ERP migration

Migrate from Integra ERP to Epicor Prophet 21

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Integra ERP and Epicor Prophet 21. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Epicor Prophet 21.

Integra ERP logo

Integra ERP

Source

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Compatibility

85%

11 of 13

objects map 1:1 between Integra ERP and Epicor Prophet 21.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

6-10 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Integra ERP to Epicor ERP is a structured extraction-and-load migration constrained by Integra ERP's absence of a public API. We access the source through direct database queries against on-premise instances or scheduled flat-file exports, then load into Epicor Kinetic through Epicor Data Management Tool (DMT) for transactional records and REST API for real-time objects. The migration follows dependency order: Chart of Accounts first (to satisfy account references in journal entries), then Customers and Vendors (for AR/AP lookup resolution), then Items (BOM flattening and branch-level aggregation), then Inventory ledgers, then open AP/AR balances, then historical Sales Orders. BOM structures for manufacturing customers require careful flattening because Integra stores multi-level hierarchies across linked tables while Epicor expects individual part numbers with assembly links. We do not migrate workflows, automations, custom reports, or attachments because Integra provides no documented export mechanism and Epicor stores these as platform-specific configuration code rather than data records.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Integra ERP logo

Integra ERP

What's pushing teams away

  • Perpetual license pricing model is rigid and does not accommodate distinct operational requirements, forcing customers with evolving workflows toward more flexible SaaS alternatives.
  • No public API is documented or available, preventing customers from integrating Integra ERP with modern BI, e-commerce, or automation tools, driving migrations to API-first platforms.
  • On-premise deployment requires dedicated Windows infrastructure and IT staff to maintain, creating hidden operational overhead that erodes the cost advantage for growing businesses.
  • Limited transparency in pricing tiers beyond the base ₹500 per-user cost, with no clear feature gating documentation, causing budget surprises during implementation.

Choosing

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-specific design for wholesale distributors, not a general-purpose ERP repurposed for distribution — distributors choose P21 because it matches their replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Strong inventory control with automated replenishment, lot and serial tracking, and multi-warehouse management appeals to distributors with complex stock requirements and tight margin pressure.
  • Responsive customer support cited across G2 and Gartner reviews, with Epicor's 90% retention rate reflecting long-term customer satisfaction in a market where switching costs are high.
  • Cloud deployment on Microsoft Azure provides the flexibility to scale user counts and warehouse locations without on-premise infrastructure investment.
  • The Software Development Kit lets distributors personalize P21 to their specific business processes without modifying the application source code, preserving upgrade paths.

Object mapping

How Integra ERP objects map to Epicor Prophet 21

Each row shows how a Integra ERP object lands in Epicor Prophet 21, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Integra ERP

Chart of Accounts

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

GL Account (APBYR/GL Account)

1:1
Mapping required

Integra ERP Chart of Accounts records map to Epicor Kinetic GL Account (GLAccount table). Account code, account name, account type (Asset, Liability, Income, Expense), and active flag transfer directly. We resolve cost-center segmentation from Integra by mapping to Epicor's dimension codes if the customer uses multi-segment account structures; otherwise cost centers become separate GL Account records or analytical reporting tags. Customer provides an account-mapping spreadsheet during scoping to resolve any gaps between Integra's account numbering convention and Epicor's GL Account code structure.

Integra ERP

Customers

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Customer and ShipTo

1:1
Fully supported

Integra ERP Customer records map to Epicor Customer with contact details, billing address, credit terms, and GST registration preserved. Each Customer in Epicor supports multiple ShipTo addresses, which we populate from Integra's customer-branch associations. We preserve open AR balances as opening AR entries in Epicor with a reference to the original invoice numbers where available. Customer code in Integra becomes CustID in Epicor; the mapping is 1:1 with no merging required.

Integra ERP

Vendors

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Supplier and PurAgent

1:1
Fully supported

Integra ERP Vendor records map to Epicor Supplier with payment terms, GST/VAT registration, address records, and vendor-specific item pricing transferred directly. Supplier codes map from Integra's vendor code to Epicor VendorID. We preserve vendor-specific pricing rows as Supplier Part UOM or Supplier Price List entries in Epicor where the source data contains them.

Integra ERP

Items (Products)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Part and PartPlant

1:1
Mapping required

Integra ERP Items map to Epicor Part records with part number, description, unit of measure, and item type (stock, non-stock, misc) transferred. Integra-specific classification codes migrate to Part Number Prefix or a custom Part attribute field. BOM hierarchies stored across multiple linked tables in Integra are flattened into Epicor Part and JobAsmbl records; multi-level BOMs are reconstructed with parent-part and child-part links using a recursive extraction script. Branch-level stock quantities map to PartPlant records per Epicor site or warehouse code.

Integra ERP

Inventory Ledgers

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

PartBin (on-hand quantities)

1:1
Mapping required

Integra ERP inventory ledgers contain branch or warehouse-specific stock quantities. We aggregate by item and map to Epicor PartBin records per site-warehouse combination. Serial and batch tracking fields are preserved where present in the source; Epicor PartBin receives the aggregated quantity as the opening on-hand balance for each warehouse. Inventory valuation (average cost, standard cost) migrates to Epicor Part and PartCost records to support correct COGS posting on future transactions.

Integra ERP

Open AP / AR

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

AP Invoice Header / AR Invoice Header (as opening balances)

1:1
Mapping required

Outstanding payable and receivable balances in Integra ERP cannot be migrated as individual invoices in most scenarios. We extract the net outstanding amount per vendor (AP) and per customer (AR) and create Epicor opening balance records using the AP/AR opening balance form or as manual journal entries against the appropriate GL Account. Each opening balance line references the source system and original party for audit trail. Historical invoice details migrate as context notes on the opening balance record.

Integra ERP

Historical Sales Orders

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

OrderHed and OrderDtl

1:1
Fully supported

Integra ERP Sales Orders map to Epicor Sales Order records (OrderHed as header, OrderDtl as lines). We extract header fields (order number, order date, customer reference, ship-to address) and line fields (item number, quantity ordered, quantity shipped, unit price, discount) across linked tables. Order status from Integra maps to Epicor OrderHed.OrderStatus and OrderHed.OpenOrder. Orders referencing voided customers or discontinued items are flagged in a reconciliation report before load. DMT Order Entry template handles the bulk load with batch sequencing.

Integra ERP

Employees

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Employee

1:1
Fully supported

Integra ERP Employee records from the employee management module map to Epicor Employee with name, department, job title, and basic employment status transferred. Compensation fields migrate to the Epicor HR module or to custom fields on Employee if the customer licenses Epicor Human Capital Management. Employee number from Integra becomes EmpID in Epicor. We preserve department assignments as Epicor Department codes.

Integra ERP

BOM (Bill of Materials)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

JobAsmbl and JobMtl

lossy
Fully supported

Integra ERP BOM structures for manufacturing customers require recursive flattening because the source stores multi-level hierarchies across parent-child linked tables with optional operations. We extract each BOM level, map to Epicor JobAsmbl (assembly header) and JobMtl (material lines), and preserve the operation sequence and quantity-per-assembly. Make-to-order parts get linked to JobAsmbl.JobNum for production order traceability in Epicor Kinetic MES.

Integra ERP

Purchase Orders

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

POHeader and PODetail

1:1
Fully supported

Open Purchase Orders from Integra ERP map to Epicor POHeader and PODetail records. Vendor, PO date, ship-to warehouse, line item, quantity ordered, quantity received, and unit cost transfer directly. Open PO status determines Epicor OpenRelease status on release records. Historical closed POs migrate as read-only records with the closed flag set to avoid duplicate GL posting.

Integra ERP

General Ledger Journal Entries

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

GLJrnHed and GLJrnDtl

1:1
Fully supported

Integra ERP journal entries map to Epicor GLJrnHed (header) and GLJrnDtl (detail) records. We preserve the journal entry number, entry date, description, and account-debit-amount pairs. Journal source codes map to Epicor JournalCode. Entries are loaded in date order to maintain fiscal period integrity; any entries with unmapped account codes go to a suspense account per the account-mapping spreadsheet.

Integra ERP

Documents / Attachments

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Not migrated (file paths only)

1:1
Fully supported

Attachments, scanned documents, and PDFs stored inside Integra ERP are not exposed via a documented export mechanism. We extract any linked file paths from the source database but cannot guarantee file integrity or completeness. Customers should extract documents independently before migration and store them in a document management system. We document the source file path against the relevant transaction or master record for post-migration retrieval.

Integra ERP

Custom Objects / User-Defined Fields

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

UD Codes and custom fields on standard objects

lossy
Fully supported

Integra ERP may contain user-defined fields on standard tables or custom objects that require mapping to Epicor UD Codes (UD01-UD12) or custom fields on the equivalent Epicor table. We map each identified Integra UDF to an Epicor custom field of matching data type (string, integer, date, decimal). Custom object data is mapped to Epicor UD tables during scoping if the customer requires preservation of Integra-specific business logic.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Integra ERP logo

Integra ERP gotchas

High

No public API for automated export

High

On-premise database format is proprietary

Medium

No documented data portability feature

Medium

Perpetual license does not include migration support

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21 gotchas

High

Third-party bolt-on integrations complicate migration scope

High

Dirty data without standardized processes compounds migration risk

Medium

SDK customizations and BPMs may not survive platform upgrades

Medium

Report-based export only for non-technical users

Low

Per-user pricing model requires accurate user count before migration planning

Pair-specific challenges

  • Integra ERP has no public API for automated extraction

    Integra ERP does not publish a public REST or SOAP API according to available documentation, confirmed at TechnologyCounter (APIs Available: No). We must extract data through direct database queries against on-premise Microsoft SQL Server or proprietary local formats, or through scheduled flat-file report exports. This adds pre-migration scoping time and requires read-only database credentials or report-writer access before extraction can begin. VPN or direct network access to the on-premise instance is required for the migration team.

  • BOM flattening from linked tables is required before Epicor load

    Integra ERP stores BOM hierarchies across multiple linked tables with parent-child relationships and optional operations. Epicor expects Part BOM data in JobAsmbl and JobMtl records with a clean parent-part-to-child-part structure. We write recursive extraction scripts to flatten Integra's multi-level BOMs and preserve operation sequences and quantity-per-assembly. Migrations that skip BOM flattening result in orphaned material lines or missing assembly links in Epicor MES, breaking production order traceability.

  • Epicor DMT batch limits require chunked sequencing for large datasets

    Epicor Data Management Tool (DMT) processes imports in batches that can time out for datasets exceeding 10,000 records per batch or containing complex lookups. We chunk large datasets (Customers, Parts, Order history) into sub-10k batches, resolve parent-record references before each chunk (AccountId, SiteID, WarehouseCode), and apply exponential backoff on 429 rate-limit responses. Without chunking, DMT runs fail silently or produce partial loads with no error summary.

  • Integra on-premise database format requires pre-export parsing

    On-premise Integra ERP instances store data in Windows-based proprietary local formats that require parsing before loading into a standard ETL pipeline. We cannot begin field mapping until the source schema is mapped against Epicor's expected structure. On-premise installations also require VPN or direct network access for the migration team, which adds coordination overhead and may require IT approval cycles before scoping begins.

  • Customizations and workflows do not migrate as code

    Integra ERP workflows, automations, custom reports, and platform-specific configurations are not exposed for export. Epicor stores its own BPMs and Method Directives as metadata that would require a separate rebuild effort. We deliver a written inventory of every identified Integra workflow, automation rule, and custom report for the customer's Epicor admin to rebuild post-migration using Epicor Kinetic's BPM designer and SSRS report builder. Document attachments and inline images stored inside Integra also cannot migrate.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Integra ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 data migration

  1. Source extraction scoping and database access provisioning

    We audit the Integra ERP instance to confirm deployment type (cloud-hosted or on-premise), database platform (SQL Server version, proprietary format), and available export mechanisms. We coordinate with the customer's IT team to provision read-only database credentials or report-writer access. We run discovery queries against every source table identified in Integra's data model (Chart of Accounts, Customers, Vendors, Items, Inventory ledgers, Open AP/AR, Sales Orders, Purchase Orders, BOM tables, Journal Entries, Employees) to confirm row counts, data types, and any encoding issues before designing the extraction scripts.

  2. Epicor edition and module selection

    We align the destination Epicor deployment on edition (Professional, Enterprise) and modules (Financial Management, Inventory Management, Order Management, Production Management, Supply Chain Management) based on the migrating data scope. Epicor Kinetic ($80-$180/user/mo cloud, $3,200-$4,800/user perpetual) requires a minimum of 10 users. We confirm whether the customer needs MES, APS, Quality Management, or configure-to-order features, as these affect Epicor module licensing. The Epicor DMT and REST API access are included in all tiers.

  3. Schema design and account mapping

    We design the Epicor Kinetic destination schema, including GL Account structure (with segment dimensions if multi-segment), Customer and Supplier number sequences, Part number conventions, warehouse codes per site, and the BOM mapping strategy for any manufacturing data. The customer provides an account-mapping spreadsheet resolving Integra account codes to Epicor GL Account IDs. We pre-create any custom fields, UD Codes, and validation rules required to absorb Integra-specific data patterns before extraction begins.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full extraction from the Integra ERP source into an Epicor Kinetic Sandbox (copy of the target configuration) using production-like data volumes. The customer's operations and finance leads reconcile record counts per object, spot-check 25-50 records per object against source values, and validate account balances, open AR/AP totals, and inventory quantities. Any mapping corrections and transformation logic updates happen in the sandbox phase. Sign-off from the customer's finance team is required before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We execute production migration in dependency sequence: GL Accounts first (to satisfy account references in all subsequent journal entries), then Customers and Suppliers (to satisfy AR/AP lookups), then Parts (to satisfy inventory and sales order lookups), then PartBin on-hand quantities, then open AP/AR opening balances, then Purchase Orders, then Sales Orders, then BOM structures, then Journal Entry history, then Employee records. Each phase emits a row-count and total-value reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use Epicor DMT for transactional record loads and REST API for real-time objects.

  6. Cutover, delta sync, and workflow inventory handoff

    We freeze Integra ERP writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then set Epicor as the system of record. We deliver the workflow and automation inventory document to the customer's Epicor admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Integra workflows as Epicor BPMs inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Integra ERP logo

Integra ERP

Source

Strengths

  • One-time perpetual license model with no recurring SaaS fees, reducing long-term subscription cost.
  • Integrated modules covering finance, inventory, supply chain, and CRM without requiring third-party integrations.
  • Purpose-built for Indian SME retail, trading, and manufacturing with GST-compliant accounting.
  • Both cloud-hosted and on-premise deployment options across Windows desktop and mobile.
  • Android mobile apps for field distribution management and executive tracking.

Weaknesses

  • No public API documented—data export relies on database access or flat-file reports with no programmatic interface.
  • Perpetual license model is inflexible for businesses with changing scope or seasonal headcount fluctuations.
  • On-premise deployments demand dedicated Windows infrastructure and in-house IT maintenance capacity.
  • Limited online review presence makes independent quality assessment difficult before purchase.
  • No documented bulk-export or data portability feature, complicating exit planning.
Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for wholesale distribution with industry-specific replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Multi-warehouse management with bin locations, cross-docking, and real-time inventory visibility across all warehouse locations.
  • Automated replenishment engine with demand-based and min-max planning reduces stockouts and overstock carrying costs.
  • AI-infused reporting via Epicor Prism provides Gen AI-driven insights into ERP data without requiring a BI team.
  • Strong customer retention at 90% and a 50-year track record in the distribution vertical provides long-term vendor stability.

Weaknesses

  • High total cost of ownership — per-user pricing of $150-200/month plus $10K-$500K implementation creates significant budget commitment for small and mid-market distributors.
  • Customization via SDK requires technical expertise and introduces upgrade risk when custom code conflicts with new P21 releases.
  • Report generation performance is a known pain point — multiple users report system freezes during large or complex report exports.
  • Third-party bolt-on reliance for functionality that competitors include natively increases integration complexity and total solution cost.
  • Limited public API documentation — developers building custom integrations report difficulty finding P21 API authentication methods and endpoint specifications.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard ERP migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Integra ERP and Epicor Prophet 21.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Integra ERP: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Integra ERP doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Integra ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Integra ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Integra ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Integra ERP to Epicor Prophet 21 migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between six and ten weeks for accounts under 50,000 items, 500 customers, and 2,000 open or historical sales orders with no multi-level BOM structures and a documented account-mapping spreadsheet available at kickoff. Migrations with multi-level BOM hierarchies (requiring recursive flattening), branch-level inventory across multiple warehouses, open AP/AR balances exceeding 1,000 accounts, or on-premise instances with proprietary database formats requiring pre-export parsing move to fourteen to twenty-two weeks because of extraction scoping and transformation logic complexity.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Integra ERP.
Land in Epicor Prophet 21, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day