ERP migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Sage Intacct and Epicor Prophet 21. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Epicor Prophet 21.
Sage Intacct
Source
Epicor Prophet 21
Destination
Compatibility
11 of 14
objects map 1:1 between Sage Intacct and Epicor Prophet 21.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
8-12 weeks
Overview
Moving from Sage Intacct to Epicor ERP is an architecture shift from a finance-first cloud platform with dimensional tagging on every transaction to a full-suite ERP with manufacturing, warehouse management, quality, field service, and ecommerce capabilities that Sage Intacct does not offer. The primary migration complexity is dimensional restructuring: Sage Intacct stores analytical tags (department, class, location, customer, project) as separate dimension values on each GL entry, while Epicor Kinetic uses subaccount segmentation and reporting category configuration against the chart of accounts. We design the subaccount structure during scoping and preserve dimension values as reporting categories or custom fields in Epicor for audit continuity. Multi-entity Sage Intacct structures map to Epicor's company and inter-company setup, with separate inter-company elimination configuration post-migration. Historical GL volume and dimensional coverage determine whether a full-detail or summary migration fits the customer's reporting needs. We do not migrate Sage Intacct Dimensions as native Epicor dimension equivalents because no such object exists—instead, we deliver a written dimensional mapping document for the customer to configure in Epicor Reporting Categories post-import. Automations, approval workflows, and custom platform applications do not migrate; we inventory them for the customer's Epicor administrator to rebuild.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Sage Intacct object lands in Epicor Prophet 21, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Sage Intacct
General Ledger Accounts
Epicor Prophet 21
Chart of Accounts (COA) + Subaccounts
lossySage Intacct GL accounts map to Epicor Kinetic chart of accounts entries with subaccount segmentation designed during scoping. Account number, name, type, and active status transfer directly. Sage Intacct's dimensional tagging does not map to an Epicor native equivalent—instead, we design Epicor subaccount segments (e.g., Department-Division-Cost Center) and map Sage dimension values into the appropriate segment positions, preserving filterable analysis capability. The mapping is validated in an Epicor test company before production import.
Sage Intacct
Journal Entries
Epicor Prophet 21
GL Journal Entries
1:1Historical journal entries migrate to Epicor GL Journal Entry records. Each journal entry line maps account number to the Epicor COA and applies the subaccount segment value derived from the Sage Intacct dimension assignment (department, class, location, or project). Entries in a 'posted' state migrate with post dates; entries in 'non-posted' or draft state are flagged in a reconciliation report for the customer's controller to post in Epicor before or after import. Non-dimensionalized GL transactions (Sage entries without dimension tags) migrate with a default subaccount value assigned at migration time.
Sage Intacct
Dimensions
Epicor Prophet 21
Reporting Categories + Custom Fields
lossySage Intacct Dimensions (department, class, location, customer, project) are a unique tagging concept without a native Epicor equivalent. We do not migrate dimensions as an Epicor object because Epicor Kinetic does not have one. Instead, we map each dimension value to either an Epicor subaccount segment or a custom field on the GL Journal Entry record. The mapping is delivered as a written dimensional inventory document for the customer's Epicor administrator to configure in Reporting Categories and validate against existing reports before go-live.
Sage Intacct
Accounts Payable (AP Bills)
Epicor Prophet 21
AP Invoice Entry + Vendor
1:1Open Sage Intacct AP bills, payment records, and vendor associations migrate to Epicor AP Invoice Entry. We flag any Sage bills in 'pending approval' workflow state because Epicor requires AP approval configuration before invoices route. Vendor master records (addresses, payment terms, default expense accounts) map to Epicor Vendor records. Approval routing workflows do not migrate; we deliver an AP workflow configuration guide for the Epicor administrator.
Sage Intacct
Accounts Receivable (AR Invoices)
Epicor Prophet 21
AR Invoice Entry + Customer
1:1Open Sage Intacct AR invoices, payment records, and customer records migrate to Epicor AR Invoice Entry and Customer master. Balance-forward vs open-item AR settings are assessed against the customer's source system configuration and mapped to Epicor's AR aging preference. Customer credit limits and payment terms transfer directly. Post-vs non-posted invoice handling mirrors AP: draft invoices are flagged for the controller to post before migration or re-create post-import.
Sage Intacct
Customers / Vendors
Epicor Prophet 21
Customer + Vendor Master
1:1Sage Intacct customer and vendor master records, including addresses, payment terms, default GL accounts, and contact information, migrate to Epicor Customer and Vendor records via Epicor REST API. Custom fields on these objects (stored with '!' prefix in Sage Intacct REST) require explicit field-level mapping to Epicor UD (User-Defined) fields. We discover all custom fields during schema mapping and apply the correct API naming convention before import.
Sage Intacct
Multi-Entity Structure
Epicor Prophet 21
Company Setup + Inter-Company Configuration
lossySage Intacct entity definitions, inter-company transaction rules, and consolidation mappings require explicit redesign in Epicor. Sage entities map to Epicor companies, but Epicor's inter-company journal entry setup uses a different configuration model (Inter-Company Journal Entry with sender and receiver companies). We deliver a written entity-to-company routing map for the Epicor administrator to configure post-migration. Cross-company elimination rules require manual setup in Epicor's consolidation module.
Sage Intacct
Projects and Project Tasks
Epicor Prophet 21
Project Management Entry + Job Records
1:1Sage Intacct project headers, task hierarchies, project status, billing type, customer association, and billable vs non-billable flags migrate to Epicor Project Management Entry or Epicor Kinetic Job records depending on the project's nature (service project vs manufacturing job). Project accounting dimensions (revenue recognition, grant tracking) are preserved as custom fields where Epicor's native project accounting does not cover the same scenarios. Project status and billing type require verification against the source system before migration.
Sage Intacct
Items (Products/SKUs)
Epicor Prophet 21
Part Master + Product Group
1:1Sage Intacct item records including description, unit price, cost, and GL associations migrate to Epicor Part Master records. Bundle and matrix items in Sage (parent-child relationships) map to Epicor Part Master with BOM (Bill of Materials) or Product Group structures. Unit of measure conversions require verification against Epicor's UOM setup because Sage and Epicor use different default UOM libraries.
Sage Intacct
Fixed Assets
Epicor Prophet 21
Fixed Asset Entry
1:1Fixed asset records migrate but depreciation schedules require recalculation in Epicor ERP because each jurisdiction uses different conventions. We transfer acquisition cost, date, asset class, and accumulated depreciation from Sage Intacct. The customer's Epicor administrator reviews and activates the depreciation book configuration post-import. Assets in Sage that are fully depreciated or disposed require separate status flags set in Epicor.
Sage Intacct
Budgets and Planning Data
Epicor Prophet 21
Budget Entry
1:1Sage Intacct Planning module budget data migrates to Epicor Budget Entry records scoped to fiscal year and account. Epicor's budget scenario structure differs from Sage's Planning module scenarios; we map budget periods and amounts to the closest matching Epicor fiscal calendar. Budget approval workflows do not migrate; we deliver a budget workflow configuration guide.
Sage Intacct
Custom Objects
Epicor Prophet 21
Custom Tables (Data Discipline)
1:1Sage Intacct custom objects behave like database tables with fields that use '!' prefix in the REST API. These migrate to Epicor Kinetic custom tables created under Data Discipline. We pre-create the Epicor table schema including all custom fields, relationship definitions, and validation rules before any data import. The '!' field prefix naming convention is handled in our extraction scripts; Epicor table fields use standard naming without a prefix equivalent. Any relationship dependencies to standard Sage objects are resolved through our standard object mapping before custom object migration runs.
Sage Intacct
Custom Fields
Epicor Prophet 21
UD (User-Defined) Fields
1:1Custom fields on any standard Sage Intacct object (Customer, Vendor, GL Account, Invoice, Project) are discovered during schema mapping and mapped to Epicor UD fields on the equivalent object. The '!' prefix in Sage Intacct REST API is handled in extraction; Epicor UD fields are accessed via standard REST naming. We verify that the UD field data type in Epicor matches the source type (text, integer, date, currency, decimal) to prevent import rejection.
Sage Intacct
Attachments / Documents
Epicor Prophet 21
Not Migrated (File-Level)
1:1Document attachments stored within Sage Intacct are not accessible via REST API for bulk export. We do not migrate attachments as part of the record migration scope. We recommend a parallel document migration strategy (e.g., SFTP file transfer or Epicor EDMS configuration) alongside the record migration, managed separately by the customer's IT team.
| Sage Intacct | Epicor Prophet 21 | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Ledger Accounts | Chart of Accounts (COA) + Subaccountslossy | Fully supported | |
| Journal Entries | GL Journal Entries1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Dimensions | Reporting Categories + Custom Fieldslossy | Mapping required | |
| Accounts Payable (AP Bills) | AP Invoice Entry + Vendor1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Accounts Receivable (AR Invoices) | AR Invoice Entry + Customer1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Customers / Vendors | Customer + Vendor Master1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Multi-Entity Structure | Company Setup + Inter-Company Configurationlossy | Fully supported | |
| Projects and Project Tasks | Project Management Entry + Job Records1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Items (Products/SKUs) | Part Master + Product Group1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Fixed Assets | Fixed Asset Entry1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Budgets and Planning Data | Budget Entry1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Custom Objects | Custom Tables (Data Discipline)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Custom Fields | UD (User-Defined) Fields1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Attachments / Documents | Not Migrated (File-Level)1:1 | Not supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Sage Intacct gotchas
Rate limit overages are billed in transaction packs
No sandbox environment for API development
Historical GL data migration complexity is non-linear with volume
Posted vs non-posted account state affects reconciliation
Custom fields use '!' prefix in REST API but not in UI
Epicor Prophet 21 gotchas
Third-party bolt-on integrations complicate migration scope
Dirty data without standardized processes compounds migration risk
SDK customizations and BPMs may not survive platform upgrades
Report-based export only for non-technical users
Per-user pricing model requires accurate user count before migration planning
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and scoping
We audit the source Sage Intacct tenant across modules in use (Core Financials, Advanced, Planning), custom object count, custom field count per object, entity count and consolidation structure, historical GL volume and dimensional coverage, open AP/AR counts, and active project accounting records. We pair this with an Epicor Kinetic edition and company structure assessment: how many legal entities or cost centers will Epicor require, and what subaccount segment count is needed to replicate the customer's dimensional analysis capability. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts per object, a dimensional mapping strategy, and an Epicor company structure recommendation.
Schema design and subaccount structure mapping
We design the Epicor Kinetic chart of accounts and subaccount segmentation based on the customer's Sage Intacct dimension usage. For each Sage Intacct dimension (department, class, location, customer, project), we assign either a subaccount segment position or a UD field on the GL Journal Entry. We design Epicor company structures to map from Sage entities, configure inter-company journal entry routing for cross-entity transactions, and pre-create all custom tables (Data Discipline) needed for migrated custom objects. The schema is validated in an Epicor test company before production migration begins.
Trial extraction and mapping validation
We run a trial extraction from Sage Intacct using a 30-day trial tenant, extracting a representative sample of each object type (50-100 records per object). We validate field-level mapping, custom field discovery (including '!' prefix handling), dimension-to-subaccount assignment, and multi-entity routing logic. The customer's controller reviews the trial output against the Sage Intacct source records and signs off on the mapping before production extraction begins. Any mapping corrections are applied to the production extraction scripts.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: chart of accounts and subaccount structure (Epicor), company and inter-company configuration (manual setup with our guide), vendor and customer masters (with UD fields), open AP bills and AR invoices (with draft state flagged), GL accounts (with subaccount segmentation applied), journal entries (with dimensional mapping to subaccount segments or UD fields), projects and tasks, fixed assets, budget data, and custom objects last (because they may have lookup dependencies to standard objects). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.
Dimensional mapping handoff and consolidation configuration
We deliver a written dimensional mapping inventory that documents every Sage Intacct dimension value, its assigned Epicor subaccount segment or UD field, and the associated GL account range. This document is used by the customer's Epicor administrator to configure Reporting Categories and validate dimensional reports post-migration. We also deliver an inter-company journal entry configuration guide for multi-entity customers. We do not configure Epicor consolidation elimination rules as part of migration scope; this is a separate Epicor consultant engagement for organizations with complex subsidiary ownership structures.
Cutover, validation, and automation handoff
We freeze Sage Intacct write access during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Epicor ERP as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of Sage Intacct workflows, approval rules, and custom platform applications requiring rebuild in Epicor. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Sage Intacct automations, approval workflows, or custom platform applications as Epicor configurations inside the migration scope; those are separate engagements with an Epicor implementation partner.
Platform deep dives
Sage Intacct
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Epicor Prophet 21
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard ERP migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Sage Intacct and Epicor Prophet 21.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Sage Intacct: 180 requests per minute, burst of 10 calls per second.
Data volume sensitivity
Sage Intacct exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Sage Intacct to Epicor Prophet 21 migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Sage Intacct to Epicor Prophet 21 migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Sage Intacct
Other ways to arrive at Epicor Prophet 21
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.