Project Management migration

Migrate from web2Project to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between web2Project and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

web2Project logo

web2Project

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between web2Project and Jira.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from web2Project to Jira is a schema-translation migration, not a direct record copy. web2Project organizes work as Projects containing Tasks with optional dependencies and a flat task-assignee model; Jira uses Projects with Issues organized by Issue Type (Epic, Story, Task, Bug, Subtask) inside Sprints, with a separate Components and Versions layer. We resolve that hierarchy during scoping, mapping web2Project Tasks to Jira Stories or Tasks based on their duration and dependency complexity, and preserving the original task structure in Jira issue links or the description field. The web2Project REST API is documented as a draft and not implemented in production, so we extract data directly from the MySQL database using read credentials. Jira Schemes (Issue Type Scheme, Workflow Scheme, Field Configuration, Screen) must be designed in the destination before any Issues migrate, and we treat these as configuration steps in the migration runbook. Workflows, automations, and web2Project forum threads do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's Jira admin to rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

web2Project logo

web2Project

What's pushing teams away

  • The interface is dated and lacks the modern UX patterns found in competing SaaS tools, leading to steeper learning curves for non-technical team members.
  • No production REST API means integrations with modern tools require custom PHP development, limiting ecosystem connectivity.
  • Community-maintained with an uneven release cycle — some teams experience reliability concerns given the volunteer-driven development model.
  • Limited reporting and analytics compared to modern project management platforms, making it difficult to derive business intelligence from project data.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How web2Project objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a web2Project object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

web2Project

Project

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project Projects map directly to Jira Projects. Each web2Project project name becomes the Jira Project name, and the project's owner becomes the Jira Project Lead. We extract the project start and end dates as the Jira Project's start date and the target end date. If the web2Project instance uses the Project Importer module for initial structure, we supplement its output with direct database queries to ensure all related records are captured.

web2Project

Task

maps to

Jira

Issue (Story or Task)

1:many
Fully supported

web2Project Tasks map to Jira Issues with an Issue Type decision based on structure: Tasks with no children and no blockers map to Jira Stories or Tasks depending on the customer's naming convention preference; Tasks with subtasks map to Jira Stories with Subtask children. Tasks with only one level of hierarchy map to Jira Stories with Jira Subtasks; deeply nested task trees map to Jira Epics containing Stories containing Subtasks. We preserve the original web2Project task_id in the Jira issue description for traceability.

web2Project

Task Dependency

maps to

Jira

Issue Link (Blocks / is blocked by)

lossy
Fully supported

web2Project Finish-to-Start and Start-to-Start dependencies map to Jira Issue Links with type Blocks and is blocked by respectively. We create the Jira Issue Links during the issue import phase after all Issues have been assigned Jira issue keys, then back-fill the link references using a lookup table generated during the first pass.

web2Project

User

maps to

Jira

User

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project user accounts map to Jira users by email address match. We extract username, email, display_name, and active/inactive status from the web2Project users table. Inactive web2Project users are provisioned as inactive Jira users to preserve historical assignment data without granting active login permissions.

web2Project

Company

maps to

Jira

Project or Component

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project Companies are organizational entities to which projects and users can be assigned. In Jira, Companies map either to Jira Projects (if each web2Project Company represents a distinct product or client) or to Jira Components (if Companies represent internal divisions within a single project). We confirm the mapping strategy during scoping based on the customer's data model and Jira project structure.

web2Project

Department

maps to

Jira

Component or Labels

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project Departments are sub-organizational units within Companies. Jira has no native department concept, so we map Departments to Jira Components within the relevant project, or to Labels with a department: prefix for cross-project organizational tagging. The customer chooses during scoping.

web2Project

Custom Field

maps to

Jira

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project custom fields (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox, rebuilt in v2.4 with SOLID OOP) map to Jira custom fields of the equivalent type. Pre-v2.4 and post-v2.4 web2Project instances have different custom field schemas; we detect the source version during database inspection and adjust field mapping logic accordingly. Custom fields are pre-created in Jira via the REST API before any issues are imported.

web2Project

Gantt Chart data

maps to

Jira

Issue dates and durations

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project Gantt chart data (task start dates, end dates, durations, and dependencies) migrates as Jira issue dates: Start Date maps to Jira Due Date or custom Start Date field, and duration maps to Estimated Hours. The Gantt visualization itself is not migratable; Jira's board and timeline views are the equivalent visualization layer that the customer's team configures post-migration.

web2Project

Calendar and Events

maps to

Jira

Issue with dates or Project Calendar events

1:1
Mapping required

web2Project calendar events migrate as Jira issues with scheduled dates if the events represent deliverables, or as Jira Project Calendar events if they represent cross-project meetings. iCalendar export from web2Project can be ingested as a source reference for the mapping.

web2Project

Forum (thread metadata)

maps to

Jira

Issue Description or Comments

lossy
Fully supported

web2Project project forums with thread metadata migrate as Jira issue descriptions or Jira Comments on the corresponding migrated issue. Forum post content migrates as Jira Comments attached to the Issue, with the original post date and author preserved. Forum categories that do not map to specific issues are documented as Jira project-level Comments for the customer's admin to route.

web2Project

File and Attachment

maps to

Jira

Issue Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project file references at the project and task level migrate as Jira Issue Attachments. Actual file content transfer is a separate coordination step — we extract file metadata and URLs from the web2Project database and provide a file transfer runbook that maps each file to the corresponding Jira issue by cross-referencing the task_id stored in the file record.

web2Project

Budget Fields

maps to

Jira

Custom text field (read-only documentation)

1:1
Mapping required

web2Project budget fields exist in the schema but are explicitly documentation-only per official documentation — they are not used for tracking, evaluation, or reporting. We migrate budget values as read-only custom text fields in Jira so that the financial data is visible in issue records, but the customer must implement any actual budget tracking workflow through Jira apps or third-party integrations post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

web2Project logo

web2Project gotchas

High

No production API means direct database access is required for migration

Medium

Budget fields are documentation-only with no financial logic

Medium

Custom field format changed significantly in v2.4

Medium

Project Importer module has limited import scope

Low

Timezone handling in user logs was rebuilt in v2.4

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • No production API forces direct MySQL database extraction

    web2Project's REST API is documented as a draft and not implemented in the production system. All data access requires direct queries to the MySQL database. We request read credentials to the source database server during discovery. If the database is on a private network or the customer cannot provide direct access, migration requires exporting via phpMyAdmin or the built-in Project Importer module, which has limited scope for related objects. We confirm database access and network reachability on the discovery call and recommend a VPN or bastion host if the database is not internet-accessible.

  • Task-to-Issue-Type hierarchy requires pre-migration design

    web2Project Tasks map to Jira Issues, but the Issue Type (Epic, Story, Task, Bug, Subtask) must be determined before migration begins because Jira's Issue Type Scheme controls which fields, workflows, and screens apply. We make the Epic/Story/Task decision based on task nesting depth, dependency complexity, and whether the task represents a deliverable or a work step. Jira Projects, Schemes, and Screens must be configured in the destination before any Issues migrate; we treat this as a pre-migration configuration step, not a data-migration step.

  • Custom field schema differs between web2Project v2.4 and earlier

    The web2Project custom field system was rebuilt from scratch in v2.4 using SOLID OOP principles. Pre-v2.4 and post-v2.4 instances store custom field values in different database tables with different column structures. We detect the source version during database inspection and adjust our field extraction logic, mapping pre-v2.4 optionlist references to Jira dropdown fields and post-v2.4 structured references to Jira Select List (cascading) fields as appropriate. Skipping this detection step causes data truncation or type mismatches in migrated Jira custom fields.

  • Jira scheme configuration must precede data migration

    Jira Projects require an Issue Type Scheme, Workflow Scheme, Field Configuration, and Screen Scheme before Issues can be created. These schemes are Jira configuration objects, not data records, and must be designed and deployed before the data migration phase begins. We include scheme design as the second step of the migration runbook, deploying via Jira REST API to a Sandbox first. Teams that attempt to import Issues before schemes are configured receive errors from Jira's required-field and workflow validation.

  • Budget fields are informational only in web2Project and require rebuild intent

    web2Project budget fields on projects are explicitly documentation values per the official schema documentation — they are not integrated into any calculation or reporting workflow. Customers migrating budget values to Jira often assume they will have active financial tracking post-migration. We flag this during scoping, migrate the values as read-only custom fields, and explicitly document that any actual budget tracking must be implemented in Jira through an app (like Budget Tracker for Jira) or a third-party integration post-migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful web2Project to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and database access verification

    We audit the source web2Project instance via direct MySQL database query. We extract the web2Project version to determine the custom field schema (pre-v2.4 or post-v2.4), record counts for Projects, Tasks, Task Dependencies, Users, Companies, Departments, custom fields, and attachments. We verify network connectivity to the MySQL database server or confirm the phpMyAdmin export fallback plan. We pair this with a Jira destination review: confirm Jira edition (Cloud or Data Center), document existing projects and schemes, and confirm Jira admin credentials for API access.

  2. Jira scheme design and pre-configuration

    We design the Jira destination configuration before any data moves. This includes creating the Jira Project, defining the Issue Type Scheme (Epic/Story/Task/Bug/Subtask hierarchy), configuring the Workflow Scheme and default workflow, designing the Field Configuration to include the migrated custom fields, and setting up Screen Schemes for each Issue Type. We deploy all schemes to a Jira Sandbox via the REST API for validation before production migration begins. Any Jira app dependencies (for budget tracking, time tracking, or advanced reporting) are identified and the customer's admin installs them before production migration.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into the Jira Sandbox using a representative data sample. The customer's project manager and Jira admin reconcile record counts, spot-check migrated Issues against the source web2Project tasks, verify that custom field values appear correctly, confirm that task dependencies resolved into Jira Issue Links, and validate that the Jira scheme behavior (required fields, workflow transitions) matches expectations. Any mapping corrections are documented and applied to the production migration script before cutover.

  4. User provisioning and owner reconciliation

    We extract every distinct web2Project user referenced on tasks, projects, and departments and match them by email against the Jira destination User table. Users without a matching Jira account go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Jira admin provisions any missing Jira users and sets appropriate permission schemes and project roles. Migration cannot proceed past this step because Jira Issue assignee fields require valid User references.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Projects and Components first, then Users and Permissions, then Issues with Jira Issue Type and custom fields resolved, then Task Dependencies resolved as Jira Issue Links using the back-filled lookup table, then Activity history (comments, attachments), then custom field values, then budget field values. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use Jira's REST API with rate-limit handling and exponential backoff, chunking large batches per Jira's bulk create limits.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff

    We freeze web2Project writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Jira as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of all web2Project forum threads, calendar events, and any configuration items that require rebuild in Jira (workflow transitions, automation rules, project board layouts). We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve reconciliation issues raised by the project team. We do not rebuild web2Project workflows or automations as Jira automations inside the migration scope; that work is documented separately for the customer's Jira admin.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

web2Project logo

web2Project

Source

Strengths

  • Zero licensing cost — fully open-source with no per-seat, per-project, or tier-based fees.
  • Full source code access enables deep customization, self-hosting, and auditability without vendor dependency.
  • Modular architecture lets teams install or remove modules to match their exact workflows and reduce bloat.
  • Role-based permissions model provides fine-grained access control at the project and module level.
  • Multi-language support with iCalendar export for calendar interoperability with external tools.

Weaknesses

  • No production REST API — all data access requires direct database queries or web interface scraping.
  • Dated user interface compared to modern SaaS project management tools, affecting team adoption.
  • Community-maintained with an uneven release cadence and no commercial support SLA.
  • Limited built-in reporting and analytics — no dashboards or data export pipelines beyond basic module reports.
  • Budget tracking fields are informational only and not integrated into any calculation or reporting workflow.
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across web2Project and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    web2Project: Not applicable — self-hosted; constrained by the customer's Apache/MySQL/PHP stack..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    web2Project exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your web2Project to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about web2Project to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during web2Project to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your web2Project to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 5,000 tasks and 500 users with straightforward Jira scheme design land between three and five weeks. Migrations with complex Jira scheme configurations (multiple Issue Type Schemes, custom workflows, large attachment volumes, or multi-project web2Project instances) move to seven to twelve weeks because of Jira scheme design time, Jira API ingestion pacing, and file-transfer coordination. Jira Cloud or Data Center edition choice affects the API rate limits we work within during migration.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from web2Project.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day