HRMS migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Infor HCM and Crelate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Crelate.
Infor HCM
Source
Crelate
Destination
Compatibility
9 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Infor HCM and Crelate.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Infor HCM to Crelate is a domain-shift migration: Infor HCM is an enterprise HRMS covering payroll, benefits, workforce management, and talent across a multi-jurisdiction workforce, while Crelate is a recruiting-focused ATS and CRM built for staffing agencies and in-house talent acquisition teams. The migration scope centers on Infor's Talent Management module—candidate profiles, talent profiles with skills and certifications, job requisitions, and placement histories—mapped into Crelate's Contact (candidate), Job, and Placement objects. We preserve effective-dated history from Infor as Crelate candidate activity records, and we remap Infor's skill taxonomy to Crelate's tagged attribute structure. Compensation history, benefits enrollments, performance reviews, payroll data, and Infor Document Management files do not have Crelate equivalents and are explicitly excluded. We deliver a written inventory of any Infor workflows or approval chains requiring manual rebuild in Crelate's task and automation tools post-migration.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Infor HCM object lands in Crelate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Infor HCM
Employee / Talent Profile
Crelate
Contact (Candidate)
1:1Infor employee records from the Talent Management module map to Crelate Contact records as candidates. Standard biographical fields (name, email, phone, address) migrate directly. Infor's user-defined fields on talent profiles (defined in CMS470 or HCM configuration sessions) are mapped to Crelate custom fields on the Contact object. The customer's Infor admin identifies which employee records are active candidates versus internal HR records during scoping; we only migrate the active candidate population. Effective-dated job history from Infor is preserved as Crelate Activity records with date-ordered entries.
Infor HCM
Skills and Certifications (Talent Science)
Crelate
Contact Tags and Custom Fields
lossyInfor Talent Science skills, certifications, and credential data attach to employee records as structured taxonomies. Crelate uses a tag-based keyword model for skills searchability rather than a hierarchical taxonomy. We extract skill names from Infor's structured fields, normalize them to plain-text keywords, and load them as Crelate tags on the Contact record. Certifications with expiry dates are mapped to Crelate custom date fields if the customer's Crelate admin configures them, or retained as tags with an expiry-note suffix. Taxonomy hierarchy is flattened during extraction since Crelate does not support nested skill taxonomies.
Infor HCM
Job Requisitions
Crelate
Job
1:1Infor HCM job requisition records from the Talent Management module map to Crelate Job records. Infor stores requisition status, department, headcount, and job description; we map these to Crelate's Job Title, Job Description, Status, and Department fields. Infor's requisition-to-candidate association (which candidates were sourced for which requisition) migrates as Crelate Job-Contact links. If Infor uses a separate approval workflow for requisitions, that workflow is documented for manual rebuild in Crelate since automations do not migrate.
Infor HCM
Organization / Department Hierarchy
Crelate
Division and Team
lossyInfor HCM org structures stored as hierarchical trees with cost center and location associations are mapped to Crelate Division and Team objects. The Infor parent-child org hierarchy is traversed during extraction, and department names are created as Crelate Divisions. Recruiters are assigned to Teams based on the Infor department-to-recruiter association. Position management headcount slots do not have a Crelate equivalent and are documented separately for the customer's workforce planning team.
Infor HCM
Compensation History
Crelate
Not Migrated (No Equivalent)
1:1Infor HCM pay history records include salary, bonus, and equity entries with effective dates. Crelate does not have a compensation or payroll object. We do not migrate compensation history to Crelate. If the customer needs to retain this data, we recommend a separate HRMS migration to a platform with compensation management (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Dayforce) or a manual archive export of the compensation history table from Infor as a CSV kept in the customer's records system.
Infor HCM
Benefits Enrollments
Crelate
Not Migrated (No Equivalent)
1:1Infor HCM benefit plans, enrollment elections, and coverage tiers live in the benefits administration module. Crelate is an ATS and recruiting CRM with no benefits management capability. Benefits enrollments do not migrate. We document the enrollment data volume during scoping so the customer can decide whether to retain it in an HR archive or a separate benefits administration platform.
Infor HCM
Performance Reviews / Goals
Crelate
Not Migrated (No Equivalent)
1:1Infor HCM performance documents, goal alignments, and review ratings from the Talent Management module do not have a Crelate equivalent. Crelate's ATS data model supports candidate notes and activity history but not structured performance review templates or competency ratings. Completed review cycles are documented as a flat record set in the migration inventory if the customer requires an audit trail, but they are not loaded into Crelate.
Infor HCM
Time and Attendance
Crelate
Not Migrated (No Equivalent)
1:1Infor Workforce Management time entries, absence balances, and accrual calculations are HRMS-layer data with no ATS analog. Crelate does not track time-off balances or attendance. We do not migrate time and attendance data. If the customer requires this functionality post-migration, a separate HRMS platform (Workday, UKG Pro, Dayforce) is recommended alongside Crelate for recruiting.
Infor HCM
Documents (IDM and SharePoint)
Crelate
Not Migrated (No Equivalent)
1:1Employee documents stored in Infor Document Management (IDM) or SharePoint integration do not migrate. The IDM export tool exports only the current version of each document, not the full version history, and there is no Crelate document management module for HR records. Crelate supports candidate document attachments (resumes, cover letters) but not HRMS-type documents like contracts, policies, or performance records. We recommend a separate document archive strategy for any compliance-required records.
Infor HCM
Custom Fields / User-Defined Fields
Crelate
Custom Fields
lossyInfor M3 and HCM support alphanumeric, numeric, date, and text user-defined fields attached to master data records. These are defined in configuration sessions and can number in the dozens per object. We extract the UDF schema during discovery, map each UDF to the corresponding Crelate field type (text, number, date, picklist), and pre-create the Crelate custom fields before candidate data loads. UDF values migrate as custom field values on the mapped Crelate record.
Infor HCM
Placement / Hiring History
Crelate
Placement
1:1Infor HCM records of hires, internal mobility events, and talent placements map to Crelate Placement records if the customer's Infor instance tracks placement outcomes. The Infor hire date, job title at hire, and department assignment become the Crelate Placement start date, job title, and division. Status (active, terminated, promoted) migrates to Crelate Placement status. Historical placements from prior years are loaded as closed Placement records.
Infor HCM
Candidate Engagements / Talent Interactions
Crelate
Activities (Calls, Emails, Meetings, Tasks)
1:1Infor Talent Management interaction history—recruiter notes, interview outcomes, sourcing activity, and engagement timestamps—maps to Crelate Activity records on the Contact. Each Infor interaction timestamp becomes a Crelate Activity date; interaction type maps to Crelate Activity type (call, email, meeting, task). Notes and outcome comments migrate as Crelate Activity notes. Activity ordering is preserved by date during load. Bulk API or CSV import is used depending on record volume; chunking is applied for histories exceeding 50,000 activity records.
| Infor HCM | Crelate | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee / Talent Profile | Contact (Candidate)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Skills and Certifications (Talent Science) | Contact Tags and Custom Fieldslossy | Fully supported | |
| Job Requisitions | Job1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Organization / Department Hierarchy | Division and Teamlossy | Fully supported | |
| Compensation History | Not Migrated (No Equivalent)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Benefits Enrollments | Not Migrated (No Equivalent)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Performance Reviews / Goals | Not Migrated (No Equivalent)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Time and Attendance | Not Migrated (No Equivalent)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Documents (IDM and SharePoint) | Not Migrated (No Equivalent)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Fields / User-Defined Fields | Custom Fieldslossy | Mapping required | |
| Placement / Hiring History | Placement1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Candidate Engagements / Talent Interactions | Activities (Calls, Emails, Meetings, Tasks)1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Infor HCM gotchas
IDM document export excludes version history
Non-public API requires file-based extraction
Hidden implementation and consulting costs inflate the real TCO
Effective-dated history requires sequenced loading
Crelate gotchas
120 req/min API rate limit throttles bulk migrations
20 custom field per-entity cap forces data model decisions
15,000-record export ceiling on single operations
Sequences and automation workflows do not migrate
API key is a querystring parameter, not a header
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and extraction planning
We audit the customer's Infor HCM instance with the Infor admin to identify which modules are in scope: Talent Management candidate and talent profile records, job requisitions, placement histories, skill and certification data, and organizational hierarchy. We map the Infor data model to Crelate's object schema, identify user-defined fields requiring custom field creation in Crelate, and determine the extraction method (IDM file export, CSV from UI, or database-level extract for on-premise LN). We also identify which Infor data has no Crelate equivalent (compensation, benefits, time-off, performance reviews, documents) and document these as explicit exclusions. The discovery output is a written extraction plan and data inventory.
Crelate custom field and taxonomy configuration
Before any data loads, we create the custom fields in Crelate that correspond to Infor user-defined fields and any Infor data (such as skill competency ratings or certification expiry dates) that requires a structured field rather than a flat tag. We also create the Crelate Divisions and Teams that correspond to the Infor organizational hierarchy. The customer's Crelate admin grants us admin-level access to configure these during this step. If the admin prefers to handle configuration themselves, we deliver a field-mapping spreadsheet with the target field name and type for each Infor UDF.
Extraction and transformation
We extract data from Infor using the agreed method. File-based exports are pulled in chunks to avoid timeout (chunks of 2,000-5,000 records per export run for employee and talent profile populations). On-premise database extracts are run under a read-only connection. During transformation, we apply the skill taxonomy flattening (converting Infor hierarchical competencies to flat keyword tags), sort effective-dated history rows in ascending date order for activity sequencing, and split the candidate population (active job seekers in scope for Crelate versus internal HR records that remain in Infor or another HRMS). Each transformation step emits a row-count and null-value report for customer verification.
Sandbox load and reconciliation
We load a representative sample (typically 10-20% of record volume) into the customer's Crelate sandbox environment to validate field mapping, custom field population, division and team assignment, and activity timeline sequencing. The customer's recruiting operations lead spot-checks 25-50 candidate records against the Infor source for accuracy in name, contact, skill tags, and activity history. Any mapping corrections are applied to the transformation logic before the full production load. This step also validates that Crelate's search returns the migrated candidates correctly.
Production migration in dependency order
We run the production load in record-dependency order: Divisions and Teams (organizational context), then Contact records (candidates with biographical data and custom field values), then Tags (skill and certification keywords), then Job records (requisitions with status and description), then Placement records (historical hires), then Activity history (calls, emails, meetings, tasks in date order). Each phase emits a reconciliation report comparing record count and null-field count to the extraction manifest. We use Crelate's CSV import for standard fields and the Crelate API for bulk activity records if the volume exceeds 50,000.
Cutover, validation, and workflow handoff
We freeze Infor writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any candidate records modified during the migration window, then enable Crelate as the active recruiting system. We deliver the workflow inventory document listing every Infor approval chain and automation with its trigger, conditions, and a recommended Crelate equivalent for the customer's admin to rebuild. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Infor workflows as Crelate automations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.
Platform deep dives
Infor HCM
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Crelate
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Infor HCM and Crelate.
Object compatibility
1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Infor HCM: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Infor HCM doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Infor HCM to Crelate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Infor HCM to Crelate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Infor HCM
Other ways to arrive at Crelate
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.