Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between web2Project and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.
web2Project
Source
Jira
Destination
Compatibility
9 of 12
objects map 1:1 between web2Project and Jira.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from web2Project to Jira is a schema-translation migration, not a direct record copy. web2Project organizes work as Projects containing Tasks with optional dependencies and a flat task-assignee model; Jira uses Projects with Issues organized by Issue Type (Epic, Story, Task, Bug, Subtask) inside Sprints, with a separate Components and Versions layer. We resolve that hierarchy during scoping, mapping web2Project Tasks to Jira Stories or Tasks based on their duration and dependency complexity, and preserving the original task structure in Jira issue links or the description field. The web2Project REST API is documented as a draft and not implemented in production, so we extract data directly from the MySQL database using read credentials. Jira Schemes (Issue Type Scheme, Workflow Scheme, Field Configuration, Screen) must be designed in the destination before any Issues migrate, and we treat these as configuration steps in the migration runbook. Workflows, automations, and web2Project forum threads do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's Jira admin to rebuild.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a web2Project object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
web2Project
Project
Jira
Project
1:1web2Project Projects map directly to Jira Projects. Each web2Project project name becomes the Jira Project name, and the project's owner becomes the Jira Project Lead. We extract the project start and end dates as the Jira Project's start date and the target end date. If the web2Project instance uses the Project Importer module for initial structure, we supplement its output with direct database queries to ensure all related records are captured.
web2Project
Task
Jira
Issue (Story or Task)
1:manyweb2Project Tasks map to Jira Issues with an Issue Type decision based on structure: Tasks with no children and no blockers map to Jira Stories or Tasks depending on the customer's naming convention preference; Tasks with subtasks map to Jira Stories with Subtask children. Tasks with only one level of hierarchy map to Jira Stories with Jira Subtasks; deeply nested task trees map to Jira Epics containing Stories containing Subtasks. We preserve the original web2Project task_id in the Jira issue description for traceability.
web2Project
Task Dependency
Jira
Issue Link (Blocks / is blocked by)
lossyweb2Project Finish-to-Start and Start-to-Start dependencies map to Jira Issue Links with type Blocks and is blocked by respectively. We create the Jira Issue Links during the issue import phase after all Issues have been assigned Jira issue keys, then back-fill the link references using a lookup table generated during the first pass.
web2Project
User
Jira
User
1:1web2Project user accounts map to Jira users by email address match. We extract username, email, display_name, and active/inactive status from the web2Project users table. Inactive web2Project users are provisioned as inactive Jira users to preserve historical assignment data without granting active login permissions.
web2Project
Company
Jira
Project or Component
1:1web2Project Companies are organizational entities to which projects and users can be assigned. In Jira, Companies map either to Jira Projects (if each web2Project Company represents a distinct product or client) or to Jira Components (if Companies represent internal divisions within a single project). We confirm the mapping strategy during scoping based on the customer's data model and Jira project structure.
web2Project
Department
Jira
Component or Labels
1:1web2Project Departments are sub-organizational units within Companies. Jira has no native department concept, so we map Departments to Jira Components within the relevant project, or to Labels with a department: prefix for cross-project organizational tagging. The customer chooses during scoping.
web2Project
Custom Field
Jira
Custom Field
1:1web2Project custom fields (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox, rebuilt in v2.4 with SOLID OOP) map to Jira custom fields of the equivalent type. Pre-v2.4 and post-v2.4 web2Project instances have different custom field schemas; we detect the source version during database inspection and adjust field mapping logic accordingly. Custom fields are pre-created in Jira via the REST API before any issues are imported.
web2Project
Gantt Chart data
Jira
Issue dates and durations
1:1web2Project Gantt chart data (task start dates, end dates, durations, and dependencies) migrates as Jira issue dates: Start Date maps to Jira Due Date or custom Start Date field, and duration maps to Estimated Hours. The Gantt visualization itself is not migratable; Jira's board and timeline views are the equivalent visualization layer that the customer's team configures post-migration.
web2Project
Calendar and Events
Jira
Issue with dates or Project Calendar events
1:1web2Project calendar events migrate as Jira issues with scheduled dates if the events represent deliverables, or as Jira Project Calendar events if they represent cross-project meetings. iCalendar export from web2Project can be ingested as a source reference for the mapping.
web2Project
Forum (thread metadata)
Jira
Issue Description or Comments
lossyweb2Project project forums with thread metadata migrate as Jira issue descriptions or Jira Comments on the corresponding migrated issue. Forum post content migrates as Jira Comments attached to the Issue, with the original post date and author preserved. Forum categories that do not map to specific issues are documented as Jira project-level Comments for the customer's admin to route.
web2Project
File and Attachment
Jira
Issue Attachment
1:1web2Project file references at the project and task level migrate as Jira Issue Attachments. Actual file content transfer is a separate coordination step — we extract file metadata and URLs from the web2Project database and provide a file transfer runbook that maps each file to the corresponding Jira issue by cross-referencing the task_id stored in the file record.
web2Project
Budget Fields
Jira
Custom text field (read-only documentation)
1:1web2Project budget fields exist in the schema but are explicitly documentation-only per official documentation — they are not used for tracking, evaluation, or reporting. We migrate budget values as read-only custom text fields in Jira so that the financial data is visible in issue records, but the customer must implement any actual budget tracking workflow through Jira apps or third-party integrations post-migration.
| web2Project | Jira | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Issue (Story or Task)1:many | Fully supported | |
| Task Dependency | Issue Link (Blocks / is blocked by)lossy | Fully supported | |
| User | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Company | Project or Component1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Department | Component or Labels1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Field1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Gantt Chart data | Issue dates and durations1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Calendar and Events | Issue with dates or Project Calendar events1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Forum (thread metadata) | Issue Description or Commentslossy | Fully supported | |
| File and Attachment | Issue Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Budget Fields | Custom text field (read-only documentation)1:1 | Mapping required |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
web2Project gotchas
No production API means direct database access is required for migration
Budget fields are documentation-only with no financial logic
Custom field format changed significantly in v2.4
Project Importer module has limited import scope
Timezone handling in user logs was rebuilt in v2.4
Jira gotchas
Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration
Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms
Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin
Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption
Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and database access verification
We audit the source web2Project instance via direct MySQL database query. We extract the web2Project version to determine the custom field schema (pre-v2.4 or post-v2.4), record counts for Projects, Tasks, Task Dependencies, Users, Companies, Departments, custom fields, and attachments. We verify network connectivity to the MySQL database server or confirm the phpMyAdmin export fallback plan. We pair this with a Jira destination review: confirm Jira edition (Cloud or Data Center), document existing projects and schemes, and confirm Jira admin credentials for API access.
Jira scheme design and pre-configuration
We design the Jira destination configuration before any data moves. This includes creating the Jira Project, defining the Issue Type Scheme (Epic/Story/Task/Bug/Subtask hierarchy), configuring the Workflow Scheme and default workflow, designing the Field Configuration to include the migrated custom fields, and setting up Screen Schemes for each Issue Type. We deploy all schemes to a Jira Sandbox via the REST API for validation before production migration begins. Any Jira app dependencies (for budget tracking, time tracking, or advanced reporting) are identified and the customer's admin installs them before production migration.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into the Jira Sandbox using a representative data sample. The customer's project manager and Jira admin reconcile record counts, spot-check migrated Issues against the source web2Project tasks, verify that custom field values appear correctly, confirm that task dependencies resolved into Jira Issue Links, and validate that the Jira scheme behavior (required fields, workflow transitions) matches expectations. Any mapping corrections are documented and applied to the production migration script before cutover.
User provisioning and owner reconciliation
We extract every distinct web2Project user referenced on tasks, projects, and departments and match them by email against the Jira destination User table. Users without a matching Jira account go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Jira admin provisions any missing Jira users and sets appropriate permission schemes and project roles. Migration cannot proceed past this step because Jira Issue assignee fields require valid User references.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Projects and Components first, then Users and Permissions, then Issues with Jira Issue Type and custom fields resolved, then Task Dependencies resolved as Jira Issue Links using the back-filled lookup table, then Activity history (comments, attachments), then custom field values, then budget field values. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use Jira's REST API with rate-limit handling and exponential backoff, chunking large batches per Jira's bulk create limits.
Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff
We freeze web2Project writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Jira as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of all web2Project forum threads, calendar events, and any configuration items that require rebuild in Jira (workflow transitions, automation rules, project board layouts). We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve reconciliation issues raised by the project team. We do not rebuild web2Project workflows or automations as Jira automations inside the migration scope; that work is documented separately for the customer's Jira admin.
Platform deep dives
web2Project
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Jira
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across web2Project and Jira.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
web2Project: Not applicable — self-hosted; constrained by the customer's Apache/MySQL/PHP stack..
Data volume sensitivity
web2Project exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during web2Project to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your web2Project to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave web2Project
Other ways to arrive at Jira
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.