Project Management migration

Migrate from Synergy to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Synergy and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Synergy logo

Synergy

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Synergy and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Synergy to Asana is a migration from an AEC-specialized platform with deeply embedded financials and CRM to a general-purpose work management tool with a clean REST API and a large integration marketplace. Synergy organizes work around Projects, Tasks, and a Job Structure that defines folder layouts, naming rules, and folder-level permissions tightly coupled to individual firm setups. Asana organizes work around Workspaces, Teams, Projects, and Tasks, with a much flatter permission model and no native financial sync. The key migration challenges are the null custom field gap in Synergy's API (which we prevent by snapshotting the full schema before migration), the Job Structure artifact (which does not map 1:1 to Asana project hierarchy), and the absence of Synergy workflows, custom reports, and file version history in Asana. We deliver a written inventory of Job Structure components and custom field mappings for your admin to rebuild in Asana, and we do not migrate workflows, sequences, automations, or reports as code.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Synergy logo

Synergy

What's pushing teams away

  • Custom reporting produces inconsistent results and unreliable data, forcing teams to manually cross-check financial summaries against exported spreadsheets rather than trusting the built-in reports.
  • The user interface is widely described as unintuitive and complex, with a steep learning curve that frustrates new users and requires significant internal training investment to achieve basic competency.
  • Sync with QuickBooks Online can break silently when chart of accounts structures diverge between systems, leading to miscategorized expenses that are difficult to trace back and reconcile without dedicated accounting review.
  • Support response times are inconsistent, with some customers reporting multi-day delays on critical issues and a perceived gap between the quality of documentation and the depth of assistance available for edge cases.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Synergy objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Synergy object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Synergy

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Projects map directly to Asana Projects. Project name, description, status, start/end dates, and creation timestamps migrate 1:1. We use Asana's Projects API to create each project, then populate custom fields by referencing workspace-global custom field GIDs. Template associations from Synergy are documented as a Project Template inventory for the customer's admin to reapply in Asana via the Duplicate Project feature.

Synergy

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Tasks map to Asana Tasks within the corresponding Project. Task name, description (rich text), assignee, due date, start date, status, and custom fields migrate 1:1. Subtask hierarchy migrates as Asana Subtasks (nested tasks) preserving the full depth. Dependencies between Tasks migrate as Asana dependencies using the Task Dependencies API. We resolve assignee email addresses to Asana User GIDs at migration time.

Synergy

Task (Comments)

maps to

Asana

Stories

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Task comments migrate to Asana Stories. Story text content, author (by email lookup), and timestamp preserve. Asana Stories also capture task creation and status-change events, which we supplement with entries captured from the Synergy change log.

Synergy

Contact

maps to

Asana

User or Team Member

lossy
Fully supported

Synergy Contacts do not have a public API endpoint. We extract Contacts via the native import/export JSON bundle which auto-collects associated groups and attributes. Each Contact email maps to an Asana User (for assignees and project members) or to a Contact stored as a custom field reference if the customer needs contact records without user accounts. We reconcile contact counts against the export manifest to detect any silently dropped records.

Synergy

Team

maps to

Asana

Team

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Teams define group-level permissions and role assignments for Projects and Jobs. They migrate to Asana Teams as the organizational unit. Team name, member list, and team-level project visibility migrate 1:1. Role assignments from Synergy that have no direct Asana equivalent (e.g., firm-specific job roles) are documented as a role matrix for the customer's admin to map to Asana project-level permissions post-migration.

Synergy

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (workspace-global or project-specific)

lossy
Fully supported

Synergy custom fields (text, number, currency, date, dropdown, multi-select) map to Asana custom fields. We snapshot the complete custom field schema including null fields before migration because Synergy's API omits null custom fields from output. We recreate null fields in Asana with type-appropriate default values so the schema remains complete. Multi-select in Synergy maps to Asana enum custom fields with multiple enum values enabled. Dropdown maps to a single-value enum. Currency maps to a number field with a display unit label.

Synergy

Job Structure

maps to

Asana

Project Sections + Naming Pattern Documentation

1:1
Mapping required

Synergy Job Structure includes folder layouts, naming rules, folder-level permissions, issue types, and dashboard configurations deeply nested and tightly coupled to individual firm setups. Asana has no equivalent folder-permission model. We extract the full Job Structure as a structured manifest, map folder hierarchy to Asana Sections within Projects, document naming patterns as a template reference for the customer to reapply, and flag unsupported permission models for manual review before go-live.

Synergy

File (binary content)

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Files transfer with content, version history, and change metadata (who and when). Asana Attachments are associated with tasks or projects. We migrate the most recent file version as the primary attachment. Historical versions are documented as a file version manifest. Note: Asana's API does not support attachments larger than 100 MB. Files exceeding this are flagged and delivered as a separate download package with links in Asana task descriptions. 12d Model project files are handled as standard attachments with no native version diff.

Synergy

File Version History

maps to

Asana

Documentation (Change Log)

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy file version history (who modified a file and when) has no direct Asana equivalent. We extract the version change log as a structured JSON manifest and attach it as a task description block or custom field reference on the task to which the file is linked, preserving audit trail without native version tracking in Asana.

Synergy

Attribute

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (task-level)

lossy
Fully supported

Synergy Attributes store metadata values tied to Jobs, Tasks, and Files. They are collected automatically by the import/export tool as part of the job and folder metadata package. We map Attributes to Asana custom fields scoped to the relevant task or project, inferring the appropriate field type from the attribute value format. Attributes with no mappable custom field are preserved in a structured JSON field for manual review.

Synergy

Association

maps to

Asana

Task Dependency or Project Membership

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Associations link Jobs, Tasks, and other objects to form cross-reference relationships. Asana natively supports Task Dependencies (finish-to-start, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, start-to-finish) and project membership linking tasks to projects. We map cross-object associations to the closest Asana equivalent: task-to-task associations become dependencies; task-to-project associations become project membership. Associations with no Asana equivalent are preserved in a custom field reference.

Synergy

QuickBooks / Xero / MYOB Financial Data

maps to

Asana

External Reference Documentation

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy's native financial sync with QuickBooks Online, Xero, MYOB, and Dynamics 365 Business Central does not have a direct Asana equivalent. Financial data (AP/AR, project profitability, billing records) remains in the source accounting platform. We document the financial sync configuration as a separate integration plan for the customer's admin to reconnect under a new accounting tool or maintain as a standalone system. This object is not migrated but is inventoried and handed off.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Synergy logo

Synergy gotchas

High

Only non-empty custom fields appear in API output

High

Public API lacks endpoints for Contacts and Activities

Medium

Job Structure complexity varies by firm configuration

Medium

Custom reports may not translate to destination platforms

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Synergy API returns only non-empty custom fields

    Synergy's API omits null or unset custom fields entirely from Project and Task responses. When migrating to Asana with a matching custom field schema, empty fields vanish silently, creating gaps in the destination schema. We prevent this by snapshotting the complete custom field schema and field-type metadata before migration, then filling null values with type-appropriate defaults in Asana so the schema remains complete. If we skip this step, any custom field that was intentionally left empty in Synergy disappears from Asana, breaking reporting and filtering downstream.

  • Synergy Contacts lack a public API endpoint

    The Synergy developer API documents Projects, Tasks, and custom field filtering but does not expose Contacts, Teams, Activities, or Attributes as addressable endpoints. Any migration touching these objects must use the native import/export JSON bundle, which auto-collects associated groups and contact attributes but offers no granular filtering or incremental sync. We scope Contacts as a batch import using the bundled JSON format and validate record counts against the source export manifest. Contacts without email addresses cannot be mapped to Asana Users and are held in a reconciliation queue.

  • Job Structure does not map 1:1 to Asana project hierarchy

    Synergy's Job Structure defines folder layouts, naming rules, folder-level permissions, issue types, and dashboard configurations tightly coupled to individual firm setups. Asana has no folder-level permission model and no equivalent to naming-rule templates. We extract the full structure as a structured manifest and rebuild it in Asana: folder hierarchy maps to Sections within Projects, naming rules map to a documented template for manual reapplication, and unsupported permission models are flagged for the customer's admin to address via Asana's project-level permission settings before go-live.

  • Synergy Workflows and custom reports do not migrate as code

    Synergy's workflow automation engine (approval chains, resource assignments, status transitions) and custom report configurations are platform-specific and cannot be transferred to Asana's Workflow Builder or reporting tools. We deliver a written inventory of every active Synergy Workflow with its trigger, conditions, actions, and a recommended Asana Workflow Builder equivalent, plus a report rebuild guide mapping each Synergy report's data sources and grouping logic to Asana Dashboard or Advanced-level reporting. The customer's admin rebuilds these post-migration.

  • Asana API limits attachments to 100 MB

    Asana's API does not support attachments larger than 100 MB. Synergy's file management includes binary deliverables that may exceed this limit, particularly for engineering drawings and model files. Files over 100 MB are flagged during scoping, delivered as a separate download package, and referenced via a URL in the related Asana task description. We recommend a shared storage location (SharePoint, Google Drive, Dropbox) as the file of record for large deliverables, with Asana tasks linking to the external location.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Synergy to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and schema snapshot

    We audit the source Synergy instance for Projects, Tasks, custom field definitions (including null-field schema captured via the admin export), Contacts via the native JSON bundle, Teams, file inventory (with size auditing for the 100 MB Asana API ceiling), and Job Structure depth. We pair this with a review of the destination Asana workspace: existing projects, custom field library, Team structure, and permission model. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a null-field schema manifest (from Synergy), a Job Structure inventory, and an Asana schema design recommendation.

  2. Null-field schema rescue and custom field pre-creation

    Before any data extraction, we capture the complete Synergy custom field schema including null fields via the admin export tool. We then pre-create the corresponding custom fields in Asana at the workspace-global level or project-specific level depending on scoping. This step is critical: without it, every null-field gap in Synergy's API response becomes a missing field in Asana. We validate that field types match (dropdown to enum, multi-select to multi-enum, currency to number with label) before proceeding to data extraction.

  3. Contact and Team extraction via native bundle

    We extract Contacts and Teams using the Synergy native import/export JSON bundle rather than the API (since no public endpoint exists). We validate the contact count against the export manifest and flag any records without email addresses or with duplicate emails. Teams are mapped to Asana Teams, with member lists resolved by email lookup against the target Asana workspace users. Role assignments are documented separately for permission-model rebuild.

  4. File inventory and size audit

    We enumerate all files attached to Synergy Projects and Tasks, capturing file size, version count, change log, and file type. Files over 100 MB are flagged and excluded from Asana API migration. We recommend a shared external storage location for large deliverables and create a structured manifest with file URLs to embed in the relevant Asana task descriptions post-migration.

  5. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into an Asana sandbox workspace or a designated pilot project using production-like data volume. The customer reconciles record counts (Projects in, Tasks in, Contacts in, Files in), spot-checks 25-50 records against the Synergy source, and validates custom field completeness (null fields should appear). Any mapping corrections and custom field schema gaps surface here. Sign-off on the sandbox validation is required before production migration begins.

  6. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Teams (for Asana workspace structure), Custom Fields (workspace-global definitions), Projects (with sections mapped from Job Structure folders), Tasks (with dependencies resolved via the Asana Task Dependencies API), Stories (comments), Attachments (with 100 MB size filter applied), and Contacts (via the JSON bundle mapped to Asana Users). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  7. Cutover, validation, and handoff documentation

    We freeze Synergy writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the Workflow inventory (for Asana Workflow Builder rebuild), the Report rebuild guide, the Job Structure manifest (for naming rule reapplication), and the file version change log. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve reconciliation issues. Post-migration admin rebuild of Workflows, Reports, and Job Structure naming rules is outside standard scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Synergy logo

Synergy

Source

Strengths

  • Combines project management, CRM, and financial sync in one platform for AEC-specific workflows
  • Highly configurable workflows, custom fields, and naming rules for complex project hierarchies
  • 12d Model project support with native file and version management for civil engineering deliverables
  • QuickBooks Online add-on enables direct AP/AR and financial data exchange without re-entry
  • Import/export tool bundles job structures, permissions, and file versions into a portable package

Weaknesses

  • Custom reporting produces inconsistent results and unreliable data, requiring manual cross-checking
  • User interface is unintuitive with a steep learning curve and significant training requirements
  • Public API lacks documented endpoints for Contacts, Teams, Activities, and Attributes
  • Contact support relies on native import/export JSON format rather than a REST API
  • No publicly documented API rate limits, auth methods, or bulk endpoint specifications
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Synergy and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Synergy: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Synergy doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Synergy to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Synergy to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Synergy to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Synergy to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Straightforward migrations under 5,000 Tasks and 200 Projects with low custom field complexity land in two to four weeks. Migrations with complex Job Structures (deep folder hierarchies, dozens of custom fields per project, large file attachment volumes with versioning) move to six to ten weeks because of schema mapping design, file batching with the 100 MB API ceiling, Job Structure documentation scope, and sandbox validation time.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Synergy.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day