Project Management

Migrate your Wrike data

Enterprise-grade project management platform with deep automation and resource planning. Best for mid-to-large teams that need structured work management at scale.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Wrike logo

In its favor

Why people choose Wrike

The signal that keeps Wrike on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Flexible and customizable workflows that adapt to diverse project methodologies, from agile sprints to traditional waterfall—reviewed positively across G2 for accommodating multiple team structures.

Real-time visibility into task dependencies, workloads, and project timelines, giving managers a single pane of glass to spot bottlenecks and reallocate resources proactively.

Deep integration ecosystem with 400+ native connectors including Salesforce, Adobe Creative Cloud, and Google Workspace, making it a hub for cross-functional teams.

Built-in proofing, approval workflows, and digital asset management for creative teams, consolidating review cycles without requiring a separate tool.

Generous free tier with unlimited users and intelligent task management lets small teams validate fit before committing to a paid seat.

Pricing rigidity punishes small teams—a user needing 2 Business-plan seats must purchase 5, adding ~$900/year in phantom costs that drive churn.

Minimum seat enforcement and annual-only billing create forced commitments that feel high-risk for teams unsure of long-term fit.

Steep learning curve for non-technical users and growing complexity as workspaces scale—many reviewers cite onboarding time as a barrier to adoption.

Interface clutter from accumulated projects, automations, and custom fields degrades performance and usability at scale.

Customer support quality is inconsistent, with some mid-market users reporting slow response times and unhelpful troubleshooting.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Wrike

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Wrike. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Wrike fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Multi-methodology support with Gantt, Kanban, Table, Calendar, and workload views in a single workspace400+ native integrations plus Wrike Integrate for custom two-way sync and API-based connectionsBuilt-in proofing and approval workflows for creative asset review without a separate DAM toolAI Essentials bundled across plans including comment summarization, board AI, and mobile prioritizationResource management and workload balancing with real-time capacity insights on Business tier and above

Weaknesses

Per-seat pricing with hard user-range boundaries creates sudden cost spikes when teams grow slightly past tier limitsFree tier limited to 2GB storage per account—small teams exhaust this quickly with attachments and exportsAnnual billing mandatory for most plans; monthly options are not generally available to non-enterprise customersStandard deployment timelines run 75-150 days with significant internal resource commitment requiredInterface complexity grows with workspace scale, leading to performance lag and governance challenges

Where it works

Mid-to-large cross-functional teams (51-1000+ employees) that require real-time visibility into task dependencies, resource workloads, and project timelines across multiple departmentsOrganizations in creative and marketing industries that need built-in proofing, approval workflows, and digital asset management to consolidate review cycles without a separate DAM toolTeams managing complex, multi-phase projects that span agile sprints and traditional waterfall methodologies, requiring Gantt, Kanban, Table, and Calendar views in a single workspaceEnterprises with established integration ecosystems—particularly those using Salesforce, Adobe Creative Cloud, or Google Workspace—that need 400+ native connectors and API-based custom sync capabilitiesMid-to-large organizations requiring SAFe governance, advanced resource planning, and portfolio-level reporting that justify the Pinnacle or Enterprise tier investment

Where it struggles

Small teams of 2-5 users needing Business-tier features—these organizations must purchase 5 seats minimum, adding ~$900/year in phantom costs that distort ROI calculationsOrganizations requiring monthly billing flexibility or short-term commitments; annual-only contracts create forced commitments that feel high-risk for teams unsure of long-term fitTeams with non-technical end users or limited IT support, where the steep learning curve and extensive configuration options become adoption barriers rather than flexibility benefitsGrowing teams approaching tier boundaries (e.g., 15 users on Team plan), where adding even one user forces migration to the next tier—doubling per-seat costs overnightCompanies seeking rapid deployment: standard implementations require 75-150 days with significant internal resource commitment for training sessions and homework between sessions

Pricing tiers

Wrike pricing overview

Wrike uses a per-seat model with tiers that jump sharply in cost and feature access. The Team tier at $10/user/month serves 2-15 users but forces annual billing; Business at $25/user/month unlocks resource management and is required for many teams needing workflow automation. The per-seat model creates a discontinuity: a 16th user jumps from Team to Business, effectively doubling the monthly spend. Enterprise tiers are custom-quoted and bundle SAFe, BI, and dedicated support at significantly higher per-seat rates.

Free

Tier 1 of 4

$0/user/month

What's included

Unlimited users with intelligent task management2GB total storage per accountFolder structure and nested projects1 shared space and 1 dashboard per accountUnlimited custom fields on tasks50 automations per accountBasic integrations with Google Workspace and Microsoft 365

Need help selecting your Project Management?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Wrike's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Wrike object support

Object-by-object support for Wrike migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Projects

Fully supported

Wrike Projects sit at the top of the folder hierarchy and contain Tasks, Subtasks, and metadata. We map Projects 1:1 using their title, dates, status, and custom field values. Folder parentage is preserved so nesting relationships are intact in the destination.

Tasks

Fully supported

Tasks are the primary work unit in Wrike with assignees, dates, durations, and dependencies. We export tasks with their full attribute set including custom fields, responsible users, and linked dependencies. Subtask relationships are preserved via parent task IDs.

Subtasks

Fully supported

Subtasks in Wrike inherit the parent's context and can have independent assignees and dates. We preserve the parent-child hierarchy explicitly in the destination schema so nesting depth is maintained.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Wrike supports 14+ Custom Field types including DropDown, Numeric, Date, Currency, Percentage, Contacts, Checkbox, and Calculated fields. We map these field types to equivalent destination fields but flag Calculated fields which cannot be migrated as editable values—only their last computed value transfers.

Workflows

Mapping required

Wrike Workflows define Status sets and transitions per project or globally. We export Workflow definitions including all custom statuses and transition rules. The destination must support custom status sets, or we map each Wrike status to the closest available destination status.

Users

Fully supported

User accounts with name, email, and role are exported via the API. We preserve the assignee-to-task mapping so the right people are assigned post-migration. Note: deactivated users may need manual cleanup in the destination.

Spaces

Mapping required

Spaces are top-level organizational containers (shared or personal). Wrike's permission model is tied to Space membership. We map Space assignments but recommend reviewing access controls in the destination, as permission inheritance may differ.

Dashboards

Mapping required

Dashboards aggregate widgets showing project health, workload, and custom metrics. We export dashboard configurations and widget definitions where the API exposes them. Not all widget types map directly; we flag those requiring manual rebuild.

Time Entries

Fully supported

Wrike logs time against tasks with hours, dates, and billing categories. We export time entries in full and map them to equivalent billing or timesheet objects in the destination. Duration-based entries are converted to explicit start/end timestamps.

Attachments

Mapping required

File attachments are referenced by URL in Wrike. We preserve download URLs and re-link them in the destination. Large attachment volumes may require separate storage migration; we flag accounts exceeding 5GB of attachment data for pre-migration storage planning.

Dependencies

Fully supported

Wrike supports Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, and other dependency types between tasks. We map these 1:1 where the destination supports dependency tracking. For destinations without native dependency support, we add dependency as a custom linked-field.

Comments

Fully supported

Comments on tasks and projects include author, timestamp, and text content. We export comments in full. Thread structure is preserved as parent-child relationships where supported by the destination schema.

Views (Gantt, Kanban, Table, Calendar)

Mapping required

Views are Wrike display configurations. We export the view layouts and filter settings. Since most destinations use their own native views, we note the original view configuration in the migration log for manual recreation.

Tags

Mapping required

Tags in Wrike are freeform labels applied to tasks and projects. We export tag values as-is. The destination must support tag-based filtering, or we convert tags to a custom multi-select field.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Wrike migrations

Issues we've hit on past Wrike migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

Minimum seat enforcement forces over-purchase

Medium

Calculated Custom Fields carry values, not formulas

Medium

2GB Free tier storage cap causes export truncation

Medium

400 req/s API rate limit throttles large migrations

Low

Annual billing lock-in limits mid-migration flexibility

How a Wrike migration works

Four steps, Wrike-specific

Connect

OAuth 2.0 into Wrike. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Wrike-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Wrike quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Wrike rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Wrike migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Wrike migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Wrike migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Wrike migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Wrike.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Wrike setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported