Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Conceptboard and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.
Conceptboard
Source
Trello
Destination
Compatibility
8 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Conceptboard and Trello.
Complexity
CModerate
Timeline
2-4 weeks
Overview
Moving from Conceptboard to Trello is a structural translation: Conceptboard is an infinite visual canvas built around spatial collaboration and governance workflows; Trello is a Kanban card system built around temporal task progression. There is no Conceptboard public API, so every migration relies on guided PDF and PNG export sessions to extract board content, followed by manual or assisted reconstruction of sticky notes, text elements, and sections as Trello cards, lists, and board descriptions. We preserve attachment files and map task and milestone data to Trello cards with due dates and labels, but we do not migrate Facilitator Tools (freeze frame, voting, structured meeting modes), approval workflows, board history, or audit logs because Trello has no equivalent schema. We deliver a written inventory of these unrecoverable features after scoping so your admin knows exactly what governance capabilities require manual re-implementation in Trello or its Power-Up ecosystem.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Conceptboard object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Conceptboard
Project
Trello
Workspace or Board group
1:1Conceptboard Projects containing Boards map to Trello Workspaces at the top level, or to board groups within a single Workspace for smaller migrations. Starter-plan organisations are limited to 5 active projects; archived projects require manual navigation to the Archive section before export. We query the full project list during discovery to identify both active and archived projects, then export each in project order to preserve the workspace hierarchy in Trello Workspace or board naming conventions.
Conceptboard
Board
Trello
Board
1:1Each Conceptboard Board becomes a Trello Board. Board name, creation date, and any board-level description text migrate as board metadata. Conceptboard's visual spatial layout (x-y coordinates of sticky notes, sections, and connectors) cannot be preserved as structured data; we export each board as PDF for archival reference and extract visible text into Trello card titles and list names. Sections within a Conceptboard Board map to Trello Lists in the destination Board.
Conceptboard
Section
Trello
List
1:1Conceptboard Sections subdivide a Board spatially and can be exported individually. We map each Section to a Trello List within the destination Board, preserving the section name as the list name. If a Section contains sub-sections, we flatten the hierarchy into Trello Lists or, if the customer requests, into a nested card structure using checklist headers.
Conceptboard
Sticky Note
Trello
Card
1:manyConceptboard sticky notes are individual text objects on a board. Each sticky note becomes a Trello Card with its text content as the card title. Sticky notes that contain multi-paragraph content or mixed formatting are split: title takes the first line, remaining content is placed in the card description. Sticky note author and creation timestamp are preserved in a card comment for audit. Colour-coded sticky notes map to Trello Labels.
Conceptboard
Text Box
Trello
Card description or Board/List description
lossyConceptboard text boxes that are not sticky notes (e.g., explanatory labels, callouts, embedded instructions) are extracted as text and placed either in Trello card descriptions (if they annotate a specific sticky note or section item) or in Board descriptions (if they describe the board as a whole). We extract all visible text from board-level text boxes during PDF review and map them contextually.
Conceptboard
Attachment
Trello
Card Attachment
1:1Files uploaded to a Conceptboard Board via the Attachments dialog are downloaded individually and re-uploaded to the equivalent Trello Card. We preserve filenames, original upload dates, and uploader attribution. Trello Standard tier supports 250 MB attachments per file; files exceeding this limit on Free (10 MB) or Standard boards require alternative storage with a link placed on the card. We flag oversized files during scoping.
Conceptboard
Task
Trello
Card with due date
1:1Conceptboard tasks attached to boards map to Trello Cards with due dates migrated from the task deadline. Assignee mapping resolves Conceptboard task owners to Trello members by email. Task descriptions migrate as card descriptions, and task checklists migrate as Trello checklists on the same card. Standalone Conceptboard tasks not attached to a specific board are placed in a designated backlog Trello Board.
Conceptboard
Milestone
Trello
Card with label or due date
lossyConceptboard milestones with dates map to Trello Cards with the milestone date as a due date and a Milestone label. Milestones with no date map to a card with a Milestone label and no due date. We do not map milestones to a separate Trello object because Trello has no native milestone concept; customers using Power-Ups for roadmapping (such as BigPicture or Elegance) can reconstruct milestone groupings post-migration.
Conceptboard
Template
Trello
Board Template
lossyConceptboard personal and team-shared templates (Advanced+ feature) migrate as standard Trello Boards marked with a Template label. We do not migrate template-as-a-template functionality because Conceptboard template metadata is not structured data; the board content itself transfers as a board that the customer copies manually in Trello to create new boards.
Conceptboard
User
Trello
Member
1:1Conceptboard licensed users map to Trello members by email address. Guest users (unregistered collaborators who do not consume paid seats in Conceptboard) are mapped to Trello members on the Free tier if the board membership model allows, or flagged as collaborators to be re-invited manually in Trello after migration. We separate the licensed-user and guest-user populations during user scoping to determine the target Trello seat count.
Conceptboard
Comment
Trello
Card comment
1:1Conceptboard comments on sticky notes and board elements are captured during the PDF export review and migrated as Trello card comments on the corresponding card. We preserve comment author, timestamp, and content text. Comment threading structure in Conceptboard (replies to comments) maps to flat card comments in Trello, preserving the chronological order of the original thread as a series of sequential comments.
Conceptboard
Board History
Trello
None
1:1Board history is an Advanced+ audit feature recording version snapshots of a board over time. It is not user content and has no equivalent schema in Trello. We do not migrate version history. We document whether boards had Board History enabled at migration time so customers understand which audit capability is being lost and can evaluate Trello Power-Ups that provide version-like tracking if required.
| Conceptboard | Trello | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Workspace or Board group1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Board | Board1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Section | List1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Sticky Note | Card1:many | Fully supported | |
| Text Box | Card description or Board/List descriptionlossy | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Card Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Card with due date1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Milestone | Card with label or due datelossy | Fully supported | |
| Template | Board Templatelossy | Fully supported | |
| User | Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Card comment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Board History | None1:1 | Not supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Conceptboard gotchas
No public API means migration relies entirely on PDF/PNG export
One-way import to Miro is PDF-only and non-editable
Starter plan limits active projects to 5, blocking full workspace migration
Board history and approval workflows are tier-gated and not migratable
Trello gotchas
Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint
Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData
API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration
Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership
Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and plan audit
We audit the Conceptboard account across Starter, Advanced, and Corporate tiers to count active and archived projects, identify boards with facilitator tools or approval workflows in use, record attachment counts and file size distribution, and map the licensed-user versus guest-user populations. We document every approval workflow and facilitator mode that was active at scoping time so these can be written into the inventory document. We also identify which boards are candidates for full reconstruction versus PDF archival, based on content complexity and the customer's preference for fidelity versus cost.
Mapping design
We design the Conceptboard-to-Trello mapping: each Conceptboard Project becomes a Trello Workspace; each Board becomes a Trello Board; each Section becomes a Trello List; sticky notes become Trello Cards with colour-to-label mapping; tasks and milestones become cards with due dates and milestone labels; text boxes become card descriptions or board descriptions; comments become card comments. We confirm the mapping design with the customer before any export sessions begin, including a walkthrough of how a sample board will look in Trello so expectations are set on visual fidelity.
Guided export sessions
Because Conceptboard has no API, we conduct live guided export sessions with the customer. We export each board as PDF (for archival reference) and as individual section PNGs where the layout is recoverable. We download all files from the Attachments dialog per board. The export order follows the project hierarchy discovered in Step 1, and we mark each board as exported in our tracking sheet. If the customer has archived projects on a Starter plan, we schedule time for the customer to access the Archive section and export those boards before the migration session concludes.
Test migration into Trello
We run a test migration into a Trello workspace using a representative sample of five to ten boards. We validate that sticky notes appear as cards in the correct lists, that attachments upload without size errors, that due dates on milestone cards are correct, and that comments land on the right cards. We share the test workspace with the customer for review and note any mapping corrections before proceeding to production. This step also confirms the customer's Trello plan level and identifies whether Custom Field configuration is needed.
Production migration
We migrate boards in batches, following the dependency order: Workspace structure first (Workspaces and boards created before any cards), then lists, then cards from sticky notes, then attachments uploaded per card, then card comments, then milestone cards with due dates, then tasks from the backlog board. Each batch emits a row-count reconciliation report. Attachments exceeding Trello Free tier limits (10 MB) are flagged and placed as external links on the card with a reference to the Conceptboard PDF export for the original file.
Cutover, validation, and rebuild handoff
We freeze Conceptboard write access during cutover and perform a final delta export of any content added since the last export session. We validate Trello board completeness against the export checklist, attach the Conceptboard PDF exports as board descriptions or as a pinned card for archival reference, then hand over Trello as the system of record. We deliver the written inventory of unrecoverable features (facilitator tools, approval workflows, board history, audit logs) with recommended Trello Power-Ups for rebuilding approval and facilitation workflows. We offer a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues.
Platform deep dives
Conceptboard
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Trello
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Moderate Project Management migration. 4 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Moderate migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Conceptboard and Trello.
Object compatibility
4 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Conceptboard: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Conceptboard doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Conceptboard to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Conceptboard to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Conceptboard
Other ways to arrive at Trello
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.