Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Wrike and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
Wrike
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
9 of 14
objects map 1:1 between Wrike and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Wrike and Asana both use hierarchical work structures—Folders containing Projects containing Tasks and Subtasks—but they diverge on permission scoping, custom field capabilities, automation models, and assignment rules. We map Wrike Spaces to Asana Teams, Folders to Projects or Sections, and preserve the full task nesting depth. The single critical structural gap is that Asana allows only one assignee per task; we handle this by migrating the primary assignee directly and encoding additional assignees as Asana tags and task comments to preserve the full assignment context. Wrike's CalculatedNumeric and CalculatedDate fields store a static value at export time, not a live formula, so we flag these during the data audit and recommend either recreating the formula in Asana or treating the migrated value as a static number. Workflows, Custom Item Types, and Dashboards do not migrate as automation code; we deliver a written inventory of every active Wrike Workflow with its trigger conditions and recommended Asana Rules equivalent for your admin to rebuild post-migration.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Wrike object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Wrike
Space
Asana
Team
1:1Wrike Spaces map to Asana Teams as the top-level organizational container. Wrike's Space-level permission model becomes Asana Team membership scoping. We map Space name to Team name and transfer Space-level custom field configurations to the equivalent Asana Team settings. Note: Asana Teams live inside a Workspace or Organization; we do not create new Workspaces or Organizations but can create new Teams within an existing destination structure.
Wrike
Folder
Asana
Project or Section
1:manyWrike Folders map to Asana Projects if the Folder contains child Projects (preserving the parent-child hierarchy). Folders containing only Tasks map to Asana Projects with their Tasks as top-level items. If a Wrike Folder has no child Projects but has Tasks, we flatten those Tasks into a Project and note the original Folder name in the Project description. This preserves the organizational intent without introducing a non-native construct.
Wrike
Project
Asana
Project
1:1Wrike Projects map directly to Asana Projects. We preserve the project name, description, start date, due date, status (Active, Completed, Archived), and custom field values. Project permissions are scoped to the target Asana Team created from the parent Wrike Space. If a Wrike Project has a status not natively supported by Asana, we map it to the closest Asana Project section or a custom field tracking the original Wrike status.
Wrike
Task
Asana
Task
1:1Wrike Tasks map to Asana Tasks with title, description, start date, due date, and custom field values preserved. Assignee resolution uses the primary assignee from Wrike mapped directly to Asana's single-assignee field. Status maps from Wrike workflow stage to Asana section membership (or the closest status value if sections are not used). Tasks are imported in dependency order to preserve the cascade if dependency resolution runs during import.
Wrike
Subtask
Asana
Subtask
lossyWrike Subtasks map to Asana Subtasks within their parent Task. Asana allows one level of Subtask nesting only. If Wrike source data contains Sub-subtasks (Subtasks of Subtasks), we flatten these to a second-level Asana Task linked to the parent Subtask as a regular Task with a custom field wrike_original_depth__c = 'sub-subtask' so the customer can identify and restructure them manually. We flag this during scoping so the customer can decide whether to flatten, convert to Sections, or accept the structural change.
Wrike
Custom Field
Asana
Custom Field
1:1Wrike Custom Fields map to Asana Custom Fields with type-level equivalence: DropDown to Dropdown, Numeric to Number, Date to Date, Currency to Number with formatting note, Percentage to Number (percentage), Contacts to People, Checkbox to Checkbox, Rating to Rating. CalculatedNumeric and CalculatedDate fields from Wrike export as static values—we do not attempt to recreate the formula in Asana because Asana Formula fields are not equivalent. Every Calculated field is flagged in the data audit with a recommendation to either accept static values or build a manual recomputation process post-migration.
Wrike
User
Asana
User
1:1Wrike Users map to Asana workspace members by email address match. We extract the full user list from Wrike including deactivated users. Active users are invited to the Asana workspace as part of the migration scope; deactivated Wrike users are noted in the migration log with a recommendation to either create inactive Asana members or clear their assignments depending on the customer's audit requirements.
Wrike
Dependency
Asana
Dependency
1:1Wrike task dependencies map to Asana dependencies via the Asana API using the dependent task GID and the dependee task GID. Finish-to-Start dependencies map directly. Start-to-Start dependencies also map via the Asana API. Finish-to-Finish and Start-to-Finish dependencies are not natively supported in Asana—these are documented in the migration log with a recommendation to either convert to an equivalent Finish-to-Start chain or accept a manual tracking workaround. After migration, we recommend running a manual verification pass in Asana Timeline for any dependency chain longer than five tasks because of known red-arrow behavior in Asana's Timeline.
Wrike
Time Entry
Asana
Time Tracking or Custom Field
lossyWrike time entries (hours, dates, and billing categories) map to Asana's built-in time tracking if the destination Asana Organization has the Timesheets add-on enabled. If not enabled, time entries migrate as a custom number field wrike_time_logged__c with the total hours value, and a text field wrike_time_category__c carrying the billing category label. Duration-based entries that store duration rather than start and end time convert to hours in decimal format.
Wrike
Attachment
Asana
Attachment
1:1Wrike file attachments are referenced by URL. We preserve the download URL in the migration log and re-link attachments in Asana by re-uploading or by storing the original Wrike URL as an Asana attachment link. Large attachment sets may require a separate storage migration step; we flag accounts with total attachment volume over 5 GB during the pre-migration storage audit. Wrike's 2GB Free tier storage cap is a source-side constraint that we audit before export.
Wrike
Comment
Asana
Comment
1:1Wrike task and project comments map to Asana task comments with author, timestamp, and text content preserved. Thread structure (parent-child comment relationships) migrates as parent-child comment nesting in Asana where the destination supports it. We use the Wrike author email to match against the migrated Asana user for display attribution.
Wrike
Workflow
Asana
Rules
lossyWrike Workflows define custom status sets and transition rules per project or globally. These do not migrate as automation code to Asana Rules because the trigger models and condition types differ structurally. We export every active Wrike Workflow definition—including all custom statuses, transition conditions, and assigned project scoping—into a written inventory document. The inventory includes the Workflow name, associated projects, trigger type, conditions, and a recommended Asana Rules equivalent configuration. The customer's admin rebuilds the Workflows in Asana Rules post-migration.
Wrike
Tag
Asana
Tag
1:1Wrike Tags migrate as Asana Tags. Tags are freeform labels on tasks and projects in Wrike and map directly to Asana Tags as key-value labels. We preserve the tag name exactly. Asana Tag filtering works at the project and portfolio level, so no structural conversion is required. If a task had multiple Wrike tags, all of them become Asana Tags on that task.
Wrike
Dashboard
Asana
Documentation
lossyWrike Dashboards aggregate widgets showing project health, workload, and custom metrics. We export dashboard configurations and widget definitions where the API exposes them and deliver them as a written dashboard inventory document. Asana Portfolios provide a similar aggregate view but are configured differently. We do not build Asana Portfolios inside the migration scope; the inventory document guides the admin in recreating the equivalent view. Custom Reporting requires a separate reporting setup in Asana that falls outside standard migration scope.
| Wrike | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Space | Team1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Folder | Project or Section1:many | Fully supported | |
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Subtask | Subtasklossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Field1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Dependency | Dependency1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Time Entry | Time Tracking or Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Comment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Workflow | Ruleslossy | Fully supported | |
| Tag | Tag1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Dashboard | Documentationlossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Wrike gotchas
Minimum seat enforcement forces over-purchase
Calculated Custom Fields carry values, not formulas
2GB Free tier storage cap causes export truncation
400 req/s API rate limit throttles large migrations
Annual billing lock-in limits mid-migration flexibility
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and scoping
We audit the Wrike workspace across Spaces, Folders, Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Custom Fields, Workflows, Dashboards, and dependency volumes. We identify calculated Custom Fields, multi-assignee tasks, subtask nesting depth, dependency complexity, and time entry volumes. We assess the destination Asana workspace to understand existing Teams, Projects, and any pre-configured Custom Fields. The discovery output is a written migration scope, an object mapping plan, and a pre-migration checklist including any storage or permission gaps on the source side.
Schema design and multi-assignee resolution
We design the Asana destination structure: Teams from Wrike Spaces, Projects from Wolders or Projects, Custom Fields from Wrike field definitions (with Calculated fields flagged as static). We design the multi-assignee resolution strategy: primary assignee maps directly, additional assignees become Asana Tags and task comments. Calculated fields are assigned a static Asana field type. We deliver a mapping specification document for customer review and sign-off before any data extraction begins.
Pilot migration and reconciliation
We run a pilot migration into a test Asana workspace with representative data volume—typically 50-100 records across Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, and Custom Fields. We reconcile object counts, spot-check 25-50 records for field-level accuracy, verify subtask nesting behavior, confirm dependency links in Asana Timeline, and validate multi-assignee encoding. The customer reviews the pilot output and approves the mapping before production migration begins.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order, using Wrike's API with rate-limit handling (approximately 400 req/s with exponential backoff and pagination). Folders and Projects are extracted first, then Tasks with parent-child relationships preserved, then Subtasks with depth flattening applied where needed, then Custom Fields, then Dependencies (with Finish-to-Finish and Start-to-Finish mapped to documentation where unsupported), then Comments, then Time Entries (as native time tracking or custom fields depending on Asana add-on status), then Attachments. Calculated fields are exported as static values and noted in the reconciliation report.
Final validation and Workflow inventory delivery
We run a full reconciliation comparing source Wrike record counts against the destination Asana record counts for each object type. We deliver the Workflow and Custom Item Type inventory document with every active Wrike Workflow and its recommended Asana Rules equivalent. We deliver the Dashboard inventory documenting widget definitions and configuration parameters. We provide a dependency verification checklist for the customer to manually verify critical chains in Asana Timeline given the known red-arrow behavior.
Cutover and handoff
We freeze Wrike writes during the cutover window, extract a final delta of any records modified during migration, apply the delta to Asana, and mark the migration complete. We provide a migration summary report with record counts by object type, a list of any records that could not migrate with reasons, and the documentation package. We offer a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Workflow rebuilds, Asana Rules configuration, and any Portfolio or reporting setup fall outside the migration scope and are handled by the customer's admin using the delivered inventory documents.
Platform deep dives
Wrike
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Wrike and Asana.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Wrike: ~400 requests per second (estimated per-second basis).
Data volume sensitivity
Wrike exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Wrike to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Wrike to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Wrike
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.