Project Management migration

Migrate from AceProject to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between AceProject and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

AceProject logo

AceProject

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

73%

8 of 11

objects map 1:1 between AceProject and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-8 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from AceProject to Microsoft Project is a platform consolidation for teams already in the Microsoft ecosystem. AceProject structures work hierarchically under Projects with Tasks holding Assignees, Estimates, and Dependencies, while Microsoft Project adds a Resource layer and a distinct task-scheduling engine. We export AceProject via the admin CSV export tool, converting line endings and verifying custom field visibility in the new interface before extraction. On the destination side, we map Tasks to Microsoft Project Tasks, AceProject Users to Resources in the Resource Sheet, and resolve task Dependencies using the predecessor-successor model. We flag that Microsoft Project does not have a native time-tracking module equivalent to AceProject's Time Entries, so time data must be stored as custom fields or linked to Project Online via SharePoint timesheets post-migration. We do not migrate AceProject workflows, document attachments, or expense records as these have no direct Microsoft Project equivalent.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

AceProject logo

AceProject

What's pushing teams away

  • Slow load times and infrequent feature updates leave teams wanting a more responsive, actively developed platform.
  • No self-hosted or on-premises option forces reliance on the vendor's cloud, which limits control for regulated industries.
  • Lack of open source status means teams cannot self-modify or audit the codebase, unlike competitors such as OpenProject.
  • Limited third-party integrations require additional tooling to connect with modern CRM, ERP, or DevOps workflows.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How AceProject objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a AceProject object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

AceProject

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project (MPP or Project Online Project Site)

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Projects map to Microsoft Project files or Project Online projects. We export project metadata (name, description, start date, end date, status) from AceProject's admin Export Data tool and create corresponding Microsoft Project files. For Project Online destinations, we create a Project Site and sync the project name, description, and classification fields. Project-level custom fields map to Microsoft Project enterprise custom fields if the destination uses Project Online with an enterprise pool.

AceProject

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Tasks map directly to Microsoft Project Tasks. Task name, start date, finish date, duration, and percent complete transfer. We convert AceProject estimates (estimated hours) to Microsoft Project duration units using the project's default calendar. Task-level custom fields (Boolean, Date, List, Numeric, Text, User) map to Microsoft Project custom fields with equivalent types.

AceProject

Subtask

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task (nested under Summary Task)

1:many
Fully supported

AceProject Subtasks nested under Tasks flatten into a Microsoft Project WBS hierarchy where the parent Task becomes a Summary Task and Subtasks become subordinate tasks. We preserve the hierarchy by setting the Outline Number and Outline Level in the destination. The parent-child relationship is reconstructed using Microsoft Project's outline structure rather than a separate Subtask object.

AceProject

User

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource (Resource Sheet)

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Users map to Microsoft Project Resources. We extract User records (name, email, role) from AceProject and create corresponding Resource Sheet entries in Microsoft Project. For Project Online destinations, resources are created in the enterprise resource pool. AceProject user-level custom fields map to Resource custom fields. Note that Microsoft Project Resources are not automatically assigned to tasks — we perform resource assignment mapping as a separate step after resource creation.

AceProject

Task Assignment (Assignee)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Assignment (Task row with Resource assigned)

lossy
Fully supported

AceProject Task Assignees map to Microsoft Project Assignments. Each unique Assignee on an AceProject Task becomes an Assignment row in Microsoft Project with the Resource, Units, and Work computed from the AceProject estimate. We run resource assignment mapping after the Resource Sheet is complete to ensure all Resources are resolvable before task assignments are written.

AceProject

Dependency

maps to

Microsoft Project

Predecessor link

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Task Dependencies with type (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish) map to Microsoft Project Predecessor fields on the dependent Task. We reconstruct the dependency graph by exporting dependency records with the predecessor and successor Task IDs, then writing the Predecessor value in the format 'TaskID[Type][Lag]' during migration. Circular dependencies are flagged and escalated before the import.

AceProject

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Fields or SharePoint Timesheet

lossy
Fully supported

Microsoft Project does not have a native time-tracking module equivalent to AceProject's Time Entries. We store time entry data (hours, date, task association) as custom Number fields on Tasks if the destination is Microsoft Project Desktop. For Project Online destinations, we map Time Entries to a SharePoint-based timesheet structure that the customer's admin links to the project via Power Automate. The billing rate from AceProject Time Entries is stored as a custom field on the Assignment.

AceProject

Expense

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not migrated

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Expense records have no direct Microsoft Project equivalent. We export expense metadata (amount, category, date, description, project association) and deliver it as a structured CSV inventory for the customer's admin to re-enter in a connected expense system (SharePoint list, Dynamics 365 Project Operations, or external tool). Expense reporting is out of scope for the standard migration but can be addressed as a separate configuration engagement.

AceProject

Document

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint Document Library

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Documents are associated with Projects. We export document metadata (name, upload date, author, file size) and file URLs. For Project Online destinations, we copy documents to the associated Project Site's SharePoint document library. For Microsoft Project Desktop destinations, we deliver the document metadata inventory and advise uploading files to a shared SharePoint or OneDrive location with the document inventory as a reference.

AceProject

Custom Field (Task)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Field (Task)

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject Task custom fields (Boolean, Date, List, Numeric, Text, User types) map to Microsoft Project custom fields with the corresponding type. We detect the interface version during scoping and export from the new AceProject interface to ensure all custom field values are visible. Custom fields with an Administrator-only visibility flag are exported under the admin account. For Project Online, custom fields are added to the enterprise project detail pages before migration.

AceProject

Comment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not migrated

1:1
Fully supported

AceProject document and task comments do not have a native Microsoft Project equivalent. We export comment text, author, and timestamp as a structured note inventory and deliver it alongside the migration. For Project Online destinations, comments can be stored in a SharePoint list linked to the project. The comment threading structure is simplified to flat text during export.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

AceProject logo

AceProject gotchas

High

Task import does not auto-assign users to Projects

Medium

Custom fields only visible in the new interface

Medium

CSV import requires DOS-style CRLF line endings

Low

Expense field visibility gated by user role

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Microsoft Project has no native time-tracking module

    AceProject's Time Entries are a first-class object linked to Tasks with hours, dates, and billing rates. Microsoft Project (both Desktop and Project Online) does not include a native time-tracking module. We store time entry data as custom Number fields on Tasks or map to a SharePoint-based timesheet structure that the customer's admin links post-migration via Power Automate. Any customer relying on AceProject's time tracking for billing, resource utilization reporting, or payroll must plan a separate timesheet solution and accept that historical time data will not appear in the Microsoft Project timeline view. This is a structural platform difference, not a migration gap.

  • Custom field values are invisible in AceProject's classic interface

    AceProject's classic interface displays the name of a custom field on a Task but renders no value — actual values only appear in the new interface. We determine which interface version the account uses at the time of scoping. If the account has not migrated to the new interface, we flag all custom field values as potentially unresolvable and recommend the customer switch to the new interface before export runs. Skipping this step results in custom fields that appear to be defined but contain no values in the exported CSV.

  • CSV import requires DOS-style CRLF line endings

    AceProject's import engine explicitly requires CSV files with DOS/Windows Carriage Return plus Line Feed (CRLF) as row delimiters. Files saved with Unix LF-only line endings are silently rejected or produce malformed records. This gotcha applies to AceProject's inbound import only. Our export process detects the line ending format during pre-flight and converts source files to CRLF before submitting them to AceProject's import endpoint if a data correction loop is needed.

  • Resource calendar availability has no AceProject equivalent

    Microsoft Project Resources carry calendar availability (standard hours per day, exceptions, overtime rate) that affects scheduling calculations. AceProject has no equivalent resource calendar model — Users are assigned directly to Tasks without capacity modeling. When mapping AceProject Users to Microsoft Project Resources, we default to the Standard calendar (Monday through Friday, 8 AM to 5 PM) and flag any User with a non-standard schedule so the customer's project manager can adjust the Resource Calendar in Microsoft Project after migration.

  • Expense visibility gated by user role in AceProject

    Normal users who have not been granted the 'Can see expense data no matter what' access right cannot view expense fields in the AceProject UI, and these fields may not appear in their export output. We run the export under an administrator account to bypass this restriction. During scoping we confirm the exporting account has admin privileges to ensure all expense records are captured. The expense inventory is delivered as a CSV regardless of whether it maps to a Microsoft Project destination.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful AceProject to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Scoping and interface audit

    We audit the AceProject account for interface version (classic vs new), user count, project count, task and subtask volume, custom field definitions, dependency graph complexity, and time entry and expense record counts. We confirm the exporting account has admin privileges to bypass expense visibility restrictions. We identify any users who do not yet have project membership that will receive task assignments, since AceProject does not auto-assign imported users to projects. The scoping output is a written migration scope with record counts per object and a recommended Microsoft Project destination (Desktop or Project Online).

  2. Source data extraction and cleaning

    We extract data from AceProject via the admin Export Data tool for Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Users, Time Entries, Expenses, and Documents. We run extraction from the new interface to capture custom field values. We convert line endings to UTF-8 for downstream processing, detect and resolve any circular task dependencies, and flatten the subtask hierarchy into parent-child pairs. Document metadata and file references are extracted separately from the document management module. We reconcile the total task count against the exported CSV row count before transformation begins.

  3. Schema design and resource pool mapping

    We design the Microsoft Project destination structure: for Project Online, we create Project Sites and configure enterprise custom fields and lookup tables to match the AceProject custom field definitions. For Microsoft Project Desktop, we configure the local custom field definitions before MPP file creation. We map AceProject Users to Resources using email as the dedupe key, defaulting all resources to the Standard calendar and flagging any with non-standard schedules for post-migration calendar adjustment. Resource cost rates from AceProject User profiles map to the Resource Sheet where present.

  4. Dependency graph and assignment resolution

    We reconstruct the AceProject dependency graph in Microsoft Project format using the Predecessor field. We validate that all predecessor Task IDs resolve to tasks in the migrated project and flag any broken references. We map AceProject Task Assignees to Microsoft Project Assignments with the Resource, Units, and Work values derived from the AceProject estimate and assignment record. Circular dependencies are flagged and escalated before the import to prevent schedule calculation errors in Microsoft Project.

  5. Pilot migration and reconciliation

    We run a pilot migration using two or three representative projects — ideally one simple, one with complex dependencies, and one with significant time entry or custom field data. We reconcile task counts, dependency relationships, resource assignments, and custom field values against the AceProject source. The customer reviews the pilot in Microsoft Project and signs off the mapping before the full production migration begins. Any mapping corrections happen in the pilot phase, not in production.

  6. Production migration and cutover

    We run production migration in dependency order: Projects (with custom fields and metadata), Resources, Tasks (with hierarchy and custom fields), Dependencies, Assignments, and Time Entries (as custom fields or SharePoint timesheet inventory). Documents are copied to SharePoint for Project Online destinations or delivered as a structured inventory for Desktop destinations. We freeze AceProject writes during cutover, run a final delta of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Microsoft Project as the system of record. We deliver the expense inventory CSV and the comment inventory separately for manual re-entry where applicable.

  7. Post-migration handoff and inventory delivery

    We deliver a written inventory of all AceProject objects that do not migrate natively: Expense records (CSV), Document file content (SharePoint copy or inventory), and Comment threads (structured note inventory). We do not rebuild AceProject workflows or automations as Microsoft Project does not have an equivalent workflow engine — we deliver a written document noting which project status updates, notifications, and approval chains existed in AceProject for the customer's admin to address in Microsoft Planner, Power Automate, or Project Online governance settings. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised during the first week of live use.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

AceProject logo

AceProject

Source

Strengths

  • Free tier available for small teams to trial without upfront cost.
  • Includes time tracking, expense management, and Gantt charts without add-ons.
  • Built-in chat and file commenting consolidate communication.
  • Admin-level CSV export covers Projects, Tasks, and Timesheets.
  • Drag-and-drop dashboard for quick project status visibility.

Weaknesses

  • No self-hosted or on-premises deployment option.
  • Not open source, limiting code auditability and customization.
  • Slow page load times reported across multiple reviews.
  • Feature release cadence is infrequent compared to competitors.
  • Third-party integration ecosystem is limited.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across AceProject and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    AceProject: Not publicly documented — typical SaaS limits assumed and confirmed during scoping..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    AceProject doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your AceProject to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about AceProject to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during AceProject to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your AceProject to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and eight weeks for accounts under 20 projects and 2,000 tasks with no complex dependency graphs. Migrations with large custom field inventories, nested subtask hierarchies, multi-project dependency networks, or a requirement to map time entries into a SharePoint-based timesheet structure move to twelve to twenty weeks because of schema design, dependency validation, and resource pool configuration complexity. AceProject's CSV-only export means all data transformation happens in our migration layer, which adds preprocessing time compared to API-based migrations.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from AceProject.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day