HRMS migration

Migrate from TRAFFIT to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TRAFFIT and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

TRAFFIT logo

TRAFFIT

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between TRAFFIT and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from TRAFFIT to Bullhorn is a lateral-record migration with two structural gaps teams must resolve before data moves: TRAFFIT's candidate activity timeline (calls logged, notes, stage-change events, internal comments) does not export via API or XLS, and TRAFFIT's extended API requires a paid add-on that we confirm during scoping. We scope TRAFFIT objects with stable export paths — candidate profiles, applications, jobs, adverts, CRM persons, tags, and GDPR consents — and map each to its Bullhorn equivalent (Candidate, JobOrder, Candidate_Submission__c, ClientCorporation, ClientContact, and compliance custom fields). Bullhorn's entity model treats Clients and Contacts separately from Candidates, so we split TRAFFIT's candidate-centric CRM Persons into ClientCorporation and ClientContact at migration time. Workflows, automations, and webhook triggers do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of TRAFFIT automation rules for the customer's Bullhorn admin to rebuild. Bullhorn's implementation timelines run two to six weeks, but data migration alone for a structured TRAFFIT export typically lands within that window if extended API access is confirmed before scoping begins.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

TRAFFIT logo

TRAFFIT

What's pushing teams away

  • The lack of a mobile app limits on-the-go recruitment tasks, frustrating teams that rely on mobile access for candidate communication and status updates.
  • Reports are described as difficult to read and incomplete by long-term users, pushing teams toward external BI tools for meaningful analytics.
  • Per-user pricing scales poorly for growing teams, with customers noting that adding more seats significantly increases monthly costs without proportional feature gains.
  • Job board multiposting is limited, requiring manual posting to each platform or paid integrations, which slows down high-volume hiring workflows.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How TRAFFIT objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a TRAFFIT object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

TRAFFIT

Candidate

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

TRAFFIT Candidate records map directly to Bullhorn Candidate. We extract first name, last name, email, phone, location, tags, talent-pool status, and custom field values from the TRAFFIT API or filtered XLS export. Soft-deleted candidates require an explicit active-record filter; TRAFFIT's default export may include soft-deleted records which we exclude before import. Bullhorn's Candidate entity stores resume content, skills, and availability alongside contact fields.

TRAFFIT

Candidate Application

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate_Submission__c (custom)

1:1
Fully supported

TRAFFIT applications link a candidate to a job with a stage, source attribution, and timestamp. Bullhorn does not have a native application object separate from Candidate and JobOrder; we create a custom Candidate_Submission__c object to preserve the job-to-candidate association, stage history, source label, and application date. Where Bullhorn's Candidate_Submission__c is already provisioned, we map into that existing custom object.

TRAFFIT

Job (Recruitment)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

TRAFFIT Jobs map to Bullhorn JobOrder. The job title, description, requirements, status, assigned user, and client reference all transfer directly. TRAFFIT's pipeline stages (from application to hire) map to Bullhorn JobOrder status values or a custom status field. Client assignment in TRAFFIT's job record resolves to the corresponding ClientCorporation in Bullhorn at migration time.

TRAFFIT

Advert

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder + JobBoardPosting (custom)

1:many
Fully supported

TRAFFIT Adverts are job-listing records with publication dates, board assignments, and status. We split advert data into the Bullhorn JobOrder (core job content and internal status) and a custom JobBoardPosting object or Bullhorn JobBoardPosting if the module is provisioned, capturing board name, publication date, and advert status. Where Bullhorn's job-board module is not included in the subscription, advert status is recorded in a custom field on JobOrder.

TRAFFIT

CRM Person

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientCorporation + ClientContact

many:1
Fully supported

TRAFFIT maintains a separate CRM Persons object for contacts outside the recruitment funnel. Bullhorn separates companies (ClientCorporation) and individuals (ClientContact) as two linked records. We merge each TRAFFIT CRM Person into a ClientContact and derive the ClientCorporation from the CRM Person's company association, creating the parent corporation record if it does not exist. Custom fields on TRAFFIT CRM Persons map to custom fields on ClientContact.

TRAFFIT

User

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

BullhornUser

1:1
Fully supported

TRAFFIT user records (role, email, active status) map to Bullhorn BullhornUser entities. Hiring Manager accounts (free-tier in TRAFFIT) map to Bullhorn Employee module records with limited permissions. We resolve TRAFFIT owner references on candidate and job records to Bullhorn User IDs by email match during migration. Any TRAFFIT owner without a matching Bullhorn User is placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes.

TRAFFIT

Tag / Talent Pool

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

CandidateTag + custom label fields

lossy
Fully supported

TRAFFIT tags serve both candidate categorization and talent-pool segmentation. We preserve tag names and talent-pool membership as Bullhorn CandidateTag records linked to Candidate. Talent-pool status (active, passive, sourced) is stored in a custom field on Bullhorn Candidate. Where the destination Bullhorn instance uses a different tagging taxonomy, we apply a mapping table documented during scoping.

TRAFFIT

Custom Field (Candidate, Job, CRM Person)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

TRAFFIT custom fields on Candidates, Jobs, and CRM Persons require pre-creation in Bullhorn before any data import. We validate field types from the TRAFFIT API schema against actual record values during the data audit phase, flag any type-mismatch records, and create Bullhorn custom fields with matching types (text, number, picklist, checkbox, date). Required-flag settings and restricted-editing configurations are replicated at the Bullhorn field level. Field type changes made mid-use in TRAFFIT may cause type-incompatible values that we flag for manual review before import.

TRAFFIT

Document / Attachment

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Resume files, cover letters, and uploaded documents attached to TRAFFIT candidate profiles export with their file associations. We transfer files as Bullhorn Candidate attachments linked by candidate ID. Bullhorn's storage limits and attachment size caps vary by tier; we verify available storage during scoping and flag any records requiring file compression or document-type prioritization. Files without a valid candidate match go to a review queue.

TRAFFIT

GDPR Consent

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Consent_Custom_Object__c or compliance fields

1:1
Fully supported

TRAFFIT consent records track when candidates gave or withdrew permission for data processing, with timestamps per consent type. We export consent timestamps and type labels, then map to a Bullhorn custom consent object or compliance fields on Candidate (HasOptedOutOfEmail, custom consent date fields). If the TRAFFIT GDPR Assistant add-on has automated anonymization scheduled, we check during discovery whether anonymization has already run, which may leave consent records partially redacted. Any gaps are documented in the consent handoff report.

TRAFFIT

Application Source

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Picklist on Candidate_Submission__c

1:1
Fully supported

TRAFFIT tracks the origin of each application (job board, referral, direct, sourcing tool). We export source labels and attribution data and apply them as a custom picklist value on the Candidate_Submission__c record. Bullhorn's standard source taxonomy differs from TRAFFIT's; we create a mapping table during scoping that collapses or renames TRAFFIT source labels to match Bullhorn's allowed values.

TRAFFIT

Candidate Activity (call, note, stage-change, internal comment)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Not migrated

1:1
Fully supported

TRAFFIT candidate activity records — calls logged, notes added, stage-change events, and internal comments — are stored in TRAFFIT's internal event system and are not exposed via API or XLS export. We do not migrate activity timelines as there is no stable export path. We disclose this limitation explicitly in scoping and scope only objects with confirmed export routes: candidate profiles, applications, jobs, adverts, CRM persons, tags, and GDPR consents. The customer should plan to rebuild candidate interaction notes as Bullhorn Task records or Note attachments post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

TRAFFIT logo

TRAFFIT gotchas

High

Extended API requires a paid add-on

High

Activity history is not exportable

Medium

Soft-deleted candidates may inflate export scope

Medium

GDPR Assistant add-on affects consent data handling

Low

Custom field type changes require re-mapping

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • Activity history is not exportable from TRAFFIT

    TRAFFIT stores candidate interaction records (calls logged, notes, stage-change events, internal comments) in its internal event system with no API endpoint and no XLS export option. This is a TRAFFIT platform limitation, not a migration methodology issue. We disclose this gap during scoping, scope only objects with stable export paths, and deliver a written handoff listing every TRAFFIT automation rule and activity type so the customer's Bullhorn admin can manually recreate the most critical interaction notes as Bullhorn Task records post-migration.

  • Extended API requires a paid TRAFFIT add-on

    TRAFFIT's base subscription includes only a limited API scope. Full API access — including bulk export endpoints and complete candidate record retrieval — is gated behind the extended API paid add-on. Without it, we rely on filtered XLS exports which omit certain fields and object relationships. We confirm API access level during discovery and advise customers who need comprehensive data exports to purchase the extended API add-on before migration begins. A TRAFFIT instance without extended API access may require additional manual data preparation time.

  • Bullhorn implementation costs extend beyond the base license

    Bullhorn's advertised entry pricing ($99/user/month) does not include implementation fees, job-board integrations, Canvas analytics, Bullhorn Automation (formerly Herefish), or premium support. Agencies cite undisclosed integration costs as a significant surprise at renewal, especially for Indeed and LinkedIn integrations that require separate API agreements. We scope Bullhorn integration dependencies during discovery and factor the integration cost picture into the total cost of ownership estimate alongside the migration fee.

  • GDPR anonymization may have already altered consent records

    Customers who purchased the TRAFFIT GDPR Assistant add-on may have automated candidate anonymization scheduled or already executed for candidates past a configured retention period. If anonymization has run, consent records for affected candidates may be partially redacted. We check for active anonymization policies during discovery, run a pre-export consent audit, and document any gaps in the consent timeline in the migration sign-off report. We do not migrate redacted or anonymized records.

  • Bullhorn support responsiveness is a known pain point

    Multiple agency reviews cite Bullhorn support as slow to respond, with ticket resolution times extending weeks on technically complex issues. This affects migration timelines if Bullhorn-side API issues, permission-configuration problems, or custom-object provisioning require vendor support during cutover. We plan Bullhorn support tickets in advance, involve the customer's Bullhorn account manager for escalation paths, and maintain a rollback window in case Bullhorn-side configuration requires resolution outside the migration window.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful TRAFFIT to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and API access confirmation

    We audit the TRAFFIT instance across all object types: Candidates, Applications, Jobs, Adverts, CRM Persons, Tags, Custom Fields, Users, and GDPR Consents. We confirm whether the extended API add-on is active and validate which API endpoints are available for bulk retrieval. We check for active GDPR anonymization policies and review any soft-delete records to establish the active-record filter baseline. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object counts, custom-field schema, GDPR consent audit summary, and a Bullhorn edition recommendation.

  2. Bullhorn schema design and pre-creation

    We design the Bullhorn destination schema based on the TRAFFIT object map. This includes creating Bullhorn custom fields (with typed field definitions matching TRAFFIT's field types), provisioning a custom Candidate_Submission__c object for application records, designing the ClientCorporation and ClientContact split for TRAFFIT CRM Persons, and configuring custom picklists for application sources and advert status. Bullhorn entity schema is deployed to a Sandbox or staging org first for validation before any data moves.

  3. Data audit and field mapping

    We run a TRAFFIT data audit against the exported records, validating field types against actual values to catch mid-use type changes on custom fields. We identify duplicate candidates, mismatched email formats, and orphaned CRM Persons (those without a parent company association). We produce a field-mapping document that pairs every TRAFFIT field to its Bullhorn equivalent, documents transformation logic (date format normalization, picklist value mapping, tag-to-label conversion), and flags any fields that cannot map due to type incompatibility.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We execute a full migration into Bullhorn Sandbox using production-equivalent data volume. The customer's recruitment operations lead reviews record counts (candidates in, applications in, jobs in, CRM contacts in), spot-checks 30-50 random records against TRAFFIT source data, and validates custom field values. Owner mapping is reconciled by email match against Bullhorn User list. Any schema corrections, mapping adjustments, or custom-object provisioning changes happen in Sandbox before production migration begins.

  5. Owner reconciliation and user provisioning

    We extract every distinct TRAFFIT user referenced on candidate, job, and CRM person records and match by email against the Bullhorn destination org's User table. TRAFFIT Hiring Manager accounts (free-tier) are mapped to Bullhorn Employee module records. Any TRAFFIT owner without a matching Bullhorn User is held in a reconciliation queue; the customer's Bullhorn admin provisions missing users before production migration resumes.

  6. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: ClientCorporation (parent companies for CRM persons), ClientContact (from CRM persons), Bullhorn Users (provisioned and validated), Candidate (profiles, skills, tags, talent-pool status), JobOrder (jobs with client assignment), Candidate_Submission__c (applications linking candidates to jobs with source attribution), Advert status (as custom fields or linked records on JobOrder), Custom Fields (populated after entity import), GDPR Consents (mapped to compliance custom fields), Documents (as Candidate attachments). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  7. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze TRAFFIT writes during cutover, run a final delta migration for any records modified during the migration window, then enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of TRAFFIT automation rules (workflow triggers, webhook dependencies, Zapier/Zoho Flow flows) with recommended Bullhorn equivalents (Bullhorn Automation, Bullhorn Tasks, or Salesforce Flow for cross-object logic). We support a five-business-day hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the recruitment team. We do not rebuild TRAFFIT automations inside the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

TRAFFIT logo

TRAFFIT

Source

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for tech recruitment with sourcing integrations and job board connectors native to the platform.
  • GDPR consent management is a first-class feature with audit trails and an optional GDPR Assistant add-on.
  • Free tier for hiring managers allows involving non-recruiters in the process without full seat costs.
  • Custom fields and flexible workflow stages adapt to varied hiring processes and agency client structures.
  • Webhook API supports real-time event triggers for integrations with external tools.

Weaknesses

  • No mobile app limits access to candidate data and workflows for recruiters working outside a desktop environment.
  • Reports are widely described as incomplete and difficult to read, reducing the platform's analytics value.
  • Per-user pricing scales linearly, making it costly for larger recruiting teams with many hiring managers.
  • Limited multiposting requires additional paid integrations or manual effort to post to all desired job boards.
  • Activity timelines are not exportable, meaning candidate interaction history is lost on migration.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TRAFFIT and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    TRAFFIT: Not publicly documented in available documentation.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    TRAFFIT doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your TRAFFIT to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about TRAFFIT to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TRAFFIT to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your TRAFFIT to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most TRAFFIT to Bullhorn migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 15,000 candidates, 500 jobs, and no complex GDPR consent histories. Migrations with large custom-field schemas, CRM person splitting into ClientCorporation and ClientContact, active GDPR anonymization policies, or TRAFFIT adverts requiring re-publishing workflows extend to six to ten weeks because of consent-field mapping, dual-entity design, and advert-status reconciliation.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from TRAFFIT.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day