ERP migration

Migrate from Total ETO to Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Total ETO and Infor CloudSuite Corporate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Infor CloudSuite Corporate.

Total ETO logo

Total ETO

Source

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Destination

Infor CloudSuite Corporate logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Total ETO and Infor CloudSuite Corporate.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

10-14 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Total ETO to Infor CloudSuite is a database-centric ERP migration with a significant schema transformation. Total ETO has no public API — we extract directly from its SQL Server database — and its ETO-specific data model (dynamic BOM versioning, project-linked job costing, NCRs, and Inspections) requires careful sequencing and transformation at the Infor destination. Infor CloudSuite Industrial ships its own Migration Utility that connects to SQL Server sources, but it requires a new initialized database and predefined import rules; we use it as our ingestion layer while handling Total ETO's export and transformation. Each BOM revision in Total ETO is a distinct object that we import into Infor as a separate SFC Project BOM version. Open POs and RFQs cannot import until the Part master is established — we sequence Parts first, then BOMs, then procurement commitments, then inventory and work orders. Workflows, automations, and custom CAD integration configurations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of ETO-specific workflows and alert rules for the customer's Infor consultant to rebuild in CloudSuite's ION or Ming.le workflow engine.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Total ETO logo

Total ETO

What's pushing teams away

  • The Windows desktop interface is described as dated by multiple reviewers, and Total ETO has acknowledged a web-based version is in development but not yet available.
  • Organizations that expand beyond pure ETO into higher-volume production find the platform's single-industry focus becomes a constraint rather than a strength.
  • Permission granularity is excessive — without deliberate configuration the system exposes too many controls to users who do not need them, creating compliance and data-integrity risk.
  • Support responsiveness, while generally excellent, cannot compensate when bugs require significant engineering fixes; one reviewer waited while the president of the company handled a user-error case personally.
  • Companies seeking to consolidate onto platforms like NetSuite or SAP for broader operational visibility eventually migrate their project histories, BOMs, and job costs into systems with different data architectures.

Choosing

Infor CloudSuite Corporate logo

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

What's pulling them in

  • Infor CloudSuite is industry-specific out of the box — manufacturing, distribution, healthcare, and food & beverage editions ship with preconfigured workflows that reduce the need for extensive customization and accelerate time to value for operations-heavy organizations.
  • The platform's deep integration with Excel for financial reporting is frequently cited as a key productivity feature, allowing finance teams to pull data directly and make changes without leaving familiar tooling.
  • AWS-hosted multi-tenant deployment eliminates data center management for IT teams, and Infor OS provides a unified integration layer (ION) that connects the CloudSuite to third-party applications without point-to-point middleware.
  • Organizations with multi-site or multi-country operations choose Infor for its multicurrency, multilanguage, and local regulatory compliance capabilities across 175+ countries, which simplifies consolidation for global CFOs.
  • The two-tier ERP strategy positioning lets corporate headquarters run CloudSuite while subsidiaries run lighter instances, which appeals to complex organizational structures that want standardization without full replacement.

Object mapping

How Total ETO objects map to Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Each row shows how a Total ETO object lands in Infor CloudSuite Corporate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Total ETO

Project

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

SFC Project (CloudSuite Industrial) or Project (CloudSuite LN)

1:1
Fully supported

Total ETO Projects organize all ETO activity from quote through delivery with status stages and owner assignment. We map Projects to CloudSuite Industrial's SFC Project module (or LN Project Management for CloudSuite Industrial Enterprise deployments). The Project status stages in Total ETO map to the SFC Project lifecycle stages at the destination. Project-linked Work Orders and BOMs reference the Project as a parent, so the Project import must complete before Work Order and BOM migration begins. Cost tracking data from Total ETO's job costing fields migrates to the corresponding cost roll-up fields in SFC Project costing.

Total ETO

Bill of Materials (BOM) — revision-level

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

SFC BOM Version

1:1
Fully supported

Total ETO BOMs are multi-level, dynamically versioned structures. Each BOM revision is a distinct object in Total ETO, and we preserve that distinction by importing each revision as a separate BOM version in Infor CloudSuite's SFC BOM module. Collapsing BOM revisions into a single flat BOM destroys the engineering change history and breaks downstream production planning that relies on revision-date ordering. We import BOMs in revision-date sequence, map the parent-component relationships to Infor's BOM operation routing, and flag any BOM that references a Part not yet established in the destination as an import exception requiring resolution before proceeding.

Total ETO

Part

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Item Master (Item)

1:1
Fully supported

Total ETO Part records carry description, unit of measure, cost, supplier link, and usage history across projects. We map Parts to the Infor CloudSuite Item Master with type (manufactured, purchased, phantom), sourcing rules, and cost element assignments. The Part master must be imported and validated before BOMs, POs, and Inventory can import because BOM line items and PO lines reference Item records by Part number as a foreign key. Any Parts with duplicate Part numbers across Total ETO contexts are reconciled during the Part master phase with a deduplication strategy documented for the customer's review.

Total ETO

Customer

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Customer

1:1
Fully supported

Total ETO Customer records include contact details, address, and AR balance. We map to Infor CloudSuite's Customer master, preserving the AR balance as an open item at migration date. Customer addresses migrate to the Infor address structure with ship-to and bill-to designations. Open Sales Orders in Total ETO, if present, map to Infor Sales Orders with Customer linkage established through the Customer master import.

Total ETO

Vendor

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Supplier

1:1
Fully supported

Total ETO Vendor records include purchasing terms and contact information. We map to Infor CloudSuite's Supplier master, preserving any active vendor-specific pricing agreements. The Supplier master must be established before open Purchase Orders and RFQs import because PO headers reference the Supplier as a required field.

Total ETO

Purchase Order (open)

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Purchase Order

1:1
Fully supported

Open POs in Total ETO represent live procurement commitments referencing specific Part numbers and quantities. We sequence PO migration after the Part master, BOMs, and Supplier master are established — without these dependencies, foreign-key violations block PO line imports. We preserve PO status (open, partial receipt), line quantities, and unit costs. RFQs are handled as a separate open-RFQ object with status preserved for the customer's purchasing team to convert or close post-migration.

Total ETO

Work Order

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Work Order (SFC)

1:1
Fully supported

Total ETO Work Orders link to Projects and BOMs, tracking manufacturing operations by shop-floor routing. We map to Infor CloudSuite SFC Work Orders with the Project and BOM version references resolved at migration time. Work Order operations (routing steps) migrate as sub-records of the Work Order. Any Work Order referencing a BOM revision not yet migrated is held in a dependency-exception queue and resolved before the Work Order import proceeds.

Total ETO

Inventory

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Inventory (on-hand quantity by location)

1:1
Fully supported

Total ETO tracks on-hand quantities by location and links reservations to Projects. We import inventory quantities by location into Infor CloudSuite's Inventory module, preserving project-linked reservations as inventory allocations. Negative quantities and reserved quantities that exceed available stock are flagged as exceptions requiring customer review before the inventory snapshot is committed.

Total ETO

Non-Conformance Record

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Quality Management Non-Conformance (QM NCM)

lossy
Fully supported

Total ETO NCRs reference specific Parts, Inspections, and quality issues logged from shop floor, engineering, or procurement. Infor CloudSuite Industrial Enterprise includes a Quality Management module with NCM tracking; CloudSuite Industrial SyteLine requires configuration as part of migration scope. We map NCR status, disposition, and root cause to the QM NCM record, preserving the link to the relevant Part and Work Order. NCRs without a corresponding Quality Management configuration at the destination are flagged for manual setup or a separate QM configuration engagement.

Total ETO

Inspection

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Quality Inspection Record

lossy
Fully supported

Total ETO Inspections record quality checks against Parts and link to the inspector. We import inspection results as Quality Inspection records in Infor CloudSuite tied to the relevant Part and NCR where the QM module is configured. Inspection pass/fail status and measurement values migrate to the inspection record. Where the QM module is not configured at the destination, inspection results are exported as a structured data file with a mapping guide for the customer's Infor consultant to configure the module.

Total ETO

Employee

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Employee (HCM)

1:1
Fully supported

Total ETO Employee records include labor class, department, and time-entry data. We map to Infor CloudSuite HCM Employee records, preserving department and labor class assignments. Active status and employment dates migrate. Time-entry logs (clock-in/clock-out, project assignment, hours) are imported against the corresponding Project and Work Order, with labor class determining cost allocation at the destination.

Total ETO

Chart of Accounts

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

GL Account (Chart of Accounts)

lossy
Fully supported

Total ETO integrates with external accounting systems (QuickBooks, Sage) rather than maintaining its own GL. We scope whether the customer's financial records (account balances, open AP/AR) live in Total ETO or in the connected accounting system. If the destination is Infor CloudSuite with full GL, we coordinate the Chart of Accounts migration from the connected accounting package (not from Total ETO, which does not hold GL data). Account balance carry-forward requires a period-end reconciliation from the source accounting system before GL go-live.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Total ETO logo

Total ETO gotchas

High

No public API means migrations are database-centric

High

Dynamic BOM versioning is not a flat list

Medium

Open POs and RFQs require pre-migration cleanup

Medium

Accounting data may live outside Total ETO

Low

Permission over-granularity creates data-integrity risk

Infor CloudSuite Corporate logo

Infor CloudSuite Corporate gotchas

High

Infor OS tier-based usage limits gate API and BaaS capabilities

Medium

Custom Fields use inconsistent naming across Infor editions

Medium

SQL migration utility requires source database access

Medium

Multi-site and multi-currency data require separate period closure sequencing

Low

REST API payload and timeout limits restrict bulk migration throughput

Pair-specific challenges

  • Total ETO has no API — cloud-hosted customers need vendor-assisted database access

    Total ETO publishes no REST or SOAP API for third-party data access. All migrations require a direct SQL Server database export. On-premise customers can provide backup files directly. Cloud-hosted customers must coordinate with Total ETO's support team for database access — this adds a vendor-dependency step that can extend discovery by one to three weeks. We assess the hosting model at scoping and configure the SQL Server connection or backup-file ingestion path before migration work begins.

  • BOM revision sequence must be preserved as separate Infor BOM versions

    Total ETO BOMs are multi-level and versioned — each engineering revision creates a new BOM revision that coexists with prior revisions rather than replacing them. Infor CloudSuite SFC BOMs require explicit version management: each Total ETO BOM revision must import as a distinct version in Infor with the revision date preserved. We import BOMs in revision-date sequence to maintain engineering change history. Collapsing BOM revisions into a single BOM destroys the revision chain and breaks production planning that depends on revision-date ordering.

  • PO and BOM dependency chain requires sequenced import

    Open Purchase Orders and RFQs in Total ETO reference live Part numbers and Supplier commitments. Attempting to import POs before the Part master, BOMs, and Supplier master are established causes foreign-key violations that block the import process. We sequence the migration: Part master first, then Supplier master, then BOMs, then open POs, then Work Orders, then inventory. Any orphaned PO lines referencing unresolved Parts or BOMs are flagged as exceptions and resolved before the next import phase begins.

  • Infor CloudSuite ETO configuration is not pre-loaded

    Infor CloudSuite Industrial and CloudSuite Industrial Enterprise are multi-industry platforms. ETO-specific features — SFC Project structure, BOM version management, job costing against projects, and WIP tracking — require configuration as part of the migration scope. We design the ETO project schema in Infor during the schema design phase before production data imports, mapping Total ETO project stages and costing fields to the corresponding Infor SFC project fields. NCR and Inspection configuration requires the QM module to be provisioned if it is not already included in the destination CloudSuite edition.

  • NCRs and Inspections lack standard migration utilities

    Total ETO Non-Conformance Records and Inspections are quality objects with shop-floor provenance that do not have a predefined migration path in the Infor CloudSuite Migration Utility. We map NCRs and Inspections as data-file imports into Infor's QM module (where configured) or as structured CSV with a field-mapping guide for the customer's Infor consultant. If the QM module is not provisioned at the destination, quality records are scoped as a separate configuration workstream.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Total ETO to Infor CloudSuite Corporate data migration

  1. Source environment assessment and database access

    We determine the Total ETO hosting model — on-premise SQL Server or cloud-hosted — and configure database access accordingly. On-premise customers provide backup files or direct SQL Server credentials. Cloud-hosted customers coordinate with Total ETO's support team for database export; we account for this vendor-dependency step in the discovery timeline. We run an initial data profiling query against the source database to assess record counts across all object types (Projects, BOMs, Parts, POs, Work Orders, NCRs, Inspections, Employees, Inventory), BOM nesting depth, BOM revision count, and open-transaction volume. This shapes the sequencing plan and pricing estimate.

  2. Destination schema design and ETO configuration

    We design the Infor CloudSuite schema for ETO operation. This includes configuring the SFC Project module with Total ETO project stage equivalents, designing the BOM version structure in SFC Manufacturing to accept Total ETO BOM revisions as distinct versions, mapping the Item Master fields from Total ETO Parts, designing the Supplier and Customer masters, and scoping the QM module configuration for NCR and Inspection records. We deploy schema configuration into a Infor staging or sandbox environment before production data migration begins. Any BOM or Part relationships that require custom mapping are documented and validated with the customer's Infor consultant.

  3. Sandbox migration and data reconciliation

    We run a full migration into the Infor staging environment using the assessed data volume from discovery. The customer's operations team reconciles a representative sample of records — Projects, BOM revisions, Parts, open POs, Work Orders, and NCRs — against the Total ETO source. We validate BOM nesting depth and BOM revision count at the destination, confirm that BOM component relationships resolve correctly, and verify that Part references in POs and BOMs are satisfied. Schema corrections and mapping adjustments happen in staging before production migration begins.

  4. Master data import in dependency order

    We run production migration in strict dependency order. Part master imports first and must fully complete and reconcile before BOMs begin. BOMs import second, with each revision imported as a distinct Infor BOM version in revision-date sequence. Supplier and Customer masters import in parallel with BOMs. NCRs and Inspections import after the QM module is confirmed configured at the destination. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Any orphaned records — Parts referenced in BOMs but not in the Part master, BOMs referenced in Work Orders but not yet imported — are logged as exceptions for customer resolution before the affected phase restarts.

  5. Transaction migration: POs, Work Orders, and Inventory

    With the Part master, BOMs, and Supplier master established, we migrate open Purchase Orders and RFQs with PO header and line data intact. We preserve PO status, line quantities, and unit costs. Work Orders migrate with Project and BOM version references resolved to the destination IDs. Inventory quantities by location import as a snapshot at the migration date, with project-linked reservations preserved as inventory allocations. Any Work Order or PO referencing a BOM revision not yet migrated is held in the dependency-exception queue until the BOM revision is resolved.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow handoff

    We freeze Total ETO writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration process, then enable Infor CloudSuite as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of Total ETO workflows, alert rules, and any ETO-specific process automation (email triggers, approval chains, scheduling rules) that requires rebuild in Infor's Ming.le or ION workflow engine. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Total ETO workflows as Infor workflows inside the migration scope; that is handled by the customer's Infor consultant or a separate Infor implementation engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Total ETO logo

Total ETO

Source

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for ETO manufacturing with dynamic BOMs that change throughout the design-build phase.
  • SolidWorks and Autodesk Inventor add-in integration brings BOMs directly into the CAD environment without double entry.
  • Real-time project job costing gives visibility into margin at every stage of a custom machine build.
  • Integrates with QuickBooks and Sage for accounting rather than forcing a full financial-system replacement.
  • Responsive support with hands-on manufacturing experience, including direct involvement from company leadership.

Weaknesses

  • No public API documented — migrations require database exports, CSV extracts, or custom integration work.
  • Windows desktop application with a dated UI that Total ETO itself acknowledges is being redesigned.
  • Excessive flexibility in the permission system means that without careful setup users see controls they do not need.
  • Pricing is opaque — different sources report conflicting figures ($500/user/year, $50/user/month) and the vendor requires a custom quote for anything beyond the 5-seat starter package.
  • Target customers are small-to-mid custom machine builders; the platform lacks the scalability and industry breadth that growing firms need.
Infor CloudSuite Corporate logo

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Destination

Strengths

  • Industry-specific preconfiguration across manufacturing, distribution, healthcare, and food & beverage reduces post-implementation customization effort.
  • Deep Excel integration for financial reporting allows finance teams to export, manipulate, and push data back without leaving a familiar environment.
  • Multi-tenant AWS deployment with Infor OS provides a unified integration layer that simplifies connecting to third-party applications and legacy systems.
  • Strong multicurrency, multilanguage, and regulatory localization capabilities support organizations operating across 175+ countries from a single platform.
  • Modular architecture allows organizations to deploy core financials, supply chain, or manufacturing modules independently and expand over time.

Weaknesses

  • Opaque pricing model with no public per-user rates and deployments commonly ranging from $500K to $5M creates significant budget uncertainty for prospective buyers.
  • Implementation complexity and timeline (commonly 2+ years for large deployments) leads to extended periods of reduced productivity and elevated project risk.
  • Steep learning curve with hidden options and a lack of public setup guidance makes self-service onboarding difficult compared to competitors with richer documentation communities.
  • Manufacturing module functionality is perceived by some users as outdated relative to modern ERP platforms, with reported bug issues that require workarounds.
  • Tight coupling between modules and environment-specific configurations makes migration to non-Infor systems labor-intensive, increasing switching costs.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard ERP migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Total ETO and Infor CloudSuite Corporate.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Total ETO: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Total ETO doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Total ETO to Infor CloudSuite Corporate migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Total ETO to Infor CloudSuite Corporate data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Total ETO to Infor CloudSuite Corporate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Total ETO to Infor CloudSuite Corporate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Total ETO to Infor CloudSuite migrations typically run ten to fourteen weeks for smaller deployments with under 5,000 Parts, under 500 active BOM revisions, and no active NCR queue. Larger databases with complex multi-level BOMs, high BOM revision counts, open PO portfolios, or quality record history move to sixteen to twenty-four weeks. The Infor CloudSuite implementation itself — the broader ERP configuration, testing, and go-live planning — typically adds additional months with an Infor-certified implementation partner and is scoped separately from the data migration engagement.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Total ETO.
Land in Infor CloudSuite Corporate, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day