Project Management migration

Migrate from Project KickStart to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Project KickStart and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Project KickStart logo

Project KickStart

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

92%

11 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Project KickStart and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Project KickStart is a Windows desktop application with no public API, so every migration begins with a CSV or XML export from the desktop client before any data enters Asana's API. We validate the export structure against the source file before loading, map Project KickStart's four-level outline hierarchy (Project, Phase, Task, SubTask) to Asana's Projects and Tasks with Sections for Phase-level groupings, and carry Goals, Obstacles, and Risks into custom fields rather than discarding them. Task Dependencies (finish-to-start, start-to-start) transfer via Asana's /tasks/{gid}/addDependencies endpoint using IDs resolved during migration. We do not migrate Project KickStart's Act! and Outlook calendar integration data because those sync records live outside the application data store. Automations and templates in Project KickStart do not have Asana equivalents as deployable code; we deliver a written inventory of these for your admin to rebuild in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Project KickStart logo

Project KickStart

What's pushing teams away

  • Project KickStart is Windows-only with no documented public API, and customers report feeling locked in once their project history grows, making migration a manual and time-intensive process.
  • As teams grow beyond planning into collaborative execution, resource management, and real-time status updates, Project KickStart's static Gantt-centric model no longer meets their needs.
  • The product has not published a public roadmap or active changelog, leaving long-term customers uncertain about continued development and future compatibility with modern operating systems.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Project KickStart objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Project KickStart object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Project KickStart

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart Project records map to Asana Projects with the project name, description, planned start and due dates, and cost fields transferred to their Asana equivalents. The source Project ID is stored in a custom text field project_kickstart_id__c for audit traceability. Project KickStart's Projects-as-folders model maps directly to Asana's project container without structural transformation.

Project KickStart

Phase

maps to

Asana

Section

1:many
Fully supported

Project KickStart Phase records within a Project map to Asana Sections within the corresponding Project. Each Phase becomes a Section header with its description stored as the Section's description field. Phases in Project KickStart represent a planning grouping (typically aligned to a project milestone or deliverable) rather than a standalone work unit, so the Section model in Asana is the closest structural equivalent. Phase-level dates do not map to Asana Section dates (Sections have no date fields); date context is preserved by anchoring the first and last task dates within each Section.

Project KickStart

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart Task records map directly to Asana Tasks. Task name, description, planned start date, due date, percent complete, estimated cost, and any custom task fields transfer to Asana Task fields. Assignee is resolved via email match against Asana workspace users at migration time. Tasks without a matching Asana user are flagged in the reconciliation report for reassignment before the task is committed.

Project KickStart

SubTask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart SubTask records map to Asana Subtasks (nested tasks) under the parent Task. SubTask name, description, dates, and assignee transfer directly. Asana supports up to 16 levels of nesting; Project KickStart's SubTask depth is typically one level, so the 1:1 mapping holds without flattening in most cases. SubTask-level custom fields map to custom fields on the subtask record in Asana.

Project KickStart

Goal

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (text)

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart Goal entries are a planning concept with no direct Asana equivalent. We preserve Goals as a multi-line text custom field (goal__c) on the Asana Project record. Goals contain project-level context, success criteria, and strategic alignment notes; we store them intact rather than splitting them into individual custom fields. Customers should verify that Asana's custom field capacity meets their Goal count and that project managers understand where to find this context post-migration.

Project KickStart

Obstacle and Risk

maps to

Asana

Task or Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart Obstacle and Risk entries map to either a dedicated Risk Task (with a custom field risk_type__c set to Obstacle or Risk) or to a custom multi-line text field on the Project, depending on the customer's scoping preference chosen during discovery. Risk title and description transfer directly. Risk links (associated tasks or milestones) are stored as text references in a risk_associated_tasks__c field. We do not create Asana's native Goals feature (a separate object at the organizational level) for Project KickStart Risks because the semantic meaning differs.

Project KickStart

Assignee

maps to

Asana

Assignee (User lookup)

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart task assignees (named team members) map to Asana assignee lookups by email address. We build a reconciliation table of every distinct assignee name in the export against the Asana workspace user list resolved at migration time. Assignees without a matching Asana user are flagged for the customer's admin to provision accounts or reassign before the task import phase begins. Active/inactive status is preserved where the destination supports it.

Project KickStart

Task Dependency

maps to

Asana

Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart explicit finish-to-start (FS) and start-to-start (SS) dependencies transfer to Asana via the POST /tasks/{gid}/addDependencies endpoint. We resolve source and destination task GIDs during migration, map Project KickStart FS to Asana DependentsEndpoint (task depends on predecessor), and store SS dependencies in a custom text field ss_dependency__c since Asana's native dependency model defaults to finish-to-start. Dependency chains are validated post-load to ensure no circular references were introduced during the transform.

Project KickStart

Note

maps to

Asana

Task comment or description

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart Notes at the Project, Phase, or Task level transfer to Asana Task comments (for task-level notes) or to the Project description field (for project-level notes). Notes are stored as plain text; rich formatting in the source export is preserved where the format is supported. Phase-level notes attach to the first task within that Phase's Section as a comment. We do not create separate Note objects in Asana because Asana does not have a standalone Note object at the project level outside of descriptions and comments.

Project KickStart

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart file attachments linked to Tasks and Projects transfer to Asana Attachments on the corresponding Task or Project record. We map the file path reference from the export to an uploaded file in Asana, preserving original filename and linked record. Customers must provide the actual attachment files alongside the export CSV; file references without corresponding files are logged as missing attachments in the reconciliation report. File path references are updated to reflect Asana's attachment storage location post-upload.

Project KickStart

Comment

maps to

Asana

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart comment log entries on Tasks map to Asana Task comments. Author name, comment text, and timestamp transfer directly. Asana does not support comment threading in the same structure as Project KickStart's log model; comments land in reverse-chronological order in the task's activity panel. Author is stored as the comment text prefix if no matching Asana user is found by email.

Project KickStart

Project Template

maps to

Asana

Project Template

1:1
Fully supported

Project KickStart Project Templates (outline structure with placeholder tasks and phases) export as Projects in the CSV. We recreate them in Asana as Asana Templates by saving the migrated Project as a Template in Asana. The template retains the Phase/Section structure, task outline, placeholder task names, and planned dates but not the original assignees (templates in Asana use placeholder data). Customers use the template to kick off new projects in Asana post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Project KickStart logo

Project KickStart gotchas

High

No public API requires manual export-based migration

Medium

Windows-only desktop client limits access patterns

Medium

Goal, Obstacle, and Risk data requires custom mapping

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • No API requires CSV export from the desktop client

    Project KickStart has no public REST or bulk API. All migration work begins with a CSV or XML export from the Windows desktop client. The customer must have a Windows environment available to generate the export file, and the export must include all Projects, Phases, Tasks, SubTasks, and custom fields they wish to migrate. We validate the export structure against the source data before any load begins. This manual export step is a prerequisite that adds 1-2 days to the scoping phase compared to API-driven migrations and cannot be automated by us.

  • Asana does not natively support Project KickStart Phase dates

    Asana Sections do not have date fields of their own, unlike Project KickStart Phases which carry planned start and end dates. We store Phase-level date context by anchoring the first task's start date and last task's due date within each Section, but stakeholders should understand that the Phase as a time-bound container has no direct representation in Asana. Customers who rely on Phase-level reporting in Project KickStart will need to rebuild Phase-level progress views in Asana using the Section-filtered task list or a Portfolio-level report.

  • Asana dependency model defaults to finish-to-start

    Project KickStart supports both finish-to-start (FS) and start-to-start (SS) dependency types. Asana's native /tasks/{gid}/addDependencies endpoint only supports finish-to-start (a task depends on its predecessor completing). Start-to-start dependencies require a custom field workaround: we store SS dependencies in a text field referencing the predecessor task GID and flag the tasks in the reconciliation report. Customers relying on SS dependencies should verify that their project methodology can accommodate FS-only in Asana or plan to use custom reporting to simulate SS logic.

  • Goal, Obstacle, and Risk data require custom field capacity planning

    Project KickStart's Goal, Obstacle, and Risk entries are preserved as custom fields in Asana rather than discarded. Asana's free and Basic tiers have lower custom field limits than Premium and Business. We confirm the custom field count during scoping and provision fields before migration. If the customer has a large number of Risk entries, the custom field approach may not scale well, and we discuss alternatives (such as creating a Risk register as a separate Project in Asana) during discovery.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Project KickStart to Asana data migration

  1. Export coordination and scoping

    We schedule a scoping session with the customer to confirm the export method (CSV or XML from the Project KickStart desktop client), identify all Projects to migrate, and inventory custom fields, Goals, Obstacles, Risks, and dependency types in use. We confirm Windows environment access for the export step and validate that the export covers all hierarchy levels (Project, Phase, Task, SubTask). The scoping output is a written migration scope document with record counts per object type, a custom field inventory, and a list of any attachments that must be provided as separate files.

  2. Asana workspace and schema preparation

    We configure the destination Asana workspace before data loads begin. This includes provisioning custom fields (goal__c, risk_type__c, risk_description__c, ss_dependency__c, project_kickstart_id__c, task_kickstart_id__c), creating a project template in Asana for any Project KickStart Project Templates, and setting up the dependency lookup table. We also configure Asana user permissions to ensure the migration user has task creation and custom field write access. All schema work happens in the customer's Asana workspace or a designated sandbox project before production data loads.

  3. Export validation and data transformation

    We validate the customer's Project KickStart export file against the source data, checking for truncation in long text fields, missing dates on tasks, orphaned SubTasks (SubTask without a parent Task), and circular dependency references. We build a transformation pipeline that maps each Project KickStart hierarchy level to its Asana equivalent, resolves Phase dates to Section-anchored task dates, and splits Goals/Obstacles/Risks into custom fields. The validation report is shared with the customer before the load begins.

  4. Asynchronous task creation with dependency resolution

    We create Projects and Sections first, then Tasks in parent-first order (Projects, then Phases/Sections, then Tasks, then SubTasks) to satisfy Asana's workspace hierarchy requirements. Dependencies are resolved in a second pass: after all tasks have GIDs assigned, we POST to /tasks/{gid}/addDependencies for each finish-to-start dependency using the resolved GID pairs. Start-to-start dependencies are written to the ss_dependency__c custom field. We use exponential backoff on Asana's API responses (1500 calls per minute on paid tiers) and chunk batches to avoid rate limit errors.

  5. Attachment and comment migration

    After all tasks are created, we migrate attachments by uploading files to Asana and linking them to the corresponding Task or Project record. Comments from Project KickStart are posted to the Asana task comment stream in chronological order. Attachments without corresponding files in the customer-provided upload package are logged as missing in the reconciliation report. We do not migrate Act! or Outlook calendar sync records because those entries do not reside in Project KickStart's own data store.

  6. Reconciliation, validation, and automation handoff

    We run a full reconciliation comparing record counts per object type, spot-checking 25-50 tasks against the source Project KickStart export to verify field-level accuracy. We deliver the Goals, Obstacles, Risks, and dependency status in a written handoff document. We do not migrate Project KickStart's implicit planning automations (such as auto-scheduling triggers) as Asana Rules; we document the planning behavior observed in Project KickStart and the recommended Asana Rules equivalents for the customer's admin to implement post-migration.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Project KickStart logo

Project KickStart

Source

Strengths

  • Wizard-led planning interface reduces planning anxiety for non-project-manager users
  • Gantt chart generation with explicit task dependencies from the outset
  • Project templates with drag-and-drop libraries for repeatable project structures
  • Act! and Outlook calendar integration for teams already in the Act! ecosystem
  • Targeted at regulated industries with structured, auditable project planning requirements

Weaknesses

  • No public API or documented export endpoint—data extraction relies entirely on the desktop client
  • Desktop-only application with no cloud or cross-platform access
  • Waterfall-only methodology does not serve teams using Agile, Scrum, or hybrid approaches
  • Limited collaboration features once the plan is created—no real-time status updates or team feeds
  • No visible product roadmap or public changelog, raising long-term viability concerns
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Project KickStart and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Project KickStart: Not applicable — no programmatic API surface published.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Project KickStart doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Project KickStart to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Project KickStart to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Project KickStart to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Project KickStart to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 2,000 tasks and 50 projects land in three to five weeks. Migrations exceeding 5,000 tasks, 200 projects, or that include Goals and Risk data mapped to custom fields move to seven to ten weeks because of the CSV validation layer, custom field provisioning, and dependency resolution work. The export step from Project KickStart (requiring a Windows environment and manual file generation) adds one to two days to the scoping phase that is not present in API-driven migrations.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Project KickStart.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day