Migrate your Yardi data
Property management platform spanning entry-level residential portfolios to enterprise commercial operations, with Yardi Voyager and Breeze covering opposite ends of the complexity spectrum.
In its favor
Why people choose Yardi
The signal that keeps Yardi on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.
Manages over $4 trillion in real estate assets globally, giving enterprise operators confidence the platform will exist and be supported for the long term.
All-in-one property management bundles accounting, leasing, tenant communication, and vendor management into a single platform without requiring separate integrations.
Yardi Breeze offers one of the lowest per-unit pricing tiers in the market at $1/unit/month for residential portfolios under 500 units.
Voyager's multi-entity accounting supports complex ownership structures and fund-level consolidation that smaller property management tools cannot replicate.
Deep interface ecosystem with hundreds of third-party vendor integrations covering screening, payments, and insurance reduces point solution sprawl.
Software timeout issues disrupt workflows, and users report being unable to manually edit transaction dates or post months, creating friction in day-to-day operations.
Onboarding for Voyager implementations frequently exceeds five months, and setup is described as difficult with a steep learning curve even for simple tasks.
Customer support is described as difficult to reach, slow to resolve issues, and lacking knowledgeable assistance, particularly on Voyager.
No native investor relations or fund management features means real estate operators managing outside capital must pair Yardi with a separate investment platform.
Frequent bugs and glitches cause data loss and crashes, with users reporting losing unsaved work without warning.
Reasons to switch
Why people leave Yardi
The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Yardi. Presented as facts, not knocks.
Platform scorecard
Strengths, weaknesses, and where Yardi fits
Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.
SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit
Strengths
Weaknesses
Where it works
Where it struggles
Pricing tiers
Yardi pricing overview
Yardi Breeze uses per-unit monthly pricing starting at $1/unit for residential and $2/unit for commercial, with minimums ranging from $100 to $400 depending on tier and contract length. Voyager and Elevate operate on custom pricing negotiated directly with Yardi, with costs varying based on portfolio size, modules selected, and implementation services required. There is no free tier available.
Yardi Breeze
Tier 1 of 4
$1/unit/month (residential), $2/unit/month (commercial)
What's included
Need help selecting your CRM?
Book a free 30 minute consultationPricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Yardi's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →
What gets migrated
Yardi object support
Object-by-object support for Yardi migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.
Properties
Fully supportedProperties are the top-level container in Yardi. We migrate property records with address, type, and classification. Breeze stores basic property metadata; Voyager stores extended asset-level fields. Both are well-structured and export cleanly via the standard query interfaces.
Units
Fully supportedUnits belong to Properties and carry fields like unit type, sq footage, market rent, and occupancy status. We map Units 1:1 and preserve the parent Property linkage during migration. The unit-level rent and status history requires a separate table extraction.
Residents (Tenants)
Fully supportedYardi calls tenant records Residents. We extract contact details, lease association, payment history, and balance. Resident screening results stored in Yardi Breeze originate from third-party integrations and may not always be in the primary tenant record.
Leases
Mapping requiredLeases are migration-critical and complex. Base lease terms (start/end dates, rent amount) are straightforward, but escalation clauses, concessions, addendums, and renewal options are stored across multiple related tables that must be joined. We explicitly scope which lease sub-records to include during the planning call.
Owners
Mapping requiredOwner records vary significantly between Breeze and Voyager. Voyager stores ownership percentages, investor classifications, and capital contribution histories that Breeze does not. Where the destination does not have a native Owner object, we map Owner data into a Company or Contact record with a custom Owner flag property.
Vendors
Fully supportedVendor records include company name, contact info, W-9 status, and categories. We migrate vendors and preserve vendor-to-property associations. Voyager vendors with multi-entity access require mapping which entities they are permitted to bill against.
Work Orders
Mapping requiredWork orders are supported in both Breeze and Voyager but have different field sets. Voyager tracks work orders at both the property and unit level with detailed cost tracking; Breeze uses a simplified workflow. We map to the destination work order object and flag extended Voyager fields that may not transfer.
Chart of Accounts
Mapping requiredThe Chart of Accounts is enterprise-critical and migration-sensitive. Voyager supports complex multi-entity accounting; accounts may be entity-specific or consolidated. We flag accounts with non-standard naming or inactive status before migration to prevent chart-of-accounts bloat in the destination system.
Transactions
Mapping requiredRent payments, charges, and vendor payments are stored with GL implications. Historical transactions require careful sequencing because Yardi locks posted periods. We scope the transaction date range during planning and flag any open AP/AR that must be reconciled before migration.
Custom Tables (Custom Fields)
Mapping requiredCustom Tables are defined in the Admin menu and house customer-specific fields not part of the standard schema. These require manual schema inspection before migration because there is no auto-discovery endpoint. We treat each Custom Table as a unique mapping exercise.
Users and Roles
Mapping requiredUser accounts carry role assignments and property-level permissions. Voyager's Dynamic Ownership feature allows granular field-level access that most destination systems cannot replicate natively. We map users and role names but note permission granularity as a post-migration configuration item.
| Object | Support | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Properties | Fully supported | Properties are the top-level container in Yardi. We migrate property records with address, type, and classification. Breeze stores basic property metadata; Voyager stores extended asset-level fields. Both are well-structured and export cleanly via the standard query interfaces. |
| Units | Fully supported | Units belong to Properties and carry fields like unit type, sq footage, market rent, and occupancy status. We map Units 1:1 and preserve the parent Property linkage during migration. The unit-level rent and status history requires a separate table extraction. |
| Residents (Tenants) | Fully supported | Yardi calls tenant records Residents. We extract contact details, lease association, payment history, and balance. Resident screening results stored in Yardi Breeze originate from third-party integrations and may not always be in the primary tenant record. |
| Leases | Mapping required | Leases are migration-critical and complex. Base lease terms (start/end dates, rent amount) are straightforward, but escalation clauses, concessions, addendums, and renewal options are stored across multiple related tables that must be joined. We explicitly scope which lease sub-records to include during the planning call. |
| Owners | Mapping required | Owner records vary significantly between Breeze and Voyager. Voyager stores ownership percentages, investor classifications, and capital contribution histories that Breeze does not. Where the destination does not have a native Owner object, we map Owner data into a Company or Contact record with a custom Owner flag property. |
| Vendors | Fully supported | Vendor records include company name, contact info, W-9 status, and categories. We migrate vendors and preserve vendor-to-property associations. Voyager vendors with multi-entity access require mapping which entities they are permitted to bill against. |
| Work Orders | Mapping required | Work orders are supported in both Breeze and Voyager but have different field sets. Voyager tracks work orders at both the property and unit level with detailed cost tracking; Breeze uses a simplified workflow. We map to the destination work order object and flag extended Voyager fields that may not transfer. |
| Chart of Accounts | Mapping required | The Chart of Accounts is enterprise-critical and migration-sensitive. Voyager supports complex multi-entity accounting; accounts may be entity-specific or consolidated. We flag accounts with non-standard naming or inactive status before migration to prevent chart-of-accounts bloat in the destination system. |
| Transactions | Mapping required | Rent payments, charges, and vendor payments are stored with GL implications. Historical transactions require careful sequencing because Yardi locks posted periods. We scope the transaction date range during planning and flag any open AP/AR that must be reconciled before migration. |
| Custom Tables (Custom Fields) | Mapping required | Custom Tables are defined in the Admin menu and house customer-specific fields not part of the standard schema. These require manual schema inspection before migration because there is no auto-discovery endpoint. We treat each Custom Table as a unique mapping exercise. |
| Users and Roles | Mapping required | User accounts carry role assignments and property-level permissions. Voyager's Dynamic Ownership feature allows granular field-level access that most destination systems cannot replicate natively. We map users and role names but note permission granularity as a post-migration configuration item. |
Gotchas
What to watch for in Yardi migrations
Issues we've hit on past Yardi migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.
Lease fine print spans multiple related tables
No public REST API for data export
Chart of Accounts migration risk on Voyager
Yardi Breeze and Voyager use incompatible export formats
Posted period locks prevent retroactive edits
| Severity | Issue |
|---|---|
| High | Lease fine print spans multiple related tables |
| High | No public REST API for data export |
| High | Chart of Accounts migration risk on Voyager |
| Medium | Yardi Breeze and Voyager use incompatible export formats |
| Medium | Posted period locks prevent retroactive edits |
Leaving Yardi?
Where Yardi customers move next
12 destinations Yardi can migrate to.
How a Yardi migration works
Four steps, Yardi-specific
Connect
Yardi Voyager uses SOAP-based web services with username/password authentication, optional MFA (SMS, email, TOTP), and SSO/OAuth where enabled by the customer. Service accounts and customer-managed credentials are supported for hosted environments. API access of any kind requires an approved Yardi partner agreement or direct customer contract. into Yardi. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.
Map
We translate Yardi-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.
Sample
Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Yardi quirks before production.
Migrate
Full migration with Yardi rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.
FAQ
Yardi migration FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Yardi migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Can't find your answer?
Walk through your Yardi migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationReady when you are
Migrate Yardi.
Without the rebuild.
Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Yardi setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.