Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between RoboHead and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.
RoboHead
Source
Jira
Destination
Compatibility
8 of 10
objects map 1:1 between RoboHead and Jira.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from RoboHead to Jira is a structural migration for teams that have outgrown RoboHead's creative-request workflow model in favor of Jira's sprint-based issue tracking and deeper API programmability. RoboHead organizes work around Projects, Campaigns, and intake Requests; Jira uses Projects, Issues, Sprints, and Boards. We map Campaigns to Jira Epics, Requests to typed Jira Issues with custom fields, and Tasks to Stories or Subtasks with assignee and due-date preservation. RoboHead's workflow automations are not exposed via the public API, so we document each automation during discovery and deliver a configuration guide for rebuilding equivalent rules in Jira Automation or ScriptRunner post-migration. Project Templates and external Contact Users receive separate treatment because they carry stale team references and access constraints that require manual resolution before landing in Jira.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a RoboHead object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
RoboHead
Project
Jira
Project
1:1RoboHead Projects map directly to Jira Projects. Each RoboHead projectId becomes a Jira Project with projectKey derived from the RoboHead project name (sanitized to uppercase alphanumeric). Project status (active, draft, archived) maps to Jira Project status via the Jira Projects API. Projects that were created from Templates are flagged as isTemplate=true during extraction and mapped to standard Jira Projects with a custom field rh_template_source__c set to the original template ID for manual review.
RoboHead
Campaign
Jira
Epic
1:1RoboHead Campaigns are top-level organizational units that group related Projects. We map each Campaign to a Jira Epic within the destination Jira Project, using campaignId and campaignName from the RoboHead API. If no Jira Epic exists, we create one before importing linked Projects. The Epic description carries the Campaign's summary. Campaign-to-Epic mapping is the highest-dependency link in the migration graph; we resolve this before Projects import to avoid orphaned project references.
RoboHead
Request
Jira
Issue (Story or Task)
1:1RoboHead Requests are intake forms submitted before a Project is created. Each Request carries a form type, requester metadata, and ListColumns representing custom brief fields. We map Requests to Jira Issues of type Story (for structured creative briefs) or Task (for action-oriented requests). Custom ListColumn fields migrate as Jira custom fields of the corresponding type (text, date, select, multi-select). Requester metadata becomes the Issue reporter or a custom field rh_requester__c.
RoboHead
Task
Jira
Issue (Story or Subtask)
1:1RoboHead Tasks belong to Projects and carry status, assignees, due dates, and role associations. We map Tasks to Jira Issues of type Story (top-level deliverables) or Subtask (nested work items). Assignee resolution uses email matching against Jira User records. Status mapping requires a status-to-status translation table because RoboHead status values (e.g., Not Started, In Progress, Submitted) do not map 1:1 to Jira workflow statuses. Due dates migrate directly as Due Dates on Jira Issues.
RoboHead
Team Member (User)
Jira
User
1:1RoboHead Users have email, name, role assignments, and optionally user-level billing rates. We map each User to a Jira User account by email. Any RoboHead User referenced in Tasks or Projects without a matching Jira account enters a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. Role assignments (Designer, Writer, QA) migrate as Jira Project Role memberships and optionally as Labels on Issues for reporting purposes.
RoboHead
Task Role
Jira
Project Role or Label
1:1RoboHead Task Roles are organizational categories for work types (e.g., Designer, Writer, QA) with optional billing rates attached to the role rather than individual users. We map role names to Jira Project Roles (if the Jira project uses a role scheme) or to Label values on Issues (for filtering and reporting). Role-level billing rates have no Jira native equivalent; we document them as a separate rate-card export for the customer's billing team.
RoboHead
Custom Field (ListColumn)
Jira
Custom Field
lossyRoboHead custom fields on Projects, Campaigns, and Requests use the ListColumns API with optionIds for list-type fields. RoboHead requires callers to first call GetAllFields to retrieve field identifiers before those fields can be populated in Add or Update operations. We discover all active custom fields and their option lists during scoping, bake the ID-to-name mapping into the transform layer, and create equivalent Jira custom fields with matching types (text, date, select, multi-select) before any record import. optionIds are resolved to display values during transform so records write with correct option references in Jira.
RoboHead
Attachment
Jira
Attachment
1:1File attachments on RoboHead Tasks and Projects are stored in RoboHead's document management layer. We migrate file references and re-attach files to the corresponding Jira Issues via the Jira Attachments API. Attachments with null filenames (a known RoboHead edge case) are flagged separately because Jira does not accept null filenames; the customer's admin resolves these in RoboHead before migration begins.
RoboHead
Note
Jira
Comment
1:1Notes on RoboHead Projects and Tasks support @mentions and are stored as structured objects. We map Notes to Jira Comments on the corresponding Issues. @mention user references from RoboHead are converted to @-mention format in Jira Comments. If the mentioned user does not have a Jira account, the mention text is preserved as plain text without an active link.
RoboHead
Project Template
Jira
Project (with flag)
lossyRoboHead Projects can be saved as templates, optionally copying tasks, files, budget details, and team structure. When a Project is created from a Template in RoboHead, role assignments and team member links are copied from the template and may reference inactive or removed users (orphaned references). We detect template-derived Projects during migration, flag any orphaned user references, and set a custom field rh_template_id__c on the Jira Project record so the customer's admin can review and reconfigure team assignments post-migration.
| RoboHead | Jira | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Campaign | Epic1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Request | Issue (Story or Task)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Issue (Story or Subtask)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Team Member (User) | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task Role | Project Role or Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field (ListColumn) | Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Note | Comment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Project Template | Project (with flag)lossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
RoboHead gotchas
Workflow automations are not exposed via the public API
Reporting accuracy depends on diligent data hygiene in RoboHead
Custom field IDs must be collected before adding or updating records
Project Templates may carry stale team references
Contact users face limited access to project data
Jira gotchas
Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration
Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms
Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin
Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption
Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and scoping
We audit the source RoboHead instance across active Projects, Campaigns, Requests, Tasks, Team Members, custom fields (ListColumns), and attachments. We identify Projects that are Templates versus active work, flag any inactive or removed users referenced in team assignments, and document each active workflow automation for the rebuild guide. The discovery output is a written migration scope document that confirms record counts, custom field inventory, and any Jira Issue Type Scheme requirements for the destination project.
Jira destination setup
We configure the destination Jira project: Issue Type Scheme (whitelisting Epic, Story, Task, Subtask as needed), custom fields (created with matching types to RoboHead ListColumns), and Project Role structure (for Designer, Writer, QA role mapping). If the customer uses Jira Software Cloud, we provision the project via the Jira REST API. We create Jira Users for every RoboHead Team Member by email match; any unmatched users enter a manual provisioning queue that must clear before record import begins.
Sandbox migration and mapping validation
We run a full migration into a Jira Sandbox or test project using a representative data sample (typically 10-20% of record volume). The customer's project manager and admin spot-check 30-50 records across Projects, Campaigns, Requests, Tasks, and Notes against the RoboHead source, verify that custom field values rendered correctly, and confirm that assignee and due-date data populated as expected. Any mapping corrections happen in the test environment before production migration begins.
Custom field ID resolution and transform build
We call RoboHead's GetAllFields endpoint to retrieve all active custom fields and their optionIds, build an ID-to-name lookup table, and code the transform layer so that list-type field values write as Jira option IDs rather than display strings. We also build the Campaign-to-Epic link resolution (resolving campaignId to Jira Epic key before Projects import), the Task status translation table, and the Note @mention user resolution. This step is the most technically complex and is validated against the sandbox before production.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Users (validated), Custom Fields (created with correct types), Campaigns (as Jira Epics), Projects (linked to parent Epics), Requests (as Jira Stories or Tasks with custom fields), Tasks (as Stories or Subtasks with assignees and due dates), Attachments (via Jira Attachments API), and Notes (as Jira Comments). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Template-derived Projects are flagged with rh_template_id__c and rh_orphaned_users__c fields for manual post-migration review.
Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff
We freeze RoboHead writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Jira as the system of record. We deliver the Workflow Automation Rebuild Guide documenting each RoboHead automation and its Jira Automation for Cloud equivalent. We do not rebuild RoboHead automations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task. We support a 5-business-day hypercare window where we resolve any data quality issues raised by the customer's team.
Platform deep dives
RoboHead
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Jira
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across RoboHead and Jira.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
RoboHead: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
RoboHead exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during RoboHead to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your RoboHead to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave RoboHead
Other ways to arrive at Jira
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.