ERP

Migrate your Total ETO data

ERP/MRP built exclusively for Engineer-to-Order manufacturers, with deep CAD integration and dynamic BOM versioning. Custom Machine Builders choose it for project-based job costing but often outgrow it when scaling beyond ETO workflows.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Total ETO logo

In its favor

Why people choose Total ETO

The signal that keeps Total ETO on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Dynamic BOM management directly inside CAD tools like SolidWorks and Inventor eliminates double-entry and accelerates the engineering-to-procurement handoff that is the critical bottleneck in ETO workflows.

Project-based job costing with real-time WIP visibility lets custom machine builders track margin at every stage without waiting days for spreadsheets to be reconciled.

Tight integration with QuickBooks and Sage means accounting staff continue working in their familiar environment while the ERP handles engineering and procurement data.

Pricing starts at $7,500/year for 5 seats, making it accessible for small-to-mid custom machine builders before they need enterprise-scale ERP infrastructure.

Customer service receives consistent praise across reviews — support staff have hands-on manufacturing experience and the president has personally resolved escalated cases.

The Windows desktop interface is described as dated by multiple reviewers, and Total ETO has acknowledged a web-based version is in development but not yet available.

Organizations that expand beyond pure ETO into higher-volume production find the platform's single-industry focus becomes a constraint rather than a strength.

Permission granularity is excessive — without deliberate configuration the system exposes too many controls to users who do not need them, creating compliance and data-integrity risk.

Support responsiveness, while generally excellent, cannot compensate when bugs require significant engineering fixes; one reviewer waited while the president of the company handled a user-error case personally.

Companies seeking to consolidate onto platforms like NetSuite or SAP for broader operational visibility eventually migrate their project histories, BOMs, and job costs into systems with different data architectures.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Total ETO

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Total ETO. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Total ETO fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Purpose-built for ETO manufacturing with dynamic BOMs that change throughout the design-build phase.SolidWorks and Autodesk Inventor add-in integration brings BOMs directly into the CAD environment without double entry.Real-time project job costing gives visibility into margin at every stage of a custom machine build.Integrates with QuickBooks and Sage for accounting rather than forcing a full financial-system replacement.Responsive support with hands-on manufacturing experience, including direct involvement from company leadership.

Weaknesses

No public API documented — migrations require database exports, CSV extracts, or custom integration work.Windows desktop application with a dated UI that Total ETO itself acknowledges is being redesigned.Excessive flexibility in the permission system means that without careful setup users see controls they do not need.Pricing is opaque — different sources report conflicting figures ($500/user/year, $50/user/month) and the vendor requires a custom quote for anything beyond the 5-seat starter package.Target customers are small-to-mid custom machine builders; the platform lacks the scalability and industry breadth that growing firms need.

Where it works

Custom machine builders in North America with 10–250 employees running project-based ETO workflows where BOMs change throughout the design-build phase.ETO manufacturers whose engineering teams use SolidWorks or Autodesk Inventor, allowing BOMs to be released directly from CAD without manual re-entry.Small engineering teams (10–50 seats) tracking margin at every stage of a custom machine build with project-based job costing and real-time WIP visibility.Companies running 10–12 concurrent projects that need minutes, not days, to pull accurate cost and status reports without interrupting colleagues.Organizations that prefer keeping QuickBooks or Sage as their accounting system rather than adopting a full ERP financials replacement.

Where it struggles

Manufacturers that expand beyond pure ETO into higher-volume production, where the platform's single-industry focus becomes a constraint rather than a strength.Organizations with more than 250 employees or multi-site, multi-country operations — the platform lacks the scalability and geographic flexibility that larger firms need.Companies requiring a modern web-based interface or mobile access; Total ETO remains a Windows desktop application with a dated UI.Businesses that require API-first integration strategies — there is no documented public API, forcing reliance on database exports or CSV extracts.Firms with strict compliance or audit requirements where Total ETO's excessive permission flexibility creates data-integrity risk if not carefully configured.

Pricing tiers

Total ETO pricing overview

Total ETO publishes no per-user list price — the only confirmed public figure is $7,500/year for 5 seats on the entry package. Industry estimates from third-party sites suggest $500/user/year or approximately $50/user/month, but the vendor requires a custom quote for any configuration beyond the starter tier, with implementation costs adding $5,000 to over $50,000 depending on scope and customization.

Starter

Tier 1 of 3

$7,500/year for 5 seats

What's included

Base package includes core ERP and MRP functionalityIncludes human-guided implementation and trainingMinimum 5-seat commitmentIncludes engineering, procurement, and manufacturing modules

Need help selecting your ERP?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Total ETO's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Total ETO object support

Object-by-object support for Total ETO migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Projects

Fully supported

Total ETO organizes all ETO activity under Projects. Projects carry a lifecycle from quote through delivery, including status stages and owner assignment. We map Projects to the equivalent project/job object at the destination, preserving all date fields, status, and owner links.

Bills of Materials (BOMs)

Mapping required

BOMs in Total ETO are dynamic and versioned — a single product can have multiple active revisions as engineering changes propagate. We do not flatten BOMs into a single list. We preserve each revision as a distinct BOM version and map multi-level BOM nesting to the destination structure. BOM-to-part linkages must be maintained during import.

Parts

Fully supported

Parts carry a complete history trail including prior usage across projects. We import part master records with their attributes (description, unit of measure, cost, supplier link) and their full usage history as a linked log object rather than as inline fields.

Customers

Fully supported

Customer master records include contact details, address, and account balance. We map these to the destination's customer or account object, preserving open AR balances as of the migration date.

Vendors

Fully supported

Vendor master records include purchasing terms and contact information. We map vendor records and preserve any active RFQs or POs as open commitments.

Purchase Orders

Mapping required

Open POs and RFQs represent live procurement commitments. We flag these separately during scoping — their line items reference specific parts and BOMs, so PO migration must follow Part and BOM migration in sequence.

Work Orders

Fully supported

Work orders in Total ETO link to Projects and BOMs, tracking manufacturing operations by shop-floor routing. We preserve the work-order-to-project linkage and operation sequencing at the destination.

Non-Conformance Records

Mapping required

NCRs reference specific parts, inspections, and quality issues logged from the shop floor, engineering, or procurement. We map NCRs as standalone quality records and preserve their association to the originating part and inspection.

Inspections

Mapping required

Inspections record quality checks against parts and link to the inspector. We import inspection results as quality log entries tied to the relevant part and NCR.

Inventory

Fully supported

On-hand quantities are tracked by location and linked to projects via reservation. We import inventory quantities, locations, and project reservations, flagging any negative or reserved quantities that require resolution before import.

Chart of Accounts

Fully supported

Total ETO integrates with external accounting systems rather than maintaining its own GL. We scope whether the customer uses QuickBooks, Sage, or another accounting tool and determine whether account mappings need to be reconciled separately.

Employees

Fully supported

Employee records include time-entry data, labor class, and department. We import employee master records and preserve time-entry logs linked to projects and work orders.

Time Entries

Fully supported

Time entries in Total ETO are project-based and include clock-in/clock-out data with geolocation where applicable. We import time logs against the relevant project and work order at the destination.

Documents

Mapping required

Total ETO stores documents linked to projects, parts, and quality records. We extract document references and file paths; actual file migration depends on the destination's document management capabilities.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Total ETO migrations

Issues we've hit on past Total ETO migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

No public API means migrations are database-centric

High

Dynamic BOM versioning is not a flat list

Medium

Open POs and RFQs require pre-migration cleanup

Medium

Accounting data may live outside Total ETO

Low

Permission over-granularity creates data-integrity risk

How a Total ETO migration works

Four steps, Total ETO-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented into Total ETO. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Total ETO-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Total ETO quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Total ETO rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Total ETO migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Total ETO migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Total ETO migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Total ETO migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Total ETO.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Total ETO setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported