Project Management migration

Migrate from CONTACT Project Office to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between CONTACT Project Office and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

60%

6 of 10

objects map 1:1 between CONTACT Project Office and Jira.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

CONTACT Project Office and Jira occupy different positions on the project management spectrum. CONTACT Project Office is an industrial-project-focused platform with limited public documentation, while Jira is an Atlassian-ecosystem issue tracker with deep API capabilities and extensive third-party migration tooling. The primary migration challenge is exporting structured data from CONTACT Project Office, which lacks a documented public API and often requires manual extraction workflows before any load into Jira. We begin every engagement with a data discovery call to inventory what actually exists in the source instance, then normalize that data into a FlitStack AI staging format for Jira load. Jira receives Projects, Issues (mapped from Tasks), Subtasks, Attachments, Comments, and Custom Fields, with Assignees resolved by email lookup. Jira automations, Jira Software workflows, and Jira Service Management queues do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer to rebuild post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office

What's pushing teams away

  • Very thin public review presence — neither G2 nor Capterra currently shows established user ratings for CONTACT Project Office, so prospective buyers struggle to find peer validation outside of CONTACT's own case studies.
  • Tightly tied to the broader CONTACT Elements stack — customers who never adopted CIM Database PLM derive less differentiated value from Project Office vs. mainstream PM tools and tend to drift toward Jira, MS Project, or Smartsheet.
  • Limited third-party integration ecosystem — outside the CONTACT Elements modules and MS Office/CAD viewers, customers report fewer pre-built connectors than ServiceNow SPM, Planview, or Wrike provide.
  • Sparse public documentation outside the customer portal — without a vendor relationship, evaluators have difficulty finding API references, data-model documentation, or pricing transparency in open channels.
  • Concentrated in German-speaking and European industrial sectors — North American and APAC customers may face support, language, and consultant availability gaps compared with global PPM vendors.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How CONTACT Project Office objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a CONTACT Project Office object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

CONTACT Project Office

Project

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Projects map to Jira Projects. Each Jira Project requires a unique Project Key (2-10 uppercase alphanumeric characters) that prefixes all Issues. We work with the customer during discovery to define Project Keys that avoid conflicts with any existing Jira projects in the destination org. Project metadata including description, lead, and default workflow migrate as project-level configuration.

CONTACT Project Office

Task

maps to

Jira

Issue

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Tasks map to Jira Issues. The Task name becomes the Issue Summary field. Task description migrates to the Issue Description field, with formatting preserved where possible. Status mapping requires configuration: we inventory all source Task status values during discovery and map each to a Jira Status value that exists in the target project's workflow scheme.

CONTACT Project Office

Subtask

maps to

Jira

Sub-Task

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Subtasks map to Jira Sub-Tasks. Jira supports one level of Sub-Task nesting under a parent Issue. If the source data contains multi-level subtask hierarchies (Subtask of Subtask), we flatten to two levels by creating additional Issue records with a Parent Link rather than true subtasks, or we discuss with the customer whether to collapse the deepest level into comments on the parent Issue.

CONTACT Project Office

Assignee

maps to

Jira

User

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office assignees resolve by email address lookup against the Jira destination org's User table. We extract every distinct assignee across Tasks and Subtasks during discovery and check for Jira User existence. Assignees without a matching Jira User go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision or map to an inactive placeholder User before migration proceeds.

CONTACT Project Office

Custom Field

maps to

Jira

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office custom fields map to Jira custom fields of equivalent type. Jira enforces typed field schemas (text, number, date, datetime, single-select, multi-select, user picker, URL). We inventory all source custom fields during discovery, classify each by data type and value format, then pre-create the equivalent Jira custom fields before any record import. Multi-select values in CONTACT Project Office map to Jira multi-select options; date values must be normalized to Jira's ISO 8601 format.

CONTACT Project Office

Attachment

maps to

Jira

Attachment (ContentDocumentLink)

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office file attachments migrate to Jira as ContentDocument records attached to Issues via ContentDocumentLink. Jira Cloud enforces a 10 MB per-file attachment limit; attachments exceeding this threshold require separate transfer via a file transfer tool or cloud storage link stored in an Issue comment. We inventory all attachments during discovery to identify volume and size outliers before migration begins.

CONTACT Project Office

Comment

maps to

Jira

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Comments on Tasks and Subtasks migrate to Jira Issue Comments. Comment authorship and timestamp migrate as Jira Comment fields. Rich text formatting in source comments is converted to Jira Wiki-style markup or stored as plain text with formatting notes. Comments are imported after the parent Issue exists to maintain proper thread ordering.

CONTACT Project Office

Priority

maps to

Jira

Priority

lossy
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office priority values (numeric or named) map to Jira Priority values. We inventory the source priority scale and configure Jira Priority to match the source semantics (Highest, High, Medium, Low, Lowest). If the source uses a numeric scale, we map to named Priority and store the original numeric value in a custom field for audit.

CONTACT Project Office

Status

maps to

Jira

Status

lossy
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Task status values map to Jira Status values within the target project's workflow. We inventory all source status values during discovery and configure the Jira workflow to include equivalent Statuses. Any source statuses that have no Jira equivalent are flagged during discovery, and the customer decides whether to map to a closest-match existing status or extend the workflow with a custom status.

CONTACT Project Office

Issue Type

maps to

Jira

Issue Type

lossy
Fully supported

Jira Issue Types (Story, Bug, Task, Epic, Sub-Task) are configured during Jira project setup. We set up the Issue Type Scheme to match the source data classification: Tasks from CONTACT Project Office map to Jira Task Issue Type by default, with Subtasks mapped to Sub-Task. The customer chooses whether to use Epics for high-level planning items during discovery.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office gotchas

High

Public documentation is limited; API surface is gated to customers

Medium

Project structure is template-driven and may include CIM Database links

Medium

Hybrid agile + classical tasks coexist in the same project

Low

Ratings and peer feedback are sparse — discovery has to be customer-led

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • CONTACT Project Office lacks a documented public API for automated export

    Unlike Jira, which has a comprehensive REST API with documented endpoints and rate limits, CONTACT Project Office has limited public API documentation. Many CONTACT Project Office instances require manual export workflows or customer-provided extraction scripts to obtain structured data. We begin every engagement with a data discovery call to inventory what actually exists in the source instance and determine the export method. This step adds one to two weeks to the timeline before any Jira schema configuration begins.

  • Jira project key conflicts require resolution before migration

    Each Jira Project requires a unique Project Key (2-10 uppercase alphanumeric characters) that prefixes all Issue keys. During discovery, we check whether any existing Jira projects in the destination org share keys with the source Project names. Project name and Project Key conflicts cause the Jira Cloud Migration Assistant to fail or create duplicate projects. We resolve these conflicts during Jira schema configuration before record import, renaming either the source or destination key per customer preference.

  • Jira custom field type constraints block import if mismatched

    Jira enforces strict type constraints on custom fields. A field containing mixed text and numeric values in CONTACT Project Office must be classified as text in Jira, losing numeric sortability. Multi-select values from the source must map to Jira multi-select options, which requires pre-creating the option set. We inventory all source custom fields during discovery, classify each by data type, and pre-create the Jira schema before migration. If a field contains data that violates the Jira field type after import begins, the import rejects those records and requires a schema correction.

  • Jira Cloud attachment size limit may require out-of-band file transfer

    Jira Cloud enforces a 10 MB per-file attachment limit. CONTACT Project Office attachments can exceed this threshold, particularly for engineering documents, CAD files, or media attachments on industrial project records. We identify attachments exceeding the Jira limit during discovery. These files are transferred via a separate cloud storage mechanism (Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, or equivalent) with a reference link stored in the Jira Issue comment. This is a known migration step that requires coordination with the customer's file management team.

  • Jira automations and workflows do not migrate from CONTACT Project Office

    Jira automations (rules that trigger on Issue events), Jira Software workflows (status transition rules), and any custom workflow configurations in CONTACT Project Office are not migrated as code. The two platforms have fundamentally different automation models. We deliver a written inventory of all active CONTACT Project Office workflow triggers, conditions, and actions for the customer's admin to rebuild as Jira Automation rules or ScriptRunner scripts post-migration. Jira Service Management queues and SLAs require separate configuration in the destination Jira Service Management project if applicable.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful CONTACT Project Office to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and export method determination

    We begin with a data discovery call to inventory the CONTACT Project Office instance. We catalog Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Assignees, Custom Fields, Attachments, and Comments in scope. We assess the export method: whether a native export exists, whether a customer-provided extraction script is available, or whether manual extraction workflows are required. The discovery output is a written inventory of all source records, an export method recommendation, and a Jira project and Issue Type scheme proposal. This step typically takes one to two weeks depending on export complexity.

  2. Source data extraction and normalization

    We execute the export method identified during discovery. For manual extraction workflows, we provide a structured export template and guide the customer through data extraction. We normalize the exported data into FlitStack AI staging format, applying initial type classification to custom fields and flagging any records with missing required fields. We produce a source-data quality report identifying records with missing assignees, invalid dates, or oversized attachments before Jira schema configuration begins.

  3. Jira schema configuration

    We configure the Jira destination org. This includes creating Projects with unique Project Keys, configuring Issue Type Schemes (Task, Story, Bug, Epic, Sub-Task), setting up Workflow Schemes, creating custom fields with correct types and options, and configuring Priority scales. We resolve any Project Key conflicts identified during discovery. Jira schema is configured in a Sandbox org first for validation, then promoted to production or deployed directly to the production org if no Sandbox is available. This step typically takes one to two weeks.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into the configured Jira Sandbox with the customer's representative reviewing record counts, spot-checking mapped custom fields, and validating assignee resolution. The customer reconciles 25-50 randomly sampled issues against the source data and signs off the mapping before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections including custom field type changes, status value additions, or assignee resolution fixes happen in this phase. Jira workflow transitions are tested during this phase to confirm the expected statuses appear in the correct order.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record dependency order: Jira Users and Groups (assignee resolution validated), Projects (metadata and default settings), Issues (Tasks mapped from source Tasks with status, priority, and assignee resolved), Sub-Tasks (parent Issue key resolved at insert time), Comments (parent Issue key resolved), Custom Field values, and Attachments (Issues must exist first). Large attachment sets exceeding Jira's 10 MB limit per file are transferred via cloud storage with reference links embedded in Issue comments. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze CONTACT Project Office writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Jira as the system of record. We deliver the automation inventory document listing all CONTACT Project Office workflow triggers, conditions, and actions with recommended Jira Automation equivalents. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve any reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild CONTACT Project Office automations as Jira Automation rules inside the migration scope; that work is documented separately for the customer's admin team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office

Source

Strengths

  • Hybrid planning combining Gantt/WBS with agile task boards inside a single project.
  • Native interoperability with CIM Database PLM for engineering-program data continuity.
  • ISO 26262 tool qualification supports safety-relevant automotive and industrial development.
  • Document management with version control and metadata is part of the same Elements stack.
  • Available as on-premise install or CONTACT Cloud SaaS in EU-hosted environments.

Weaknesses

  • Very limited public review and pricing data — Capterra lists 0 reviews and only a single €35/month figure with no tier breakdown.
  • Strength is conditional on adopting the broader CONTACT Elements stack; standalone value is harder to justify.
  • Smaller pre-built integration ecosystem than mainstream PPM tools.
  • Public API and data-model documentation is gated behind the customer portal.
  • Vendor and consultant footprint is concentrated in European industrial sectors.
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate Project Management migration. 7 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across CONTACT Project Office and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    D

    7 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    CONTACT Project Office: Not publicly documented — confirmed with CONTACT support per tenant during scoping..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    CONTACT Project Office doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your CONTACT Project Office to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about CONTACT Project Office to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during CONTACT Project Office to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your CONTACT Project Office to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for straightforward cases under 5,000 issues with clean custom field types and no oversized attachments. Migrations with large attachment volumes (over 50 GB total), complex multi-level subtask hierarchies, multiple Jira project configurations, or attachments requiring out-of-band file transfer due to Jira's 10 MB limit move to eight to fourteen weeks because of the discovery and extraction phase, Jira schema configuration, and potential attachment remediation.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from CONTACT Project Office.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day