HRMS migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TalentFlow and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.
TalentFlow
Source
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Destination
Compatibility
7 of 12
objects map 1:1 between TalentFlow and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from TalentFlow to Bullhorn means crossing from an entertainment-industry-specific ATS into a general-purpose staffing CRM and ATS that serves 10,000+ customers globally. The TalentFlow data model centers on Talents (roster entries), Clients (hiring entities), Jobs, Submissions linking candidates to requisitions, Contracts, and Deals tied to commission structures. Bullhorn uses Candidate, ClientCorporation, JobOrder, JobSubmission, Placement, and Opportunity instead. We normalize TalentFlow's talent-centric model to Bullhorn's candidate-centric model, preserve the submission-to-job linkage as Bullhorn JobSubmission records, and map Deals to Opportunity with commission-rate custom fields where applicable. TalentFlow has no publicly documented API reference, so we begin every engagement with a live credential review to determine whether programmatic export is available or whether we must fall back to CSV extraction with relational reconciliation. Bullhorn's custom object limits vary by edition (ATS Growth has none, ATS has 2, Front Office Growth and Enterprise have 10), which shapes how we handle TalentFlow's per-account custom field schema during migration planning. Workflows, automations, and email templates do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer to rebuild in Bullhorn's workflow builder post-migration.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a TalentFlow object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
TalentFlow
Talent
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Candidate
1:1TalentFlow Talents map to Bullhorn Candidate records. We extract the full Talent record including name, contact information, representation status, bio text, and headshot reference. The headshot URL migrates as an external link stored in a custom Candidate field since Bullhorn does not natively store headshots on the Candidate object. Any representation agent or manager linked to the Talent becomes a User lookup or custom field in Bullhorn. We flag talents without a valid email address for the customer's review before import because Bullhorn requires an email for candidate deduplication.
TalentFlow
Client
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
ClientCorporation and ClientContact
1:manyTalentFlow Clients (hiring companies or production entities) split into Bullhorn ClientCorporation (the organization) and ClientContact (the hiring manager or internal recruiter contact). The Client name becomes ClientCorporation name; primary and secondary contacts from TalentFlow become ClientContact records with a link to the corporation. Industry, website, and address fields map directly. If TalentFlow stores multiple contact persons under one Client, we create one ClientCorporation and multiple ClientContact records, all linked.
TalentFlow
Job
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
JobOrder
1:1TalentFlow Jobs map to Bullhorn JobOrder records. Job title, description, location, pay range, employment type, and status migrate as standard Bullhorn JobOrder fields. The job status workflow (open, filled, cancelled, on hold) maps to Bullhorn's JobOrder status field. We preserve the Client link by resolving the ClientCorporation record created in the prior phase. If the TalentFlow job has custom fields, we map these to Bullhorn custom fields or custom objects depending on Bullhorn edition.
TalentFlow
Submission
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
JobSubmission
1:1TalentFlow Submissions (linking a Talent to a Job with stage, submitted date, and feedback) map to Bullhorn JobSubmission records. The Candidate reference comes from the Talent migration; the JobOrder reference comes from the Job migration. Submission stage (applied, screening, interview, offer, rejected, placed) maps to JobSubmission status with a custom mapping table built during discovery. Feedback notes migrate as Note records linked to the JobSubmission. We preserve submission order to maintain the candidate pipeline history in Bullhorn's candidate筒application view.
TalentFlow
Contract
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Placement (plus custom fields)
lossyTalentFlow Contracts capture agreement terms between agency and client or talent. Bullhorn uses Placement for placed candidates but does not have a native Contract entity. We map Contract records to Bullhorn Placement with commission rate, effective dates, and terms stored in custom fields on the Placement. If the TalentFlow Contract is not tied to a placed candidate (e.g., a retainer agreement), we store it as a custom object record linked to the relevant ClientCorporation. The customer reviews the custom field schema during discovery to confirm the contract data they need accessible in Bullhorn.
TalentFlow
Deal
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Opportunity
1:1TalentFlow Deals track placement revenue and commission structures. We map Deals to Bullhorn Opportunity with deal value mapped to Amount, expected close date to CloseDate, and stage to Opportunity stage. The deal's linked Talent and Client resolve to the migrated Candidate and ClientCorporation. Commission rate and payout details from TalentFlow become custom Opportunity fields since Bullhorn stores commission through back-office integrations rather than natively. We confirm the customer's commission workflow during scoping to determine whether Opportunity or a custom object is the appropriate destination.
TalentFlow
Custom Fields (Talent and Job)
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Custom Fields or Custom Objects
lossyTalentFlow custom fields are per-account and discovered during live scoping. We map Talent custom fields to Bullhorn Candidate custom fields and Job custom fields to Bullhorn JobOrder custom fields. Bullhorn edition determines how many custom fields are available per object (55 per entity). If the TalentFlow custom field set exceeds Bullhorn's per-entity limit, we escalate the overflow to Bullhorn Custom Objects, which are scoped to specific Bullhorn editions (ATS Growth 0, ATS 2, Growth/Enterprise 10 with 55 fields each). The customer reviews the discovered custom field list before migration mapping is finalized.
TalentFlow
Attachments (resumes, headshots, documents)
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
ContentDocument (via Bullhorn Documents)
1:1TalentFlow attachments linked to Talents (resumes, headshots) and Jobs (job descriptions as PDFs) migrate to Bullhorn's document model. We export files from TalentFlow and re-associate them using Bullhorn's document linking (Candidate筒Documents, JobOrder筒Documents, Placement筒Documents). File type is detected and mapped to the appropriate Bullhorn document type. Headshots for TalentFlow Talents store as external URL references in Candidate custom fields since Bullhorn does not natively display headshots on candidate cards.
TalentFlow
Team Members (Users)
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
User
1:1TalentFlow user accounts (agents, admins) migrate to Bullhorn User records with roles and permissions. We resolve TalentFlow users by email match against the Bullhorn destination User table. Role naming conventions differ between platforms (TalentFlow roles are entertainment-agency-oriented; Bullhorn roles follow staffing-vertical permissions), so we map each TalentFlow role to the closest Bullhorn equivalent and flag any roles without a clear Bullhorn analog for the customer's admin to configure. Inactive TalentFlow users migrate as inactive Bullhorn Users to preserve historical assignment data.
TalentFlow
Notes and Feedback
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Note
1:1Free-text notes and feedback entries on Talent, Job, and Submission records migrate as Bullhorn Note records linked via ContentDocumentLink to the parent record. We preserve the note author and timestamp. Bullhorn's Note model differs from some ATS platforms in that notes are stored as ContentDocument entities, so the linking relationship is via ContentDocumentLink rather than a direct parent-child field. We set the IsPrivate flag to false for all migrated notes unless the original TalentFlow note was explicitly marked private, which we confirm during discovery.
TalentFlow
Pipeline Stages
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Custom JobOrder Status Configuration
lossyTalentFlow's configurable submission pipeline stages (applied, screening, interview, offer, placed, rejected) map to Bullhorn JobOrder status values and JobSubmission status values. We build a custom status configuration in Bullhorn that mirrors the TalentFlow stage order, names, and any automation triggers. Bullhorn's JobOrder status is a standard picklist, while JobSubmission status is more granular. We configure both during the Bullhorn setup phase before any data loads to ensure stage mapping is consistent across the migration.
TalentFlow
Tags and Labels
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Labels (custom multi-select picklist)
lossyTalentFlow tags applied to Talents, Jobs, or Submissions migrate as Bullhorn label custom fields (single-select or multi-select picklist depending on whether a TalentFlow record can hold multiple tags). We map tag names directly where possible and flag any tags that do not fit Bullhorn's picklist value constraints. The customer chooses whether to create a new label taxonomy in Bullhorn or map to an existing label set during discovery. Unmapped tags are preserved in a custom text field for later manual categorization.
| TalentFlow | Bullhorn ATS & CRM | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Talent | Candidate1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Client | ClientCorporation and ClientContact1:many | Fully supported | |
| Job | JobOrder1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Submission | JobSubmission1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Contract | Placement (plus custom fields)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Deal | Opportunity1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Fields (Talent and Job) | Custom Fields or Custom Objectslossy | Fully supported | |
| Attachments (resumes, headshots, documents) | ContentDocument (via Bullhorn Documents)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Team Members (Users) | User1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Notes and Feedback | Note1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Pipeline Stages | Custom JobOrder Status Configurationlossy | Mapping required | |
| Tags and Labels | Labels (custom multi-select picklist)lossy | Mapping required |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
TalentFlow gotchas
No publicly documented API endpoint reference
Tier-based client count limits affect migration scope
Custom fields schema is per-account and opaque
Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas
ATS Growth edition has no API access
Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports
Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition
Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific
Resume parse quality varies by document format
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Live credential review and export feasibility assessment
We begin every TalentFlow engagement with a live credential review of the source account. We attempt to connect to TalentFlow via API to determine whether programmatic export endpoints exist (even undocumented ones), what authentication method is in use, and what object and field coverage the export would provide. If API access is not available or returns incomplete data, we fall back to CSV extraction. We export all object types (Talents, Clients, Jobs, Submissions, Contracts, Deals, Notes, Attachments) and assess relational integrity (foreign key presence) in the extracted files. The output is a written Export Feasibility Report that determines the migration path and informs the timeline estimate.
Discovery scoping and Bullhorn edition selection
We audit the TalentFlow account for record counts (Talents, Clients, Jobs, Submissions, Contracts, Deals), custom field schema, user count, pipeline stage definitions, and any notes or attachment volume. We pair this with a Bullhorn edition assessment based on the customer's requirements: ATS Growth for basic ATS-only needs (no custom objects), ATS for up to 2 custom objects, or Front Office Growth/Enterprise for up to 10 custom objects. We also confirm whether the customer needs Bullhorn's CRM layer (ClientCorporation, ClientContact) or ATS-only functionality. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts, mapping decisions, custom field handling, and Bullhorn edition recommendation.
Schema design and custom field mapping
We design the destination Bullhorn schema based on the discovery scope. This includes confirming ClientCorporation and ClientContact structure for TalentFlow Clients, mapping TalentFlow Jobs to JobOrder with custom field placement, designing the JobSubmission status configuration to match TalentFlow pipeline stages, and mapping Deals to Opportunity with commission custom fields. If the TalentFlow custom field count exceeds Bullhorn's per-entity limits, we escalate to custom objects and confirm the target Bullhorn edition. The schema design document is reviewed by the customer before any data moves, with particular attention to commission tracking logic if the customer uses Deals for placement revenue.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Bullhorn Sandbox (or a test environment designated by the customer) using production-like data volumes. We validate record counts per object, spot-check mapped fields against the source data, confirm that Talent-to-Candidate normalization preserved required fields (particularly email addresses), verify that Submission-to-Job linkages resolved correctly, and test that Deals mapped to Opportunities with correct amounts and dates. The customer reconciles the sandbox data and signs off before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections identified in sandbox happen here, not in production.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: ClientCorporation records (from TalentFlow Clients, as the organizational anchor), ClientContact records (split from Clients), JobOrder records (from TalentFlow Jobs with ClientCorporation lookups resolved), Candidate records (from TalentFlow Talents), JobSubmission records (linking Candidate to JobOrder with status mapped), Placement records (for Contracts tied to placed candidates), Opportunity records (from Deals with commission fields), User records (reconciled by email), Notes (linked via ContentDocumentLink to parent records), Attachments (exported and re-linked), and Tags (mapped to custom picklist fields). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. If TalentFlow's API is unavailable and we are using CSV extraction, we perform lookup reconciliation during the transform phase to resolve Talents linked to Submissions and Submissions linked to Jobs before insert.
Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff
We freeze TalentFlow writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration, then enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver a written workflow and automation inventory document listing every TalentFlow workflow requiring rebuild in Bullhorn's automation builder, plus any Bullhorn workflow recommendations for common staffing automation patterns. We do not rebuild TalentFlow workflows as Bullhorn automations inside the migration scope. We support a one-week post-cutover window where we resolve data quality issues identified by the customer's team. Bullhorn user provisioning for permissions not exposed in the Admin UI requires a support ticket per Bullhorn's documented provisioning process.
Platform deep dives
TalentFlow
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TalentFlow and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.
Object compatibility
1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
TalentFlow: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
TalentFlow doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TalentFlow to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your TalentFlow to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave TalentFlow
Other ways to arrive at Bullhorn ATS & CRM
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.