Project Management migration

Migrate from .STUDIO to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between .STUDIO and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

.STUDIO logo

.STUDIO

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between .STUDIO and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

.STUDIO organizes work around a Client-Project hierarchy with built-in invoicing and proposal tools purpose-built for creative and design agencies. Asana is a general-purpose work management platform with broad third-party integrations, a mature API with bulk endpoints, and a free tier. The migration is structural: .STUDIO Clients have no native Asana equivalent, so we normalize client records into Asana Companies or into Projects with a client-association custom field during scoping. Time entries, tags, and custom field definitions migrate as typed values or notes depending on the destination tier. .STUDIO Workflows, Templates, and Invoices do not migrate as code or records; we deliver a written map of every active workflow and template for your admin to rebuild in Asana's rules engine and project templates feature.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

.STUDIO logo

.STUDIO

What's pushing teams away

  • Customers expecting a PM tool will find Studio.com is not a PM product, requiring re-discovery of the actual vendor.
  • Consumer-coaching positioning is misaligned with B2B PM evaluation criteria typically applied in this catalog.
  • No published pricing, API documentation, or enterprise feature set on the studio.com property.
  • Limited public review footprint as a workplace tool — most public mentions are of consumer-app reviews.
  • If the customer migrates to or from a true PM product called .STUDIO, that vendor's documentation must be sourced separately.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How .STUDIO objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a .STUDIO object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

.STUDIO

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Projects in .STUDIO map directly to Asana Projects. The project name, description, status (active/archived), start date, and due date migrate to Asana's name, notes, archived flag, and start_on/due_on fields. Budget fields in .STUDIO are optional and many workspaces leave them blank; we preserve budget values as a numeric custom field in Asana and flag any nulls during scoping so the customer can set defaults or accept nulls.

.STUDIO

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Tasks in .STUDIO map to Asana Tasks. The assignee, due date, estimated hours, status, and custom fields migrate as typed values. Task hierarchy (parent task and subtasks) maps to Asana's subtasks using the parent task GID resolved after the parent record is created in Asana. Dependencies are preserved as notes in the task description because Asana's dependency feature requires a paid Advanced plan.

.STUDIO

Client

maps to

Asana

Company or Project Custom Field

1:many
Fully supported

.STUDIO Clients have no native Asana equivalent. We offer two normalization strategies during scoping: Option A maps Client records to Asana Companies (Company object) and then links Projects to the appropriate Company via the project-company association. Option B drops the Client entity and instead adds a client_name custom field on each migrated Project. Option A is recommended for agencies that bill clients and need company-level reporting; Option B is recommended if client records are primarily label-based. The customer chooses during scoping.

.STUDIO

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Task Custom Field or Story

lossy
Fully supported

Time entries in .STUDIO carry task_id, user_id, duration, date, billable flag, and hourly rate, rounded to 6-minute increments. Asana's native time tracking requires an Advanced tier subscription ($24.99/user/mo) and uses a timesheet add-on. For Starter and lower tiers, we map time entries to a structured custom field on the linked Task (e.g., 'Logged Hours: 3.5h, Billable: Yes, Rate: $120/hr') as a text block and flag this limitation in the migration manifest. For Advanced tier destinations, we configure the time tracking add-on before migration and populate time entries directly.

.STUDIO

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Projects and tasks in .STUDIO support custom field definitions that vary by workspace. Asana's custom fields are organization-wide. We read the active custom field schema at export time and map each field by type: .STUDIO text maps to Asana text, number to Asana number with the same decimal precision, date to Asana date, and drop-down to Asana drop-down. Formula fields or fields referencing other custom fields in .STUDIO fall back to plain-text storage with a note in the migration manifest. If a drop-down value exceeds Asana's 255-character label limit, we truncate and flag it.

.STUDIO

Team Member

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

User accounts in .STUDIO store name, email, role, and hourly rate. We map these to Asana Users by email match. Any .STUDIO user without a matching Asana account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before task assignee resolution proceeds. Hourly rate from .STUDIO migrates as a custom field on the Asana User profile for use with billing calculations if the customer enables the time tracking add-on.

.STUDIO

Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Tags in .STUDIO are flat string labels applied to tasks and projects. Asana uses a flat tagging model. We upsert tags individually and attach them to the migrated task records using Asana's tag association endpoint. If a task in .STUDIO has multiple tags, all tags migrate to the same task in Asana. Tag count and tag names are preserved verbatim.

.STUDIO

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Attachments in .STUDIO carry filename, URL, size, and type. We export attachment metadata and re-upload files to Asana using the Asana Attachments API. Files are associated with the migrated parent task or project. Storage location context from .STUDIO is not preserved; the file becomes an Asana-hosted attachment. Note: Asana limits attachment size to 100 MB per file.

.STUDIO

Comment

maps to

Asana

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Comments in .STUDIO attach to tasks and carry author, timestamp, and text body. We export all comment records and recreate them as Asana Stories on the migrated task. The author name maps to the Asana user if an email match exists; otherwise the author name is stored as plain text in the story body. Timestamps are preserved using the created_at field on the Asana Story.

.STUDIO

Template

maps to

Asana

Project Template

1:1
Fully supported

Project templates in .STUDIO export as template structure (task list skeleton, placeholder field names, and layout) without populated data. We map the template schema to Asana's duplicate-from-template feature and deliver a manifest of which records are templates versus active projects. The customer manually creates a corresponding Asana project template in their workspace post-migration.

.STUDIO

Client Billing Details

maps to

Asana

Not migrated

lossy
Fully supported

Client records in .STUDIO store billing address, tax ID, payment terms, and invoice history. Asana has no native billing submodule. We preserve billing contact information as a structured text custom field on the Company record (for Option A customers) or on the project record (for Option B). Invoice history and payment records do not migrate and are flagged in the scoping report as requiring export from .STUDIO's billing submodule for archival purposes.

.STUDIO

Workspace Configuration

maps to

Asana

Domain Settings

lossy
Fully supported

.STUDIO's workspace-level settings (brand colors, logo, client portal white-labeling) have no direct Asana equivalent. We document the workspace configuration during discovery and deliver a configuration checklist for the customer's admin to reapply in Asana (workspace name, member permissions, notification preferences, and custom field library) manually post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

.STUDIO logo

.STUDIO gotchas

High

API lacks bulk export endpoint

Medium

Project budget fields are not always populated

Medium

Custom field schema varies per workspace

Low

Time entry rounding behavior differs between platforms

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • .STUDIO lacks a bulk export API endpoint

    .STUDIO exposes a REST API for individual record CRUD but does not offer a bulk export or batch endpoint. We paginate through records sequentially using cursor-based pagination, which causes extended export windows for workspaces with thousands of tasks. We handle this with configurable page sizes and retry logic on rate-limited responses. The export window for a workspace with 10,000 tasks may take two to three times longer than the equivalent Asana-to-Asana migration due to sequential API calls. We disclose the estimated export duration during scoping and run exports during off-peak hours to minimize interference with the team's active use of .STUDIO.

  • Client-to-Company normalization requires a scoping decision

    .STUDIO Clients are separate records that Projects link to, storing company name, contact info, and billing details. Asana has no native client object. We present two options during scoping and the customer must choose before migration begins. Option A creates Asana Company records and links them to Projects; Option B uses a client_name custom field on Projects. Choosing Option A after migration has started requires a retroactive Company insert and project re-link, which adds rework. We hold the migration scope on this decision at discovery.

  • Time entries require tier-appropriate handling

    .STUDIO rounds time entries to the nearest 6-minute increment (0.1 hour) by default. Asana's native time tracking requires an Advanced tier subscription. For Starter-tier destinations, we migrate time entries as structured custom field text blocks on the linked task, which does not support sum aggregation in Asana's default reporting. The customer must either upgrade to Asana Advanced for native time tracking or accept the text-based representation. We surface this limitation and the associated Asana pricing impact during scoping.

  • Budget fields on .STUDIO Projects are often unpopulated

    .STUDIO Project budget fields are optional and many workspaces leave them blank. We flag records with missing budget data during the scoping audit. Null budgets do not block migration, but they may cause downstream surprises if the customer expects budget tracking in Asana. We allow customers to set a default budget value for null records during migration or to carry nulls forward and configure budget alerts in Asana manually post-migration.

  • Custom field schema varies per .STUDIO workspace

    .STUDIO allows per-workspace custom field definitions, so the same field name may have different types across workspaces in multi-workspace .STUDIO accounts. We read the active schema at export time and generate a per-workspace field map. If a custom field type in .STUDIO is unsupported by Asana (e.g., a formula field referencing another custom field), we fall back to plain-text storage and note the limitation in the migration manifest. Multi-workspace migrations with inconsistent schemas may require multiple field map reviews before migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful .STUDIO to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and workspace audit

    We audit the source .STUDIO workspace(s) across object counts (projects, tasks, clients, time entries, attachments, comments), active custom field definitions per workspace, team member list with roles and hourly rates, and active workflows and templates. We pair this with an Asana destination assessment: tier selection (Starter $10.99/user, Advanced $24.99/user, Enterprise contact sales), existing workspace structure, and current user provisioning. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object, the client-to-company normalization strategy decision, and a time-tracking tier recommendation.

  2. Schema normalization and custom field design

    We normalize the custom field schema across all source workspaces into a single Asana custom field library. Conflicting field types for the same field name (a common multi-workspace .STUDIO issue) are resolved to the most specific type available in Asana, with fallbacks noted. For Option A clients, we design the Company-to-Project association structure in Asana before any data import begins because AccountId and Project-Company links must be established before Contact and Task inserts.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into an Asana workspace (using a temporary team for isolation) with production-like data volume. The customer's project manager or agency lead reconciles record counts, spot-checks a random sample of 25-50 records against the .STUDIO source for field-level accuracy, and signs off the schema and mapping before the production migration begins. Mapping corrections happen in the sandbox, not in production. Time entry formatting and custom field text blocks are validated here for the chosen tier strategy.

  4. User provisioning and owner reconciliation

    We extract every distinct .STUDIO user referenced on tasks, time entries, and client records and match by email against the Asana destination workspace's user table. Users without a matching Asana account go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. Task assignments and time entries cannot be fully resolved until all owner records are confirmed. We resolve assignments by email match and hold any unresolvable assignments as a text custom field on the task pending admin review.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (validated), Companies or Project custom fields (depending on Option A or B), Projects (with client association resolved), Tasks (with assignee, due date, subtasks, tags, custom fields, and comments), Time Entries (as custom field text blocks or native time logs depending on tier), Attachments (via Asana Attachments API), Templates (as project template manifests). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Workflows and templates are not migrated as code; we deliver the written inventory document at this step.

  6. Cutover, validation, and admin handoff

    We freeze .STUDIO writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records created or modified after the initial export timestamp, then switch the team to Asana as the system of record. We deliver the Workflow and Template inventory document to the customer's admin team with Asana equivalents documented. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any data reconciliation issues raised by the team. Workflow rebuild in Asana's Rules engine and template recreation are outside standard migration scope and are handled as a separate admin engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

.STUDIO logo

.STUDIO

Source

Strengths

  • All-in-one workspace combining project boards, time tracking, and client management
  • Clean interface purpose-built for creative and design agencies
  • Includes built-in invoicing and proposal tools for client-facing work
  • Supports resource planning with team availability and capacity views
  • Offers white-labeling options for agencies delivering client portals

Weaknesses

  • Limited native integrations compared to mainstream PM tools
  • API documentation is sparse, making custom integrations difficult
  • Mobile app features lag behind the web experience
  • Reporting and analytics are basic without advanced BI export
  • No built-in resource management beyond simple capacity views
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across .STUDIO and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    .STUDIO: Not applicable.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    .STUDIO doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your .STUDIO to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about .STUDIO to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during .STUDIO to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your .STUDIO to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for workspaces under 5,000 tasks, a single workspace, and straightforward client-to-project relationships. Migrations with multiple .STUDIO workspaces, high time entry counts (over 10,000 entries), complex multi-workspace custom field schemas, or Option A client normalization requiring Company-to-Project linking move to six to ten weeks because of sequential API pagination during export, multi-workspace schema reconciliation, and multi-phase record dependency ordering.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from .STUDIO.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day