HRMS

Migrate your ClearCompany data

Unified talent management platform spanning ATS, onboarding, learning, and performance for mid-to-large organizations. The breadth of modules is its selling point and its complexity challenge.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
ClearCompany logo

In its favor

Why people choose ClearCompany

The signal that keeps ClearCompany on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Unified talent suite covering ATS, onboarding, LMS, and performance in one platform reduces the need to manage multiple disconnected HR tools

Pre-built integrations with ADP, LinkedIn, Indeed, and major assessment vendors streamlines the recruiting tech stack for mid-market teams

Interview and offer management workflows with scorecards and templates provide structured hiring processes out of the box

Learning management with curated content, learning paths, and compliance tracking addresses both upskilling and regulatory requirements

Customer service receives consistent praise for responsiveness and the platform is rated 4.6/5 on major review platforms

Quote-based pricing with no public per-seat or per-module rates creates friction during renewal negotiations and budgeting cycles

Limited direct contact during implementation requires engaging a third-party integrator for complex configurations

Customization depth varies across modules; some users report that advanced reporting requires workarounds

Integration with non-listed payroll providers can be inconsistent, forcing manual data re-entry for some workflows

Platform complexity increases with module count, and smaller teams report feeling overwhelmed by the feature set

Reasons to switch

Why people leave ClearCompany

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing ClearCompany. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where ClearCompany fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Integrated ATS, onboarding, LMS, and performance management in a single platformStrong customer satisfaction ratings (4.6/5) with praised support responsivenessPre-built connectors to ADP, LinkedIn, Indeed, and assessment vendorsClearInsights built-in analytics for recruiting metrics and executive reportingEnterprise-ready security with SSO support for larger deployments

Weaknesses

Quote-based pricing model lacks transparency and complicates budget forecastingImplementation takes 6-8 weeks regardless of contract timingCustomization depth varies across modules with some advanced features gatedSmaller teams may find the platform overwhelming relative to simpler ATS-only solutionsLimited direct vendor contact during implementation requires third-party integrator

Where it works

Mid-to-large organizations (200+ employees) seeking unified talent management across ATS, onboarding, LMS, and performance in a single platformCompanies already using ADP payroll who benefit from pre-built integrations, avoiding manual data re-entry between recruiting and payroll systemsOrganizations with structured hiring processes that rely on interview scorecards, offer letter templates, and compliance tracking for regulated industriesTeams with dedicated HR administrators who have capacity to manage platform complexity and configure multiple modules effectivelyEnterprises requiring enterprise-ready security posture with SSO support and integration with existing directory services like Okta or Azure AD

Where it struggles

Small teams (under 50 employees) or startups that lack dedicated HR administration resources to configure and maintain multiple talent modulesOrganizations using non-ADP payroll providers who report inconsistent integrations forcing manual data re-entry for some recruiting and HR workflowsCompanies needing rapid deployment with tight implementation timelines, since onboarding takes 6-8 weeks regardless of when contracts are signedOrganizations with tight per-seat budgets who need transparent pricing, since ClearCompany uses quote-based pricing with no public ratesCompanies requiring direct vendor contact during implementation, as complex configurations require engaging third-party integrators with limited direct vendor support

Pricing tiers

ClearCompany pricing overview

ClearCompany uses a quote-based pricing model that tailors cost to organization size and selected module bundles (ATS, onboarding, learning, performance). Third-party estimates suggest ranges from $60-$80 per user per month for the core tiers, but the platform does not publish official per-seat pricing. Implementation is fixed at 6-8 weeks and is included in the contract.

Essential

Tier 1 of 2

~$60 per user/month (estimated)

What's included

ATS core functionality for recruiting and applicant trackingStandard job posting and candidate management workflowsBasic reporting and analyticsPre-built integrations with major job boardsEmail support

Need help selecting your HRMS?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on ClearCompany's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

ClearCompany object support

Object-by-object support for ClearCompany migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Candidates

Fully supported

Candidate records include contact information, application status, source, and custom fields. We export full candidate profiles including activity history and preserve the association to open Jobs. Standard fields map cleanly to most destination ATS platforms.

Employees

Fully supported

Employee records in ClearCompany include employment details, department, manager assignment, start date, and custom properties. We map these to the destination HRMS employee object and preserve the org hierarchy relationships.

Jobs/Positions

Fully supported

Job records include title, department, location, status, and description. We export active and closed positions and preserve the job-to-candidate association for historical reference.

Onboarding Workflows

Mapping required

Onboarding task checklists and new-hire workflows are module-specific. We export task definitions and completion status but note that some checklist logic and conditional branching may not translate directly to destination onboarding systems.

Performance Reviews

Mapping required

Performance review records, goals, and calibration data are available. Review templates and rating scales vary by organization configuration and may require field-level mapping work during migration.

Learning Courses and Content

Mapping required

LMS content including courses, learning paths, completion records, and compliance data are exported. SCORM packages require additional handling; we flag these for explicit customer decision during scoping.

Departments

Fully supported

Organizational structure including departments, offices, and reporting relationships is exported and mapped to the destination's org hierarchy. We preserve parent-child department relationships.

Users and Roles

Fully supported

User accounts including role assignments, permissions, and active/inactive status are exported. We map roles to destination equivalents where naming conventions differ.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom fields on Candidates, Employees, and Jobs vary by module and tenant configuration. We discover field definitions during scoping, flag any with picklist constraints, and apply mapping logic per destination schema.

Documents and Attachments

Mapping required

Documents attached to employee records, candidates, and jobs are exported by reference with URLs or file content depending on export method. We flag any documents exceeding typical size thresholds.

Integrations and Reference Data

Mapping required

Reference data including countries, job functions, and integration configurations are exported for context. Active integration credentials are excluded for security and re-entered at the destination.

Gotchas

What to watch for in ClearCompany migrations

Issues we've hit on past ClearCompany migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

Medium

Quote-based pricing with no public tiers

Low

Implementation window is fixed at 6-8 weeks

Medium

SCORM content requires explicit handling during LMS migration

High

Active integrations cannot be exported with credentials

How a ClearCompany migration works

Four steps, ClearCompany-specific

Connect

Bearer token into ClearCompany. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate ClearCompany-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate ClearCompany quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with ClearCompany rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

ClearCompany migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ClearCompany migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ClearCompany migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most ClearCompany migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate ClearCompany.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your ClearCompany setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported