HRMS migration

Migrate from greytHR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between greytHR and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

greytHR logo

greytHR

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

25%

3 of 12

objects map 1:1 between greytHR and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

greytHR and Bullhorn serve fundamentally different markets, which makes this migration a domain-crossing data project. greytHR is a full-suite Indian HRMS covering the complete employee lifecycle with built-in PF, ESI, TDS, and state labor-code compliance. Bullhorn is a cloud ATS and CRM built for staffing agencies, with a data model oriented around Candidates, Job Orders, Placements, and Client Corporations. The migration maps greytHR Employees to Bullhorn Candidate or ClientContact records, preserves leave balances and attendance history in Bullhorn Custom Objects, and transfers statutory fields (UAN, PAN, PF, ESI) into custom fields that Bullhorn's admin must explicitly configure. Bullhorn has no native payroll engine; payslip history and salary structures must be re-established via Bullhorn's partner ecosystem or manual configuration post-migration. Workflows, approval chains, and leave carry-forward rules do not migrate as code. We deliver a written inventory of every greytHR workflow and leave policy requiring rebuild at the destination.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

greytHR logo

greytHR

What's pushing teams away

  • Performance degradation at scale — multiple reviewers on G2 and Capterra report slow page loads and frequent manual refreshes required to complete routine operations.
  • Mid-to-large companies outgrow the platform when they need advanced workforce analytics, multi-country payroll, or deep integration with ERP systems that greytHR does not natively support.
  • Attendance sync reliability issues surface in reviews: swipe data occasionally fails to register, requiring manual regularization steps that erode trust in the system.
  • Switching mid-year creates anxiety around statutory filings (PF, ESI) — companies worry that migrating in the middle of a compliance cycle will cause government-filing errors or penalties.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How greytHR objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a greytHR object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

greytHR

Employee

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate and ClientContact

1:many
Fully supported

greytHR Employee records split across two Bullhorn entities based on role context. Internal employees (HR, finance, operations staff) map to Bullhorn ClientContact attached to a ClientCorporation record representing the company. Candidates from greytHR's own hiring pipeline map to Bullhorn Candidate records. We preserve greytHR demographic fields (name, DOB, gender, mobile, email, address), employment fields (department, designation, grade, date of joining, employment type), and statutory fields (UAN, PAN, PF number, ESI number, TDS section) as Bullhorn standard or custom fields. The split is determined during scoping: if the customer was using greytHR to track job applicants, those records become Candidates; administrative staff become ClientContacts.

greytHR

Statutory Compliance (UAN, PF, ESI, PAN, TDS)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Fields on Candidate and ClientContact

lossy
Fully supported

greytHR's structured statutory fields (UAN, PF account number, ESI number, PAN, TDS deduction section) have no native Bullhorn equivalent because Bullhorn is not an Indian payroll platform. We map each statutory field to a Bullhorn Custom Field on the Candidate and ClientContact entities. Bullhorn's Growth and Enterprise editions support up to 10 Custom Objects per entity with 55 fields each; we use standard custom fields first and reserve Custom Objects for compound or multi-value statutory data. These custom fields must be configured by Bullhorn Support or an admin with field mapping access before migration begins. We recommend downloading official PF and ESI slips from the greytHR government portal as a supplementary offline record.

greytHR

Leave Management

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: Leave Balance

lossy
Fully supported

greytHR stores leave entitlements, accrual history, current balances, carry-forward amounts, and encashment records per employee. Bullhorn has no native leave management module. We map current leave balances at migration cutoff to a Bullhorn Custom Object (customObject1s: Leave Balance) with fields for leave type, balance, accrual date, carry-forward, and encashment amount. The leave carry-forward logic, accrual rate, and policy-level rules do not migrate as data because greytHR applies them as policy definitions rather than stored formulas. We document the current leave policy settings during scoping so the customer's Bullhorn admin can configure equivalent rules manually or via Bullhorn Onboarding (formerly Able). In-progress accrual cycles are migrated as balance snapshots with a flag indicating the cycle was mid-run at cutover.

greytHR

Attendance Records

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: Attendance Record

lossy
Fully supported

greytHR stores raw swipe logs with timestamps, shift schedule assignments, overtime entries, and regularization status per employee. Bullhorn does not have an attendance data model. We map swipe logs to a Bullhorn Custom Object (customObject2s: Attendance Record) with fields for employee reference (linked to ClientContact), date, in-time, out-time, shift, overtime hours, and regularization status. Note that greytHR attendance records with regularization requirements may reflect swipe visibility issues reported in greytHR reviews; we export both the raw swipe log and the regularization status and flag records where the two contradict, so the customer's admin can verify attendance before the migration cutoff.

greytHR

Payroll Runs (Payslip data)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: Payslip Record

lossy
Fully supported

greytHR payroll runs produce payslip records with gross salary, component-wise deductions (PF employee share, ESI employee share, TDS, professional tax), employer contributions (PF employer, ESI employer), and net pay. Bullhorn has no native payroll engine; the Bullhorn Time & Expense module and Bullhorn Onboarding handle timesheet-based billing for placed contractors, not payroll computation. We map greytHR payslip rows to a Bullhorn Custom Object (customObject3s: Payslip Record) linked to the ClientContact employee record. The salary computation rules (grade-based salary structures, deduction formulas, variable pay rules) are greytHR policy logic and do not export; we document the current salary structure and deduction setup for the customer to re-enter in their chosen payroll platform. We recommend a supplemental manual export of payroll reports from the greytHR UI for audit trail completeness.

greytHR

Position History

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Bullhorn Custom Fields on ClientContact

lossy
Mapping required

greytHR tracks department transfers, designation changes, grade promotions, and location reassignments with effective dates as a position history timeline. Bullhorn's ClientContact model stores the current position and does not natively maintain a historical timeline. We map the most recent position assignment as the live ClientContact fields (title, business sector, department custom field) and preserve the full effective-dated history as a custom text field or a related Custom Object, depending on the volume of position changes. If the customer requires a clean position timeline for compliance or audit purposes, we document the complete history separately for manual entry or BI reporting.

greytHR

Claims and Expense Records

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: Expense Claim

lossy
Mapping required

greytHR stores expense claims with category, amount, approval status, reimbursement date, and linked employee. Bullhorn has no native expense claim module for internal employees. We map approved and pending expense claims to a Bullhorn Custom Object (customObject4s: Expense Claim) linked to the ClientContact employee. Claim status (approved, rejected, pending) and reimbursement details transfer. Custom expense categories defined in greytHR map to a Bullhorn custom picklist field on the Expense Claim custom object; if the destination Bullhorn edition does not support enough custom fields, we prioritize the most-used categories and document the remainder for manual categorization post-migration.

greytHR

Documents (Employee files)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Bullhorn Document Storage on Candidate and ClientContact

1:1
Fully supported

greytHR stores employee documents (offer letters, ID proofs, contracts, joining letters, promotion letters) in its document module. Bullhorn's ContentDocument and ContentVersion model handles document attachments on any entity. We export document metadata (filename, document type, upload date, related employee) from greytHR and link binary files to the corresponding Bullhorn Candidate or ClientContact record via ContentDocumentLink. Bullhorn's storage limits vary by edition; we flag total document volume during scoping to confirm the destination org has sufficient capacity. Some greytHR document access requires admin API credentials beyond standard user tokens; we request elevated read access during discovery.

greytHR

Performance Reviews

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object: Performance Review

lossy
Mapping required

greytHR PMS stores review cycles, rating scores, goals, and free-text feedback per employee. Bullhorn has no native performance management module. We map completed review records to a Bullhorn Custom Object (customObject5s: Performance Review) linked to the ClientContact employee, with fields for review period, rating score, goal text, and feedback. In-progress review cycles migrate as-is with a status flag; finalization must be completed in the destination system after cutover. Review cycle definitions and rating templates do not migrate as configuration data.

greytHR

Users and Roles

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Bullhorn User provisioning

1:1
Mapping required

greytHR Users are HR admins, managers, and employees with role-based access. Bullhorn Users are recruiters, sales staff, and administrators with a UserType (Admin, Regular, Portal). We extract the greytHR user list, map HR admin roles to Bullhorn Admin users and manager roles to Bullhorn Regular users with appropriate object and field permissions. Role definitions (permission sets, approval authority, data access scope) are greytHR platform logic and do not export; we document the current role hierarchy for the customer's Bullhorn admin to rebuild using Bullhorn's role and permission tooling.

greytHR

Audit Logs

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Supplementary export package

1:1
Fully supported

greytHR maintains a tamper-evident audit trail covering payroll, leave, and employee data changes. Bullhorn's own audit log tracks user actions within the ATS. We export the greytHR audit log records for the most recent 12 months as a supplementary compliance package delivered alongside the migration, stored as a CSV or JSON archive. This does not replace Bullhorn's native audit trail; it supplements it for the period prior to cutover. Audit log volume is typically manageable (a few hundred to a few thousand records per month depending on company activity).

greytHR

Custom Fields and Picklists

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Bullhorn Custom Fields and Field Mappings

lossy
Mapping required

greytHR custom fields on Employee records and its List of Values (LOV) picklist definitions map to Bullhorn custom fields and dropdown values. We export both the custom field values stored on each employee and the LOV definitions (display label, API value, sort order). Bullhorn custom fields are created via Admin > Field Mappings, and picklist values are entered in the field's value list. Bullhorn editions limit the number of custom fields per entity (Growth supports a defined set; Enterprise supports more). We prioritize migration of custom fields that contain statutory data, compensation data, or custom status fields, and document remaining custom fields for post-migration manual entry.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

greytHR logo

greytHR gotchas

High

Statutory field data quality directly impacts government filings

Medium

Attendance regularization status does not always reflect true swipe data

Medium

Leave carry-forward and encashment rules are policy-specific, not record-specific

Medium

API lacks documented bulk export endpoint for historical payroll data

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • Indian statutory fields have no native Bullhorn equivalent

    UAN, PF account number, ESI number, PAN, and TDS section are structured fields in greytHR's statutory compliance module, but Bullhorn is an ATS designed for staffing agencies with no native Indian payroll or compliance module. We map these to Bullhorn Custom Fields on Candidate and ClientContact, but the customer must configure these fields in Bullhorn's admin panel (or open a Bullhorn Support ticket) before migration begins. PF and ESI government portal access credentials, filed returns, and year-to-date contribution totals should be downloaded from the EPFO and ESIC portals as supplementary offline records before cutover. Any gaps in greytHR statutory data (missing UAN, malformed PAN, duplicate PF entries) will carry into Bullhorn as invalid values unless cleaned pre-migration.

  • Bullhorn editions limit Custom Object availability

    The leave balance, attendance record, payslip, expense claim, and performance review objects all require Bullhorn Custom Objects. Bullhorn ATS (entry tier) supports only 2 Custom Objects per entity; Bullhorn ATS Growth supports none; Bullhorn Growth and Enterprise support 10 Custom Objects with 55 fields each per entity. We verify the customer's Bullhorn edition during discovery. If the destination is ATS or ATS Growth, we migrate only the highest-priority data (current leave balances, most recent payroll run, employee statutory fields) and deliver a written recommendation for upgrading to a Custom Object-capable edition or using a third-party HRIS integration for the remainder.

  • greytHR leave carry-forward logic does not export as records

    greytHR stores current leave balances and applies carry-forward rules defined in the leave policy configuration. The policy-level rules (accrual rate, carry-forward ceiling, encashment eligibility, lapse date) do not export as data. We migrate current balances as snapshots and document the policy settings for the customer's Bullhorn admin to re-enter. If the company has mid-year policy exceptions or employee-specific carry-forward overrides, these must be captured as notes on the Leave Balance custom object during migration scoping. Bullhorn's leave policy tooling (Bullhorn Onboarding or partner HRIS) requires manual configuration for each leave type.

  • greytHR API has no documented bulk endpoint or rate limits

    The greytHR public API exposes employee, leave, attendance, and payroll endpoints but does not document a bulk export method or rate limit values. Based on community reports and API structure, we implement throttled sequential reads with resume-from-cursor logic to handle large employee bases without hitting undocumented limits. For migrations exceeding 2,000 employee records, we recommend a supplemental manual export of payroll and leave reports from the greytHR admin UI to supplement the API export, ensuring audit trail completeness for compliance-critical data.

  • Document binary export requires elevated greytHR API access

    greytHR stores employee documents (offer letters, contracts, ID proofs, joining letters) in its document module. API access to document binaries may require admin-level credentials or a separate document API token beyond standard user OAuth. We request elevated read access during discovery. If document API access is restricted, we export document metadata (filename, type, upload date, related employee ID) and recommend the customer download document folders directly from the greytHR UI as a supplementary export, then upload them to Bullhorn's document storage manually or via Bullhorn's bulk document upload tooling post-migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful greytHR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and edition verification

    We audit the greytHR tenant for employee count, active and inactive records, leave balance volume, attendance record count and retention period, payroll run history depth, custom field count, and statutory field completeness. We simultaneously verify the customer's Bullhorn edition (ATS, ATS Growth, Growth, or Enterprise) to confirm Custom Object availability and field limits. If the destination is ATS or ATS Growth, we scope the migration to Bullhorn-supported standard fields and Custom Objects, and flag the remainder as out-of-scope pending edition upgrade. We also capture greytHR user roles, approval workflows, and leave policy definitions as documentation for the post-migration rebuild phase.

  2. Data quality audit and statutory field validation

    greytHR community posts confirm that Indian HRMS data frequently contains inconsistencies in statutory fields: duplicate employee records, malformed PAN numbers (10-character alphanumeric), missing UAN values, and incorrect ESI numbers. We run a pre-migration audit against PF/ESI/PAN format rules, flag each invalid or missing statutory field, and present a remediation report to the customer. PF and ESI contribution data must be verified against government portal records before migration to ensure continuity of filing. Leave balances are audited for negative balances, future-dated accruals, and records with regularization flags that contradict raw swipe data. We do not write records with known invalid statutory values to Bullhorn without explicit customer sign-off.

  3. Bullhorn schema configuration and Custom Object setup

    We configure Bullhorn Custom Fields and Custom Objects to receive the mapped greytHR data before any records are written. This includes creating custom fields for UAN, PF, ESI, PAN, and TDS on Candidate and ClientContact; creating the Leave Balance, Attendance Record, Payslip Record, Expense Claim, and Performance Review Custom Objects with their required fields; configuring picklist values from greytHR LOV definitions; and setting up ContentDocument storage for document attachments. Bullhorn requires Custom Objects to be requested via a Support ticket (using Bullhorn's Custom Object Setup Spreadsheet) or configured by an admin with field mapping access. Bullhorn editions with lower Custom Object limits are flagged during discovery so the customer can plan an edition upgrade or accept a reduced data scope.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into the customer's Bullhorn Sandbox using production-like data volume to validate the schema, field mapping, and Custom Object configuration before production cutover. The customer's Bullhorn admin reconciles record counts (Candidates in, ClientContacts in, Custom Object records in), spot-checks 25-50 random records against the greytHR source for field accuracy and completeness, and reviews the statutory field values for government-portal compliance. Any mapping corrections, missing picklist values, or Custom Object field adjustments happen in the Sandbox phase, not in production. The customer signs off the Sandbox validation report before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Custom Object schema deployed first, then ClientContact records for internal employees (with statutory fields populated from greytHR Employee records), then Candidate records for greytHR hiring pipeline applicants, then Custom Object records for leave balances, attendance, payroll, expense claims, and performance reviews linked to their parent ClientContact or Candidate records. Documents are uploaded last via Bullhorn's ContentDocument API. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report; no phase proceeds until the previous phase's reconciliation passes. greytHR write access is suspended during the production migration window to prevent new records from being created on the source.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze greytHR writes at cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Bullhorn as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of greytHR approval workflows, leave policy rules, role definitions, and payroll computation settings requiring manual rebuild in Bullhorn or a third-party HRIS integration. Bullhorn Onboarding (formerly Able) is the native Bullhorn path for employee document collection and onboarding workflows. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues identified by the customer's HR and recruiting teams. Workflow rebuild, leave policy configuration, and payroll integration setup are outside standard migration scope and are documented as separate tasks for the customer's Bullhorn admin or implementation partner.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

greytHR logo

greytHR

Source

Strengths

  • Covers the full Indian statutory stack (PF, ESI, TDS, state labor codes) within a single platform.
  • Per-employee pricing model is transparent and affordable for companies with 50–500 employees.
  • Employee Self Service mobile app lets workers handle leave, attendance, and payslips without HR intervention.
  • Reporting covers 150+ pre-built HR and payroll reports out of the box.
  • No long-term contract commitments — month-to-month subscription with annual option.

Weaknesses

  • API documentation is limited; public-facing API reference covers only core modules and does not document rate limits or bulk endpoints.
  • Performance degrades under larger employee counts; reviews report sluggish UI and frequent refresh requirements.
  • Lacks native multi-country payroll support, limiting use for companies expanding beyond India.
  • Advanced workforce analytics and predictive HR features lag behind enterprise platforms like Workday or SAP SuccessFactors.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. All 7 core objects map 1:1 between greytHR and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across greytHR and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 7 core objects map 1:1 between greytHR and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    greytHR: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    greytHR doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your greytHR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about greytHR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during greytHR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your greytHR to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for companies with under 500 employees, clean statutory data, and no more than three Custom Objects in scope. Migrations with Indian PF/ESI compliance requirements, large leave and attendance histories (more than 12 months of swipe records), payroll run data, or Custom Object configurations requiring Bullhorn Support tickets move to ten to fourteen weeks because of pre-migration data audit time, government portal record verification, and Bullhorn Custom Object schema setup. Bullhorn's own documentation notes that small staffing agencies go live in two weeks, and larger agencies take two to six weeks for standard implementation; the greytHR migration adds data migration complexity on top of that baseline.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from greytHR.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day