Project Management migration

Migrate from Redmine 3.3 to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Redmine 3.3 and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Redmine 3.3 logo

Redmine 3.3

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

50%

6 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Redmine 3.3 and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Redmine 3.3 stores project hierarchies, issue workflows, and time entries in a self-hosted Rails 4.2 database with a read-oriented REST API and no native bulk import capability. Asana uses a cloud-native workspace-team-project-task model with custom fields, Timeline views, and a real-time API. The structural differences are significant: Redmine's subproject nesting must map to Asana's project hierarchy or team structure, its issue-status workflow states have no direct Asana equivalent and become task Status fields, and its tracker types (Bug, Feature, Support) become custom field dropdowns or project sections. We resolve Redmine's custom field list IDs to display labels before writing to Asana, download attachment files from the Redmine server filesystem and re-upload to Asana task attachments, and translate Redmine's typed issue relations (blocks, blocked by, relates to) into Asana dependency arrows on the Timeline view. We do not migrate Redmine workflows, wiki pages (Asana has no wiki concept), or plugin-specific data that lives in non-standard database tables.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Redmine 3.3 logo

Redmine 3.3

What's pushing teams away

  • No native Agile experience — Kanban boards and sprint planning require third-party plugins (Backlogs, Agile plugin from RedmineUP, etc.), which is a hard adoption blocker for teams that want Scrum or Kanban out of the box.
  • Stuck on an old release — Redmine 3.3 specifically is years behind the latest 5.x line, missing modern Ruby version support, security patches, and recent UX work; remaining on 3.3 is now a security and supportability risk.
  • Initial setup and ongoing upgrades require real Rails sysadmin skills (Ruby version, database, migrations, plugins, ERB templates), which is beyond what most project managers can handle without IT support.
  • Ecosystem is smaller than Jira — fewer modern SaaS integrations (Slack, GitHub, Bitbucket connectors exist but lag) and no built-in marketplace UX, so connectivity to current toolchains often needs custom work.
  • Self-hosted means the customer also owns backup, uptime, scaling, and security — costs that look invisible on paper but become significant for larger teams, often pushing them to migrate to Jira Cloud, GitLab, or Linear.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Redmine 3.3 objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Redmine 3.3 object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Redmine 3.3

Project

maps to

Asana

Project or Team

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine projects map to Asana Projects within Teams. Redmine's subproject hierarchy (a project with a parent project_id) maps to Asana's project nesting or a separate project within the same Team. If the Redmine instance uses many levels of subproject nesting, we discuss collapsing into a flat project-per-team structure or using Asana Portfolios for cross-project grouping. The project's public/private flag maps to the Asana project's visibility setting. Each Redmine project module (wiki, forums, repository, time tracking) is audited and flagged: Asana has no wiki or forum equivalent, so those are omitted from the migration scope unless the customer requests wiki-to-task conversion.

Redmine 3.3

Issue

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine issues map directly to Asana tasks. Subject maps to Task Name, Description maps to the task description field (markdown preserved), Done Ratio maps to a custom numeric field or Percent Complete if using the Asana Timeline. Start Date and Due Date map to the task Start Date and Due Date fields. Redmine's issue priority (Low, Normal, High, Urgent) maps to Asana's Custom Fields as a single-select dropdown. Redmine's estimated hours map to Asana's Time Tracking field if the project has it enabled. We resolve assignee (issue.assigned_to_id) by matching to an Asana User by email.

Redmine 3.3

Tracker

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (dropdown) or Section

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine trackers (Bug, Feature, Support, or custom trackers defined at install time) do not have a native Asana equivalent. We create an Asana custom field named 'Tracker' with a single-select dropdown containing each distinct tracker name from Redmine, then write the tracker value into that field for each migrated task. Alternatively, if the customer prefers a non-custom-field approach, we create one Asana Section per tracker within each project and sort migrated issues into those sections.

Redmine 3.3

Custom Field (list-format)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (single-select or multi-select)

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine 3.3 stores list-format custom field values as internal numeric IDs in the issue record, while the human-readable label lives in a separate possible_values table. We query the custom_field definitions endpoint and build an ID-to-label lookup table before processing any issue export. For each list-format custom field, we create a corresponding Asana custom field of the matching type (single-select for list, multi-select for multi-list) and write the resolved display label rather than the raw ID. This prevents migrated records from showing numeric IDs instead of meaningful values.

Redmine 3.3

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Task (with time tracking)

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine time entries record hours spent against a project or specific issue, with activity categories (e.g., Development, Design, Meeting) and comments. Asana's time tracking feature is enabled at the project level and records time against tasks. We migrate time entries by converting the Redmine hours and activity into Asana time logged against the corresponding task. If Asana time tracking is not enabled on the destination project, we create a custom numeric field 'Hours Logged' and write the total hours there, losing the per-activity breakdown. Activity category names migrate as a custom field on the task if the customer requires the breakdown.

Redmine 3.3

Version

maps to

Asana

Milestone

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine versions (or targets) represent milestones or releases within a project, with fields for name, effective date, description, and status. Asana Milestones are a task type with zero duration that represent checkpoints. We migrate each Redmine version as an Asana Milestone within the corresponding project. The version effective date maps to the milestone due date, and the version description migrates to the milestone description. If the Redmine version is not yet effective (status = 'open'), the milestone is created without a due date.

Redmine 3.3

Issue Relation

maps to

Asana

Task Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine supports typed issue relations: blocks, blocked by, relates to, duplicates, and others. Asana Timeline supports dependency types finish-to-start, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, and start-to-finish. We map Redmine 'blocks' to Asana 'blocks' (finish-to-start where the blocking task must complete before the dependent starts), 'blocked by' to 'depends on', 'relates to' to a non-blocking association (noted in the task description because Asana has no non-blocking dependency type), and 'duplicates' to a task-level flag. Circular dependency detection is applied during the transform phase.

Redmine 3.3

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Task Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine stores uploaded files on the server filesystem under the files/ directory (or a configured storage path) and records only the file path and metadata in the attachments table. We extract file paths from the attachments table, verify file accessibility on the Redmine server, download each file, and re-upload to Asana as a task attachment via the Asana Attachments API. The original filename and content-type are preserved so that the attached file opens correctly in Asana. Files are processed in batches to manage download/upload time and avoid timeout during the migration window.

Redmine 3.3

User and Membership

maps to

Asana

Team Member

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine user accounts include login, firstname, lastname, email, admin flag, and custom fields. We export users and their project memberships with role assignments. We match Redmine users to Asana workspace members by email address. If a Redmine user has no corresponding Asana account, they are added to a reconciliation list for the customer to provision before record import. Role-based access control (Redmine role permissions per project) has no direct Asana equivalent; we document the role matrix in the migration handoff and the customer recreates permissions in Asana Teams and Projects manually.

Redmine 3.3

Wiki Page

maps to

Asana

Not migrated

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine wikis are project-scoped and store content in a wiki_format attribute with page hierarchy. Asana has no wiki or document-repository concept. We do not migrate wiki pages as functional content. We export wiki content as HTML files and deliver them as a static export package. If the customer uses Redmine wiki for project documentation, they must recreate it in a document management tool (Notion, Confluence, Google Docs) or in Asana task descriptions. This is flagged during discovery and documented in the scope agreement before migration begins.

Redmine 3.3

Document

maps to

Asana

Task Attachment or Not migrated

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine project-level documents store a title, description, and category with attached files. If the document has files attached, we migrate those files as task attachments on a designated documentation task within the project. If the document has no attachments, it is flagged as a candidate for recreation in a document management tool. Document categories vary by installation and do not have an Asana equivalent.

Redmine 3.3

News

maps to

Asana

Not migrated

lossy
Mapping required

Project news posts include a title, summary, content, and author. Asana has no news feed equivalent. News is omitted from standard migration scope as it is typically lower priority than task and project data. If explicitly requested, we migrate news as tasks with a custom 'News' section and the author set as the task assignee.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Redmine 3.3 logo

Redmine 3.3 gotchas

High

Database migrations are required between major Redmine versions

High

CSV export has no native import counterpart

Medium

Custom field list values store internal IDs, not display labels

Medium

Plugin-specific data is not accessible via the REST API

Medium

Attachment files live on the server filesystem, not the database

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Custom field list values store internal IDs, not display labels

    Redmine 3.3 stores list-format custom field values as numeric IDs in the issue record, with the human-readable label in a separate possible_values table. Exporting issues as CSV shows the numeric ID, not the label text. If those IDs are written directly into Asana without resolution, every record ends up with raw integers instead of meaningful values. We query the custom_field definitions endpoint before processing any issue export, build an ID-to-label lookup table for each list-format custom field, and substitute display values at the point of writing to Asana.

  • Redmine wiki pages have no Asana equivalent

    Asana has no wiki, document repository, or project-level knowledge-base feature. Redmine wiki content (which may contain critical project documentation, runbooks, or onboarding guides) cannot be migrated as functional content. We export wiki pages as an HTML static archive, but the customer must recreate this content in a document management tool. We flag this gap during discovery so it does not surface as a surprise at cutover.

  • Attachments live on the Redmine server filesystem, not the database

    Redmine stores uploaded files on disk under the files/ directory (or a configured storage path) and records only the file path and metadata in the database. If the Redmine instance uses local disk storage, files must be accessible from our migration environment. If the instance uses cloud storage (S3, Azure Blob), credentials must be provided. We extract file paths from the attachments table, verify accessibility, download each file, and re-upload to Asana via the attachments endpoint. Files without a valid path or inaccessible storage are flagged in the reconciliation report.

  • Redmine workflows and tracker permissions do not migrate

    Redmine 3.3 introduced per-role, per-tracker workflow restrictions that define which status transitions are allowed for which roles. Asana has no workflow state machine equivalent; task status is a simple picklist (Not done, In Progress, On Hold, Complete) per project without role-based transition rules. We document the Redmine workflow state matrix in the migration handoff for the customer's admin to evaluate whether manual task-status assignment or a post-migration automation is appropriate.

  • Asana Timeline dependency date propagation has known quirks

    Asana community forum posts document cases where manually moved tasks on the Timeline do not propagate date changes to dependent tasks consistently, producing red dependency arrows. This is an Asana platform behavior, not a migration artifact. We test the dependency graph in a staging environment after migration and document any unresolved dependency arrows for the customer. For critical scheduling paths, we recommend verifying the Timeline after cutover to confirm date propagation behaves as expected.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Redmine 3.3 to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and source audit

    We audit the Redmine 3.3 database schema directly (via a read-only SQL connection or CSV export of all relevant tables) to capture all projects, subprojects, issues, trackers, custom field definitions, time entries, versions, attachments, users, and memberships. We identify plugin-specific tables that extend the core schema and flag any plugin-isolated data as out of scope. We document the project hierarchy depth, custom field count, total attachment file size, and time entry volume to produce a migration scope and timeline estimate.

  2. Custom field ID resolution and transform design

    We query the custom_field definitions table to retrieve all list-format custom fields and their possible_values. We build an ID-to-label lookup map for every list-format field. We also capture any enumeration format custom fields (checkboxes, radio buttons) and map them to Asana single-select or multi-select custom fields of the corresponding type. The transform design document is reviewed with the customer before any data is written to Asana.

  3. Asana workspace and project structure setup

    We create the Asana workspace structure to receive the Redmine data. This includes provisioning Teams (if the Redmine project count warrants team-level grouping), Projects per Redmine project, enabling time tracking on projects where time entries are in scope, creating custom field definitions (Tracker, Priority, and any resolved Redmine custom fields) as single-select or multi-select dropdowns, and creating Milestone custom fields for Redmine versions. The structure is validated in Asana before migration begins.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into an Asana workspace using production-equivalent data volume. The customer reconciles record counts (projects in, tasks in, custom field values populated, attachments count), spot-checks 25-50 randomly sampled tasks against the Redmine source for field accuracy, and verifies that subproject hierarchy, assignee resolution, and attachment links are correct. Mapping corrections are applied here, not in production.

  5. Attachment extraction and re-upload

    We extract file paths from the Redmine attachments table, verify each file is accessible on the server or storage backend, download files in batches, and re-upload to Asana tasks via the Asana Attachments API. We match attachments to tasks by issue_id, preserve the original filename and content-type, and record the upload confirmation in the migration manifest. Any inaccessible files or path errors are logged for manual resolution.

  6. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Team and project structure first, then versions as milestones, then issues as tasks (with custom fields resolved from ID to label), then issue relations as Timeline dependencies, then time entries against tasks, then attachments. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. After all data is written, we run a dependency graph validation to flag any unresolved red arrows from the known Asana Timeline quirk.

  7. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We freeze Redmine writes during cutover, run a delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the workflow inventory document (documenting Redmine tracker permission restrictions and workflow state transitions for the admin to evaluate), the wiki HTML export, and the role matrix documentation. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Redmine workflows as Asana automations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Redmine 3.3 logo

Redmine 3.3

Source

Strengths

  • Zero licensing cost — fully open-source with no per-user or per-project fees regardless of team size
  • Flexible role-based access control with per-role, per-tracker permission restrictions introduced in 3.3
  • Multi-database support (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, SQL Server) for on-premises deployment flexibility
  • Integrated time tracking with activity categories and per-user, per-issue reporting
  • Native Gantt chart and calendar views built on issue start and due dates without plugins

Weaknesses

  • No built-in bulk import tool — data movement relies on CSV exports with manual sequencing or third-party plugins
  • REST API in 3.3 is read-oriented for most objects; write operations and bulk endpoints are limited or absent
  • Upgrading Redmine between major versions requires running database migrations that are not always reversible
  • The web UI is considered dated and unpolished compared to modern SaaS alternatives, increasing user onboarding friction
  • Plugin ecosystem is fragmented — many popular plugins are not compatible with newer Redmine major versions
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Redmine 3.3 and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Redmine 3.3: Not publicly documented — no published rate limit for self-hosted instances.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Redmine 3.3 doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Redmine 3.3 to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Redmine 3.3 to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Redmine 3.3 to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Redmine 3.3 to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 5,000 issues with no custom objects, minimal attachments, and no time entry migration. Migrations with large attachment volumes (over 10,000 files), extensive custom field configurations, time entry migration across many projects, or deep subproject hierarchies requiring manual Asana workspace design move to eight to twelve weeks. The primary time drivers are the custom field ID resolution work, the file extraction and re-upload pipeline for attachments, and the Asana workspace structure design.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Redmine 3.3.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day