Project Management migration

Migrate from web2Project to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between web2Project and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

web2Project logo

web2Project

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

80%

12 of 15

objects map 1:1 between web2Project and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from web2Project to Asana is a platform-class migration: web2Project is a self-hosted PHP/MySQL system with no production REST API, while Asana is a cloud-native SaaS tool with a well-documented REST API. We extract directly from the web2Project MySQL database, preserving the project hierarchy, task dependencies, Gantt chart dates, user assignments, and custom field values. The key complexity on the source side is web2Project's v2.4 custom field rebuild, which changed the schema for all custom field storage; we detect the source version during database inspection and adjust field mapping logic accordingly. On the destination side, Asana's file attachment limit of 100MB and its Start Date requirement on the Premium plan require pre-migration configuration decisions. Forum threads migrate as task comments, and project-specific forums are inventoried as Asana Conversations or externalized links. We do not migrate web2Project workflows or community-added modules as code; we deliver a written map of any active workflows for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana's Rules engine.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

web2Project logo

web2Project

What's pushing teams away

  • The interface is dated and lacks the modern UX patterns found in competing SaaS tools, leading to steeper learning curves for non-technical team members.
  • No production REST API means integrations with modern tools require custom PHP development, limiting ecosystem connectivity.
  • Community-maintained with an uneven release cycle — some teams experience reliability concerns given the volunteer-driven development model.
  • Limited reporting and analytics compared to modern project management platforms, making it difficult to derive business intelligence from project data.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How web2Project objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a web2Project object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

web2Project

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project Projects map to Asana Projects. The source project name, description, start_date, end_date, priority, and color code all migrate. The web2Project project owner maps to an Asana Project member with Admin access. We preserve the project status (Active, On Hold, Completed) by mapping it to an Asana project field. Note that Asana does not have a native Project-level budget field; any web2Project budget values migrate as read-only custom fields in Asana.

web2Project

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project Tasks map to Asana Tasks. The task name, description (migrated as rich text), start_date, due_date, priority, and percent_complete all transfer. The web2Project task owner (assigned user) maps to the Asana Task assignee. Subtasks in web2Project with a parent_task_id map to Asana Subtasks nested under the parent Task. Asana's Start Date field requires Premium or above—if the destination plan is Starter or lower, we migrate start dates as a custom field instead.

web2Project

Task Dependency

maps to

Asana

Task Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project supports Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, and Start-to-Finish dependency types. Asana natively supports only Finish-to-Start and Start-to-Start. We migrate Finish-to-Finish and Start-to-Finish as Finish-to-Start with an adjusted offset calculated from the task duration difference, and flag these in the mapping notes. Cycles are detected and broken at the earliest dependency in the chain.

web2Project

User

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project User records (username, email, role, active/inactive status) map to Asana User accounts. We match by email address. The web2Project role (Project Manager, Developer, Viewer) maps to Asana Project membership levels (Admin, Member, Guest) based on a role-mapping table defined during scoping. Inactive web2Project users migrate as Asana Guests with no project assignments, preserving the historical record without consuming a seat license.

web2Project

Company

maps to

Asana

Team (Workspace-level organization)

many:1
Fully supported

web2Project Companies are organizational entities distinct from Departments. Asana's equivalent organizational unit is the Team (inside a Workspace). We map web2Project Companies to Asana Teams, merging any Companies with duplicate names during import. If a web2Project Company has associated Departments, those map to Asana Sections within Projects or to Tags for cross-project grouping. The Company name becomes the Team name; Company contact information becomes a Team description or a dedicated Contacts integration if the customer uses Asana with a CRM.

web2Project

Department

maps to

Asana

Section or Tag

lossy
Fully supported

web2Project Departments are sub-organizational units within Companies. Asana has no native Department object. We map Departments to Asana Sections within Projects (for project-scoped grouping) or to Tags (for cross-project tagging). The customer chooses during scoping. If the department hierarchy matters for reporting, we recommend Tags with a naming convention that preserves the hierarchy (e.g., Engineering > Backend, Engineering > Frontend).

web2Project

Custom Field (post-v2.4)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project v2.4+ custom fields use SOLID OOP storage with standard store and delete methods. We map text fields to Asana Text, number fields to Asana Number, date fields to Asana Date, dropdown lists to Asana Enum (single-select), and checkbox fields to Asana Enum (multi-select with checkbox UI). Custom field labels and option values transfer directly. Note that Asana custom fields require Starter tier or above—we confirm the destination plan during scoping and flag if a custom field reduction is needed for Starter plans.

web2Project

Custom Field (pre-v2.4)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project pre-v2.4 custom fields used a different storage schema with the optionlist system reimplemented in v2.4. We detect the source version during database inspection and adjust field mapping logic. Pre-v2.4 optionlist values require a join across the old options table; we execute this at extraction time to produce a flattened dataset compatible with Asana's custom field enum values. Truncation risks are flagged before import.

web2Project

Gantt Chart Data

maps to

Asana

Timeline (Start Date + Due Date + Dependencies)

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project Gantt chart data consists of task start dates, end dates, durations, and dependencies. We migrate these as Asana Timeline view data—the underlying task dates and dependency relationships drive the Asana Timeline rendering. The Gantt chart visual rendering itself does not migrate (it is a display artifact), but the data that populates it transfers 1:1. Timeline view requires Asana Premium; if the destination plan is lower, we migrate dates as custom fields and note that Timeline rebuild is a post-migration configuration step.

web2Project

Calendar Event

maps to

Asana

Task with date fields or Calendar view entries

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project calendar events with start time, end time, and location map to Asana Tasks with start_date, due_date, and a location custom field. iCalendar export data (VEVENT components) is parsed and transformed during extraction. Recurring events in web2Project map to Asana recurring tasks if the recurrence pattern is simple (daily, weekly); complex recurrence rules are flattened into individual task instances with a recurrence metadata tag.

web2Project

Forum Thread

maps to

Asana

Task Comments or Conversation Thread

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project project forums contain thread metadata (author, timestamp, subject) and post content. Forum categories map to Asana Conversations at the Project level, and individual threads map to Conversation threads with posts preserved in chronological order. If the project forums are extensive (hundreds of threads), we may externalize them as linked Google Docs or Confluence pages with a link in the Asana Project description, per the customer's preference.

web2Project

File Attachment Reference

maps to

Asana

Attachment (with externalization for large files)

lossy
Fully supported

web2Project file attachments at the project and task level store file references and metadata. We migrate the file name, URL (if hosted externally), upload date, and uploader. For files under 100MB, we upload directly to Asana as native attachments. For files exceeding 100MB, we upload to Google Drive or SharePoint and link from Asana; the file reference migrates but the binary does not. We inventory all large files during discovery and confirm the externalization strategy with the customer.

web2Project

Budget Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Number Field (read-only)

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project budget fields exist in the schema but are explicitly documented as for documentation purposes only—they are not used for calculation or reporting. We migrate budget field values as Asana custom number fields with a note that they are informational. Any actual budget tracking logic (alerts, roll-ups, variance reports) must be re-implemented in Asana as a separate configuration or through an Asana-integrated budget tool.

web2Project

User Activity Log

maps to

Asana

Not migrated (audit trail inventory delivered)

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project v2.4+ activity logs are timezone-aware; pre-v2.4 logs store timestamps in server local time with no explicit timezone metadata. We extract activity log records as a reference dataset during migration but do not load them into Asana's native audit trail (Asana's audit log is an admin-visible feature separate from task history). Instead, we deliver a CSV inventory of activity log records grouped by user and date range, which the customer's admin can consult post-migration if historical activity review is required.

web2Project

Community Module Extension

maps to

Asana

Inventory and recommendations

1:1
Fully supported

web2Project's modular PHP architecture allows community-added modules that extend the standard schema. During database inspection we identify any non-core tables. These tables are inventoried in the migration scope document with recommendations: if a community module has an Asana equivalent (e.g., a time-tracking module maps to an Asana time-tracking integration), we include it in the scope; if no equivalent exists, we note it for the customer to address post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

web2Project logo

web2Project gotchas

High

No production API means direct database access is required for migration

Medium

Budget fields are documentation-only with no financial logic

Medium

Custom field format changed significantly in v2.4

Medium

Project Importer module has limited import scope

Low

Timezone handling in user logs was rebuilt in v2.4

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • web2Project v2.4 custom field schema change requires detection

    web2Project rebuilt its custom field system from the ground up in the v2.4 release. Pre-v2.4 instances store custom field values and option lists in a different table structure than v2.4+ instances. We detect the source version during initial database inspection and apply schema-adaptive SQL queries for all custom field extraction. If this step is skipped, custom field values for pre-v2.4 instances are either truncated or misaligned with their option list labels, producing silent data corruption that only surfaces when an Asana user sees incorrect enum values on migrated tasks.

  • Asana 100MB file attachment limit may require externalization

    Asana enforces a 100MB per-file attachment limit via its API. web2Project has no documented file size cap. During discovery we inventory all file attachments and identify any exceeding 100MB. Files over the limit are uploaded to Google Drive or SharePoint (per the customer's choice), and Asana task records receive a link to the external file instead of a native attachment. We confirm the externalization strategy during scoping to avoid discovering this constraint mid-migration and having to redesign the file handling pipeline.

  • Asana Start Date requires Premium plan

    Asana's Start Date field on tasks is only available on paid tiers (Starter, Premium, Business, Enterprise). The free plan supports Due Date but not Start Date. web2Project tasks commonly have start_date values. If the destination Asana plan is Starter or lower, we migrate start_date values as a custom date field named Original Start Date and note that Timeline view and automatic scheduling based on start dates are not available until an upgrade. This constraint is confirmed during scoping to prevent surprise post-migration.

  • Finish-to-Finish and Start-to-Finish dependencies require offset conversion

    web2Project supports four dependency types including Finish-to-Finish and Start-to-Finish, which Asana does not natively support. We convert these to Finish-to-Start with a date offset equal to the difference in duration between the dependent tasks, preserving the logical relationship as closely as possible. However, this conversion means the dependency arrow in Asana Timeline will show a different type than the original web2Project dependency. We flag every converted dependency in the mapping inventory and recommend the customer review critical FF and SF chains post-migration to confirm the offset logic produces the expected schedule.

  • web2Project budget fields have no calculation logic

    web2Project's schema includes budgetary fields on projects, but the official documentation explicitly states they are for documentation purposes only. Customers migrating from web2Project sometimes assume budget fields represent live financial data. We flag this during scoping and migrate the values as read-only custom number fields in Asana. We explicitly note in the mapping documentation that any budget tracking, alerts, roll-ups, or financial reporting using these values must be re-implemented in Asana or a connected financial tool post-migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful web2Project to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and database inspection

    We connect to the web2Project MySQL database (read-only credentials provided by the customer) and perform a schema inventory. We identify the web2Project version (pre-v2.4 or v2.4+), enumerate all core tables (projects, tasks, users, departments, companies, custom_field_values, dependencies, forums, files, activity_log) and any community-added module tables. We count records, identify null rates on key fields, and flag any data quality issues (orphaned tasks, circular dependencies, inactive users with active assignments). The discovery output is a written scope document with a web2Project version confirmation, a record count per object, and any data quality flags requiring customer action before migration begins.

  2. Asana plan confirmation and custom field planning

    We confirm the destination Asana plan (Free, Starter, Premium, Business, Enterprise) during scoping because several migration decisions depend on it. Custom fields require Starter or above. Timeline view and Start Date on tasks require Premium or above. We present the web2Project custom field inventory against the Asana plan's capabilities and recommend any plan upgrades or custom field reductions needed. We also confirm the file externalization strategy (Google Drive vs SharePoint) for any web2Project files exceeding 100MB.

  3. Schema mapping and sandbox migration

    We design the object mapping (Projects to Projects, Tasks to Tasks, Dependencies to Dependencies, Companies to Teams or Tags, Departments to Sections or Tags, Custom Fields to Custom Fields) and deploy it into an Asana Sandbox project to validate the mapping. The customer reviews a sample of migrated records and confirms the mapping decisions. Key decisions made here include the FF/SF dependency offset formula, the department-to-tag or department-to-section strategy, and how to handle web2Project budget fields. Corrections happen in sandbox, not in production.

  4. User provisioning and owner reconciliation

    We extract all web2Project users and match by email against the destination Asana organization's user list. Users present in web2Project but not in Asana go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions any missing Asana users (active or inactive depending on whether the original web2Project user is still active) before record migration begins. Role mapping (web2Project role to Asana Project membership level) is confirmed with the customer at this stage.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Teams (from Companies), Projects (with Team membership set), Users (already provisioned, validated), Tasks (with parent task IDs resolved for subtask nesting), Dependencies (with dependency type conversion applied), Custom Field values (post-extraction transform applied), File attachments (under 100MB to Asana, over 100MB to external storage with links), Forum threads (as Asana Conversations or externalized), Budget fields (as read-only custom fields), and Activity Log (as reference CSV). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow inventory handoff

    We freeze web2Project writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We perform a 25-record spot-check against the web2Project source for each major object type. We deliver the web2Project workflow and community module inventory to the customer's admin team with recommendations for Asana Rules rebuilds if automations existed. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild web2Project workflows as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

web2Project logo

web2Project

Source

Strengths

  • Zero licensing cost — fully open-source with no per-seat, per-project, or tier-based fees.
  • Full source code access enables deep customization, self-hosting, and auditability without vendor dependency.
  • Modular architecture lets teams install or remove modules to match their exact workflows and reduce bloat.
  • Role-based permissions model provides fine-grained access control at the project and module level.
  • Multi-language support with iCalendar export for calendar interoperability with external tools.

Weaknesses

  • No production REST API — all data access requires direct database queries or web interface scraping.
  • Dated user interface compared to modern SaaS project management tools, affecting team adoption.
  • Community-maintained with an uneven release cadence and no commercial support SLA.
  • Limited built-in reporting and analytics — no dashboards or data export pipelines beyond basic module reports.
  • Budget tracking fields are informational only and not integrated into any calculation or reporting workflow.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across web2Project and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    web2Project: Not applicable — self-hosted; constrained by the customer's Apache/MySQL/PHP stack..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    web2Project exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your web2Project to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about web2Project to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during web2Project to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your web2Project to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for instances under 500 users, 200 projects, and 5,000 tasks with no community-added modules. Migrations with active web2Project v2.4+ custom fields, community-added module tables, large file attachment inventories requiring externalization, or forum thread conversion work move to six to ten weeks because of schema detection logic, file handling decisions, and thread content mapping. Discovery alone (database inspection and record counting) takes three to five business days before the scope is finalized.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from web2Project.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day