HRMS migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between WebCruiter and Recruit CRM & ATS. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Recruit CRM & ATS.
WebCruiter
Source
Recruit CRM & ATS
Destination
Compatibility
6 of 10
objects map 1:1 between WebCruiter and Recruit CRM & ATS.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from WebCruiter to Recruit CRM is a structured migration from a portal-export-dependent Norwegian ATS to a globally-deployed recruitment platform with REST API access. WebCruiter does not expose a public API for automated extraction; all data originates from a manual Talentech customer portal export that we request at scoping and validate before load. Custom application-screening fields store their values as free-form text regardless of intended type, requiring type-inference in our staging environment before values land in correctly typed Recruit CRM fields. We separate archived job requisitions from active jobs during scoping, recommend a dedicated legacy pipeline for archived records in Recruit CRM, and flag any recruiter user IDs that cannot be resolved to a known Recruit CRM user before the load phase. Workflows, automation sequences, and custom form builder configurations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for your admin to rebuild in Recruit CRM.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a WebCruiter object lands in Recruit CRM & ATS, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
WebCruiter
Candidate
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate
1:1WebCruiter Candidate records map to Recruit CRM Candidate records. Standard fields (full name, email address, phone number, physical address) transfer directly. We flag records where contact information was manually entered versus auto-populated from a job board or referral, storing the entry method in a custom notes field. Candidate source attribution (job board, referral, direct) migrates as a tagged field and is normalised to Recruit CRM's candidate source taxonomy during staging.
WebCruiter
Job Posting
Recruit CRM & ATS
Job
1:1WebCruiter Job Posting records map to Recruit CRM Job records. Title, department, location, and status (active, paused, closed) transfer directly. We preserve the original posting date and any internal requisition ID present in the export. Archived jobs are separated from active jobs during scoping and mapped to a dedicated legacy pipeline group in Recruit CRM rather than the active pipeline, to avoid conflicts with stage configurations.
WebCruiter
Application
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate Job
1:1WebCruiter Application records link a Candidate to a Job Posting and carry a status (applied, in review, rejected, hired). These map to Recruit CRM Candidate Job association records, preserving the application date and any stage history included in the export. We flag records where stage history is incomplete or absent in the export, as these may indicate a truncated migration of pipeline activity.
WebCruiter
Custom Form Fields
Recruit CRM & ATS
Custom Fields
lossyWebCruiter custom screening questions export as untyped text regardless of their intended data type (date, integer, multi-select, boolean). We profile each custom field in the staging environment, apply type inference or customer-confirmed manual mapping, and create or map to correctly typed custom fields in Recruit CRM before the load phase. Fields where type inference is ambiguous are flagged for customer review and resolved before records insert.
WebCruiter
Pipeline Stages
Recruit CRM & ATS
Pipeline Stages
lossyWebCruiter uses configurable pipeline stages per job requisition with names that vary by organisation. We extract the complete stage set from each exported job, map stage names to Recruit CRM pipeline stage values, and flag any stage that has no direct Recruit CRM equivalent. Active pipeline stages are configured in Recruit CRM before migration; archived pipeline configurations are separated and mapped to the legacy group.
WebCruiter
Attachment
Recruit CRM & ATS
Attachment
1:1WebCruiter stores CVs, cover letters, and portfolio files attached to candidate records. The standard data export does not bundle files; we request a complete file archive from Talentech support before the load phase, count attachment filenames against exported record IDs to detect mismatches, and insert files into Recruit CRM linked to the correct candidate record using filename-to-record reconciliation. Files without a matching exported record are held in a naming-exception queue for customer review.
WebCruiter
Candidate Source
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate Source
1:1WebCruiter's candidate source field tracks where an application originated (job board, referral, direct, agency). This field is frequently blank in legacy records or populated inconsistently. We map non-blank source values to Recruit CRM's candidate source taxonomy during staging and flag the percentage of records with missing source attribution so the customer can assess data completeness in Recruit CRM post-migration.
WebCruiter
User/Owner Assignment
Recruit CRM & ATS
Recruiter/User
1:1WebCruiter assigns recruiters and hiring managers as owners to jobs and candidates, referencing internal user IDs that may not appear in the standard data export. We extract all owner IDs from the exported records, match them by email against Recruit CRM's user directory during scoping, and flag any owner ID that cannot be resolved to a known Recruit CRM recruiter. A user-mapping table is confirmed by the customer before the production load phase begins; unmapped owners are assigned to a placeholder or system admin pending resolution.
WebCruiter
Archived Job Requisition
Recruit CRM & ATS
Job (Legacy Pipeline)
lossyWebCruiter archives jobs without deleting associated candidate records, and archived jobs retain their original pipeline stage configuration. These stage sets frequently conflict with active pipeline schemas in Recruit CRM. We separate archived from active jobs at scoping, recommend mapping archived jobs to a dedicated legacy pipeline group in Recruit CRM, and exclude archived pipelines from active stage configuration to prevent schema collision. The customer chooses whether to include archived records in the migration scope.
WebCruiter
Company
Recruit CRM & ATS
Client / Contact
1:manyWebCruiter does not have a standalone Company object; company information lives within the Candidate or Job record. Where explicit company records are present in the export, we map them to Recruit CRM Client records, with individual candidate company affiliations mapped to Contact records linked to the Client. This split requires a normalisation step in staging to extract company data embedded in candidate records.
| WebCruiter | Recruit CRM & ATS | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Candidate1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Job Posting | Job1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Application | Candidate Job1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Form Fields | Custom Fieldslossy | Mapping required | |
| Pipeline Stages | Pipeline Stageslossy | Mapping required | |
| Attachment | Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Candidate Source | Candidate Source1:1 | Mapping required | |
| User/Owner Assignment | Recruiter/User1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Archived Job Requisition | Job (Legacy Pipeline)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Company | Client / Contact1:many | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
WebCruiter gotchas
No documented public API for automated migration
Attachment bulk download not available via standard export
Custom screening fields lack consistent data typing
Archived job requisitions may carry stale pipeline stage configurations
Owner and recruiter user IDs may not resolve in target system
Recruit CRM & ATS gotchas
API rate limits are license-scaled and can throttle bulk migration
Custom field schemas vary per organization and require field-level mapping
Files and email attachments require separate extraction and re-upload
Email sequences and automation logic do not transfer between platforms
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and Talentech export request
We begin by requesting the full data export through the Talentech customer portal on the customer's behalf. We profile the export in our staging environment: candidate record count, job posting count, application count, custom screening field names and value distributions, attachment filename list, owner user ID set, and the count of active versus archived job requisitions. We validate that all expected objects are present in the export and escalate any incomplete object sets to Talentech support. The scoping output is a written migration scope document covering record counts, custom field inventory, and recommended archive strategy.
Staging environment and custom field type profiling
We load the WebCruiter export into a staging database and run type profiling across all custom screening fields. Date fields, integer fields, and multi-select fields are identified by pattern analysis; ambiguous fields are flagged for customer confirmation. We normalise candidate source values to Recruit CRM's taxonomy, separate archived from active job records, and build the owner-to-recruiter reconciliation list by matching exported owner IDs against the customer-provided Recruit CRM user list. Any owner without a match goes to a mapping queue for the customer's admin to resolve before production load.
Recruit CRM environment preparation
We work with the customer's Recruit CRM admin to prepare the destination environment: configure active pipelines and stage values matching the WebCruiter active job stage set, create a legacy pipeline group for archived jobs, set up custom fields matching the profiled WebCruiter custom field types, and provision any recruiter users not yet present in Recruit CRM. We validate the environment in a test workspace before production migration begins. Any Recruit CRM subscription tier limitations (e.g., custom field count caps on lower tiers) are flagged during this step.
Attachment bundle retrieval and filename reconciliation
We request the complete file archive from Talentech support, receive it as a zip or file bundle, and reconcile filenames against the exported candidate record IDs. We flag any attachment without a matching exported record for customer review and hold unmatched files pending resolution. Matched files are staged for bulk insertion into Recruit CRM linked to their candidate records. This step runs in parallel with Recruit CRM environment preparation.
Production migration in dependency order
We run the production migration in record-dependency order: candidates first (establishing the primary record base), then jobs (active and archived separated), then applications linking candidates to jobs, then custom field values inserted against the established records, then owner assignments resolved against the user-mapping table, then attachments inserted linked to candidate records. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report; the next phase does not begin until the previous phase reconciliation is signed off. We apply rate-limit handling and batch chunking throughout to avoid Recruit CRM API throttling.
Cutover, validation, and rebuild inventory handoff
We freeze WebCruiter writes during the cutover window, run a final delta scan for any records modified during the migration, insert the delta, then mark Recruit CRM as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory covering custom field mapping decisions, the archived job pipeline strategy, the owner mapping table, and the attachment filename reconciliation log. Workflows, automation sequences, and custom form builder configurations are listed with their WebCruiter identifiers for the customer's admin to rebuild in Recruit CRM. We offer a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues and do not provide post-hypercare admin support as standard scope.
Platform deep dives
WebCruiter
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Recruit CRM & ATS
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across WebCruiter and Recruit CRM & ATS.
Object compatibility
1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
WebCruiter: Not publicly documented — no public API surface exists for end customers..
Data volume sensitivity
WebCruiter doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during WebCruiter to Recruit CRM & ATS migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your WebCruiter to Recruit CRM & ATS migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave WebCruiter
Other ways to arrive at Recruit CRM & ATS
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.