Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Avaza and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.
Avaza
Source
Jira
Destination
Compatibility
10 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Avaza and Jira.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
2-4 weeks
Overview
Moving from Avaza to Jira is a use-case pivot, not a platform upgrade. Avaza packages project management, time tracking, expense management, and invoicing under one login; Jira packages issue tracking, agile boards, and development workflows. The migration maps Avaza Projects to Jira Projects, Sections to Epics or component labels, and Tasks to Jira Issues. We do not migrate Invoices, Quotes, or Billable Rates because Jira has no native financial model. We extract Timesheets and Expenses as structured CSV reference records attached to the destination Jira Project for audit purposes, but Jira will not surface them as financial objects. Workflows, project templates, and Team Chat do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of every Avaza workflow rule and template for your admin to rebuild in Jira. Teams switching cite Jira's agile tooling depth, its portfolio-level visibility across large project hierarchies, and the Atlassian integration ecosystem as the primary drivers.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Avaza object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Avaza
Projects
Jira
Projects
1:1Avaza Projects map directly to Jira Projects as the top-level container. Each Avaza Project name becomes the Jira Project name, and the Project Key (the prefix used for issue keys, e.g., PROJ) is derived from the first 2-3 characters of the Avaza Project name in uppercase. Avaza Project status (Active / Archived) maps to Jira Project state; Archived projects are migrated as Jira Projects with the Archived workflow state. Avaza Project billing method and budget fields have no Jira equivalent; we document these as reference fields in the project description or a linked Confluence page for admin review.
Avaza
Sections
Jira
Epics
1:1Avaza Sections (grouping containers inside a Project that organize Tasks) map to Jira Epic Issues within the corresponding Jira Project. The Avaza Section name becomes the Epic Summary, and the Epic Key is auto-generated from the parent Jira Project Key. If the Avaza account uses Sections to represent phase-level groupings (e.g., Discovery, Development, QA), these translate naturally to Jira Epics that can contain Stories and Tasks. Sections without any child Tasks are still migrated as Epics with zero issues to preserve the organizational structure visible in Avaza.
Avaza
Tasks
Jira
Issues (Stories, Tasks, Bugs)
1:1Avaza Tasks map to Jira Issues with the following type mapping convention: Tasks with a flat-rate amount and no assignee dependency become Jira Tasks; Tasks representing deliverables that belong to a sprint become Jira Stories; Tasks logged as bug or defect indicators in Avaza become Jira Bugs. Avaza task assignees map to Jira Assignee (resolved by email match against Jira User directory); unassigned Avaza tasks remain unassigned in Jira. Due dates, priorities, and task status map directly. Avaza task descriptions migrate as Jira Issue descriptions in plain-text format.
Avaza
Timesheets
Jira
Custom field: Work Log (linked reference record)
1:1Avaza Timesheets have no native Jira equivalent because Jira does not have a timesheet object. We extract Avaza timesheet records as a structured CSV reference file (Project, Section, Task, User, Date, Hours, Billable Rate, Cost Rate, Category) and attach it as a pinned file to the corresponding Jira Project. Historical timesheet hours can also be logged as Jira Issue Work Logs at the task level, but this requires Jira Premium and is a manual post-migration step that we document in the Statement of Work. The frozen Billable Rate and Cost Rate values stored in each Avaza timesheet at entry time are preserved in the CSV reference file.
Avaza
Expenses
Jira
Custom field: Expense Log (linked reference record)
1:1Avaza Expenses have no native Jira equivalent. We extract expenses as a structured CSV (Project, Task, User, Date, Amount, Currency, Category, Billable flag, Receipt URL) and attach it to the corresponding Jira Project as a pinned file. The Billable flag from Avaza is preserved as a Yes/No column in the CSV for downstream billing reconstruction. Receipt attachment URLs from Avaza are preserved in the CSV where they are reachable; files without a reachable URL are flagged in the reconciliation report.
Avaza
Invoices
Jira
Not migrated
1:1Avaza Invoices have no Jira equivalent and cannot be migrated. Jira is a work-tracking platform with no invoicing, billing, or accounts-receivable model. We extract the full Invoice Detail report from Avaza as a structured CSV (Invoice ID, Customer, Date, Line Items, Amount, Status, Payment Terms) and deliver it alongside the migration for the customer's finance team to import into a billing tool of their choice (Stripe, QuickBooks, FreshBooks, or a custom ERP). The Avaza Invoice-to-Project linkage is preserved in the CSV so that invoiced amounts can be traced back to migrated Jira Projects.
Avaza
Quotes and Estimates
Jira
Not migrated
1:1Avaza Quotes and Estimates are distinct from Projects and have approval statuses and client-view links that have no Jira equivalent. Jira does not have a Quote or Estimate object. We extract the Quote Detail report from Avaza as a structured CSV (Quote ID, Customer, Date, Line Items, Amount, Approval Status) and deliver it separately. The customer's sales or finance team rebuilds quotes in their preferred billing tool. Avaza's one-click quote-to-project conversion is not replicated in Jira; the corresponding Jira Issues are migrated independently without a Quote linkage.
Avaza
Customers and External Contacts
Jira
Jira Users (selective)
1:manyAvaza distinguishes between billable Customers (account-level contacts) and External Contacts and Project Collaborators. Jira's user model is simpler: a Jira User is a person with an Atlassian account who can be assigned to Issues. We map Avaza Customers and External Contacts who are active project assignees to Jira Users by email. Contacts who are billable entities but do not require Jira access (e.g., client billing contacts) are exported as a CSV reference file and not provisioned as Jira Users. The customer's admin confirms the access scope before user provisioning begins.
Avaza
Users and Team Members
Jira
Jira Users
1:1Avaza Users and Team Members map to Jira Users by email match. Avaza role types (Timesheet/Expense User, Admin/Finance, Project Collaborator, Resource Scheduler, Chat-access Team Member) have no Jira equivalent role model; Jira's permission model is project-scheme-based rather than user-type-based. We map Avaza active users to Jira users with Jira Standard access. Users with inactive Avaza accounts are held in a reconciliation queue for the admin to confirm whether they need Jira access. Jira Cloud Free tier is limited to 10 users; migrations exceeding 10 users require the customer to select a Jira Standard or higher plan before user provisioning.
Avaza
Timesheet Categories
Jira
Jira Labels (optional configuration)
lossyAvaza Timesheet Categories define work types (e.g., Development, Design, Meetings, Admin) and carry default Billable and Cost Rates that cascade into timesheet entries. Jira has no native category or rate concept. We offer two options: (1) migrate category names as Jira Labels on Issues for work-type classification, or (2) create a Jira Project per category with the rate information stored in the project description. The customer selects the preferred strategy during scoping. The Billable and Cost Rate values per category are preserved in the Timesheet reference CSV delivered alongside the migration.
Avaza
Attachments
Jira
Attachments
1:1File attachments on Avaza Tasks, Expenses, and Invoices migrate as Jira Issue Attachments. We re-attach files where the Avaza export includes the blob or a reachable URL. Files without a reachable URL (attachments stored in Avaza's internal file layer without an exportable link) are flagged in the reconciliation report and documented for manual re-upload. Jira's attachment file size limit is 75 MB per file on Cloud plans; Avaza attachments exceeding this limit are flagged and excluded from the automated migration.
Avaza
Custom Fields
Jira
Custom Fields
1:1Avaza Project and Task custom fields are migrated to Jira Issue-level custom fields on the corresponding Issue Types. Avaza custom fields appear only in filtered report views, which means we must request a custom-field report export with the correct filter context applied. Jira custom field types (Text, Number, Date, Select, Multi-select, Checkbox, User Picker) are mapped from Avaza field types; fields without a direct Jira type equivalent (e.g., currency-specific rate fields) are migrated as Text fields with the original value preserved. Jira custom fields must be created in the target Jira Project before migration begins; we handle this via the Jira REST API as part of the pre-migration schema setup.
| Avaza | Jira | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projects | Projects1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Sections | Epics1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Tasks | Issues (Stories, Tasks, Bugs)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Timesheets | Custom field: Work Log (linked reference record)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Expenses | Custom field: Expense Log (linked reference record)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Invoices | Not migrated1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Quotes and Estimates | Not migrated1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Customers and External Contacts | Jira Users (selective)1:many | Fully supported | |
| Users and Team Members | Jira Users1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Timesheet Categories | Jira Labels (optional configuration)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Attachments | Attachments1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Custom Fields | Custom Fields1:1 | Mapping required |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Avaza gotchas
Cost Rates and Billable Rates are role-restricted
Timesheet rate values are copied at entry time
Invoice data spans multiple linked entities
Tier-based limits on active projects and users
Team Chat has no export capability
Jira gotchas
Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration
Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms
Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin
Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption
Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Avaza account audit and extraction
We audit the source Avaza account using Admin-level credentials across all five object layers: Projects, Sections, Tasks, Timesheets, Expenses, Invoices, Quotes, Customers, External Contacts, Users, and Custom Fields. We verify that custom field reports return complete data (not blank columns), confirm that Cost Rates and Billable Rates are visible in a test timesheet export (a prerequisite for rate preservation), and extract the Invoice Detail and Quote Detail reports for separate delivery. We pull the Exports section data for raw unformatted records and cross-reference against the filtered views to confirm completeness. The audit output is a record-count manifest by object type and a confirmed migration scope list signed off by the customer before extraction begins.
Jira destination schema setup
We provision the Jira destination before any data loads. This includes creating Jira Projects (one per Avaza Project, using the Avaza Project name and a derived Project Key), configuring Issue Type Schemes (Epics, Stories, Tasks, Bugs mapped to Avaza Sections and Tasks), creating Jira custom fields to receive Avaza custom field data (with type mapping from Avaza field types to Jira field types), configuring Jira Labels for any timesheet category migration strategy the customer selected, and setting up the Jira Project permission scheme to match the access scope confirmed during scoping. All schema setup uses the Jira REST API against the customer's Jira Cloud or Data Center instance. Jira Premium or higher is required for Work Log migration if the customer wants timesheet hours visible as Jira work logs on Issues.
Data extraction, transformation, and sequence
We extract Avaza data in dependency order: Projects (root), then Sections (parented to Projects), then Tasks (parented to Sections), then Timesheets and Expenses (referencing Projects and Tasks), then Users and Contacts (for Jira User provisioning), then Attachments (referencing Tasks). Custom fields are extracted from the filtered report view with the correct context active. The transformation layer resolves Avaza section IDs to Jira Epic keys, resolves Avaza assignee emails to Jira user account IDs, maps Avaza task priorities to Jira priority IDs, and formats dates to Jira's ISO-8601 requirement. Any Avaza custom field that cannot be mapped to a Jira field type is written to the Jira Issue description as a structured reference block so the data is not lost.
Bulk load into Jira with rate-limit handling
We load Issues into Jira via the Jira REST API with batch chunking and exponential backoff on 429 responses. The batch size is tuned to the customer's Jira plan tier (smaller batches on Free/Standard tiers, larger on Premium). Parent-key resolution runs before each batch: Avaza Section IDs are resolved to Jira Epic Keys, and Avaza Project IDs are resolved to Jira Project Keys, so that every Issue insert call includes the correct parent reference. After Issues are loaded, attachments are uploaded in a separate pass using Jira's attachment endpoint. Jira's 75 MB per-file attachment limit is enforced; oversized files are flagged in the reconciliation report. The financial reference files (Timesheet CSV, Expense CSV, Invoice CSV, Quote CSV) are attached as pinned files to the corresponding Jira Project for audit access.
Sandbox validation and production cutover
We run a full migration into a Jira Sandbox or test project before production cutover. The customer reconciles record counts (Projects in, Epics in, Issues in), spot-checks 25-50 random Issues against the Avaza source for field-level accuracy, and validates that assignee mapping and custom field population are correct. Any mapping corrections are made in the transformation layer and the sandbox migration is re-run until reconciliation passes. Production cutover follows: Avaza write access is suspended, a final delta extraction captures any records modified during the migration window, Issues are loaded into production, and Jira is enabled as the system of record. Jira permissions are set to restrict Avaza-user access to the migrated Jira Projects based on the confirmed access scope.
Reconciliation report and workflow rebuild handoff
We deliver a four-part post-migration package: (1) a record-count reconciliation report showing all objects migrated, all objects skipped, and the reason for each skip; (2) the financial reference package containing the Timesheet, Expense, Invoice, and Quote CSVs as pinned project files; (3) a workflow and template inventory listing every Avaza project workflow rule and template requiring rebuild in Jira, with Jira Automation recommended equivalents; and (4) a Jira configuration summary documenting the Issue Type Scheme, custom field IDs, and permission scheme applied to each Jira Project. We support a one-week hypercare window for post-migration reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Avaza workflows in Jira Automation as part of the migration scope; that is a separate engagement for the customer's Jira admin or an Atlassian partner.
Platform deep dives
Avaza
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Jira
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Avaza and Jira.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Avaza: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Avaza exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Avaza to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Avaza to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Avaza
Other ways to arrive at Jira
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.