Project Management migration

Migrate from Wrike to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Wrike and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Wrike logo

Wrike

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

64%

9 of 14

objects map 1:1 between Wrike and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Wrike and Asana both use hierarchical work structures—Folders containing Projects containing Tasks and Subtasks—but they diverge on permission scoping, custom field capabilities, automation models, and assignment rules. We map Wrike Spaces to Asana Teams, Folders to Projects or Sections, and preserve the full task nesting depth. The single critical structural gap is that Asana allows only one assignee per task; we handle this by migrating the primary assignee directly and encoding additional assignees as Asana tags and task comments to preserve the full assignment context. Wrike's CalculatedNumeric and CalculatedDate fields store a static value at export time, not a live formula, so we flag these during the data audit and recommend either recreating the formula in Asana or treating the migrated value as a static number. Workflows, Custom Item Types, and Dashboards do not migrate as automation code; we deliver a written inventory of every active Wrike Workflow with its trigger conditions and recommended Asana Rules equivalent for your admin to rebuild post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Wrike logo

Wrike

What's pushing teams away

  • Pricing rigidity punishes small teams—a user needing 2 Business-plan seats must purchase 5, adding ~$900/year in phantom costs that drive churn.
  • Minimum seat enforcement and annual-only billing create forced commitments that feel high-risk for teams unsure of long-term fit.
  • Steep learning curve for non-technical users and growing complexity as workspaces scale—many reviewers cite onboarding time as a barrier to adoption.
  • Interface clutter from accumulated projects, automations, and custom fields degrades performance and usability at scale.
  • Customer support quality is inconsistent, with some mid-market users reporting slow response times and unhelpful troubleshooting.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Wrike objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Wrike object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Wrike

Space

maps to

Asana

Team

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike Spaces map to Asana Teams as the top-level organizational container. Wrike's Space-level permission model becomes Asana Team membership scoping. We map Space name to Team name and transfer Space-level custom field configurations to the equivalent Asana Team settings. Note: Asana Teams live inside a Workspace or Organization; we do not create new Workspaces or Organizations but can create new Teams within an existing destination structure.

Wrike

Folder

maps to

Asana

Project or Section

1:many
Fully supported

Wrike Folders map to Asana Projects if the Folder contains child Projects (preserving the parent-child hierarchy). Folders containing only Tasks map to Asana Projects with their Tasks as top-level items. If a Wrike Folder has no child Projects but has Tasks, we flatten those Tasks into a Project and note the original Folder name in the Project description. This preserves the organizational intent without introducing a non-native construct.

Wrike

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike Projects map directly to Asana Projects. We preserve the project name, description, start date, due date, status (Active, Completed, Archived), and custom field values. Project permissions are scoped to the target Asana Team created from the parent Wrike Space. If a Wrike Project has a status not natively supported by Asana, we map it to the closest Asana Project section or a custom field tracking the original Wrike status.

Wrike

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike Tasks map to Asana Tasks with title, description, start date, due date, and custom field values preserved. Assignee resolution uses the primary assignee from Wrike mapped directly to Asana's single-assignee field. Status maps from Wrike workflow stage to Asana section membership (or the closest status value if sections are not used). Tasks are imported in dependency order to preserve the cascade if dependency resolution runs during import.

Wrike

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

lossy
Fully supported

Wrike Subtasks map to Asana Subtasks within their parent Task. Asana allows one level of Subtask nesting only. If Wrike source data contains Sub-subtasks (Subtasks of Subtasks), we flatten these to a second-level Asana Task linked to the parent Subtask as a regular Task with a custom field wrike_original_depth__c = 'sub-subtask' so the customer can identify and restructure them manually. We flag this during scoping so the customer can decide whether to flatten, convert to Sections, or accept the structural change.

Wrike

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike Custom Fields map to Asana Custom Fields with type-level equivalence: DropDown to Dropdown, Numeric to Number, Date to Date, Currency to Number with formatting note, Percentage to Number (percentage), Contacts to People, Checkbox to Checkbox, Rating to Rating. CalculatedNumeric and CalculatedDate fields from Wrike export as static values—we do not attempt to recreate the formula in Asana because Asana Formula fields are not equivalent. Every Calculated field is flagged in the data audit with a recommendation to either accept static values or build a manual recomputation process post-migration.

Wrike

User

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike Users map to Asana workspace members by email address match. We extract the full user list from Wrike including deactivated users. Active users are invited to the Asana workspace as part of the migration scope; deactivated Wrike users are noted in the migration log with a recommendation to either create inactive Asana members or clear their assignments depending on the customer's audit requirements.

Wrike

Dependency

maps to

Asana

Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike task dependencies map to Asana dependencies via the Asana API using the dependent task GID and the dependee task GID. Finish-to-Start dependencies map directly. Start-to-Start dependencies also map via the Asana API. Finish-to-Finish and Start-to-Finish dependencies are not natively supported in Asana—these are documented in the migration log with a recommendation to either convert to an equivalent Finish-to-Start chain or accept a manual tracking workaround. After migration, we recommend running a manual verification pass in Asana Timeline for any dependency chain longer than five tasks because of known red-arrow behavior in Asana's Timeline.

Wrike

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Time Tracking or Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Wrike time entries (hours, dates, and billing categories) map to Asana's built-in time tracking if the destination Asana Organization has the Timesheets add-on enabled. If not enabled, time entries migrate as a custom number field wrike_time_logged__c with the total hours value, and a text field wrike_time_category__c carrying the billing category label. Duration-based entries that store duration rather than start and end time convert to hours in decimal format.

Wrike

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike file attachments are referenced by URL. We preserve the download URL in the migration log and re-link attachments in Asana by re-uploading or by storing the original Wrike URL as an Asana attachment link. Large attachment sets may require a separate storage migration step; we flag accounts with total attachment volume over 5 GB during the pre-migration storage audit. Wrike's 2GB Free tier storage cap is a source-side constraint that we audit before export.

Wrike

Comment

maps to

Asana

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike task and project comments map to Asana task comments with author, timestamp, and text content preserved. Thread structure (parent-child comment relationships) migrates as parent-child comment nesting in Asana where the destination supports it. We use the Wrike author email to match against the migrated Asana user for display attribution.

Wrike

Workflow

maps to

Asana

Rules

lossy
Fully supported

Wrike Workflows define custom status sets and transition rules per project or globally. These do not migrate as automation code to Asana Rules because the trigger models and condition types differ structurally. We export every active Wrike Workflow definition—including all custom statuses, transition conditions, and assigned project scoping—into a written inventory document. The inventory includes the Workflow name, associated projects, trigger type, conditions, and a recommended Asana Rules equivalent configuration. The customer's admin rebuilds the Workflows in Asana Rules post-migration.

Wrike

Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Wrike Tags migrate as Asana Tags. Tags are freeform labels on tasks and projects in Wrike and map directly to Asana Tags as key-value labels. We preserve the tag name exactly. Asana Tag filtering works at the project and portfolio level, so no structural conversion is required. If a task had multiple Wrike tags, all of them become Asana Tags on that task.

Wrike

Dashboard

maps to

Asana

Documentation

lossy
Fully supported

Wrike Dashboards aggregate widgets showing project health, workload, and custom metrics. We export dashboard configurations and widget definitions where the API exposes them and deliver them as a written dashboard inventory document. Asana Portfolios provide a similar aggregate view but are configured differently. We do not build Asana Portfolios inside the migration scope; the inventory document guides the admin in recreating the equivalent view. Custom Reporting requires a separate reporting setup in Asana that falls outside standard migration scope.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Wrike logo

Wrike gotchas

High

Minimum seat enforcement forces over-purchase

Medium

Calculated Custom Fields carry values, not formulas

Medium

2GB Free tier storage cap causes export truncation

Medium

400 req/s API rate limit throttles large migrations

Low

Annual billing lock-in limits mid-migration flexibility

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Asana allows only one assignee per task

    Wrike supports multiple assignees on a single task, which is common in cross-functional teams. Asana permits exactly one assignee per task. During migration, we map the primary (first) Wrike assignee directly to Asana's assignee field. For any additional Wrike assignees, we create Asana Tags named 'additional-assignee: [name]' and append a comment to the task reading 'Originally assigned to: [full name list]' to preserve the complete assignment context. This is the best available workaround within Asana's data model. We flag every task with multiple assignees during the pre-migration audit so the customer can decide whether to accept this encoding or reorganize task ownership before migration.

  • Calculated Custom Fields carry values, not formulas

    Wrike's CalculatedNumeric and CalculatedDate fields store a computed value at the time of export, not a live formula reference. When these fields migrate to Asana, they land as static values in an Asana Number or Date field. Asana does not support live formula recalculation against Wrike's original formula logic. We flag every Calculated field during the data audit with the current value and the field's original Wrike name. The customer can either accept the static value or set up a manual refresh process or a separate Asana integration to recompute values post-migration.

  • 2GB Free tier storage cap truncates exports on unpaid accounts

    Wrike's free plan caps storage at 2GB per account. Accounts with substantial attachment histories may find exports incomplete without upgrading to a paid plan first. We run a pre-migration storage audit and alert customers whose total attachment volume approaches or exceeds 80% of the cap. If the account cannot be upgraded, we prioritize task records, custom field data, and comments first, and note which attachment sets will be omitted from the migration. The migration plan documents every omitted attachment with its Wrike URL so the customer can re-upload manually if needed.

  • Asana Timeline dependency bug affects manually moved tasks

    Asana's Timeline view has a documented bug where manually dragging a task changes its date independently of the dependency chain, producing red arrows and incorrect cascade dates on dependent tasks. This affects long or complex dependency chains most. Wrike has no equivalent known issue. We flag this behavior during migration scoping for any workspace with more than five sequential dependencies. After migration, we recommend that customers verify all critical dependency chains in Asana Timeline manually and avoid using drag-and-drop date changes on tasks that are part of a dependency sequence.

  • Wrike Workflows and Custom Item Types do not migrate as code

    Wrike Workflows define custom status sets and transition rules per project or globally, and Custom Item Types create specialized task types beyond the standard task. Neither Workflows nor Custom Item Types transfer as automation code to Asana Rules because the underlying trigger, condition, and action models differ. We export complete Workflow definitions including status labels, transition rules, and project associations as a written inventory document. The customer's admin uses this to configure equivalent Rules in Asana. We do not rebuild Wrike Workflows inside the migration scope.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Wrike to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the Wrike workspace across Spaces, Folders, Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Custom Fields, Workflows, Dashboards, and dependency volumes. We identify calculated Custom Fields, multi-assignee tasks, subtask nesting depth, dependency complexity, and time entry volumes. We assess the destination Asana workspace to understand existing Teams, Projects, and any pre-configured Custom Fields. The discovery output is a written migration scope, an object mapping plan, and a pre-migration checklist including any storage or permission gaps on the source side.

  2. Schema design and multi-assignee resolution

    We design the Asana destination structure: Teams from Wrike Spaces, Projects from Wolders or Projects, Custom Fields from Wrike field definitions (with Calculated fields flagged as static). We design the multi-assignee resolution strategy: primary assignee maps directly, additional assignees become Asana Tags and task comments. Calculated fields are assigned a static Asana field type. We deliver a mapping specification document for customer review and sign-off before any data extraction begins.

  3. Pilot migration and reconciliation

    We run a pilot migration into a test Asana workspace with representative data volume—typically 50-100 records across Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, and Custom Fields. We reconcile object counts, spot-check 25-50 records for field-level accuracy, verify subtask nesting behavior, confirm dependency links in Asana Timeline, and validate multi-assignee encoding. The customer reviews the pilot output and approves the mapping before production migration begins.

  4. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order, using Wrike's API with rate-limit handling (approximately 400 req/s with exponential backoff and pagination). Folders and Projects are extracted first, then Tasks with parent-child relationships preserved, then Subtasks with depth flattening applied where needed, then Custom Fields, then Dependencies (with Finish-to-Finish and Start-to-Finish mapped to documentation where unsupported), then Comments, then Time Entries (as native time tracking or custom fields depending on Asana add-on status), then Attachments. Calculated fields are exported as static values and noted in the reconciliation report.

  5. Final validation and Workflow inventory delivery

    We run a full reconciliation comparing source Wrike record counts against the destination Asana record counts for each object type. We deliver the Workflow and Custom Item Type inventory document with every active Wrike Workflow and its recommended Asana Rules equivalent. We deliver the Dashboard inventory documenting widget definitions and configuration parameters. We provide a dependency verification checklist for the customer to manually verify critical chains in Asana Timeline given the known red-arrow behavior.

  6. Cutover and handoff

    We freeze Wrike writes during the cutover window, extract a final delta of any records modified during migration, apply the delta to Asana, and mark the migration complete. We provide a migration summary report with record counts by object type, a list of any records that could not migrate with reasons, and the documentation package. We offer a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Workflow rebuilds, Asana Rules configuration, and any Portfolio or reporting setup fall outside the migration scope and are handled by the customer's admin using the delivered inventory documents.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Wrike logo

Wrike

Source

Strengths

  • Multi-methodology support with Gantt, Kanban, Table, Calendar, and workload views in a single workspace
  • 400+ native integrations plus Wrike Integrate for custom two-way sync and API-based connections
  • Built-in proofing and approval workflows for creative asset review without a separate DAM tool
  • AI Essentials bundled across plans including comment summarization, board AI, and mobile prioritization
  • Resource management and workload balancing with real-time capacity insights on Business tier and above

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing with hard user-range boundaries creates sudden cost spikes when teams grow slightly past tier limits
  • Free tier limited to 2GB storage per account—small teams exhaust this quickly with attachments and exports
  • Annual billing mandatory for most plans; monthly options are not generally available to non-enterprise customers
  • Standard deployment timelines run 75-150 days with significant internal resource commitment required
  • Interface complexity grows with workspace scale, leading to performance lag and governance challenges
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Wrike and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Wrike: ~400 requests per second (estimated per-second basis).

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Wrike exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Wrike to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Wrike to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Wrike to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Wrike to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for workspaces under 500 tasks, 20 projects, and minimal custom fields. Complex migrations with 5,000+ tasks, deep subtask nesting, calculated fields, complex dependency chains, and multiple Workflows requiring documentation move into six to ten weeks because of subtask flattening verification, multi-assignee resolution, dependency chain testing, and Workflow inventory work. A documented case study of a professional sports organization migrating 200 projects to Asana from Wrike ran four weeks with an external team handling workflow rebuilding in parallel.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Wrike.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day