Project Management migration

Migrate from TimeHero to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TimeHero and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

TimeHero logo

TimeHero

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

60%

6 of 10

objects map 1:1 between TimeHero and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from TimeHero to Microsoft Project is a manual, CSV-driven migration because TimeHero exposes no public API. All data extraction requires the Premium-tier CSV export ($22-27/user/month), which is a hard dependency we confirm before scoping. We capture tasks with their title, work estimate, actual duration, remaining time, and both the original due date and the current adaptive-scheduled date — TimeHero's engine reschedules tasks silently when calendar events change, so we treat these as distinct fields to preserve full planning context. Projects and folders map to Microsoft Project plans with task hierarchy preserved through the outline level field. Recurring task rules are parsed from TimeHero's recurrence pattern and regenerated using Microsoft Project's recurrence dialog. Workflow templates, risk indicators, and calendar events are computed application state that cannot be exported; we document them for manual rebuild. We do not migrate attachments or Asana integration data — those require separate handling by the customer's team.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

TimeHero logo

TimeHero

What's pushing teams away

  • Steep learning curve makes onboarding slow — users struggle to understand the adaptive scheduling logic at first.
  • Over-automation causes frustration when tasks reschedule unexpectedly without clear reason or notification.
  • Small team size raises concerns about long-term product support and whether the company will remain solvent.
  • Lacks depth for complex project management — better suited for task scheduling than full project tracking.
  • Limited integrations beyond calendar sync and Asana connector restrict usefulness in diverse tool stacks.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How TimeHero objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a TimeHero object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

TimeHero

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

TimeHero tasks map to Microsoft Project tasks with Task Name, Duration (computed from work estimate), Work (in hours), Start Date (both original due date and current scheduled date as separate fields), Finish Date, Priority, and percent complete preserved. TimeHero's work estimate maps to the Work field; actual duration maps to Actual Work. We store the original due date in a custom text field (Original Due Date) and the current adaptive-scheduled date as the standard Start and Finish fields, so the destination has full planning context.

TimeHero

Project/Folder

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project Plan

1:1
Fully supported

TimeHero projects and folders map to individual Microsoft Project .mpp files or Project Online project plans. Each TimeHero project folder becomes a standalone plan. Tasks within that project retain their outline structure from the CSV export. We create the project in Microsoft Project using the first task's start date as the project start date and configure the project calendar before task import.

TimeHero

Time Entry (embedded in Task)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Actual Work and Actual Duration

lossy
Fully supported

TimeHero embeds time entry data as fields on each task: actual duration and remaining time. We parse these and write them to Microsoft Project's Actual Work and Remaining Work fields respectively. The percent complete is calculated as Actual Work divided by Total Work if TimeHero provides both. Note that TimeHero's timesheet CSV does not produce a separate time log with date-stamped entries; it produces task-level aggregates.

TimeHero

Recurring Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Recurring Task

lossy
Fully supported

TimeHero recurring tasks have a recurrence rule (daily, weekly, monthly, with interval and end condition) stored as application state. We extract the recurrence pattern and regenerate future instances in Microsoft Project using the Recurring Task dialog. Each generated instance becomes an individual task in the destination plan. Past completed instances are imported as regular tasks with Actual Work and dates set.

TimeHero

Assignee

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource Assignment

1:1
Fully supported

TimeHero task assignees are individual team members. We extract the assignee list and either map them to named Microsoft Project resources (if resource management is enabled) or write them to a custom Text field (Assignee) on each task. If the destination uses resource pools, we pre-create resource records with names matched from the assignee list.

TimeHero

Priority

maps to

Microsoft Project

Priority

1:1
Fully supported

TimeHero task priority (high, medium, low) maps directly to Microsoft Project Priority field. Values are numeric in Microsoft Project (500=high, 300=normal, 100=low) and we transform accordingly.

TimeHero

Risk Indicator

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Flag Field

lossy
Fully supported

TimeHero risk indicators are computed values (tasks flagged at risk when deadlines are at risk or capacity conflicts exist). These are not stored fields and cannot be exported directly. We capture the triggering conditions — deadline proximity, assigned capacity, scheduling conflicts — as a text note on the task and flag it using a custom Flag field in Microsoft Project so project managers can manually assess and address risk.

TimeHero

Calendar Events (scheduling context)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project Calendar

lossy
Fully supported

TimeHero uses Google and Outlook calendar events as scheduling context for its adaptive engine, but these events are not stored as primary data in TimeHero. We do not migrate calendar events. If the customer requires calendar-based scheduling in Microsoft Project, we document the connected calendar accounts during discovery and recommend importing calendar data as a separate step using Power Automate or a third-party integration.

TimeHero

Workload Report data

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task list with assignment data

1:1
Fully supported

Workload reports in TimeHero (Premium feature) show team capacity and task distribution. We extract the underlying task data for each team member and reproduce a workload view in Microsoft Project by grouping tasks by resource name or custom assignee field. True resource leveling in Microsoft Project requires resource management to be enabled in the destination plan.

TimeHero

Asana Integration Data

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task (standalone)

1:1
Mapping required

The TimeHero Asana connector syncs assigned tasks from Asana into TimeHero's inbox for scheduling. These tasks appear in TimeHero as regular tasks with Asana context. We import them as standard Microsoft Project tasks without the Asana reference. If the customer maintains Asana as the task management system, the Asana-to-Microsoft Project migration is a separate engagement.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

TimeHero logo

TimeHero gotchas

High

CSV export is gated behind Premium plan

High

No public API or documented REST endpoints

Medium

Workflow templates are non-portable configuration

Medium

Over-automation can reschedule tasks silently

Low

Timesheet export lacks attachment references

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • CSV export is gated behind TimeHero Premium tier

    TimeHero's data export functionality is only available on the Premium plan ($22-27/user/month). Basic and Professional users cannot export tasks or timesheet data through the UI. During migration scoping, we confirm the customer's current plan and factor in the cost of a temporary Premium upgrade or guide them to initiate export before downgrade if budget is constrained. This is a hard blocker — without the Premium export, no data leaves TimeHero programmatically or manually.

  • No public API forces per-project manual CSV export

    TimeHero does not publish a public API for programmatic data access. All migration work must be done through the CSV export in the web interface, which is a manual, per-project process. We cannot automate the extraction loop, which adds time and requires the customer's active participation to navigate to each project and trigger the export. We batch the export requests and handle the transformation pipeline, but the upstream collection is a manual human workflow.

  • Adaptive scheduling creates dual-date mismatch

    TimeHero's adaptive engine automatically reschedules tasks when calendar events change or capacity shifts. This means a task's planned date in TimeHero may differ significantly from its original due date set at creation. When migrating, we capture both the original due date and the current scheduled date as separate fields. Microsoft Project has no equivalent to adaptive rescheduling — tasks sit at fixed constraint dates or dependency-driven dates. The destination plan requires manual review to set the correct baseline.

  • Workflow templates and risk indicators are application state

    TimeHero's workflow template builder (Premium feature) stores template configurations as application state, not as exportable data. If a customer has built a library of workflow templates, those cannot be exported and must be manually recreated in Microsoft Project or documented as a rebuild checklist. Similarly, risk indicators are computed by TimeHero's engine and not stored as a field — we capture the triggering conditions but cannot import the computed flags directly.

  • Timesheet export lacks attachment references and date-stamped entries

    The CSV timesheet export includes task titles, estimates, actual durations, remaining time, and completion dates, but provides no reference to attached files or documents and does not produce a dedicated time log with separate date-stamped entries. We alert customers to download any file attachments manually from within TimeHero before migration and re-attach them in Microsoft Project. Timesheet data lands as task-level aggregates in Microsoft Project rather than as a separate time-tracking log.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful TimeHero to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Confirm export access and audit TimeHero data

    We confirm whether the customer holds TimeHero Premium (required for CSV export) or whether a temporary upgrade is needed. We then audit the full TimeHero workspace: count of projects, folders, tasks, recurring task patterns, time entries, assignee list, and any workflow template structures. We document the connected Asana integration scope and any attached files the customer should download manually before migration begins.

  2. Coordinate per-project CSV export

    Because TimeHero has no API, we guide the customer through the manual per-project CSV export workflow. We provide a checklist of each project and folder to export, with instructions for the export format (timesheet export including all task fields). We batch the export collection and validate file completeness before proceeding to transformation.

  3. Transform and reconcile dates

    We parse the exported CSVs and apply the dual-date rule: the original due date set at task creation is stored in a custom field, and the current adaptive-scheduled date becomes the standard Start and Finish dates in Microsoft Project. We reconcile recurring task rules from the recurrence pattern field, parse work estimates into Microsoft Project Work (hours) and Duration fields, and resolve assignees against the collected assignee list.

  4. Create destination project structure in Microsoft Project

    We create the project plan structure in Microsoft Project (or Project Online). This includes setting the project start date (from the earliest task date in the source), configuring the project calendar, enabling resource management if the customer requires named resources, and setting the default task type (Fixed Duration vs Fixed Work) based on how the source data was structured. Tasks are imported in outline hierarchy order.

  5. Import tasks and validate completeness

    We import the transformed task records into Microsoft Project, preserving task name, outline level (from folder hierarchy), start and finish dates (both original and current), work, duration, actual work, remaining work, percent complete, priority, and assignee. We run a row-count reconciliation against the source CSV exports and spot-check a random sample of 25-50 tasks for field-level accuracy. Recurring task instances are generated from the parsed recurrence rules.

  6. Document non-migratable artifacts for rebuild

    We deliver a written inventory of all workflow templates, risk indicator rules, and calendar integration configurations that cannot be exported from TimeHero. The inventory includes the template structure, trigger conditions, and recommended Microsoft Project equivalent (for example, converting a TimeHero workflow template to a Microsoft Project baseline and task group structure). We do not rebuild these as part of the migration scope.

  7. Cutover and post-migration validation

    We freeze writes in TimeHero, run a final delta reconciliation of any tasks modified during the export window, and deliver the completed Microsoft Project plans. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve import issues raised by the customer's project management team. We do not provide ongoing administrative support, workflow rebuild, or training as part of the standard migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

TimeHero logo

TimeHero

Source

Strengths

  • AI-driven adaptive scheduling that auto-plans tasks around calendar availability
  • Built-in time tracking with timer start from any context
  • Automatic risk detection when tasks conflict or deadlines are at risk
  • Recurring task scheduling with intelligent regeneration
  • Low entry price point at Basic tier with Asana connector included

Weaknesses

  • No documented public API — all migration relies on manual CSV export
  • Small company with ~2 employees raises long-term viability concerns
  • Steep learning curve due to non-obvious adaptive scheduling behavior
  • Over-automation can cause unexpected task rescheduling without clear notification
  • Premium-only export means Basic users cannot self-serve data extraction
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TimeHero and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    TimeHero: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    TimeHero doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your TimeHero to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about TimeHero to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TimeHero to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your TimeHero to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 2,500 tasks and 50 projects land between two and four weeks. Migrations above 2,500 tasks, with recurring task rule parsing, multiple folder hierarchies, or timesheet data across many projects, move to five to eight weeks. The manual per-project CSV export workflow is the primary timeline driver — we cannot automate data extraction from TimeHero, so the customer's participation in running exports adds time that is not present in API-driven migrations.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from TimeHero.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day