Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Planview AgilePlace and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
Planview AgilePlace
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
10 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Planview AgilePlace and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Planview AgilePlace to Asana is primarily a structural simplification. AgilePlace organizes work on Kanban boards with hierarchical Lanes and Swimlanes; Asana uses Projects with Lists, Boards, and Sections. We map each Board to a Project, preserve the Lane hierarchy as Section nesting or flat Sections, and carry WIP limit values as custom numeric fields since Asana does not enforce WIP limits natively. Card Dependencies require a separate pass after all cards are loaded because parent-card IDs are unknown until the first-pass import completes. We do not migrate Card Automation, Board Automation, or Card Relations Summary computed fields. We flag Card Relations Summary ERROR states from AgilePlace and recompute relationship counts in Asana to avoid propagating stale data. Automations, Workflows, and reporting dashboards require manual reconstruction in Asana; we deliver a written inventory of every board automation and dashboard for the customer's admin to reference.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Planview AgilePlace object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Planview AgilePlace
Board
Asana
Project
1:1Each AgilePlace Board maps to one Asana Project. We export the board name, description, and lane structure as a first-pass import, then map each Lane to either a Section or a nested Section within the Asana project. Swimlanes, which represent a second hierarchy level in AgilePlace, require a flattening decision during scoping: either promoted to top-level Asana Projects within a Portfolio or stored as a custom field value on cards. The customer confirms the preferred approach before migration begins. Board archive status migrates as a custom field or project status note.
Planview AgilePlace
Card
Asana
Task
1:1Cards represent work items and map directly to Asana Tasks. We migrate title, description (rich text preserved), Card Type, priority, WIP status, due date, created and modified timestamps, and card position within the lane. The Asana project membership and section placement are resolved from the Lane assignment at import time. Historical timestamps are stored as custom fields so that cycle-time reporting tools can still reference the original created date.
Planview AgilePlace
Custom Field
Asana
Custom Field
1:1AgilePlace custom fields are defined at the board level with role-gated write access, meaning a user without project-level write access cannot edit certain fields even if assigned across all records. We export the field definitions alongside card values, map field types to Asana equivalents (text to Text, single-choice to Single-Select, multi-choice to Multi-Select, number to Number, date to Date), and create matching fields in the Asana project. Any Relations Summary fields showing ERROR in AgilePlace are excluded from migration and recomputed in Asana. Role-based write restrictions in AgilePlace do not have a direct Asana equivalent; we document the original restriction so the admin can configure Asana project-level field editing permissions post-migration.
Planview AgilePlace
Card Type
Asana
Label
lossyCard Types are a board-level taxonomy in AgilePlace used for filtering and card styling. Asana uses Labels for a similar categorization purpose. We map each distinct Card Type to an Asana Label on the corresponding project. If the customer uses Card Types as workflow states rather than categories, we map them to Asana Sections instead. The customer confirms the intended use of Card Types during discovery to select the correct destination representation.
Planview AgilePlace
Card Dependency
Asana
Dependency
1:1Parent-child card links in AgilePlace are stored as a separate API relationship, not embedded in the card record. We export these as a dependency table during the first card pass and resolve them in a second pass after all cards have received their Asana GIDs. The second pass creates dependency records in Asana using the Asana API, matching each child task to its parent task via the temporary AgilePlace card ID mapping table. Cross-board dependencies require the customer to confirm whether the parent and child boards map to the same Asana project or separate projects, which affects how the dependency is created in Asana.
Planview AgilePlace
Comment
Asana
Subtask or Comment
1:1Card comments migrate as Asana subtasks (if they represent action items) or as comments on the task (if they are discussion notes). Author attribution is preserved via email-to-user matching against the Asana workspace members. Rich text formatting in comments is preserved as-is. Threaded comment structures in AgilePlace become flat comments in Asana since Asana does not support nested comment threads natively.
Planview AgilePlace
Task (Sub-task)
Asana
Subtask
1:1AgilePlace Tasks are child items within a Card. These map to Asana Subtasks, preserving title, completion status (mapped to subtask completion in Asana), assignee, and due date. Subtask order within the parent card is preserved by setting the Asana subtask creation sequence.
Planview AgilePlace
Tag
Asana
Tag
1:1Tags in AgilePlace are flat string labels on cards. These map directly to Asana Tags within the workspace. Asana Tags are workspace-level and can be applied to any task across any project. We preserve the tag string values and create matching tags in the destination workspace before the card import phase.
Planview AgilePlace
User / Assignee
Asana
User
1:1Card assignees are resolved by email address match against the Asana workspace user list. A user in AgilePlace with no matching Asana account is flagged in a reconciliation report for the customer's admin to provision before record import continues. Archived or inactive AgilePlace users are flagged with a status note in the Asana assignee field so that the admin can decide whether to reassign or leave them as orphaned assignees.
Planview AgilePlace
WIP Limit
Asana
Custom Field
lossyWIP limits in AgilePlace are defined per Lane and enforced visually when the lane is full. Asana has no native WIP limit enforcement. We migrate the WIP limit values as custom Number fields on each card (populated with the lane-level limit value), or as a project-level custom field if all cards in the project share the same limit. Post-migration, the admin can use Asana Rules or a third-party WIP enforcement app to alert when column limits are exceeded, but native enforcement requires a separate rebuild.
Planview AgilePlace
Card Attachment
Asana
Attachment
1:1File attachments on cards are downloaded from AgilePlace and re-uploaded to Asana as task attachments. Large attachment volumes (over 500 attachments per 1,000 cards) increase migration duration and require storage capacity planning in the Asana workspace. We handle attachments after card creation so that each attachment is linked to the correct task by its Asana GID.
Planview AgilePlace
Integration Metadata
Asana
Note
1:1Integration references stored as card metadata in AgilePlace such as Jira issue IDs, GitHub commit hashes, Azure DevOps work item URLs, and external hyperlinks do not migrate as live links. We log these references as Notes on the corresponding Asana task so that the admin has a record of the external reference without the link itself functioning in Asana.
| Planview AgilePlace | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Board | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Card | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Field1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Card Type | Labellossy | Fully supported | |
| Card Dependency | Dependency1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Subtask or Comment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task (Sub-task) | Subtask1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Tag | Tag1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User / Assignee | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| WIP Limit | Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Card Attachment | Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Integration Metadata | Note1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Planview AgilePlace gotchas
Card Automation cannot mirror or copy cards between boards natively
Custom field permissions are role-gated, not globally editable
Relations Summary fields can display ERROR for large record sets
Reporting API is tier-gated to Advanced and Enterprise editions
Portfolios integration requires Planview Hub as a separate license
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and tier audit
We audit the source AgilePlace account across tier (Teams, Scaled Teams, or Custom), board count, card volume, custom field definitions per board, Card Type taxonomy, active Swimlane usage, Card Dependencies across boards, WIP limit configuration per Lane, and attachment volume. We pair this with an Asana workspace audit to confirm the destination project structure, existing custom field library, and label taxonomy. The discovery output is a written migration scope document that includes the Lane flattening decision, custom field scope mapping, and the dependency pass sequencing plan.
Schema design and custom field preparation
We design the Asana destination schema. This includes creating Asana Projects to match AgilePlace Boards, defining Section structures (flattened from Lane and Swimlane hierarchy per the scoping decision), creating custom fields that match AgilePlace field definitions with correct Asana types (Text, Single-Select, Multi-Select, Number, Date, People), and creating Labels to match Card Types. We exclude any Relations Summary custom fields showing ERROR in AgilePlace and document them as fields to be recomputed manually or via an Asana Formula field post-migration.
User and assignee reconciliation
We extract every distinct assignee and watcher from AgilePlace cards and match by email address against the Asana workspace member list. Any AgilePlace user without a matching Asana account is held in a reconciliation report for the customer to provision before record import continues. Archived AgilePlace users are flagged with a status note so the admin can decide whether to reassign or retain their historical attribution.
Card and attachment import in dependency order
We run the migration in this order: Projects and Sections (first), Tasks with all standard fields and custom field values (second), Tags applied per card (third), Card Attachments re-uploaded by Asana GID (fourth), and Comments mapped to task comments or subtasks (fifth). Card Dependencies run as a separate pass after all cards have GIDs so that parent-child links resolve correctly. WIP limit values are populated as custom Number fields during the card import phase.
Automation and integration reference inventory
We export a complete inventory of every AgilePlace Card Automation including trigger type, conditions, actions, and affected boards. We also log Integration Metadata references (Jira, GitHub, Azure DevOps URLs) as Notes on the corresponding Asana task. This inventory is delivered as a written document to the customer's admin for manual rebuild in Asana Rules.
Validation, reconciliation, and handoff
We run a reconciliation comparing AgilePlace record counts (cards, comments, attachments, dependencies, custom field values) against Asana counts and spot-check 25-50 random tasks against the source. The customer reviews the migrated data in Asana and signs off before the source is decommissioned. We deliver the automation inventory document and a custom field mapping sheet. We support a one-week hypercare window for post-migration issues and do not rebuild Asana Rules, Forms, or reporting dashboards as part of the standard scope.
Platform deep dives
Planview AgilePlace
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Planview AgilePlace and Asana.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Planview AgilePlace: Not publicly documented on the public-facing API page.
Data volume sensitivity
Planview AgilePlace doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Planview AgilePlace to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Planview AgilePlace to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Planview AgilePlace
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.