Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Conceptboard and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.
Conceptboard
Source
Microsoft Project
Destination
Compatibility
9 of 11
objects map 1:1 between Conceptboard and Microsoft Project.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Conceptboard is a visual collaboration whiteboard designed for EU enterprises and regulated industries that need GDPR compliance, audit trails, and EU data residency. Microsoft Project is a structured project management and scheduling tool built around Gantt charts, task dependencies, resource allocation, and earned value metrics. These are fundamentally different tools: Conceptboard is for freeform brainstorming and workshop facilitation, while Microsoft Project is for formal project execution, tracking, and reporting. Migrating from one to the other is a transformation, not a record copy, because the data model concepts do not map one-to-one. We run guided export sessions with the customer to extract Board and Project content as PDF and PNG files, then manually extract task titles, descriptions, assignments, and milestones from those exports with customer subject-matter-expert review. We map Conceptboard Project containers to Microsoft Project project plans, Conceptboard section outlines to MS Project summary tasks or phases, and Conceptboard user accounts to MS Project resource records. We do not migrate facilitator tools, voting sessions, board history, approval workflows, or audit logs because these are process artifacts with no Microsoft Project equivalent. We deliver a written inventory of any board-level configurations requiring manual rebuild in MS Project.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Conceptboard object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Conceptboard
Board
Microsoft Project
Project
1:1Each Conceptboard Board maps to a separate Microsoft Project plan (.mpp file or Project Online project). Because Conceptboard has no API, we run guided export sessions to produce a PDF and PNG of each board, which the customer subject-matter expert reviews to confirm the board's purpose and content. We create the MS Project plan with the board name as the project name, board creation date as the project start date, and board description as the project summary notes. Board visual layout does not carry forward; the MS Project plan is a structured schedule reconstructed from the board's content.
Conceptboard
Project
Microsoft Project
Project Summary Task or Enterprise Project
1:1Conceptboard Projects are containers grouping Boards. If a Conceptboard Project contains multiple boards representing phases of a single initiative, we consolidate those boards into one MS Project plan with summary tasks per board. If boards within a Conceptboard Project represent independent initiatives, we create separate MS Project plans linked by a SharePoint hub site or Project Online Project Professional site. Starter tier limits active projects to 5, so we scope the full project list (including archived) during discovery to avoid missing content.
Conceptboard
Section
Microsoft Project
Summary Task
1:manyConceptboard Sections subdivide a board visually. We treat each section as a summary task in MS Project, with its title as the task name and any sub-items within the section as subtasks. Section order is preserved by setting task outline numbers sequentially. Sections with no sub-items become placeholder summary tasks with a note indicating they were originally board sections.
Conceptboard
Tasks
Microsoft Project
Task
1:1Conceptboard's built-in task feature (checklist items, task cards, or milestones on a board) maps directly to MS Project tasks. We extract task titles, assignees (mapped to MS Project resources by email), due dates (mapped to task Start and Finish dates), and completion status (mapped to % Complete). Task descriptions from Conceptboard become MS Project task notes. Custom task fields in Conceptboard map to custom fields in MS Project.
Conceptboard
Milestones
Microsoft Project
Milestone
1:1Conceptboard milestones (if used on boards with the task feature) map to MS Project milestones (task with zero duration and Milestone = Yes). We preserve milestone names and target dates exactly. Milestone dependencies are reconstructed from the board's section order or any explicitly drawn connectors if visible in the exported content.
Conceptboard
User
Microsoft Project
Resource
1:1Conceptboard licensed users map to MS Project resources. We separate licensed users (per-seat) from guest accounts (free, unregistered) and create only licensed users as resources in MS Project. Guest collaborators without Conceptboard accounts do not get resource records. Resource booking kind defaults to Work. Customers using Project Online with enterprise resource management map Conceptboard users to the enterprise resource pool by email match.
Conceptboard
Attachment
Microsoft Project
Document (SharePoint or Project Attachments)
1:1Files attached to a Conceptboard board are downloaded individually and re-attached to the corresponding MS Project plan. Project Online attachments store in the associated SharePoint document library; Project Desktop attachments store in the project folder. We preserve original filenames and attempt to attach to the relevant task if the attachment context is identifiable from the board export. Attachments without clear task context are added as project-level documents.
Conceptboard
Template
Microsoft Project
Project Template
lossyConceptboard templates (personal and team-shared) are migrated as standard boards in MS Project. We note which boards were templates versus production boards so the customer can extract a project template from the exported board structure. MS Project does not have a native template library for Project Online plans, but SharePoint document libraries can store .mpt template files for Project Desktop users.
Conceptboard
Comment
Microsoft Project
Task Note
1:1Conceptboard comments on board elements are captured in the PDF export as text but are not available as structured data. We record the comment count per board as a quality indicator and include comment content in the board-level PDF that becomes the project documentation. If individual task comments are identifiable from the board layout, we add them as task notes in MS Project. Comment authors map to task notes with a [Comment by Name] prefix.
Conceptboard
Board History
Microsoft Project
Not migratable
1:1Board history (Advanced+ tier) records version snapshots of a board over time. This is an audit artifact with no Microsoft Project equivalent. MS Project stores task history as a basic change log but not version snapshots of the entire plan. We document whether boards had active history tracking and flag this as a governance feature the customer will lose. The customer may export board history as PDF before migration if historical versions are required for record-keeping.
Conceptboard
Approval Workflow
Microsoft Project
Not migratable
1:1Approval workflows (Corporate & Government tier) are process state artifacts. Microsoft Project does not have a native board-level approval workflow; approvals are handled via SharePoint Power Automate workflows or external tools. We flag whether any boards had active approval workflows at migration time and deliver a written recommendation for rebuilding approvals as Power Automate flows or as SharePoint approval steps attached to the project site.
| Conceptboard | Microsoft Project | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Project | Project Summary Task or Enterprise Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Section | Summary Task1:many | Fully supported | |
| Tasks | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Milestones | Milestone1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User | Resource1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Document (SharePoint or Project Attachments)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Template | Project Templatelossy | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Task Note1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Board History | Not migratable1:1 | Not supported | |
| Approval Workflow | Not migratable1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Conceptboard gotchas
No public API means migration relies entirely on PDF/PNG export
One-way import to Miro is PDF-only and non-editable
Starter plan limits active projects to 5, blocking full workspace migration
Board history and approval workflows are tier-gated and not migratable
Microsoft Project gotchas
Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner
Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling
Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client
Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365
Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and board inventory
We run a scoping session with the customer to enumerate all Conceptboard projects and boards (including archived boards on Starter tier), identify which boards contain task/milestone content versus pure visual reference, and confirm the customer subject-matter experts who will review exported boards for task extraction. We also capture the Conceptboard tier (Starter/Advanced/Corporate) to identify which features require explicit flagging, map licensed user counts to MS Project resource counts, and confirm the destination Project SKU (Project Online Plan 1-3, Project for the Web/Planner, or Project Desktop). The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing every board to migrate, its priority, and the estimated extraction complexity.
Guided export sessions
We conduct live export sessions with the customer, exporting Conceptboard boards as PDF and PNG files using the Export Board feature. We export boards in batches grouped by Conceptboard Project, capturing both the full-board export and individual section exports where sections correspond to MS Project summary tasks. We also download all board attachments during this phase. Each exported board is paired with a review request sent to the customer's designated SME, who identifies which visual elements map to tasks, milestones, or deliverables in MS Project. We do not attempt to run these exports unattended because Conceptboard's manual-only export requires UI interaction.
Task extraction and transformation
We extract task data from the exported boards using the customer's SME review as the authoritative source for mapping visual content to structured tasks. For each board, we produce a task list with task name, description, assigned resource (by email match to Conceptboard user), start date, finish date, duration, and milestone flag. Dates are derived from the board's content if present, or estimated from the Conceptboard project creation date. We preserve section hierarchy as MS Project outline levels. We flag any task items that appear in the board but lack sufficient detail to create a proper MS Project task and escalate to the customer for clarification.
Resource mapping and provisioning
We map Conceptboard licensed users to MS Project resources by email. We separate guest accounts (no Conceptboard license) from licensed users and create only the latter as resources. If the destination is Project Online with an enterprise resource pool, we match Conceptboard users to the resource pool by email lookup. Resource booking kind defaults to Work, and we note any Conceptboard users who should be mapped as material or cost resources based on the customer's project type.
MS Project plan creation and bulk import
We create MS Project plans in the destination environment (Project Online via REST API, or Project Desktop as .mpp files for local delivery). For Project Online, we use the PWA REST API to provision projects, add tasks with the extracted task data, set task calendars and dependencies, assign resources, and set milestones. For Project Desktop, we use the MS Project Object Library or direct XML/MPP manipulation to create project plans. Each Conceptboard Project becomes one MS Project plan, or multiple plans if the customer's SMEs determine that the board contents warrant separate project structures. We attach exported board files as project documents in the associated SharePoint library or project folder.
Reconciliation, delivery, and automation handoff
We deliver a reconciliation report comparing the extracted task count, milestone count, resource count, and attachment count against the source Conceptboard inventory. We deliver the MS Project plans in the destination environment (Project Online or as .mpp files), the exported PDF/PNG board files, and a written board-to-project mapping document showing which board maps to which MS Project plan. We do not migrate facilitator tools, voting sessions, board history, approval workflows, or audit logs. We deliver a written inventory of facilitator-mode boards and approval workflows with recommendations for rebuilding as Power Automate flows or separate facilitation tools. We support a one-week post-delivery reconciliation window for record count discrepancies.
Platform deep dives
Conceptboard
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Microsoft Project
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Conceptboard and Microsoft Project.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Conceptboard: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Conceptboard doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Conceptboard to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Conceptboard to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Conceptboard
Other ways to arrive at Microsoft Project
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.