HRMS migration

Migrate from Betterteam to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Betterteam and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Betterteam logo

Betterteam

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Betterteam and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Betterteam to Bullhorn is a migration from a job-posting-centric platform with per-application candidate storage to a candidate-centric ATS with a full CRM layer. Betterteam treats each application as a standalone candidate record; Bullhorn consolidates all applications by a candidate into one unified profile. We deduplicate by email address during extraction and reconstruct the consolidated Candidate record in Bullhorn before inserting any applications against it. Betterteam exposes no documented public API, so we extract via the platform's CSV export and parsed application exports, then validate record counts against Bullhorn's entity limits before import. Careers page content from Betterteam's rendered HTML is extracted separately and rebuilt as Bullhorn job postings with clean descriptions. Workflows, job board distribution mappings, and Betterteam's automated screening features do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Bullhorn.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Betterteam logo

Betterteam

What's pushing teams away

  • Limited ATS functionality—Betterteam lacks pipeline stages, interview scheduling, offer management, and onboarding tools that growing teams eventually need.
  • Lower candidate volume per posting compared to premium platforms like ZipRecruiter or LinkedIn, frustrating hiring managers who need faster fills.
  • No robust screening or filtering automation; unqualified candidates still reach the review queue, increasing sorting workload for recruiters.
  • Scales awkwardly—adding headcount does not increase hiring capacity, but plan upgrades cost significantly more for modest job-post increases.
  • Customer support responsiveness declines for non-Enterprise tiers, with solo operators reporting slow ticket resolution during critical hiring periods.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How Betterteam objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a Betterteam object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Betterteam

Job

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

Betterteam Jobs map to Bullhorn JobOrder records. Job title, description, requirements, location, department, employment type, and status migrate directly. Betterteam job status (active, closed, draft, expiring) maps to Bullhorn JobOrder status values (Open, Interviewing, Offered, Filled, Closed). The job's posting date and expiration date migrate to Bullhorn date fields. JobOrder RecordType and JobOwner are resolved during import, with the Bullhorn OwnerId assigned from the user mapping step.

Betterteam

Candidate

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:many
Fully supported

Betterteam stores candidate data per-application rather than as unified profiles. A candidate who applied to three different jobs appears as three separate records in Betterteam. We deduplicate by email address, merging all applications into a single Bullhorn Candidate record. The Bullhorn Candidate record becomes the parent for all subsequent JobSubmission records. Name, email, phone, location, current employer, and linkedinUrl migrate from the best non-null field across duplicate source records. Skills, certifications, and employment history stored as structured fields in Betterteam map to Bullhorn Candidate custom fields where available.

Betterteam

Application

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobSubmission

1:1
Fully supported

Betterteam Applications map to Bullhorn JobSubmission records, which link a Candidate to a JobOrder. Each JobSubmission inherits the CandidateId from the merged candidate record and the JobOrderId from the mapped job. Application status in Betterteam (new, reviewed, liked, declined) maps to Bullhorn JobSubmission status values (New, Submitted, Interview, Offer, Hired, Rejected). Submission date and last-updated timestamp preserve on the JobSubmission record. The source job board attribution (Betterteam's board-level source only) migrates to a custom field on JobSubmission.

Betterteam

Candidate Rating

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Rating

1:1
Fully supported

Betterteam star ratings (1-5 scale) applied to candidates migrate to Bullhorn's Candidate rating field. Each rating carries a reviewer user attribution and timestamp that we map to Bullhorn's rating metadata fields where supported. If the candidate received multiple ratings across applications, we record the aggregate average as the primary rating and note the count of reviews.

Betterteam

Candidate Note

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Note

1:1
Fully supported

Betterteam reviewer notes attach to candidate records and include free-text content, author attribution, and timestamp. We import notes as Bullhorn Note records linked to the consolidated Candidate via ContentDocumentLink. Author attribution is preserved in the Note body and via a custom field mapping to the Bullhorn User who authored the original note, resolved by email match against the Bullhorn User table. Chronological ordering is preserved by the Note CreatedDate.

Betterteam

Attachment

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Resume (parsed) + ContentDocument

1:1
Fully supported

Resume and cover letter files attached to Betterteam applications are downloaded and re-uploaded to Bullhorn as ContentDocument records linked to the Candidate. Bullhorn's built-in resume parsing extracts candidate name, email, phone, skills, work history, and education from the uploaded resume and populates the corresponding Bullhorn Candidate fields automatically. We flag any file naming convention differences and any unsupported file formats for manual review.

Betterteam

Careers Page

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder (enhanced)

lossy
Fully supported

Betterteam generates hosted careers pages as rendered HTML rather than exposing a structured API. We extract the visible job listing content, company branding text, and page URL from the rendered page and reconstruct this as Bullhorn JobOrder records with full description fields populated. Any content that cannot be parsed from HTML (hiring manager, compensation range, urgency flags) is flagged for manual verification before the Bullhorn career portal goes live.

Betterteam

Owner (User)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

User

1:1
Fully supported

Betterteam does not have a structured user management layer equivalent to Bullhorn's. Reviewers who liked, rated, or commented on candidates are treated as Owner candidates. We resolve Betterteam reviewer emails against the Bullhorn User table. Any reviewer without a matching Bullhorn User is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Bullhorn requires every Candidate and JobOrder to have an OwnerId at insert time.

Betterteam

Job Board Distribution

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobBoardPosting (not migrated)

1:1
Not supported

Betterteam's job board posting integrations (100+ boards including Indeed, ZipRecruiter, and LinkedIn) are managed server-side and are not exposed in exportable data or API fields. The mapping of which job was posted to which board, when, and with what content does not migrate. We flag this as an item for the customer's admin to reconfigure manually in Bullhorn's career portal distribution settings and Bullhorn's 350+ AppExchange partner integrations post-migration.

Betterteam

Custom Properties

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Betterteam plans do not include a structured custom field API, but teams sometimes store custom data in job description text, free-text notes, or third-party-integrated fields. We audit all Betterteam data for structured-looking content (key-value pairs in descriptions, formatted note sections) and map any identifiable custom properties to Bullhorn Custom Fields on the appropriate entity (Candidate, JobOrder, JobSubmission). Custom Fields on Bullhorn ATS require field mapping setup in Admin > Field Mappings before import.

Betterteam

Placement

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Placement

lossy
Fully supported

Betterteam does not have a placement tracking module. Teams that need to track candidate placements, assignments, and start dates must configure Bullhorn Placements after migration. We do not create Placement records from Betterteam source data, but we document the Bullhorn Placement data model (Candidate, JobOrder, ClientCorporation, StartDate, EndDate, PayRate, BillRate) so the customer's Bullhorn admin can begin recording placements from the migration date forward.

Betterteam

Lead

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Lead

lossy
Fully supported

Bullhorn treats Leads as a separate pipeline from Candidates for prospects who have not yet submitted a formal application. Betterteam does not have a Lead object; all applicant-trackable records are Jobs, Candidates, and Applications. We configure Bullhorn's Lead object for any pipeline records the customer creates after migration and document the Lead-to-Candidate conversion workflow for cases where a prospect contacts the team outside of a formal Betterteam-tracked application.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Betterteam logo

Betterteam gotchas

Medium

Job post cap enforces active posts only, not total monthly posts

Medium

Candidate limits on lower tiers cap monthly intake

Low

Careers pages are rendered HTML, not structured data

Low

Application source attribution is job-board level only

Low

Yearly billing requires cancellation to stop auto-renewal

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • Betterteam has no public API — data extraction relies on CSV exports

    Betterteam does not publish a public REST or GraphQL API. All data extraction requires CSV exports from the Betterteam dashboard, application-level exports, and where necessary, parsing of rendered HTML from careers pages. We cannot perform real-time validation queries against Betterteam during migration; extraction is a batch process. We plan for this by requesting complete dataset exports during scoping, running a full reconciliation before import, and scheduling a delta export for the cutover window. If exports are incomplete or passwords have changed, we flag this before migration begins.

  • Per-application candidate deduplication is required before Bullhorn insert

    Betterteam stores a candidate's data separately under each application. A candidate who applied to three jobs appears as three records with potentially different names, emails, and note content. Bullhorn expects one Candidate record per person. We deduplicate by email address during extraction, merging the most complete record per candidate into a unified profile. Any email address collisions with different names are flagged for manual resolution before import. Bullhorn's Candidate entity does not support duplicate records without creating data integrity issues in reporting and matching.

  • Bullhorn requires OwnerId on Candidate and JobOrder at insert

    Every Bullhorn Candidate and JobOrder record must have an OwnerId pointing to a valid Bullhorn User. Betterteam has no equivalent structured user table, and team members are identified by email on notes and ratings. We resolve Betterteam reviewer and posting-user emails to Bullhorn User records during the User mapping step. Any email without a Bullhorn User match is held for admin provisioning. Bullhorn will reject records submitted without a valid OwnerId, causing the import batch to fail silently if not handled.

  • Bullhorn Custom Objects are edition-gated and have field limits

    Bullhorn ATS supports 2 Custom Objects per entity; Bullhorn ATS Growth and Enterprise support 10. Each Custom Object supports up to 55 fields, with limits on how many can be drop-down, text, or picker types. If the customer has structured data in Betterteam (certifications, compliance fields, emergency contacts) that maps to custom objects, we validate the destination Bullhorn edition during scoping. Custom Object setup in Bullhorn requires a support ticket with a completed Custom Object Setup Sheet; we handle this coordination before the data migration phase begins.

  • Careers page content is rendered HTML with no structured schema

    Betterteam's hosted careers pages are generated as rendered HTML rather than a structured careers API response. Job titles, descriptions, requirements, and branding content are visible but not delivered as field-level structured data. We extract visible content from the rendered page, which may miss metadata like salary ranges, hiring urgency flags, or internal job codes. We flag any content gaps for the customer's Bullhorn admin to verify and complete manually before the Bullhorn career portal publishes.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Betterteam to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Scoped extraction and deduplication design

    We audit the Betterteam account across all plan tiers, extracting Jobs (active and closed), Candidates, Applications, Ratings, Notes, and Attachments. We run an initial email-deduplication pass to establish the merged candidate count and flag any email collisions with different name data for manual resolution. We count unique Jobs, unique merged Candidates, unique Applications, and note attachment file formats. The output is a migration scope document with record counts, a deduplication strategy, and a Bullhorn edition recommendation based on custom object requirements.

  2. Source data extraction

    We extract data from Betterteam via CSV exports from the Jobs, Candidates, and Applications dashboards, and via application-level exports for notes and ratings. Careers page HTML is scraped from Betterteam's hosted careers URL for each active job. Resume and cover letter attachments are downloaded via authenticated session and organized by candidate email. We validate extracted row counts against the Betterteam dashboard totals and flag any discrepancies before transformation begins. If Betterteam account access is at risk due to a pending cancellation, we prioritize completing extraction before the billing date.

  3. Schema design and custom field configuration in Bullhorn

    We configure the Bullhorn destination schema before any data import. This includes setting up JobOrder RecordTypes and Sales Processes for each job category, configuring Custom Fields on Candidate and JobOrder for any migrated custom properties, and ensuring the migration user has the required Bullhorn REST API permissions and Bulk API access. Bullhorn's Admin > Field Mappings section is configured for any custom text, picklist, or date fields that carry Betterteam data. Bullhorn Support is contacted to request Custom Object setup if the edition requires it.

  4. Transformation and deduplication

    We run the deduplication transform in a staging environment, merging Betterteam's per-application candidate records into unified Bullhorn Candidate records keyed by email. For each merged candidate, we preserve the most complete name, phone, email, and location field across source records. Application history is rebuilt as JobSubmission records attached to the unified Candidate. Notes and ratings are linked to the merged candidate. The transformation output is a reconciled dataset with record counts validated against the extraction totals.

  5. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Bullhorn Sandbox environment to validate the data, test field mapping, and confirm that OwnerId lookups resolve correctly. The customer's Bullhorn admin reviews a random sample of migrated records against the Betterteam source, validates that deduplication produced the expected candidate count, and confirms that job descriptions and application histories are intact. Any mapping corrections are applied to the transformation logic before production migration begins.

  6. Production migration and cutover

    We run the production migration in dependency order: Bullhorn Users (validated), JobOrders (with RecordType and JobOwner resolved), Candidates (merged and deduplicated), JobSubmissions (linked to CandidateId and JobOrderId), Notes (linked via ContentDocumentLink), and Attachments (parsed resumes and uploaded files). We freeze writes in Betterteam during the cutover window, extract a final delta of any records modified since the initial export, apply it, then hand off to Bullhorn. We deliver the written inventory of workflows, job board distribution mappings, and any screening automation for the customer's admin to rebuild.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Betterteam logo

Betterteam

Source

Strengths

  • Flat-rate job-based pricing with no per-user fees keeps costs predictable for small teams.
  • One-click distribution to 100+ job boards including Indeed, ZipRecruiter, and LinkedIn.
  • Simple interface requires no training or IT support to operate on day one.
  • 50% yearly discount makes annual plans significantly more affordable for budget-conscious SMBs.
  • Multicurrency billing in 105 currencies supports international hiring teams.

Weaknesses

  • Not a full ATS—lacks pipeline stages, interview scheduling, and onboarding workflows.
  • Job-based billing caps hiring volume; teams needing 5-10 concurrent open roles quickly outgrow low tiers.
  • Lower candidate volume per posting compared to premium job boards and competing ATS platforms.
  • No public API documentation found; external integrations and automated migrations require reverse-engineering.
  • Candidate screening and filtering features are minimal, requiring manual review of unqualified applicants.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Betterteam and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Betterteam and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Betterteam and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Betterteam: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Betterteam doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Betterteam to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Betterteam to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Betterteam to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Betterteam to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations complete in two to four weeks for accounts with up to 500 active jobs, 5,000 deduplicated candidates, and 10,000 applications. Migrations with high candidate deduplication volume, careers page HTML extraction across many listings, or Bullhorn editions with Middle Office integration move to six to ten weeks. Bullhorn's own onboarding through Bullhorn Launch (included with all tiers) runs in parallel and typically reaches initial operational status within two weeks.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Betterteam.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day