Project Management

Migrate your Planview AgilePlace data

Enterprise Kanban platform for scaling Lean and Agile delivery across multiple teams, originally Planview LeanKit, now part of Planview's work management suite.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Planview AgilePlace logo

In its favor

Why people choose Planview AgilePlace

The signal that keeps Planview AgilePlace on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Scales Kanban visibility beyond single teams to programs and value streams, giving enterprise PMOs a unified view of delivery across hundreds of boards without sacrificing team autonomy.

Unlimited boards on every paid tier means large organizations do not face board-count limits as they expand agile practices across divisions, unlike per-project licensing models in competing tools.

Native integrations with Jira, GitHub, Visual Studio, and Oracle Primavera Cloud reduce friction for DevOps and Engineering teams already invested in those ecosystems.

Planview's portfolio-level context connects team-level Kanban cards to strategic objectives, a gap that generic Kanban tools like Trello or Asana do not address out of the box.

30-day free trial with no credit card required allows enterprises to validate fit for complex, multi-team deployments before committing to a contract.

The interface and visual design feel dated compared to modern alternatives, with users noting that newer competitors offer a more contemporary experience for day-to-day team members.

Kanban-only view limits adoption for teams that need Gantt charts, calendar views, or structured task lists — organizations with mixed methodology needs often must supplement AgilePlace with another tool.

Reporting requires the Advanced or Enterprise tier via a separate Reporting API, adding cost for organizations that need cross-board analytics rather than board-local charts.

Performance degrades when organizations run large numbers of boards or high card volumes, with community posts and reviews noting sluggish load times under heavy data conditions.

Portfolios integration depends on Planview Hub, a separate licensed product, meaning portfolio-level visibility is not included in AgilePlace pricing and adds a second procurement conversation.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Planview AgilePlace

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Planview AgilePlace. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Planview AgilePlace fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Unlimited boards on all paid tiers removes licensing friction for large agile organizations expanding across teams.Visible WIP limits and lane-based workflow visualization help teams enforce pull-based delivery and identify bottlenecks early.Multi-board rollup reporting available via Advanced Reporting API enables portfolio-level analytics across teams.Strong ecosystem integrations with Jira, GitHub, and CI/CD tools reduce context-switching for engineering teams.Hierarchical structure from boards down to cards, tasks, and comments maps cleanly to most destination PM tools.

Weaknesses

Reporting requires a paid upgrade tier; board-local charts only unless you purchase Advanced or Enterprise edition.Portfolio-level planning depends on a separate Planview Hub license, adding procurement complexity for organizations needing strategic alignment.Kanban-only view means teams requiring Gantt or calendar views must use a second tool for those work styles.User management and permissions are hierarchical and can be confusing for large organizations with many nested project roles.Community posts document recurring issues with Relations Summary custom fields displaying ERROR states, suggesting data reliability concerns for custom field-heavy migrations.

Where it works

Mid-to-large enterprises (51–1,000+ employees) running Kanban across multiple autonomous teams who need unified delivery visibility without mandating a single methodology.Engineering and DevOps organizations already invested in Jira, GitHub, or Visual Studio that want to preserve their toolchain while gaining cross-team board visibility.Organizations adopting scaled agile frameworks such as SAFe, Spotify model, or Scrum at Scale, where hierarchical team-to-program structure maps cleanly to AgilePlace lanes.PMOs that have already licensed Planview Hub and need to connect portfolio-level strategic objectives down to team-level Kanban cards in a single tool chain.Organizations with high-card-volume boards that can invest in Advanced or Enterprise tier to unlock cross-board analytics via the Reporting API.

Where it struggles

Teams or organizations that need Gantt charts, calendar views, or structured task lists alongside Kanban, because AgilePlace offers no alternative visualization modes.Organizations that need cross-board or portfolio-level reporting without paying for the Advanced or Enterprise tier, since board-local charts are the base-tier limit.Small teams or startups that prefer a modern, contemporary UI, because multiple reviews describe AgilePlace's interface as visually dated compared to newer alternatives.Organizations needing portfolio integration without purchasing Planview Hub as a second licensed product, as AgilePlace alone provides no portfolio-to-board linkage.Large deployments with hundreds of boards and high card volumes, where community posts and reviews document sluggish load times and performance degradation.

Pricing tiers

Planview AgilePlace pricing overview

Per-user monthly pricing with three tiers at $19 and $29, plus a custom enterprise tier. All tiers include unlimited boards. Advanced Reporting and cross-portfolio integration require the Scaled Teams tier or a separate Planview Hub license.

Teams

Tier 1 of 3

$19/user/month

What's included

Unlimited Kanban boardsCard automation and WIP limitsCustom fields and card typesStandard integrations (Jira, GitHub, Visual Studio)30-day free trial available

Need help selecting your Project Management?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Planview AgilePlace's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Planview AgilePlace object support

Object-by-object support for Planview AgilePlace migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Boards

Fully supported

Boards are the top-level container in AgilePlace. We export board structure including Lanes and Swimlanes as a first-pass import, mapping each Lane to its destination equivalent or creating a flat task list if the destination lacks board semantics.

Cards

Fully supported

Cards represent work items. We migrate Card title, description (rich text), type, priority, WIP status, due dates, created/modified timestamps, and board position. Card body content is preserved as-is.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom Fields exist per-board and are defined at the board level. We must export their definitions alongside card data and map values to the destination's custom field system. Role-based permission restrictions on custom fields require explicit scoping before import.

Card Types

Mapping required

Card Types are board-level taxonomy. If the destination uses a flat task object, we map each Card Type to a label or tag. If custom types are supported, we recreate the type definitions in the destination before card import.

Card Dependencies

Mapping required

Parent-child card links are stored as a separate API relationship. We export these as a dependency table and recreate them in the destination after all cards are loaded, matching by temporary ID mapping.

Comments

Fully supported

Card comments are migrated as threaded discussion entries on the destination task. Author attribution is preserved via email-to-user matching.

Tasks (Sub-tasks)

Fully supported

AgilePlace Tasks are child items within a Card. We import them as sub-tasks in the destination, preserving completion status and assignee.

Tags

Mapping required

Tags in AgilePlace are flat string labels on cards. We map these to the destination's tag or label system. If the destination has no tag support, we store tags as a comma-separated custom field.

Users and Assignees

Mapping required

Card assignee mapping is done by email address. Inactive or archived users in AgilePlace require fallback handling by username or explicit orphan-flagging for customer review.

WIP Limits

Mapping required

WIP limits are defined per Lane on a board. We flag these as custom metadata in the destination or map to an equivalent WIP field if the destination supports it natively.

Card Attachments

Mapping required

File attachments on cards are downloaded and re-uploaded to the destination's document store. Large attachment volumes increase migration duration and require storage capacity planning.

Integrations Metadata

Not in this platform

Integration references to Jira issues, GitHub commits, or external URLs are stored as card metadata but the linked external records do not migrate. We log these references as notes in the destination record.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Planview AgilePlace migrations

Issues we've hit on past Planview AgilePlace migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

Medium

Card Automation cannot mirror or copy cards between boards natively

Medium

Custom field permissions are role-gated, not globally editable

Low

Relations Summary fields can display ERROR for large record sets

High

Reporting API is tier-gated to Advanced and Enterprise editions

Medium

Portfolios integration requires Planview Hub as a separate license

How a Planview AgilePlace migration works

Four steps, Planview AgilePlace-specific

Connect

API key (documented via LeanKit API docs on Planview Success community) into Planview AgilePlace. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Planview AgilePlace-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Planview AgilePlace quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Planview AgilePlace rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Planview AgilePlace migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Planview AgilePlace migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Planview AgilePlace migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Planview AgilePlace migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Planview AgilePlace.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Planview AgilePlace setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported