HRMS migration

Migrate from TalentWall to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TalentWall and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

TalentWall logo

TalentWall

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

92%

11 of 12

objects map 1:1 between TalentWall and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from TalentWall to Bullhorn is a multi-source extraction because TalentWall does not function as a standalone ATS — all Jobs, Candidates, and Pipeline Stages originate in the connected upstream ATS and sync to the Wall in real time. We treat the ATS as the primary data source for canonical records and extract TalentWall-specific data (job health rankings, candidate freshness scores, custom widget configurations, and any TalentWall-native scorecards) separately. We then combine both extracts into a unified migration dataset and load it into Bullhorn through the REST API with proper parent-record dependency resolution. TalentWall does not publish a public API, so every migration requires coordinating a data snapshot with TalentWall support or extracting from the upstream ATS directly. We do not migrate TalentWall workflows, custom widgets as reusable components, or pipeline visualization layouts; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's Bullhorn admin to rebuild as Bullhorn Record Types, Sales Processes, and custom fields post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

TalentWall logo

TalentWall

What's pushing teams away

  • Public pricing is not surfaced — quote-only model complicates budget evaluation.
  • Coverage is limited to a handful of supported ATSs (Greenhouse, Lever, Jobvite primarily) — teams on other ATSs can't use TalentWall at all.
  • All ATS-side data lives in the upstream system — when TalentWall is removed, custom widgets, job-health rankings and freshness scores are lost unless explicitly exported.
  • AS a thin visualisation layer, TalentWall doesn't replace any core ATS functionality, so customers paying for both eventually evaluate whether their ATS's native dashboards have caught up.
  • Brand confusion with similarly named recruiting/HR tools; ensure the customer is on TalentWall.io specifically before scoping.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How TalentWall objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a TalentWall object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

TalentWall

Job

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

Jobs originate in the upstream ATS (Greenhouse, Lever, or Jobvite) and sync to TalentWall. We extract the canonical job record from the ATS API — not TalentWall — preserving title, department, location, employment type, and the job description. Bullhorn JobOrder fields map directly: title to title, department to jobBoardCategory or a custom department field, and the ATS job ID preserved as an external reference field. If multiple ATS instances are connected to TalentWall, we run separate ATS API extracts per instance and merge by external ID before Bullhorn ingestion.

TalentWall

Candidate

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Candidate records come from the upstream ATS as the system of record. We export all application data, contact information, work history, education, and resume from the ATS. Bullhorn's Candidate entity is the direct equivalent. Resume files export from the ATS file storage and attach to Bullhorn Candidate records via ContentDocumentLink. We preserve the TalentWall card position (pipeline stage at time of extraction) as a custom Candidate field if the customer requires historical position tracking.

TalentWall

Pipeline Stage

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

JobOrder Status / Record Type

lossy
Fully supported

TalentWall reflects ATS pipeline stages as visual columns on the Wall. We extract stage names and ordering from the ATS job configuration. Each distinct ATS pipeline maps to a Bullhorn JobOrder Record Type with its own Sales Process that defines the allowed Status values. Stage probability percentages from the ATS migrate to Bullhorn's JobOrder probability field.

TalentWall

Job Health Ranking (Red/Yellow/Green)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Field on JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

Job health status is a TalentWall-native annotation not stored in the ATS. We extract it from TalentWall's storage (via support-coordinated export or direct access if available) and write it as a custom picklist field job_health_status__c on the Bullhorn JobOrder. We also extract any health annotation notes and write them to a custom text area field job_health_notes__c. If the customer's Bullhorn edition is ATS Growth (which has no Custom Objects), we use standard Bullhorn custom fields instead.

TalentWall

Candidate Freshness Score

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Field on Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Candidate freshness is TalentWall-computed or -entered metadata indicating last activity and pipeline position. We extract it as a numeric or categorical value and write it to a Bullhorn Candidate custom field candidate_freshness_score__c. If the freshness score is a composite value not exposed in the ATS, we coordinate with TalentWall support to retrieve the full freshness dataset. Bullhorn ATS edition customers with limited custom fields use a single custom field to store the score as a text value for filtering.

TalentWall

Custom Widget (Job-level)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Field on JobOrder

1:1
Fully supported

TalentWall's custom widget library maps widgets to specific ATS custom fields scoped at the job level. We extract the widget-to-field mapping table from TalentWall, identify the corresponding ATS custom field, and recreate the display logic as Bullhorn JobOrder custom fields and section headers in the Page Layout. Widget visual placement does not migrate; the customer configures the Bullhorn Page Layout post-migration based on the inventory we deliver.

TalentWall

Custom Widget (Offer-level)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Field on Placement

1:1
Fully supported

Offer-level custom widgets in TalentWall reference offer-level custom fields in the ATS. These map to Bullhorn Placement custom fields (Placement being Bullhorn's record for a placed candidate). We extract the widget configuration and write key-value pairs as Placement custom fields. If the customer does not use Bullhorn Placements (only tracking candidates through the pipeline), we map to Candidate custom fields instead.

TalentWall

Scorecard / Evaluation (TalentWall-native)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object or Custom Field on Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Interview scorecards entered directly into TalentWall (rather than the ATS) exist only in TalentWall storage. We audit both TalentWall and the upstream ATS during discovery. If TalentWall holds scorecard data not present in the ATS, we extract it and write it to Bullhorn Custom Objects if the edition supports them (Front Office Growth/Enterprise: 10, Bullhorn ATS: 2, ATS Growth: none), or to Candidate custom fields. Bullhorn ATS Growth customers receive scorecard data as text-area fields on the Candidate record.

TalentWall

Interview / Calendar Event

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

PlacementSchedule or Event

1:1
Fully supported

Interview scheduling data shown in TalentWall originates from the ATS calendar integration. We pull interview records (scheduled time, interviewer, interview type, meeting link) from the ATS calendar export and write them to Bullhorn PlacementSchedule (if the customer's Bullhorn edition supports it) or to Event records linked to the Candidate. Bullhorn's Event object stores StartDateTime, EndDateTime, Location, and interviewer as EventRelation records.

TalentWall

Tag / Label (TalentWall-native)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Field on Candidate or ClientCorporation

1:1
Fully supported

Recruiters may apply tags or labels on TalentWall cards that are not mirrored back to the ATS. We extract any TalentWall-native tags per candidate or job and write them as Bullhorn Candidate tags (if Bullhorn's tag feature is enabled) or as a multi-select picklist custom field candidate_tags__c. Tags used for candidate classification migrate to TopicAssignment records if the customer uses Bullhorn's Topic feature.

TalentWall

Client Corporation

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientCorporation

1:1
Fully supported

Client companies are not managed in TalentWall (it is candidate- and job-focused). We export ClientCorporation records from the upstream ATS if they exist there (Lever and Greenhouse store client or organization data). Bullhorn ClientCorporation maps directly to ATS organization records, with the ATS organization ID preserved as an external reference field. If the upstream ATS does not store client data, we extract it from any CRM connected to TalentWall or coordinate a separate export.

TalentWall

Attachment / Resume

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ContentDocument via ContentDocumentLink

1:1
Fully supported

Resumes and attachments live in the ATS as the system of record. We export from the ATS file storage at migration time and deliver them as a structured file package alongside the record data, then attach to Bullhorn Candidate records via ContentDocumentLink. File naming follows the convention CandidateID_Filename to maintain association during ingestion. Bullhorn parses resumes through its built-in resume parsing on Candidate insert if the Bullhorn parsing feature is enabled.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

TalentWall logo

TalentWall gotchas

High

TalentWall-native annotations are not in the ATS

Medium

Scorecard data may reside in TalentWall or the ATS

Medium

Custom fields have job-level vs. offer-level scoping

High

No publicly documented API for programmatic migration

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • TalentWall has no public API — extraction requires support coordination

    TalentWall does not publish a REST API with documented endpoints. All integrations referenced in research are ATS-side API connections that TalentWall initiates. Migration therefore relies on extracting canonical records from the upstream ATS API (Greenhouse, Lever, or Jobvite), supplemented by a TalentWall-coordinated data snapshot for TalentWall-native objects (health rankings, freshness scores, custom widgets, scorecards). We handle the coordination with TalentWall support to request a full data export. If TalentWall cannot produce a machine-readable export, we fall back to ATS-only extraction and acknowledge that TalentWall-native enrichment will not migrate without a manual data entry step or a separate TalentWall export project.

  • TalentWall-native annotations live outside the connected ATS

    Job health rankings (Red/Yellow/Green), candidate freshness scores, and custom widget configurations are stored exclusively in TalentWall's own database and are not written back to the connected ATS. We explicitly scope extraction from TalentWall's storage for these objects. If the customer's instance does not expose a data export mechanism, we coordinate with TalentWall support to retrieve a full data snapshot before cutover. Failure to capture this step results in TalentWall-specific enrichment being silently dropped.

  • Bullhorn Custom Object tiering limits enrichment storage on lower plans

    Bullhorn editions cap Custom Objects: Front Office Growth and Enterprise allow 10 Custom Objects with 55 fields each; Bullhorn ATS allows 2; ATS Growth allows none. If the customer's TalentWall instance uses more than two distinct enrichment object types (e.g., scorecards, custom widgets, freshness data), we must prioritize which migrate as Custom Objects and which compress into Bullhorn standard custom fields. We surface this constraint during scoping and agree on a prioritization before migration begins.

  • Scorecard data ambiguity between TalentWall and the ATS

    Some teams enter interview scorecards directly into TalentWall rather than the ATS, depending on their workflow. We audit both TalentWall and the ATS during the discovery phase to identify where the authoritative evaluation record lives. If TalentWall holds scorecard data not present in the ATS, we extract it from TalentWall. If the ATS is the source of truth, we pull from the ATS. Running both audits before extraction prevents silent data loss on evaluations.

  • Custom widget scope (job-level vs. offer-level) must not be mixed during mapping

    TalentWall's custom widget library maps widgets against either a job-level custom field or an offer-level custom field. These are separate namespaces. When mapping custom fields to Bullhorn, we validate the field scope — a job-level widget in TalentWall must map to a Bullhorn JobOrder custom field, and an offer-level widget must map to a Placement custom field. Mixing scopes causes the widget to reference a non-existent field and fail silently, producing empty data in the destination.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful TalentWall to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and multi-source audit

    We audit the upstream ATS (Greenhouse, Lever, or Jobvite) via its API to enumerate Jobs, Candidates, Pipeline Stages, and any client or organization records. In parallel, we audit TalentWall for job health rankings, candidate freshness scores, custom widget configurations, any TalentWall-native scorecards, tags, and interview calendar data. We also identify which data lives exclusively in TalentWall (not in the ATS) and determine whether TalentWall support can provide a machine-readable export. The discovery output is a multi-source data map: for each object, we document the source system, the extraction mechanism (ATS API, TalentWall export, or manual), and the destination Bullhorn entity.

  2. TalentWall support coordination and snapshot retrieval

    Because TalentWall has no public API, we coordinate directly with TalentWall support to request a full data snapshot of TalentWall-native objects. We submit the request on the customer's behalf, specifying the objects required (health rankings, freshness scores, custom widget configurations, scorecards, tags) and the preferred export format (CSV or JSON). If TalentWall cannot produce a structured export, we document the limitation and proceed with ATS-only extraction, noting that TalentWall-specific enrichment will be excluded from the migration dataset unless the customer arranges a manual export.

  3. Bullhorn schema design and edition check

    We review the customer's Bullhorn edition (Starter, Core, Front Office Growth, Enterprise) and confirm the Custom Object allocation before migration begins. For each TalentWall-native object, we design the Bullhorn destination: job health as a picklist custom field on JobOrder, freshness score as a numeric custom field on Candidate, scorecards as a Custom Object (Front Office Growth/Enterprise) or custom fields on Candidate (ATS Growth). We create Bullhorn custom fields via Admin Field Mappings before any record migration starts. We also configure the JobOrder Record Types and Sales Processes to match the pipeline stages extracted from the ATS.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Bullhorn Sandbox (Full Copy or Partial Copy) using the extracted ATS records plus the TalentWall-native enrichment. The customer's Bullhorn admin reviews record counts, spot-checks 25-50 candidate and job records against the source data, and validates that custom field values populated correctly. Any mapping corrections (wrong field type, missing values, scope mismatches) happen in the Sandbox. We do not begin production migration until the customer signs off on the Sandbox results.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in dependency order: Bullhorn Users (validated against ATS user emails), ClientCorporation (from ATS organization records), Candidate (with resume files attached via ContentDocumentLink), JobOrder (with Record Type and Sales Process resolved), Placement (for placed candidates with offer-level custom fields), then TalentWall-native enrichment (health, freshness, scorecards, tags as custom fields and Custom Objects). Bullhorn REST API batch endpoints handle the load with rate-limit handling and row-count reconciliation after each phase.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze TalentWall and upstream ATS writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the window, then mark Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of TalentWall workflows (none exist in TalentWall natively, but any ATS automations surfaced by TalentWall are documented for Bullhorn rebuild), custom widget configurations, and pipeline stage definitions. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Bullhorn automations as part of the migration scope; that work is delivered as a configuration document for the customer's Bullhorn admin.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

TalentWall logo

TalentWall

Source

Strengths

  • Real-time bidirectional sync with Greenhouse, Lever, Jobvite, and other major ATS platforms
  • Kanban-style drag-and-drop candidate management on an intuitive visual Wall
  • Built-in job health tracking with Red/Yellow/Green status per open role
  • Candidate freshness indicators showing which candidates need prioritization
  • Hiring analytics dashboards with visualizations for time-to-hire and pipeline health

Weaknesses

  • Does not function as a standalone ATS — requires an active upstream ATS integration
  • Core feature set rated lower (4.3/5) than ease-of-use and customer service scores on Capterra
  • TalentWall-native data (freshness, health, custom widgets) not stored in the ATS and requires separate extraction
  • Public API documentation not readily accessible for programmatic extraction
  • Limited to teams already invested in a supported ATS with which TalentWall can integrate
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between TalentWall and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TalentWall and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 7 core objects map 1:1 between TalentWall and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    TalentWall: Not publicly documented — TalentWall is constrained by the upstream ATS's API rate limits rather than its own published quota.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    TalentWall doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your TalentWall to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about TalentWall to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TalentWall to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your TalentWall to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for single-ATS connections with under 10,000 candidate records and no TalentWall-native scorecard data. Migrations with multiple connected ATS instances, TalentWall-specific scorecards requiring Custom Object configuration, or a customer on Bullhorn ATS Growth (limited to two custom objects) requiring creative field mapping move to six to ten weeks. Bullhorn's own onboarding team runs concurrently with our migration, and Bullhorn Starter and Core tiers include data import as part of the subscription.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from TalentWall.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day