Project Management migration

Migrate from Twproject to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Twproject and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Twproject logo

Twproject

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

33%

4 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Twproject and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

1-2 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Twproject to Trello is a structural simplification: Twproject's Gantt WBS, resource allocation, cost tracking, and hierarchical task model compress into Trello's flat board-card architecture. We extract worklogs and costs via direct API calls because the Twproject project JSON export explicitly omits both, then map Projects to Boards, Phases to Lists, and Tasks to Cards with subtasks as checklist items. We flag upfront that Trello has no native Gantt, resource workload view, or cost tracking — teams that rely on these Twproject features receive a written gap analysis and a Power-Up recommendation for post-migration continuity. We do not migrate Twproject ToDos or attachments, both of which are absent from the JSON export and have no Trello equivalent. We do not migrate automations; Twproject's workflow rules and Trello's Butler rules require separate rebuild scope.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Twproject logo

Twproject

What's pushing teams away

  • API documentation is sparse — rate limits, versioning policy, and bulk operation details are not publicly published, making integration planning difficult.
  • The built-in project JSON export omits worklogs, costs, ToDos, and attached documents — teams expecting a complete data package are surprised to find these absent.
  • User management is tied to licensing in a non-obvious way; disabled users lose access immediately which can disrupt active assignments if not handled proactively.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Twproject objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Twproject object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Twproject

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Each Twproject project becomes a Trello board. We create the board in the target workspace, set visibility (public or private), and import the project name, description, start date, and target end date as board metadata. Trello's board-level metadata fields are limited compared to Twproject's project detail view, so dates migrate as card due dates or as a pinned board description note. Multi-phase projects in Twproject map to multiple Trello lists within the board (see Phase/List mapping below). Teams should decide on a board-naming convention and workspace assignment before migration begins.

Twproject

Phase / Sub-project

maps to

Trello

List

1:many
Fully supported

Twproject's hierarchical project structure (project > phase > sub-phase > task) has no direct Trello equivalent. Trello supports only two levels: Board > List > Card. We flatten the hierarchy by mapping the top-level Twproject phase to a Trello List, and any nested sub-phases are handled as either additional Lists within the same board or as Card labels to preserve the original hierarchy signal. We document the original WBS path as a card label or as the first line of the card description during scoping so the admin can decide on the best flattening approach for their team.

Twproject

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Twproject tasks map directly to Trello cards. We preserve the task name as the card title, description as the card description (rich text), due date as the card due date, priority from Twproject's urgency field as a Trello Label (color-coded), and assignee as the card member. Twproject's parent-child subtask relationship maps to Trello checklist items within the parent card rather than as separate cards — this preserves the hierarchy within the card boundary while keeping the board flat. Task status in Twproject maps to the card's current list position or to a dedicated Done/Closed list.

Twproject

Resource (User)

maps to

Trello

Member

1:1
Fully supported

Twproject Resources (user accounts with allocation and cost rate metadata) map to Trello workspace Members. We resolve by email match and map the user's Twproject display name to the Trello full name. Cost rate data from Twproject has no Trello native equivalent — we document it as a custom card field (if Business Class is purchased) or as a note in the card description. We also flag any Twproject Resource without a corresponding Trello account to the customer's admin for member provisioning before the card migration phase begins.

Twproject

Worklog

maps to

Trello

Card Description / Checklist Item

lossy
Fully supported

Worklogs are not included in Twproject's project JSON export. We extract them via direct API calls using the task ID association, pulling date, hours, user, and notes. Trello has no native time-entry object, so we embed worklog data as either a structured card description entry (date + hours + user) or as a read-only checklist item on the related card. Worklogs that represent billable hours should be migrated to a dedicated time-tracking Power-Up (such as Timesheet by Greep or Plinq) post-migration, which we recommend during scoping. Date-range scoping applies to limit extraction to the relevant active-project window.

Twproject

Cost and Budget

maps to

Trello

Card Description / External Documentation

lossy
Fully supported

Twproject's Costs & Revenues section (budget-vs-actual forecasts) is excluded from the project JSON export and fetched separately via API. Trello has no cost-tracking feature at any tier. We document cost data as structured text in the related card description and deliver a written cost data export as a supplementary CSV. For teams that need ongoing budget tracking, we recommend establishing a separate financial Power-Up or tool post-migration. Cost records are flagged as not migratable-native during scoping so the customer can plan accordingly.

Twproject

Custom Field

maps to

Trello

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Twproject custom fields (wizard-driven on tasks and projects) are retrieved via API and mapped to Trello Custom Fields. Trello Custom Fields are available on Standard ($6/user/month) and Business Class ($10/user/month) plans only — the free tier does not support them. We enumerate all Twproject custom field definitions during discovery, map data types to Trello's Custom Field types (text, number, date, checkbox, single-select, multi-select), and import values per card. If the customer is on Trello Free, we flag the limitation and recommend a plan upgrade or note which fields cannot be preserved.

Twproject

Gantt / WBS Structure

maps to

Trello

Labels + Timeline Power-Up

lossy
Fully supported

Twproject's Gantt WBS (phases, sub-phases, tasks with start dates, end dates, dependencies, and milestones) has no native Trello equivalent. Trello natively stores only card title, description, due date, member, label, and list position. We map task start and end dates to card due dates and start dates, map the WBS phase path to a label (e.g., Phase-1-Design), and document the full dependency tree in a separate CSV for manual rebuild. Trello's Timeline Power-Up (Business Class) provides a Gantt-style view after migration but must be installed and configured post-migration — dependencies are not automatically re-created in Timeline.

Twproject

Kanban View (Twproject daily planning)

maps to

Trello

Lists

lossy
Fully supported

Twproject's Kanban is a daily planning view rather than a top-level project object, driven by task status and assignments. We migrate the underlying task data (assignee, status, dates) which populates Trello's board views naturally. The Kanban board configuration itself (columns, swimlanes, WIP limits) is Twproject-specific and does not transfer — we document the column names and any WIP limit settings as a written reference for the customer's admin to reconfigure in Trello Lists or in a Power-Up.

Twproject

Tags

maps to

Trello

Labels

1:1
Fully supported

Twproject tags on tasks and projects map to Trello Labels. We retrieve tag assignments via API, normalize them to Trello label names, and apply color assignments where Twproject uses a color taxonomy. Some Twproject tags may be flat while Trello labels are per-board — we note any workspace-level labeling strategy during scoping so tags used across multiple projects are handled consistently.

Twproject

MS Project Import/Export data

maps to

Trello

Card metadata

lossy
Fully supported

Twproject supports MS Project file import and export for projects that originated in Microsoft Project. We include MS Project metadata (task hierarchy, durations, dependencies) as card description notes or as labels if the project originated externally and the MS Project data is the primary record. We flag this during scoping to determine whether the MS Project import data is the authoritative source or supplementary.

Twproject

Resource Allocation / Workload

maps to

Trello

Member assignment on cards

lossy
Mapping required

Twproject's resource workload view shows assignment distribution across time periods per resource. Trello has no workload view — card membership is the only allocation signal. We map Twproject assignment data to card members, and document per-resource assignment load in a written CSV (resource, task, allocation percentage, date range) for the customer's admin to use when rebuilding workload visibility in a Power-Up or external resource management tool.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Twproject logo

Twproject gotchas

High

Project JSON export excludes worklogs, costs, and attachments

Medium

API authentication tied to individual user credentials

Medium

On-premise deployments use customer-specific server URLs

Low

License count is based on enabled users, not active assignments

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Twproject JSON export omits worklogs, costs, ToDos, and attachments

    Twproject's project JSON export deliberately excludes worklogs, costs, ToDos, and attached documents according to the platform's own support documentation. Customers who initiate a migration expecting a complete data package will find these object types absent from the exported file. We address this by pulling each excluded object type directly from the API during extraction. We flag the full exclusion list during scoping so the customer confirms which objects contain live data versus historical archive, and we note which objects cannot be natively represented in Trello (costs and worklogs embed into card descriptions; ToDos and attachments have no Trello equivalent).

  • Twproject subtasks map to Trello checklist items, not cards

    Twproject's parent-child task hierarchy is a first-class data model with subtasks as separate database records. Trello supports only one level of card with checklist items nested inside. We map Twproject subtasks to Trello checklist items on the parent card, which preserves the relationship but loses the ability to assign, date, or track subtasks independently. Teams that rely on subtask-level assignments, due dates, or custom fields need to flatten their data model during migration or use a Power-Up that supports sub-card structures post-migration.

  • Trello board structure must be designed before migration begins

    Twproject's project-phase-task hierarchy compresses into Trello's board-list-card model, but Trello has no automated way to infer the correct list structure. Lists must exist in Trello before cards are created, and labels must be defined before they are applied. We work with the customer's admin during scoping to map each Twproject project to a Trello board and each Twproject phase/status to a Trello list, so that cards land in the correct list on first import. Skipping this step results in cards in a catch-all list and a post-migration relabeling effort.

  • Trello Free caps workspaces at 10 boards

    Twproject's unlimited-projects pricing means customers with large project portfolios may have 20 or more active projects. Trello's free tier limits each workspace to 10 boards. We validate the board count against the target workspace tier during scoping. If the customer is on Trello Free, we recommend upgrading to Standard ($6/user/month) or Business Class ($10/user/month) before migration to accommodate the full project portfolio without archiving active projects.

  • Trello has no native cost tracking, Gantt, or resource workload view

    Trello intentionally provides no native cost tracking, Gantt chart, or resource workload feature at any tier. Teams migrating from Twproject that actively use cost dashboards, budget-vs-forecast, or resource allocation views receive these as gaps in Trello. We document each missing feature with a recommendation for Trello Power-Up substitutes (Timeline for Gantt-style views, a time-tracking Power-Up for worklogs, a resource management Power-Up for workload) and flag that these require separate purchase and configuration post-migration. This gap analysis is delivered as part of the scoping package before extraction begins.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Twproject to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We inventory every Twproject object in scope: projects, tasks, subtasks, resources, custom field definitions, worklogs, costs, and tags. We confirm the Twproject deployment type (cloud or on-premise, which determines the API base URL), collect admin credentials for a dedicated migration user, and verify the API key validity. We count active projects and map them to the target Trello workspace, identify the board-count relative to the workspace plan, and enumerate which Twproject objects are live data versus historical archive. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with an explicit exclusion list for objects that cannot migrate natively.

  2. Board-structure design

    We work with the customer's admin to map each Twproject project to a Trello board and each Twproject phase or status to a Trello list. We define the label taxonomy (matching Twproject tags and priority levels to Trello label names and colors) and confirm which Twproject custom fields map to Trello Custom Fields. We verify the Trello workspace plan supports Custom Fields and confirm the board count does not exceed the plan limit. This step must complete before any data is extracted because the list and label definitions are required during the card creation phase.

  3. Extraction from Twproject API

    We extract data from Twproject via the REST API using the dedicated admin account credentials. We run the project JSON export as a baseline, then supplement with separate API calls for worklogs (fetched by task ID), costs (fetched from the Costs & Revenues section), custom field values, resource allocation records, and tag assignments. We flag any API call that returns a credential or rate-limit error and retry with exponential backoff. Attachments and ToDos are confirmed absent from the API export path and documented as excluded.

  4. Transformation and staging

    We transform extracted records into Trello card JSON format: task name becomes card title, Twproject description becomes card description (with worklog entries appended as structured text), priority becomes a label, dates become card due dates, and subtasks become checklist items. We resolve Twproject resource IDs to Trello member email addresses (using the user mapping built during discovery), and map Twproject custom field values to Trello Custom Field values per card. The staging output is a set of per-board card batches ready for Trello API import.

  5. Load into Trello and reconciliation

    We create boards in the target Trello workspace via the Trello REST API, then create lists within each board, then import cards in batches per list. We apply labels, members, due dates, and custom field values after card creation using the card ID returned from the create call. We run a row-count reconciliation against the Twproject extraction (projects in, boards created; tasks in, cards created; resources in, members assigned) and flag any discrepancies. We do not migrate archived Trello cards from any source because Twproject does not have an archived-card equivalent.

  6. Cutover and handoff

    We freeze writes in Twproject during cutover, run a final delta extraction of any records modified during the migration window, and apply the delta to Trello. We deliver the excluded-objects inventory (worklogs, costs, ToDos, attachments) as a written CSV and a gap analysis recommending Power-Up replacements for Gantt, time tracking, and cost management. We deliver the board-structure map (Twproject project to Trello board) and the custom field mapping reference. We do not rebuild Twproject workflows or Trello Butler rules as part of the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Twproject logo

Twproject

Source

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects across all plans removes the most common scaling pain point found in per-project pricing models.
  • Per-user, enabled-only licensing means teams only pay for people who actually need access, not total registered accounts.
  • On-premise or cloud deployment options with optional source code access make Twproject viable for regulated industries and enterprises with strict data-residency requirements.
  • Integrated cost tracking with budget-vs-forecast dashboards covers financial project management without requiring a separate tool.
  • Multi-methodology views (Gantt, Kanban, weekly planner) in a single tool reduce the need to onboard teams onto different interfaces as project types change.

Weaknesses

  • API documentation is minimal — no public rate limit spec, no structured changelog, and no public bulk endpoint reference make programmatic migration planning difficult.
  • Project JSON export deliberately omits worklogs, costs, ToDos, and attachments — customers expecting a complete data bundle face surprise gaps post-export.
  • Italian-headquartered software house with a relatively small team (11–50 employees) may raise concerns for enterprise customers requiring large-scale or multi-region support coverage.
  • No publicly documented roadmap or API versioning policy means customers cannot predict how future platform changes might affect integrations.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Twproject and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Twproject: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Twproject doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Twproject to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Twproject to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Twproject to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Twproject to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between one and two weeks for accounts with up to 20 Twproject projects, no cost data, and no custom fields. Migrations with over 50 projects, active custom field definitions, multi-board structures, or historical worklog data requiring API extraction move to three to five weeks because of board-structure planning, list taxonomy design, and the supplemental API calls for objects excluded from the JSON export.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Twproject.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day