replenishment engine with demand-based and min-max planning reduces stockouts and overstock carrying costs.
  • AI-infused reporting via Epicor Prism provides Gen AI-driven insights into ERP data without requiring a BI team.
  • Strong customer retention at 90% and a 50-year track record in the distribution vertical provides long-term vendor stability.

Weaknesses

  • High total cost of ownership — per-user pricing of $150-200/month plus $10K-$500K implementation creates significant budget commitment for small and mid-market distributors.
  • Customization via SDK requires technical expertise and introduces upgrade risk when custom code conflicts with new P21 releases.
  • Report generation performance is a known pain point — multiple users report system freezes during large or complex report exports.
  • Third-party bolt-on reliance for functionality that competitors include natively increases integration complexity and total solution cost.
  • Limited public API documentation — developers building custom integrations report difficulty finding P21 API authentication methods and endpoint specifications.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard ERP migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across KeyedIn and Epicor Prophet 21.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    KeyedIn: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    KeyedIn doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your KeyedIn to Epicor Prophet 21 migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about KeyedIn to Epicor Prophet 21 data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during KeyedIn to Epicor Prophet 21 migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your KeyedIn to Epicor Prophet 21 migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and eight weeks for organizations under 500 Projects and 5,000 Tasks with standard resource allocation and budget data. Migrations with complex Task Plan hierarchies requiring WBS flattening, large financial data planes with multi-currency budgets, or a high volume of disconnected Deliverable records requiring manual deduplication move to eight to fourteen weeks because of reconciliation time, UD field BPM development, and budget validation. Epicor Kinetic implementation (typically five to ten months) runs in parallel and is scoped separately from the data migration.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from KeyedIn.
Land in Epicor Prophet 21, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day