Project Management migration

Migrate from TeamGantt to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TeamGantt and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

62%

8 of 13

objects map 1:1 between TeamGantt and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from TeamGantt to Microsoft Project is a Gantt-centric migration where the scheduling semantics differ significantly between the two platforms. TeamGantt stores project dates as task-derived inferences (no explicit project start/end fields), manages resource assignments through a Workloads report gated behind Pro/Unlimited, and exposes baselines as named snapshots tied to specific plan tiers. Microsoft Project uses explicit project start dates, a per-assignment calendar and work-spread model, and multi-baseline storage within each plan file. We resolve the date-derivation gap by using the earliest task start date as the project anchor, map Workloads assignments to Task.Assignment objects, and handle the Workloads paywall by falling back to CSV-derived assignment data when the API returns a 403. We do not migrate TeamGantt's Gantt views, automation rules, or template library as code; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's project manager to rebuild in Microsoft Project. Both tools are English-only at the UI layer but handle Unicode in task names correctly throughout the export and import pipeline.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt

What's pushing teams away

  • Teams report that resource management is limited—workload views are paywalled behind Pro and the capacity planning features are basic compared to dedicated resource management tools.
  • The lack of a native macOS desktop app frustrates users who want a full-screen experience; the iPad/iPhone app is described as small and insufficient for complex project management.
  • Integration ecosystem is narrow—Zapier is the primary no-code integration path, and teams needing native bi-directional sync with tools like Salesforce or QuickBooks find themselves building custom API workarounds.
  • Some teams find collaboration features lacking—particularly threaded discussions, @mentions, and shared document editing that modern PM tools bundle in.
  • As teams scale beyond 5–10 concurrent projects, the per-project pricing model becomes expensive and teams report looking for unlimited-project plans or portfolio-level views that TeamGantt Basic and Standard do not offer.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How TeamGantt objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a TeamGantt object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

TeamGantt

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Projects map directly to Microsoft Project .mpp files. TeamGantt derives project start and end dates from the earliest and latest task dates respectively; Microsoft Project has explicit ProjectStartDate and ProjectFinishDate fields. We use the earliest task start date as the project anchor date in Microsoft Project, set the ProjectStartDate accordingly, and note the inferred-date behavior in the mapping spec so the project manager can verify the schedule alignment in Microsoft Project before finalizing.

TeamGantt

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Tasks map to Microsoft Project Tasks with Name, Start, Finish, Duration, PercentComplete, Notes, and custom fields preserved. Task hierarchy (subgroups and subtasks) maps to Microsoft Project outline levels using the ID and OutlineLevel fields; parent-child date dependencies are maintained by setting the parent task's constraints based on the earliest child start and latest child finish. TeamGantt's percent-complete rolls up automatically through the outline hierarchy in Microsoft Project.

TeamGantt

Dependency

maps to

Microsoft Project

PredecessorLink

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt task dependencies map to Microsoft Project PredecessorLink records. We translate the dependency type (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish) to the Microsoft Project PredecessorType field (FF, FS, SF, SS) and carry lag or lead time as the Delay field on the PredecessorLink. Circular dependency detection runs during the transform phase; any circular references are flagged in the mapping spec for the customer to resolve before the successor records import.

TeamGantt

Milestone

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task (IsMilestone = True)

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt Milestones (zero-duration markers with a name and date) map to Microsoft Project Tasks with the IsMilestone field set to Yes and Duration set to 0. The milestone date maps to both Start and Finish fields on the Microsoft Project task row. Milestone names and parent project associations are preserved in the Name and Summary fields.

TeamGantt

Baseline

maps to

Microsoft Project

Baseline (Baseline0 through Baseline10)

lossy
Fully supported

TeamGantt baseline snapshots (Pro/Unlimited only) map to Microsoft Project's multi-baseline slots. We read each named baseline from TeamGantt, match it to an available BaselineN field in Microsoft Project, and write the Start, Finish, and Work values for each task under that baseline. If the source TeamGantt account is on Basic or Standard and baselines are absent, we skip this mapping and flag it in the scope document. We preserve up to 10 named baselines; additional TeamGantt baselines beyond this require customer review to decide which are the highest priority for import.

TeamGantt

User (Task Resource)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt task assignees (Users) map to Microsoft Project Resource records. Each user is created as a Resource with the Name from TeamGantt and Email as the ID or material label. Resources are created before task imports so that the assignment lookups are satisfied. TeamGantt Guest users without full account status are mapped as material Resources with zero Max Units to distinguish them from billable human Resources.

TeamGantt

Workloads

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment (AssignmentUnits and AssignmentWork)

1:1
Mapping required

TeamGantt Workloads report data (per-user task assignments and hours, Pro/Unlimited only) maps to Microsoft Project Assignment records on each Task. The AssignmentUnits field represents the allocation percentage; AssignmentWork represents total hours. If the source TeamGantt account is on Basic or Standard and the API returns 403 on the Workloads endpoint, we fall back to CSV export data and reconstruct assignment records from the task-assignee mapping in the CSV. We note this fallback in the mapping spec and reconcile the assignment row counts against the total task count during validation.

TeamGantt

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment (AssignmentActualWork)

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt time entries (tracked hours on tasks, accessible via API and CSV) map to Microsoft Project AssignmentActualWork on the corresponding Task-Resource assignment pair. Actual work is set in hours aligned to the project's calendar. Planned hours from TeamGantt's time tracking map to AssignmentWork; actual tracked hours map to AssignmentActualWork. If TeamGantt uses hourly estimation without actual time tracking, AssignmentWork carries the estimate and ActualWork remains blank.

TeamGantt

Checklist

maps to

Microsoft Project

Note (structured)

lossy
Fully supported

TeamGantt checklist items on tasks are serialized as a structured Note in Microsoft Project with a checklist-header prefix and checkbox markers. Completion status is represented as [x] or [ ] prefixes. We preserve the full checklist structure, item order, and completion flag. If the customer uses Microsoft Project's native Checklist field (Project Plan 3+), we map directly to that field instead of Note.

TeamGantt

Discussion

maps to

Microsoft Project

Note

1:1
Fully supported

TeamGantt discussion threads attached to tasks (comment text, author name, timestamp) map to Microsoft Project Task Notes prefixed with the author name and timestamp. We preserve the full comment history in chronological order. Microsoft Project does not have a threaded discussion model, so multi-comment threads are collapsed into a single Note record with each comment on its own line. The customer's project manager reviews note formatting after migration.

TeamGantt

Custom Field (project-level)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field (project summary)

lossy
Fully supported

TeamGantt project-level custom fields map to Microsoft Project project summary task custom fields. We discover each custom field's data type (text, number, date, dropdown) from the TeamGantt API and map to the equivalent Microsoft Project field type. Project-level custom fields in Microsoft Project display on the Project Information dialog and are accessible in reporting views. We configure the custom field definitions in the .mpp file before task data imports.

TeamGantt

Custom Field (task-level)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field (task)

lossy
Fully supported

TeamGantt task-level custom fields map to Microsoft Project task custom fields (Text1-30, Number1-20, Date1-10, Flag1-20). We assign each TeamGantt custom field to an available Microsoft Project custom field slot, preserving data type fidelity. If a TeamGantt custom field is a multi-select label, we map it to a Text field; if it is a date, we map it to a Date field. We document the full custom field assignment map for the customer's admin to rename the field aliases to match their internal naming convention in Microsoft Project.

TeamGantt

Label

maps to

Microsoft Project

Text or Flag Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

TeamGantt Labels (categorization tags on tasks) map to a Microsoft Project Text custom field. If the customer has fewer than 20 unique labels, we map to a dedicated Text field; if labels are used for status flags (e.g., 'At Risk', 'Blocked'), we map to a Flag field instead. Label assignment is per-task and preserved in the custom field value on each task row. We note the full label-to-value mapping in the mapping spec for the customer to verify and rename post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt gotchas

High

Project billing model charges per project on Basic tier

Medium

Workloads report requires Pro or Unlimited plan

Medium

Free plan exports are limited to CSV with no API access

Low

Project start date is inferred, not set explicitly

Low

Time zone and language handling for non-Latin characters

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • No native export-import path between TeamGantt and Microsoft Project

    TeamGantt supports importing .mpp files but provides no native export to Microsoft Project format. TeamGantt's CSV export (Menu > Export CSV) flattens the subtask hierarchy, strips dependency relationships, and omits baselines, discussions, and time entries entirely. We reconstruct all of these from the TeamGantt REST API (Projects, Tasks, Dependencies, Milestones, Baselines, Workloads, Time Entries, Discussions) and build a Microsoft Project-compatible import structure. If the source account is on the Free plan with no API access, we advise upgrading to a paid plan for 14 days before migration scoping begins so that API endpoints are accessible.

  • Workloads report requires Pro/Unlimited; CSV fallback adds reconciliation work

    The Workloads report—the source for per-user task allocation and hours—is gated behind TeamGantt Pro ($49/manager/month) and Unlimited. If the source account is on Basic or Standard, the API returns 403 on the Workloads endpoint, and the CSV export does not include per-assignment hour data. We fall back to the CSV task export and extract user assignments from the assignee columns, but this lacks the hours-per-task breakdown. We flag the delta in the scope document and advise the customer on whether to upgrade TeamGantt temporarily or accept assignment data without hour allocation in Microsoft Project.

  • TeamGantt project dates are inferred; Microsoft Project requires explicit start dates

    TeamGantt has no explicit project-level start and end date fields. The project start date is derived from the earliest task's start date, and the end date from the latest task's end date. Microsoft Project has mandatory ProjectStartDate and ProjectFinishDate fields that must be set explicitly. We resolve this by setting Microsoft Project's ProjectStartDate to the earliest task start date from TeamGantt, and we note in the mapping spec that the project manager should verify the schedule alignment in Microsoft Project before publishing. Changes to task dates in TeamGantt after migration scoping do not automatically propagate to the Microsoft Project start date.

  • Baseline snapshots are Pro/Unlimited only; Standard accounts lack this data

    Baseline comparison in TeamGantt is a Pro and Unlimited feature. If the source account is on Basic or Standard, no baseline snapshots are accessible via API or CSV export, and we cannot migrate them to Microsoft Project's 11 baseline slots. We skip the baseline mapping for Standard/Basic accounts and flag this in the scope document. If the customer needs baseline tracking post-migration and is currently on a lower tier, the recommendation is to upgrade to Pro temporarily, create and save baselines in TeamGantt, then proceed with migration scoping.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful TeamGantt to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and plan tier audit

    We audit the source TeamGantt account across plan tier (Free/Basic/Standard/Pro/Unlimited), project count, task hierarchy depth, active baselines, user count with assignment scope, Workloads accessibility (API vs 403), time entry completeness, and custom field inventory. We check whether the account is on a trial or active paid plan to confirm API access. The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing each object, its source API endpoint, row counts, any paywall constraints, and a pre-flight checklist for the customer to upgrade temporarily if API access is missing.

  2. Dependency extraction and circular reference resolution

    We extract all task dependencies from the TeamGantt API (predecessor, successor, type, lag time) and build a dependency graph for each project. Circular dependency detection runs as a pre-import validation step; any cycles are flagged in the mapping spec with the specific task IDs and the dependency pair causing the cycle, for the customer's project manager to resolve in TeamGantt before we proceed. Lag time is captured as Delay values on the PredecessorLink records during the transform phase.

  3. Baseline and Workloads fallback planning

    If the source account is on Pro or Unlimited, we extract all saved baseline snapshots from the TeamGantt API and map each to an available Microsoft Project BaselineN slot. If the account is on Basic or Standard, we document the absence of baseline data in the scope document and advise the customer on the implications for schedule comparison post-migration. For Workloads, we attempt the API endpoint first; on 403, we extract assignee data from the CSV export and reconstruct the assignment structure, noting the hour-allocation delta in the reconciliation report.

  4. Microsoft Project schema preparation and custom field assignment

    We configure the destination .mpp file before data import: setting the project start date, configuring the project calendar, creating custom field definitions for all TeamGantt custom fields and labels, and reserving baseline slots for Pro/Unlimited accounts. We create Resource records for each distinct user assignee before task import so that assignment lookups are satisfied at import time. If the customer uses Project Plan 3 or Plan 5, we configure enterprise custom fields; for Project Standard, we use the standard custom field slots (Text1-30, Number1-20, Date1-10, Flag1-20).

  5. Data import in dependency order with reconciliation

    We import data in record-dependency order: Resources first, then Summary Tasks (parent groups), then child Tasks, then Milestones, then PredecessorLinks (after all tasks are present), then Assignments, then Time Entries, then Baselines, then Notes and Discussions. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report comparing source API row counts to destination inserted counts. PredecessorLink import is held until after all tasks are loaded so that the predecessor task IDs resolve correctly. Activity timestamps on Notes preserve the original TeamGantt posting date.

  6. Cutover, validation, and rebuild handoff

    We freeze writes in TeamGantt during the cutover window, run a final delta migration for any records modified during the migration, then deliver the final .mpp file(s) to the customer. We provide a mapping spec that documents every custom field assignment, baseline slot usage, resource allocation summary, and any data that could not migrate (with reason). We do not migrate TeamGantt automation rules, Gantt view configurations, templates, or reporting views as these are destination-platform constructs; the mapping spec serves as the reference for the project manager to rebuild these in Microsoft Project.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

TeamGantt logo

TeamGantt

Source

Strengths

  • Drag-and-drop Gantt chart scheduling with automatic dependency propagation and rescheduling notifications.
  • Generous free tier with unlimited tasks and projects, no time cap, making it accessible for freelancers and small teams.
  • Task-level time tracking with hourly estimation and a dedicated Workloads report on higher plans.
  • Baseline comparison that lets teams see planned vs. actual progress over time.
  • Clean CSV and PDF export for sharing project data outside the platform.

Weaknesses

  • No native macOS desktop app; the iOS app is a scaled mobile interface, not a full desktop client.
  • Per-project pricing on lower tiers becomes costly for teams managing many concurrent projects.
  • Resource management is limited—workload views are gated behind Pro/Unlimited, and advanced capacity planning features are absent.
  • Collaboration features are basic; no native document co-editing or rich @mention notification system within tasks.
  • Limited integrations beyond Zapier; no native bi-directional sync with major CRMs or accounting tools.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TeamGantt and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    TeamGantt: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    TeamGantt doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your TeamGantt to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about TeamGantt to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TeamGantt to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your TeamGantt to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

TeamGantt has no native export path to Microsoft Project .mpp format, and its CSV export omits dependencies, baselines, discussions, and time entries. We extract all project data from the TeamGantt REST API—Tasks, Dependencies, Milestones, Baselines, Workloads, Time Entries, Discussions, and Custom Fields—and transform it into a Microsoft Project-compatible structure. The .mpp file is assembled with tasks in the correct outline hierarchy, PredecessorLinks wired to the right task IDs, and Resources created before assignment import. If the source account is on the Free plan without API access, we advise upgrading to a paid plan for at least 14 days before migration scoping begins.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from TeamGantt.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day