Project Management migration

Migrate from Birdview to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Birdview and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Birdview logo

Birdview

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Birdview and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Birdview to Asana is a migration from a professional services automation platform to a work management tool, which means financial objects (time entries, expenses, rate cards, approvals) require deliberate decisions at scoping because Asana does not have native equivalents at most tiers. We begin by enumerating the full Birdview schema — Spaces, Projects, Activity types (Task, Issue, Request), Custom fields, and user roles — so that the Activity type label is preserved as a custom field in Asana and no tenant-defined field is silently dropped. Spaces map to Asana Teams; Projects map to Projects; time entries and expenses are extracted as structured records and delivered as CSV with a manual-rebuild recommendation for Asana Premium's time tracking. We do not migrate Birdview Workflows, Approvals, or Rate Cards as code; we deliver a written inventory of every active workflow and approval chain for the customer to rebuild in Asana Rules or manually.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Birdview logo

Birdview

What's pushing teams away

  • The platform rewards organizational discipline at setup — teams that do not maintain clean Spaces and structured workflows early report friction that compounds as projects scale
  • Cannot remove hours from a project entirely; the system enforces a minimum 0:01 hour entry, forcing teams to either leave phantom time or adjust billing in the destination system
  • Some users report the methods and configuration options are more complicated to learn than expected, particularly around workflow automation and custom field setup
  • Per-user pricing can become expensive for large teams with many stakeholders who only need read-only access, since every named user counts toward the license regardless of activity level

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Birdview objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Birdview object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Birdview

Spaces

maps to

Asana

Organization + Teams

1:many
Fully supported

Birdview Spaces are top-level organizational containers that may contain Projects and nested sub-Spaces. We map each Space to an Asana Team within the destination Organization. If the Birdview tenant has more than 500 projects under a single Space, we split the Space into multiple Asana Teams using the first-level Project grouping as the Team boundary. Space hierarchy (parent-child) is preserved as Team naming conventions or in a custom field space_parent__c for audit.

Birdview

Projects

maps to

Asana

Projects

1:1
Fully supported

Birdview Projects map directly to Asana Projects with status, start date, due date, owner (mapped to Asana Team member), and description preserved. Project budget fields in Birdview do not have a native Asana equivalent; we migrate budget as a custom number field project_budget__c and flag it as requiring manual entry if the destination Asana plan lacks the Budgets add-on (Premium and Business only).

Birdview

Activities (Task subtype)

maps to

Asana

Tasks

1:1
Fully supported

Birdview Activities with type Task map to Asana Tasks. We preserve the Activity type label as a custom single-select field activity_type__c set to 'Task' during migration. All standard task fields (assignee, due date, priority, description) map directly. Subtasks in Birdview map to Asana Subtasks via the parent_task_gid reference. Task completion status maps to the Asana completed field.

Birdview

Activities (Issue subtype)

maps to

Asana

Tasks + Custom Fields

1:1
Fully supported

Birdview Issues are Activity subtypes with priority, resolution status, and resolution notes fields. There is no native Issue object in Asana. We migrate Issues as Tasks, preserving the issue-specific fields as custom fields: issue_priority__c, issue_resolution_status__c, and issue_resolution_notes__c. The activity_type__c custom field is set to 'Issue' to maintain classification in the destination.

Birdview

Activities (Request subtype)

maps to

Asana

Projects or Tasks + Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Birdview Requests are intake-style Activities tied to Custom Forms with tenant-defined field schemas. We extract the form definition during scoping before mapping any Request records. Each Request migrates as a Task with the custom form field values mapped one-by-one to custom fields in Asana. We flag any form field types that Asana does not support (e.g., file upload fields) as skipped fields with a note in the migration manifest.

Birdview

Portfolios

maps to

Asana

Custom Field Grouping

lossy
Fully supported

Birdview Portfolios group Projects for executive oversight and are Enterprise-tier only. Asana does not have a native Portfolio object below Enterprise. We migrate Portfolio membership as a custom field portfolio_name__c on Projects and recommend the customer use Asana Portfolios on Business or Enterprise tier if available. If the customer is on Asana Starter or Premium, we document the Portfolio-to-Project groupings for manual rebuild in Asana's search and filter layer.

Birdview

Time Entries

maps to

Asana

CSV Export (manual rebuild)

1:1
Mapping required

Birdview time entries are linked to Activities and Users with the 0:01 hour minimum enforced. We extract all time entry records including those below the 0:01 floor as a separate data set. We present the customer with three options: migrate zero-value entries as 0.01-hour entries in Asana Premium time tracking, drop zero-value entries entirely, or deliver time entry data as a structured CSV for billing reconciliation outside Asana. We do not create a shadow billing system inside Asana; time entry migration is a customer choice documented in the scoping sign-off.

Birdview

Expenses

maps to

Asana

CSV Export (manual rebuild)

1:1
Mapping required

Birdview Expenses are tied to Activities and Projects with cost center and approval status. Asana has no native expense object. We extract all expense records and deliver them as a structured CSV with project reference, cost center, amount, currency, approval status, and expense date. For teams that need expense tracking inside Asana, we recommend a third-party integration (expense management tool or custom build) and document the recommended configuration as part of the post-migration handoff.

Birdview

Custom Fields

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Birdview custom fields are tenant-defined on Projects, Tasks, and Activities. We enumerate every custom field definition during discovery, map field types to Asana-supported types (text, number, date, dropdown, multi-select, checkbox, people), and flag unsupported types (e.g., formula fields, rollup fields) as skipped with a field-level note. Dropdown and multi-select option lists migrate with values preserved; we extend the options list if Asana already has conflicting values in the same field.

Birdview

User Types

maps to

Asana

Team Members

1:1
Mapping required

Birdview Full User, Collaborator, Executive, and Viewer roles govern data visibility. We map these to Asana Team membership by resolving each Birdview user email to an Asana user. Collaborators who cannot access financial data in Birdview are migrated as Asana Members on the relevant Teams; their access scope is scoped to the non-financial projects during migration. We flag any role that cannot be represented in Asana's permission model as an access gap in the migration report.

Birdview

Workflows

maps to

Asana

Workflow Inventory (no code migration)

lossy
Mapping required

Birdview custom Workflows govern task routing and approval chains. Asana Rules (trigger-action) and Workflow Builder (Business tier) are different automation paradigms from Birdview's visual workflow configuration. We do not migrate Workflows as code. We audit every active Birdview Workflow, document its trigger conditions, routing logic, and actions in a written inventory, and deliver it to the customer's admin for rebuild in Asana Rules or Workflow Builder. We test the inventory against Asana's rule action coverage and flag any Birdview workflow actions that have no Asana equivalent.

Birdview

Rate Cards

maps to

Asana

External Documentation

1:1
Mapping required

Birdview Rate Cards define billing rates per user or role. Asana has no native rate card object. We extract rate card definitions (role, rate, currency, effective dates) and deliver them as a structured CSV alongside the time entry export. If the customer uses Asana for billing rate visibility, we recommend building a rate card reference inside Asana as a custom Project or as a document in the customer's connected Google Drive or SharePoint, documented in the handoff report.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Birdview logo

Birdview gotchas

Medium

Minimum 0:01 hour enforcement on time entries

Medium

Custom fields require pre-migration schema enumeration

Low

User-type permission model gates data visibility

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Minimum 0:01 hour floor on time entries forces a migration decision

    Birdview enforces a minimum 0:01 hour entry on all time logs and does not permit deletion of time records. Asana Premium time tracking allows zero-value entries. We extract all time entry records during migration, flag every record that sits at the 0:01 floor, and present the customer with three documented options before migration: accept the floor entry in Asana, drop zero-value entries entirely, or deliver the full time entry data as a structured CSV for billing reconciliation outside Asana. Skipping this decision causes a reconciliation mismatch post-migration because teams expecting zero-hour records in Asana will find 0:01-hour entries instead.

  • Activity type (Task, Issue, Request) has no native Asana equivalent

    Birdview distinguishes Tasks, Issues, and Requests as Activity subtypes with different field schemas. Asana has one Task object. We preserve the Activity subtype as a custom single-select field activity_type__c on every migrated task and document the field in the Asana project settings. Teams that rely on Birdview's Issue and Request subtypes for intake workflows must rebuild those classification triggers in Asana Rules or manually filter by the activity_type__c field after migration.

  • Custom field schema is tenant-specific and must be enumerated before mapping

    Birdview allows unlimited custom fields per object with no enforced naming convention or type constraints. We enumerate all custom field definitions during discovery before mapping begins. Some Birdview field types — formula fields, rollup fields, and nested custom objects — have no Asana equivalent and are flagged as skipped fields in the migration manifest. Skipping enumeration risks silent field drops or type mismatches that surface only after the migration is complete and users report missing data.

  • Asana requires Premium plan for Start Date and time tracking

    Asana's Start Date field on tasks is available on Starter plans but time tracking (time entries linked to tasks) requires Asana Premium ($10.99/user/month) or higher. If the migration scope includes time entry data from Birdview and the customer intends to use Asana Premium time tracking, we configure it during the migration. If the customer is on Asana Starter, we deliver time entry data as a structured CSV and document the upgrade path to Premium as a post-migration recommendation.

  • Workflow and approval chains do not migrate as automation code

    Birdview Workflows define task routing logic and approval chains that have no direct Asana equivalent. Asana Rules and Workflow Builder are trigger-action systems with different action models and limits. We audit every active Birdview Workflow during scoping, document it as a written inventory with trigger, conditions, actions, and recommended Asana Rules rebuild steps, and deliver it to the customer's admin post-migration. Approval workflows (expense approval, time approval) have no Asana native equivalent and are documented as manual-process recommendations or third-party tool suggestions.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Birdview to Asana data migration

  1. Schema enumeration and scoping

    We audit the full Birdview tenant: all Spaces, Projects, Activity records by type (Task, Issue, Request), Custom field definitions on every object, User roster with role assignments, active Workflow definitions, time entry records, and expense records. We enumerate every custom field name, type, and applicable object before any field-level translation begins. The scoping output is a written migration manifest listing every object and field that will migrate, every field that will be skipped with rationale, and a decision gate for the time entry floor and expense handling.

  2. Asana destination setup and Team mapping

    We configure the Asana destination workspace: create Teams mapped from Birdview Spaces (with naming conventions aligned to the customer's organizational structure), provision custom fields matching the enumerated Birdview schema, and create the activity_type__c custom field on the Task object with options Task, Issue, and Request. We configure Asana project templates that mirror Birdview project structures and set up any required Sections for project organization. If the customer is on Asana Business or Enterprise, we enable Portfolio features to support the Birdview Portfolio groupings.

  3. User reconciliation and role mapping

    We extract every distinct Birdview user (Owner, Full User, Collaborator, Executive, Viewer) referenced on any migrating record. We match by email against the Asana destination workspace's user list. Any Birdview user without a matching Asana account is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. We document the role-mapping gap between Birdview's permission model and Asana's Team-membership model, flagging any Collaborator or Executive whose financial data access scope cannot be represented in Asana's destination Teams.

  4. Project and task migration with type preservation

    We migrate Birdview Projects into Asana Projects in dependency order (Projects created before Tasks, so parent references are satisfied). Each Activity record migrates as an Asana Task with the activity_type__c custom field set to the original Birdview Activity type. Issue-specific fields (priority, resolution status, resolution notes) migrate to their corresponding custom fields on the Task. Request records inherit their custom form field values as individual custom fields on the Task. We preserve assignee, due date, start date, priority, description, and completion status directly. Subtasks migrate as Asana Subtasks with parent references resolved at migration time.

  5. Custom field and attachment migration

    All enumerated Birdview custom fields are mapped to Asana custom fields of equivalent type. Dropdown and multi-select values migrate with the option list extended if needed. We handle attachments separately: Asana's API has a 100MB per-file limit. Any attachment exceeding 100MB is flagged as skipped in the migration manifest, and we provide a list of skipped files with original URLs so the customer can re-upload manually or store in a connected Google Drive or SharePoint.

  6. Cutover, delta sync, and workflow handoff

    We freeze Birdview writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then deliver the completed Asana workspace as the system of record. We deliver the Workflow and Approval inventory document to the customer's admin team with recommended Asana Rules rebuild steps. We support a five-business-day hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Birdview Workflows as Asana Rules or configure Asana automations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Birdview logo

Birdview

Source

Strengths

  • Per-user pricing from $9/month with unlimited projects, tasks, and custom fields on the Lite tier
  • Multiple view types (Table, Kanban, Gantt, Calendar) available on all paid plans
  • AI project plan assistant and completion forecast on Team and Enterprise tiers
  • 5000+ Zapier connectors on Lite and 500+ Workato connectors on Enterprise for broad integration coverage
  • Resource workload management and critical path tracking included on Team tier

Weaknesses

  • Per-user pricing scales expensively for large read-only stakeholder populations
  • Cannot delete time entries entirely — minimum 0:01 hour enforced on all time logs
  • Requires disciplined initial configuration to avoid compounding organizational friction later
  • Custom form and custom field schema is tenant-specific, requiring enumeration before migration can begin
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Birdview and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Birdview: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Birdview doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Birdview to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Birdview to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Birdview to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Birdview to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 10,000 Projects and Tasks with a straightforward custom field schema and no time entry or expense migration. Migrations with large activity volumes (over 50,000 tasks), complex custom field schemas (100+ fields), multi-Space organizational structures requiring careful Team mapping, or explicit time entry floor handling move to seven to twelve weeks. Workflow and approval chain enumeration is included at every scope.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Birdview.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day