Project Management migration

Migrate from Synergy to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Synergy and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

Synergy logo

Synergy

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

50%

5 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Synergy and Jira.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

6-10 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Synergy to Jira is a structural remapping of AEC-centric project data into a software-development-oriented platform. Synergy's API exposes Projects and Tasks but omits Contacts and Activities entirely, requiring the native import/export JSON bundle for those objects. The Job Structure — a deeply nested folder layout, naming rule, and permission bundle — has no direct Jira equivalent, so we extract it as a manifest and rebuild it as Jira project configurations, applying naming conventions where Jira supports them and flagging unsupported permission models for manual review. Jira's workflow engine and automations do not accept migrated code; we deliver a written inventory of every active Synergy workflow for the customer's admin to rebuild in Jira. The Synergy-to-Jira path suits architecture, engineering, and construction firms that have standardized on Atlassian tools for software development work and need a single project management surface across the organization.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Synergy logo

Synergy

What's pushing teams away

  • Custom reporting produces inconsistent results and unreliable data, forcing teams to manually cross-check financial summaries against exported spreadsheets rather than trusting the built-in reports.
  • The user interface is widely described as unintuitive and complex, with a steep learning curve that frustrates new users and requires significant internal training investment to achieve basic competency.
  • Sync with QuickBooks Online can break silently when chart of accounts structures diverge between systems, leading to miscategorized expenses that are difficult to trace back and reconcile without dedicated accounting review.
  • Support response times are inconsistent, with some customers reporting multi-day delays on critical issues and a perceived gap between the quality of documentation and the depth of assistance available for edge cases.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How Synergy objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a Synergy object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Synergy

Project

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Projects map 1:1 to Jira Projects as the primary container. Project name, description, creation timestamp, and key settings migrate directly. Synergy's project-level custom fields (text, number, currency, date, dropdown, multi-select) map to Jira custom fields created in the destination project. We snapshot the full custom field schema before migration because Synergy's API returns only non-empty custom fields, omitting null fields entirely; without the snapshot, empty fields vanish in Jira, breaking schema completeness.

Synergy

Task

maps to

Jira

Issue (Story, Task, Bug)

1:1
Fully supported

Synergy Tasks map to Jira Issues using the most appropriate Issue Type per task's content and status. Tasks with subtasks generate Jira sub-tasks. Task status, priority, assignees, due dates, dependencies, and comments migrate directly. Synergy's dependency graph (linked predecessor and successor relationships) maps to Jira Issue Links (Blocks/Blocked By) or Jira's native dependency field depending on the Jira project configuration.

Synergy

Job Structure

maps to

Jira

Project Configuration + Folder Structure

lossy
Mapping required

Synergy Job Structure defines the folder layout, naming rules, folder-level permissions, issue types, and dashboard configurations for each Project. It is deeply nested and varies by firm setup, with no direct Jira equivalent. We extract the full structure as a manifest (folder hierarchy, naming rule logic, permission model, issue-type assignments) and rebuild it in Jira: Jira projects receive matching configuration (issue types, screens, field layouts, permissions schemes, notification schemes), and folder naming conventions are applied to Jira project or component names. Unsupported permission models are flagged in the handoff document for manual review.

Synergy

Custom Fields

maps to

Jira

Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

Synergy supports text, number, currency, date, dropdown, and multi-select custom fields per Project and Task. Jira's custom field types must match exactly: Synergy currency maps to Jira Number Field with formatting; Synergy dropdown maps to Jira Select List (single choice); Synergy multi-select maps to Jira Select List (multiple choice). We snapshot the complete custom field schema and field-type metadata before migration, then create equivalent Jira custom fields in the destination project via the Jira API before any data loads.

Synergy

Contact

maps to

Jira

User or Contact (depending on Jira project type)

1:many
Fully supported

Synergy Contacts are stored but have no public API endpoint; migration uses the native import/export JSON bundle which auto-collects associated groups and attributes. Jira does not have a native Contact object in Jira Software — users are Jira Users and assignees. We map Synergy Contacts to Jira Users by email, creating Jira User accounts for any contacts not already in the destination Jira instance. Contact-level metadata (company association, phone, address) migrates to a Jira project-specific custom field group if the customer requires contact records as data rather than system users.

Synergy

Team

maps to

Jira

Group

lossy
Fully supported

Synergy Teams define group-level permissions and role assignments for Projects and Jobs. The native import/export tool handles Teams as part of the metadata bundle. No standalone API endpoint exists for Teams. We extract team memberships from the JSON bundle and create Jira Groups in the destination, then assign Jira project role memberships based on the team-to-role mapping extracted from the manifest.

Synergy

Files and Versions

maps to

Jira

Attachments

1:1
Mapping required

Synergy Files include content, all versions, change records (who and when), and file-level permissions. Jira handles file attachments as Jira Attachments linked to Issues. We transfer binary content alongside version history and change metadata. Jira's attachment size limit is 75 MB per file on most plans. Large files or 12d Model project files that exceed this limit are flagged during scoping and migrated as linked external references (URL or cloud storage link) rather than inline attachments. Version history is preserved as Jira comment entries referencing the original version metadata.

Synergy

Associations

maps to

Jira

Issue Links

1:1
Mapping required

Synergy Associations link Jobs, Tasks, and other objects across the system to form cross-reference relationships. The import/export tool bundles Associations into the configuration package. We map these relationships to Jira Issue Links (Blocks, Blocked By, Relates To, Duplicate, Clone) using the Association type to determine the appropriate Jira link type. Circular dependency resolution is applied to prevent infinite link loops in Jira's issue graph.

Synergy

Attributes

maps to

Jira

Custom Field Values

1:1
Not supported

Synergy Attributes store metadata values tied to Jobs, Tasks, and Files. They are collected automatically by the import/export tool as part of the job and folder metadata package. There is no public API endpoint for Attributes. We extract attribute key-value pairs from the JSON bundle and map them to Jira Issue custom fields, creating the custom field in Jira if it does not already exist in the destination project schema.

Synergy

QuickBooks Financial Data

maps to

Jira

Not Migrated

lossy
Fully supported

Synergy's QuickBooks Online add-on synchronizes AP/AR, profitability, and financial data directly with QuickBooks. Jira does not have a native accounting or financial sync capability. Financial data, invoice records, expense tracking, and budget information in Synergy do not migrate. We recommend maintaining QuickBooks as the system of record for financial data and configuring a separate QuickBooks-to-Jira integration if Jira is used for project cost tracking. We document the financial data scope during discovery so the customer can plan accordingly.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Synergy logo

Synergy gotchas

High

Only non-empty custom fields appear in API output

High

Public API lacks endpoints for Contacts and Activities

Medium

Job Structure complexity varies by firm configuration

Medium

Custom reports may not translate to destination platforms

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • Synergy API omits null custom fields silently

    Total Synergy's API explicitly returns only non-empty custom fields in Project and Task responses, omitting null or unset custom fields entirely. When migrating to Jira, fields that were never populated in Synergy vanish from the Jira custom field inventory, creating schema gaps that are difficult to detect after migration. We prevent this by snapshotting the full custom field schema and field-type metadata before migration, then creating all defined fields in Jira (regardless of whether they had data) and populating null values with type-appropriate defaults so the schema in Jira matches the schema in Synergy completely.

  • Contacts and Activities lack API endpoints in Synergy

    The developer API at developers.totalsynergy.com documents Projects and Tasks but does not expose Contacts or Activities as addressable endpoints. Any migration touching these objects must rely on the native import/export JSON bundle, which handles groups and contact associations automatically but offers no granular filtering, no incremental sync, and no programmatic control over field mapping. We scope Contacts and Activities as batch imports using the bundled JSON format, validate record counts against the source export manifest, and advise customers to budget extra time for association reconciliation because the JSON bundle does not expose foreign-key relationships with the same clarity as a REST endpoint.

  • Jira custom field types must match exactly on import

    Jira's Bulk API and CSV import require field types to match exactly. String values cannot be imported into a Jira Select List field without first creating the option in Jira; array values cannot land in a single-select field; date values not in ISO 8601 format (YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS) are rejected silently or converted incorrectly. We pre-create all Jira custom field options and validate data types in the transform layer before any Jira API call. Custom field configuration (options, allowed values, default values) is deployed to Jira before data migration begins.

  • Synergy workflows and Jira automations do not migrate as code

    Synergy's workflow automation engine (approval chains, resource assignments, status transitions) and Jira's automation rules are different systems with different action models and trigger types. We do not migrate workflows as executable code. We deliver a written inventory of every active Synergy workflow with its trigger, conditions, actions, and a recommended Jira Automation equivalent (or Jira project workflow configuration), and the customer's admin rebuilds them post-migration. Jira's native workflow schemes (Statuses and Transitions) also require manual configuration in the target project.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Synergy to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and Synergy data audit

    We audit the source Synergy instance across Projects, Tasks, Job Structures, custom fields, contacts, teams, files, and associations. Because Synergy lacks a public API for Contacts and Activities, we work with the native import/export JSON bundle for these objects. We snapshot the complete custom field schema (including null fields that do not surface in API output) and extract the full Job Structure manifest. We also document any active workflows for the inventory deliverable. The discovery output is a written migration scope, Jira project architecture recommendation (project count, issue types, workflow schemes), and a Synergy export plan.

  2. Jira destination schema design

    We design the destination Jira configuration before any data moves. This includes creating Jira Projects (one per Synergy Project or grouped by Job Structure), configuring Issue Type Schemes (mapping Synergy task types to Jira Issue Types), creating Jira custom fields matching Synergy's full custom field schema, configuring Status and Workflow Schemes, setting up Jira Groups matching Synergy Teams, and designing Jira Permission Schemes. Jira schema is deployed to a Sandbox or staging environment first for validation. We also create any custom field options (dropdown values, multi-select lists) that are required for data import.

  3. Contacts and Activities export via native JSON bundle

    We export Contacts and Activities from Synergy using the native import/export JSON bundle. This step differs from API-based migrations because there is no programmatic filtering capability — the entire contact and activity corpus exports as a single bundle. We validate the bundle against the source manifest (record counts, file sizes, association completeness) and transform the JSON into Jira-compatible User and Activity formats before the Jira bulk import. Association reconciliation (linking contacts to the correct Jira project and User accounts) happens here and requires manual validation against Synergy's group and attribute metadata.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Jira Sandbox or test environment using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager and system administrator reconcile record counts (Projects in, Issues in, Contacts in, Files in), spot-check 25-50 records against Synergy source data, verify custom field completeness (including fields that were null in Synergy but must exist in Jira), and validate Jira workflow configuration. Any mapping corrections, missing custom field options, or Jira schema gaps are resolved in this phase before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Projects and schema (first), Jira Users and Groups (from Synergy Teams and Contacts), Custom Fields with full schema including null-field defaults, Issues (Tasks mapped from Synergy Tasks with dependencies as Issue Links), Files and Attachments, and Associations. Synergy Job Structure manifests are applied as Jira project configuration updates after issue migration. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Jira Bulk API with rate-limit handling and batch chunking is used for all large-volume phases.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff

    We freeze Synergy writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Jira as the system of record. We deliver the Workflow and Automation inventory document listing every active Synergy workflow with its trigger, conditions, actions, and recommended Jira Automation equivalent. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve reconciliation issues raised by the customer's project team. We do not rebuild Synergy workflows as Jira automations or Jira workflow schemes inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Synergy logo

Synergy

Source

Strengths

  • Combines project management, CRM, and financial sync in one platform for AEC-specific workflows
  • Highly configurable workflows, custom fields, and naming rules for complex project hierarchies
  • 12d Model project support with native file and version management for civil engineering deliverables
  • QuickBooks Online add-on enables direct AP/AR and financial data exchange without re-entry
  • Import/export tool bundles job structures, permissions, and file versions into a portable package

Weaknesses

  • Custom reporting produces inconsistent results and unreliable data, requiring manual cross-checking
  • User interface is unintuitive with a steep learning curve and significant training requirements
  • Public API lacks documented endpoints for Contacts, Teams, Activities, and Attributes
  • Contact support relies on native import/export JSON format rather than a REST API
  • No publicly documented API rate limits, auth methods, or bulk endpoint specifications
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Synergy and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Synergy: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Synergy doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Synergy to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Synergy to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Synergy to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Synergy to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Synergy to Jira migrations land between six and ten weeks for accounts under 500 Projects and 5,000 Tasks with no complex Job Structure dependencies and a straightforward contact export. Migrations with deeply nested Job Structures, large file repositories (especially 12d Model files), or multi-project Jira destinations requiring granular issue-type and workflow configuration move to twelve to eighteen weeks because of Job Structure manifest design, association reconciliation for JSON-bundled contacts, and Jira schema configuration time.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Synergy.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day