Project Management migration

Migrate from RoboHead to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between RoboHead and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

RoboHead logo

RoboHead

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

80%

8 of 10

objects map 1:1 between RoboHead and Jira.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from RoboHead to Jira is a structural migration for teams that have outgrown RoboHead's creative-request workflow model in favor of Jira's sprint-based issue tracking and deeper API programmability. RoboHead organizes work around Projects, Campaigns, and intake Requests; Jira uses Projects, Issues, Sprints, and Boards. We map Campaigns to Jira Epics, Requests to typed Jira Issues with custom fields, and Tasks to Stories or Subtasks with assignee and due-date preservation. RoboHead's workflow automations are not exposed via the public API, so we document each automation during discovery and deliver a configuration guide for rebuilding equivalent rules in Jira Automation or ScriptRunner post-migration. Project Templates and external Contact Users receive separate treatment because they carry stale team references and access constraints that require manual resolution before landing in Jira.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

RoboHead logo

RoboHead

What's pushing teams away

  • Manual tagging for notifications forces users to remember who to include, creating miscommunication when team composition changes mid-project.
  • Contact users external to the organization cannot reliably view or interact with their assigned projects, blocking collaboration with agency partners or clients.
  • The task list lacks an outbox-style status indicator, making it difficult to identify which tasks have been submitted without drilling into each one individually.
  • Limited mobile app functionality reduces project visibility and task management for team members working outside the office.
  • Some fundamental features behave unexpectedly, requiring workarounds that slow down established team processes.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How RoboHead objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a RoboHead object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

RoboHead

Project

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Projects map directly to Jira Projects. Each RoboHead projectId becomes a Jira Project with projectKey derived from the RoboHead project name (sanitized to uppercase alphanumeric). Project status (active, draft, archived) maps to Jira Project status via the Jira Projects API. Projects that were created from Templates are flagged as isTemplate=true during extraction and mapped to standard Jira Projects with a custom field rh_template_source__c set to the original template ID for manual review.

RoboHead

Campaign

maps to

Jira

Epic

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Campaigns are top-level organizational units that group related Projects. We map each Campaign to a Jira Epic within the destination Jira Project, using campaignId and campaignName from the RoboHead API. If no Jira Epic exists, we create one before importing linked Projects. The Epic description carries the Campaign's summary. Campaign-to-Epic mapping is the highest-dependency link in the migration graph; we resolve this before Projects import to avoid orphaned project references.

RoboHead

Request

maps to

Jira

Issue (Story or Task)

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Requests are intake forms submitted before a Project is created. Each Request carries a form type, requester metadata, and ListColumns representing custom brief fields. We map Requests to Jira Issues of type Story (for structured creative briefs) or Task (for action-oriented requests). Custom ListColumn fields migrate as Jira custom fields of the corresponding type (text, date, select, multi-select). Requester metadata becomes the Issue reporter or a custom field rh_requester__c.

RoboHead

Task

maps to

Jira

Issue (Story or Subtask)

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Tasks belong to Projects and carry status, assignees, due dates, and role associations. We map Tasks to Jira Issues of type Story (top-level deliverables) or Subtask (nested work items). Assignee resolution uses email matching against Jira User records. Status mapping requires a status-to-status translation table because RoboHead status values (e.g., Not Started, In Progress, Submitted) do not map 1:1 to Jira workflow statuses. Due dates migrate directly as Due Dates on Jira Issues.

RoboHead

Team Member (User)

maps to

Jira

User

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Users have email, name, role assignments, and optionally user-level billing rates. We map each User to a Jira User account by email. Any RoboHead User referenced in Tasks or Projects without a matching Jira account enters a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. Role assignments (Designer, Writer, QA) migrate as Jira Project Role memberships and optionally as Labels on Issues for reporting purposes.

RoboHead

Task Role

maps to

Jira

Project Role or Label

1:1
Fully supported

RoboHead Task Roles are organizational categories for work types (e.g., Designer, Writer, QA) with optional billing rates attached to the role rather than individual users. We map role names to Jira Project Roles (if the Jira project uses a role scheme) or to Label values on Issues (for filtering and reporting). Role-level billing rates have no Jira native equivalent; we document them as a separate rate-card export for the customer's billing team.

RoboHead

Custom Field (ListColumn)

maps to

Jira

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

RoboHead custom fields on Projects, Campaigns, and Requests use the ListColumns API with optionIds for list-type fields. RoboHead requires callers to first call GetAllFields to retrieve field identifiers before those fields can be populated in Add or Update operations. We discover all active custom fields and their option lists during scoping, bake the ID-to-name mapping into the transform layer, and create equivalent Jira custom fields with matching types (text, date, select, multi-select) before any record import. optionIds are resolved to display values during transform so records write with correct option references in Jira.

RoboHead

Attachment

maps to

Jira

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

File attachments on RoboHead Tasks and Projects are stored in RoboHead's document management layer. We migrate file references and re-attach files to the corresponding Jira Issues via the Jira Attachments API. Attachments with null filenames (a known RoboHead edge case) are flagged separately because Jira does not accept null filenames; the customer's admin resolves these in RoboHead before migration begins.

RoboHead

Note

maps to

Jira

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Notes on RoboHead Projects and Tasks support @mentions and are stored as structured objects. We map Notes to Jira Comments on the corresponding Issues. @mention user references from RoboHead are converted to @-mention format in Jira Comments. If the mentioned user does not have a Jira account, the mention text is preserved as plain text without an active link.

RoboHead

Project Template

maps to

Jira

Project (with flag)

lossy
Fully supported

RoboHead Projects can be saved as templates, optionally copying tasks, files, budget details, and team structure. When a Project is created from a Template in RoboHead, role assignments and team member links are copied from the template and may reference inactive or removed users (orphaned references). We detect template-derived Projects during migration, flag any orphaned user references, and set a custom field rh_template_id__c on the Jira Project record so the customer's admin can review and reconfigure team assignments post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

RoboHead logo

RoboHead gotchas

High

Workflow automations are not exposed via the public API

Medium

Reporting accuracy depends on diligent data hygiene in RoboHead

Medium

Custom field IDs must be collected before adding or updating records

Low

Project Templates may carry stale team references

Low

Contact users face limited access to project data

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • RoboHead workflow automations are not accessible via API

    RoboHead's workflow automation rules—including approval chains, status-change triggers, and conditional notifications—are not exposed through the documented REST API. We cannot export or reconstruct automation logic programmatically. During scoping we document each active automation with its trigger, conditions, and actions, and we deliver a Jira Automation configuration guide that maps each RoboHead automation to its Jira Automation for Cloud equivalent (or ScriptRunner equivalent for Data Center). The customer's admin rebuilds the automations post-migration; we budget 1-2 days for this work in the project plan.

  • Custom field optionIds require GetAllFields before writes

    RoboHead's ListColumns API returns optionIds and display values for list-type fields, but writing to these fields requires the optionId integer, not the display name string. RoboHead callers must first call GetAllFields to retrieve field identifiers before records can be populated in Add or Update operations. We discover all active custom fields and their option lists during scoping, build an ID-to-name lookup table, and use optionIds in the transform layer. If this step is skipped, records write with display names instead of IDs, causing silent failures where list fields appear empty in Jira.

  • Project Templates carry stale team member references

    When a RoboHead Project is created from a Template, role assignments and team member links copy from the source template. If the template references inactive or removed users, those stale links persist in new Projects. We detect template-derived Projects during migration, extract the team member list, and flag any user references that do not resolve to a valid Jira account. These orphaned references are held in a reconciliation sheet for the customer's admin to resolve before the Jira Project receives its final team configuration.

  • Jira issue type scheme constrains the import schema

    Jira Projects use Issue Type Schemes to control which issue types (Epic, Story, Task, Bug, Subtask) are available within each project. We must configure the destination Jira Project's Issue Type Scheme before importing RoboHead data so that the imported issue types are whitelisted. If the scheme does not include a required type (e.g., Subtask is disabled on some Jira projects), we map Subtask-typed records to Task instead, which the customer's admin must approve during scoping.

  • External Contact users have restricted access in RoboHead

    RoboHead's external Contact user type can view Projects but has constrained interaction capabilities, including difficulty working with assigned tasks and projects. If migration scope includes external stakeholder records (agency partners, clients), we isolate them separately during extraction and flag which records will be fully accessible versus read-only in Jira. Jira's permission model handles external users differently—typically via project-specific roles or issue-level security levels—so the customer's admin reviews and configures external access post-migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful RoboHead to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the source RoboHead instance across active Projects, Campaigns, Requests, Tasks, Team Members, custom fields (ListColumns), and attachments. We identify Projects that are Templates versus active work, flag any inactive or removed users referenced in team assignments, and document each active workflow automation for the rebuild guide. The discovery output is a written migration scope document that confirms record counts, custom field inventory, and any Jira Issue Type Scheme requirements for the destination project.

  2. Jira destination setup

    We configure the destination Jira project: Issue Type Scheme (whitelisting Epic, Story, Task, Subtask as needed), custom fields (created with matching types to RoboHead ListColumns), and Project Role structure (for Designer, Writer, QA role mapping). If the customer uses Jira Software Cloud, we provision the project via the Jira REST API. We create Jira Users for every RoboHead Team Member by email match; any unmatched users enter a manual provisioning queue that must clear before record import begins.

  3. Sandbox migration and mapping validation

    We run a full migration into a Jira Sandbox or test project using a representative data sample (typically 10-20% of record volume). The customer's project manager and admin spot-check 30-50 records across Projects, Campaigns, Requests, Tasks, and Notes against the RoboHead source, verify that custom field values rendered correctly, and confirm that assignee and due-date data populated as expected. Any mapping corrections happen in the test environment before production migration begins.

  4. Custom field ID resolution and transform build

    We call RoboHead's GetAllFields endpoint to retrieve all active custom fields and their optionIds, build an ID-to-name lookup table, and code the transform layer so that list-type field values write as Jira option IDs rather than display strings. We also build the Campaign-to-Epic link resolution (resolving campaignId to Jira Epic key before Projects import), the Task status translation table, and the Note @mention user resolution. This step is the most technically complex and is validated against the sandbox before production.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Users (validated), Custom Fields (created with correct types), Campaigns (as Jira Epics), Projects (linked to parent Epics), Requests (as Jira Stories or Tasks with custom fields), Tasks (as Stories or Subtasks with assignees and due dates), Attachments (via Jira Attachments API), and Notes (as Jira Comments). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Template-derived Projects are flagged with rh_template_id__c and rh_orphaned_users__c fields for manual post-migration review.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze RoboHead writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Jira as the system of record. We deliver the Workflow Automation Rebuild Guide documenting each RoboHead automation and its Jira Automation for Cloud equivalent. We do not rebuild RoboHead automations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task. We support a 5-business-day hypercare window where we resolve any data quality issues raised by the customer's team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

RoboHead logo

RoboHead

Source

Strengths

  • Custom creative request briefs and intake forms reduce project kickoff back-and-forth for marketing teams.
  • Role-rate and user-rate billing tracking enables accurate creative workforce cost accounting.
  • DesignDrop provides a zero-friction file annotation and feedback layer for external stakeholders.
  • No-code workflow automation with approval chains and triggers configurable by project managers.
  • Differentiated focus on the marketing and creative project lifecycle rather than generic project tracking.

Weaknesses

  • Notification system requires explicit manual tagging; automations do not fire for all team members by default.
  • Contact users (external collaborators) face restricted project visibility and interaction capabilities.
  • API documentation is minimal and rate limits are not publicly published, complicating programmatic migrations.
  • Mobile app functionality is limited compared to the desktop experience.
  • The task list view does not clearly distinguish sent versus pending tasks without manual status inspection.
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across RoboHead and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    RoboHead: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    RoboHead exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your RoboHead to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about RoboHead to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during RoboHead to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your RoboHead to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 5,000 tasks and 200 projects with standard custom field counts and no complex template structures. Migrations with high custom field density, projects saved as templates with stale team references, large attachment volumes (over 10 GB), or multi-project Jira destinations with complex permission schemes move to six to ten weeks because of custom field ID resolution, orphaned user reconciliation, and Jira Issue Type Scheme configuration. The Jira-side configuration alone (creating custom fields, setting up issue type schemes, defining project roles) typically requires 3-5 business days before any data moves.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from RoboHead.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day