HRMS migration

Migrate from Manitou ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Manitou ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Manitou ATS logo

Manitou ATS

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

92%

11 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Manitou ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

5-7 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Manitou ATS to Bullhorn is a migration defined by data extraction complexity on the source side and schema design on the destination side. Manitou does not publish a public REST API, so we negotiate a structured CSV or direct-database export with Manitou's team before any data movement begins. Bullhorn receives data through its REST API with standard and custom fields that we configure during scoping. We deduplicate Candidates by email and phone before writing to Bullhorn's Candidate entity, resolve ownership by matching Manitou user emails to Bullhorn User records, and map job requisition status (active, on-hold, filled, archived) to Bullhorn JobOrder status codes. Pipeline stages, automation rules, and custom workflow configurations do not migrate; we document the existing stage taxonomy in the scoping report and deliver a written configuration guide for Bullhorn's admin to rebuild hiring pipelines post-migration. Timeline for most Manitou-to-Bullhorn migrations lands between five and eight weeks.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Manitou ATS logo

Manitou ATS

What's pushing teams away

  • Limited brand recognition outside Europe makes it difficult to justify to globally-minded hiring stakeholders or investors.
  • Absence of a public API restricts automation possibilities and makes data portability a manual, fragile process.
  • Lacks the AI-driven sourcing and candidate matching features found in newer competitors like Ashby or Lever.
  • Small vendor footprint means fewer third-party integrations compared to established ATS platforms with large marketplace ecosystems.
  • Interface and feature set feel less polished than modern SaaS ATS products marketed primarily to US-based growth-stage companies.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How Manitou ATS objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a Manitou ATS object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Manitou ATS

Candidate

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Manitou Candidate records (the applicant bank) map to Bullhorn Candidate. We deduplicate by email and phone before writing to Bullhorn, presenting a deduplication report to the customer for any records that match on both fields. Candidate contact info, skills (as text tags), application history, and custom fields migrate. We flag any structured competency taxonomies in Manitou that require normalization against Bullhorn's flat tag model. Note that Manitou's person-type taxonomy (e.g., Keyholder default on contact records) may create Candidate records that should be ClientContact in Bullhorn; we resolve the entity split during scoping using Manitou's person-type flag.

Manitou ATS

Job Requisition

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

Manitou Job Requisitions map to Bullhorn JobOrder. We preserve job title, description, status (active, on-hold, filled, archived), department, and any custom fields. Internal hiring manager assignments from Manitou map to Bullhorn JobOrder's hiringOwner or a custom user reference field. Status values require mapping during scoping: Manitou's internal status labels must be mapped to Bullhorn's JobOrder status codes (Open, Interview, Offer, etc.) and any custom status values created in Bullhorn before import.

Manitou ATS

Application

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobSubmission

1:1
Fully supported

The Manitou join table between Candidate and Job Requisition maps to Bullhorn JobSubmission, which links the Candidate record to the JobOrder. We preserve application status, the Manitou pipeline stage the candidate occupied at time of migration, and the timestamp of stage entry. If the candidate was moved through multiple stages, we preserve the most recent stage name and date as a custom field on JobSubmission since Bullhorn's standard JobSubmission does not expose full stage history in the same way.

Manitou ATS

Company (CRM module)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientCorporation

1:1
Fully supported

Manitou CRM Company records map to Bullhorn ClientCorporation. We preserve company name, address, industry, and any custom CRM fields. Associated contacts from Manitou's CRM link to the ClientCorporation via ClientContact records. If Manitou stores multiple address types (billing, shipping, office) on a single company, we map the primary address to ClientCorporation address fields and store additional addresses in custom fields or notes for Bullhorn admin to resolve post-migration.

Manitou ATS

Contact (CRM module)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientContact

1:1
Fully supported

Manitou individual Contact records map to Bullhorn ClientContact when they represent client-side contacts (hiring managers, client stakeholders). We preserve name, email, phone, and custom properties. ClientContact records are linked to a ClientCorporation via the corporationID field. We resolve this linkage during migration by matching Manitou's company-to-contact relationship to the ClientCorporation records migrated in the previous phase.

Manitou ATS

User / Team Member

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

User

1:1
Fully supported

Manitou internal user accounts (recruiters, hiring managers, administrators) map to Bullhorn User records. We resolve ownership on migrated Candidates, JobOrders, JobSubmissions, ClientCorporations, and ClientContacts by matching Manitou user email addresses to Bullhorn User email addresses. Any Manitou user without a matching Bullhorn User goes to a reconciliation queue; the customer's Bullhorn admin provisions missing users before record import resumes. Role and permission data from Manitou maps to a Bullhorn custom field for the admin to configure role parity post-migration.

Manitou ATS

Pipeline Stages

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

CandidatePipeline / custom status fields

lossy
Mapping required

Manitou's configurable hiring stages (Screening, Interview, Offer, Hired, etc.) do not export as structured data. We extract stage names from individual job records where available and document the existing stage taxonomy in the scoping report. Bullhorn's candidate pipeline stages are configurable per job order type. We deliver a written stage configuration guide that maps each Manitou stage name to a Bullhorn CandidatePipeline or JobOrder custom status value, enabling the Bullhorn admin to implement parity before go-live.

Manitou ATS

Skill

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate.skillList (tags)

1:1
Fully supported

Manitou skill tags and competency tags attached to candidates and jobs migrate as text tags to Bullhorn Candidate.skillList. We flag any structured skill taxonomies in Manitou that use hierarchical or categorized skill groupings; these require normalization to a flat tag list for Bullhorn import. The customer chooses whether to use Bullhorn's standard skillList field or a custom multi-select picklist during scoping.

Manitou ATS

Evaluation / Note

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Note

1:1
Fully supported

Manitou recruiter notes and structured evaluations attached to applications or candidates migrate as Bullhorn Note records linked to the Candidate or JobSubmission. Evaluation scores and structured fields from Manitou map to custom fields on the Note record or to a custom Candidate-level field depending on the evaluation's intended use in Bullhorn. We preserve the author (linked to the migrated User), timestamp, and full note body.

Manitou ATS

Document / Attachment

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

CandidateAttachment / ContentDocumentLink

1:1
Fully supported

Resume files, cover letters, portfolio documents, and other attachments linked to Manitou candidates or jobs are extracted and re-attached to Bullhorn Candidate or JobOrder records. Bullhorn stores candidate attachments as CandidateAttachment records linked to the Candidate entity. We extract binary files from the Manitou export, map file type (resume, cover letter, portfolio), and upload to Bullhorn via the REST API with the attachment linked to the corresponding Candidate record.

Manitou ATS

Time & Expenses (module)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom fields or separate billing system

1:1
Fully supported

Manitou's Time & Expenses module stores timesheet and expense data tied to placements or internal projects. Bullhorn does not have a native Time & Expenses module in the standard ATS & CRM product; Bullhorn Time & Expense is a separate product (formerly myPeopleNet). We document time-and-expense record counts and field schemas in the scoping report and flag that placement-linked expense records may need to map to a custom Bullhorn object or remain in a separate billing system post-migration. This is a migration boundary decision the customer makes during scoping.

Manitou ATS

Invoicing / Accounting (module)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Placement + custom billing fields

1:1
Fully supported

Manitou's Invoicing and Accounting modules store client billing records tied to placements. Bullhorn's billing context lives in the Placement entity with billing rate, pay rate, and invoice status fields, but not full accounting ledger functionality. We migrate Placement records with their associated billing fields from Manitou's invoicing module, but we flag that accounting ledger details (GL codes, accounts payable/receivable, invoice PDFs) may exceed Bullhorn ATS & CRM scope and recommend a separate accounting system migration if those records are needed in the new stack.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Manitou ATS logo

Manitou ATS gotchas

High

No public API means migration depends on vendor-assisted export

Medium

Applicant Bank deduplication is source-side responsibility

Medium

Pipeline stage configurations do not export as structured data

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • No public API on Manitou requires vendor-assisted export

    Manitou ATS does not publish a public REST API in its current offering. All data extraction for migration is entirely dependent on whatever CSV export or direct database access the vendor grants on a per-customer basis. We flag this as a migration-critical risk and recommend requesting a full data export window early in the scoping process, before contract termination negotiations compress the timeline. We negotiate structured export windows with Manitou on behalf of customers to secure the export before vendor relationship cooling begins. Without an export commitment, migration timelines can slip by four to eight weeks.

  • Candidate deduplication must happen before Bullhorn import

    Manitou's central applicant bank accumulates duplicate candidate records when the same person applies through multiple job postings or external job board integrations. Bullhorn's API import does not automatically deduplicate on a composite key of email plus phone; duplicates will create separate Candidate records unless we apply matching logic before writing to Bullhorn. We run deduplication during the extraction phase using name, email, and phone matching, present a deduplication report to the customer before Bullhorn import begins, and let the customer's admin decide which canonical record to preserve for each duplicate set.

  • Pipeline stage configurations do not export as structured data

    Manitou's pipeline stage names and ordering are configured per-job or globally and stored in a format that does not expose cleanly via standard exports. We extract stage names from individual job records where available, but the visual pipeline layout, automation triggers tied to stages, and stage probability or weighting data must be manually re-established in Bullhorn post-migration. We document the existing stage taxonomy in the scoping report so the Bullhorn administrator can configure pipeline parity before go-live. This is a known manual-rebuild item that the customer should budget admin time for.

  • Bullhorn implementation and onboarding fees inflate total cost

    Bullhorn's base license ($99-$315/user/month) represents only part of the total cost of switching. Implementation fees range from $1,000 to $50,000+ depending on data volume and customization scope, and onboarding assistance is separately priced. Reviewers on Reddit and Capterra consistently note that Bullhorn's pricing lacks transparency, with some agencies reporting 20% renewal increases at contract renewal. We include Bullhorn's implementation and onboarding fee estimates in the scoping document so the customer's finance team can model total cost of ownership before committing to the migration timeline.

  • Manitou CRM module data may require entity reassignment

    Manitou uses a unified person record type across its ATS and CRM modules, meaning a contact created in the CRM may share the same record type as an ATS candidate. Bullhorn maintains strict entity separation: ATS persons are Candidate records, while client-side contacts are ClientContact records linked to ClientCorporation. We identify during extraction which Manitou person records are candidate-type versus client-contact-type using Manitou's person-type flag or source module attribution, and map them to the correct Bullhorn entity. Any ambiguous records go to a reconciliation queue for the customer to classify before migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Manitou ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Export negotiation and data discovery

    We initiate contact with Manitou's support or account management team to request a full data export. Because Manitou has no self-service export, we negotiate the export scope, format (CSV preferred, direct database access if available), and delivery timeline on the customer's behalf. During this phase we also enumerate the full object inventory: candidates, jobs, applications, companies, contacts, users, skills, notes, and attachments. We assess the presence of the Time & Expenses and Invoicing modules to determine whether placement billing data requires migration. Export commitment is gated before we begin schema design.

  2. Data profiling and deduplication

    We receive and profile the Manitou export, assessing record counts, data quality, custom field presence, and attachment availability. We run deduplication on the Candidate dataset using email and phone as composite keys, producing a deduplication report that the customer's admin reviews. We identify and queue ambiguous person-type records (candidate vs. client contact) for classification. We also extract pipeline stage names from individual job records and document the existing stage taxonomy for the Bullhorn configuration guide.

  3. Bullhorn schema design and custom field provisioning

    We design the Bullhorn destination schema using Bullhorn's REST API. This includes creating custom fields on Candidate, JobOrder, JobSubmission, ClientCorporation, and ClientContact to receive Manitou's custom properties. We configure JobOrder status values to match Manitou's requisition status taxonomy and define CandidatePipeline stages per the documented Manitou stage list. Bullhorn custom objects (if needed for placement billing or invoicing data) are created before any data import begins. Schema is validated in a Bullhorn sandbox or demo org before production migration starts.

  4. Owner and user reconciliation

    We extract every distinct Manitou user referenced on Candidate, JobOrder, ClientCorporation, and ClientContact records and match by email address against Bullhorn User records in the destination org. Any Manitou user without a matching Bullhorn User goes to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Bullhorn admin provisions missing users (active or inactive based on whether the original Manitou user remains employed) before record import resumes. Migration cannot proceed past this step because Bullhorn requires OwnerId references on most standard records.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: ClientCorporation records first (establishing the parent for client contacts), ClientContact records (with corporationID resolved), Candidate records (with deduplication applied), JobOrder records (with status mapped), JobSubmission records (linking Candidate to JobOrder), User-linked notes and evaluations, and finally attachments. Time & Expenses and Invoicing module data migrates to Bullhorn custom objects or a separate billing note on Placement records per the customer's scoping decision. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and configuration handoff

    We freeze writes on the Manitou export dataset during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, and enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver the pipeline stage configuration guide to the Bullhorn administrator for stage parity setup before go-live. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues raised by the customer's recruiting team. Workflows, automations, and custom pipeline rules from Manitou do not migrate; we document the existing automation inventory in the scoping report for the customer's admin to rebuild in Bullhorn Automation or a third-party tool post-migration.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Manitou ATS logo

Manitou ATS

Source

Strengths

  • Combines ATS, CRM, HR, Projects, Time & Expenses, Invoicing, and Accounting in a single subscription.
  • Applicant bank provides a persistent, searchable talent repository across all open and closed requisitions.
  • Job board integrations allow single-post publishing to multiple external staffing platforms simultaneously.
  • Supports end-to-end staffing workflows from requisition through onboarding and client invoicing.
  • No-code pipeline configuration lets non-technical recruiters adjust hiring stages without developer involvement.

Weaknesses

  • No publicly documented REST API, making automated data extraction and migration dependent on vendor cooperation.
  • No published pricing on the website; prospective customers must contact sales for a custom quote.
  • Very limited third-party review presence on G2 and Capterra makes independent evaluation difficult.
  • Sparse documentation of data export capabilities, raising concerns about data portability when switching vendors.
  • Smaller market share compared to category leaders like Greenhouse, Lever, or iCIMS, reducing confidence in long-term vendor stability.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Manitou ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Manitou ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 7 core objects map 1:1 between Manitou ATS and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Manitou ATS: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Manitou ATS doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Manitou ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Manitou ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Manitou ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Manitou ATS to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Manitou-to-Bullhorn migrations land between five and seven weeks for accounts under 10,000 candidates and 500 active job requisitions with a straightforward CSV export from Manitou. Migrations with large candidate databases (over 25,000 records), multiple Manitou modules to map (ATS plus CRM plus Time & Expenses), complex custom field schemas, or data requiring engineering-level transformation move to ten to fourteen weeks. The export negotiation phase with Manitou typically adds two to four weeks to the front end of the schedule and is the most schedule-sensitive step in the project.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Manitou ATS.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day