CRM migration

Migrate from Act-On to Pipedrive

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Act-On and Pipedrive. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Pipedrive.

Act-On logo

Act-On

Source

Pipedrive

Destination

Pipedrive logo

Compatibility

60%

6 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Act-On and Pipedrive.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Act-On is a marketing automation platform centred on Contacts, Companies, Programs, and engagement scoring. Pipedrive is a sales-focused CRM built around People, Organizations, Deals, and pipeline stages. The two platforms share a Contact and Company foundation but diverge sharply on automation logic, engagement scoring, and list management. We migrate the contact record core (name, email, phone, company, lifecycle stage, source, Tags) cleanly, preserve engagement scores as a static numeric custom field, and translate Act-On List membership into Pipedrive labels and activity tags. Act-On Program definitions (multi-step nurture sequences) do not export via API; we document each Program's steps as a written blueprint for your admin to rebuild in Pipedrive's automation builder. Email content, form submissions, and activity history migrate as a structured timestamped record set. We do not migrate workflows, Sequences, Forms (embed code), or engagement scoring formulas because Act-On's calculation rules are not accessible for export.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Act-On logo

Act-On

What's pushing teams away

  • Feature gaps in email composer quality and CRM integration force teams to layer on additional tools, increasing stack complexity and cost.
  • Performance and reporting depth lag behind competitors at similar price points, making it harder to justify ROI to leadership.
  • Pricing is perceived as high relative to the value delivered, especially as teams scale contact volumes and hit tier limitations.
  • Users report that Act-On feels less suitable as companies grow beyond mid-market requirements and need more sophisticated pipeline management.

Choosing

Pipedrive logo

Pipedrive

What's pulling them in

  • Clean drag-and-drop pipeline interface with minimal learning curve, making it approachable for small sales teams without dedicated CRM admins.
  • Visual deal tracking keeps reps focused on next actions — activities, calls, and follow-up tasks surface directly in the pipeline view.
  • Strong integrations via Zapier and native marketplace apps let teams wire Pipedrive into Calendly, ActiveCampaign, and similar sales-stack tools.
  • Mobile apps for iOS and Android keep field reps connected to deals, contacts, and tasks without a desktop session.
  • Reputation and review volume — over 3,000 verified reviews across G2 and Capterra — signal reliability for teams evaluating CRM options.

Object mapping

How Act-On objects map to Pipedrive

Each row shows how a Act-On object lands in Pipedrive, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Act-On

Contact

maps to

Pipedrive

Person

1:1
Fully supported

Act-On Contact maps directly to Pipedrive Person. Standard fields (firstname, lastname, email, phone, mobilephone, title) pass through cleanly. The Act-On Lifecycle Stage property migrates to a Pipedrive custom field lifecyclestage__c for audit continuity. We use email as the dedupe key during import to prevent duplicate Persons.

Act-On

Company

maps to

Pipedrive

Organization

1:1
Fully supported

Act-On Company maps to Pipedrive Organization. Company name maps to Organization name, domain to website, industry to industry picklist, and address fields to the Organization address block. Organization is created before any Person import so that the Person.organization_id lookup is satisfied at insert time.

Act-On

Contact

maps to

Pipedrive

Person

1:1
Fully supported

Act-On's one-to-many Contact-to-Company relationship resolves at migration time. We look up the Organization ID using the Act-On contact's company field and write it to Person.organization_id. Any Contact with a company name that has no matching Organization record is held for reconciliation.

Act-On

Tags

maps to

Pipedrive

Labels + Activity labels

lossy
Fully supported

Act-On Tags export as label arrays per contact. We map them to Pipedrive Labels on the Person record and create Activity labels for any tag that represents an event rather than a category. Dynamic Act-On List membership is not technically equivalent to a tag; we document each dynamic list's filter logic as a Pipedrive filter view reference.

Act-On

Lists

maps to

Pipedrive

Labels

lossy
Mapping required

Act-On Lists are audience segments used for campaign targeting. We preserve List membership as a Pipedrive Label on each Person (e.g., Label: 'Q4 Webinar Attendees'). The underlying dynamic or static logic of the Act-On List does not transfer; we document the filter conditions in a written reference so the admin can create equivalent Pipedrive filter views or segmentation.

Act-On

Engagement Score

maps to

Pipedrive

Custom field (engagement_score__c)

lossy
Fully supported

Act-On calculates engagement scores using proprietary weighting across email opens, clicks, page visits, and form submissions. The formula does not export. We migrate the current numeric score for each Contact as a static integer in a custom field Pipedrive custom field engagement_score__c. The score must be recalculated or replaced with Pipedrive-compatible scoring logic post-migration.

Act-On

Emails (campaign history)

maps to

Pipedrive

Activity log entries

1:1
Fully supported

Act-On email send history, subject lines, open and click records migrate as timestamped Activity entries linked to the Person. Each activity receives a type designation (email_sent, email_opened, email_clicked) and a timestamp from the Act-On engagement record. HTML body content is not migrated; only the activity record and metadata transfer.

Act-On

Forms (submission data)

maps to

Pipedrive

Activity log entries

1:1
Fully supported

Act-On form submission data migrates as Activity entries with a type of form_submission on the Person record. The form field values and submission timestamp migrate; the form embed code does not transfer and must be re-implemented in Pipedrive Web Forms or a third-party form tool.

Act-On

Custom Data Schema / Custom Objects

maps to

Pipedrive

Custom fields on Person/Organization

lossy
Mapping required

Act-On's Custom Data schemas export via the Custom Objects API as structured records. We read the schema definition, pre-create matching custom fields in Pipedrive (with appropriate field types: text, number, date, drop-down), and import existing records as custom field values on the corresponding Person or Organization. If the Act-On custom object has relationships to other objects, those map to custom lookup fields in Pipedrive.

Act-On

Programs (Automated Workflows)

maps to

Pipedrive

Reference documentation only

1:1
Not supported

Act-On Automated Programs define multi-step nurture sequences with branching, delays, and CRM actions. These are workflow definitions rather than data records and are not accessible via API for export. We document each Program's trigger, steps, conditions, and actions as a written reference artifact. The customer's admin rebuilds the equivalent logic in Pipedrive's automation builder using that document as a blueprint.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Act-On logo

Act-On gotchas

High

ACT! desktop CRM and Act-On marketing automation are different products

Medium

Automated Program logic does not export

Medium

Engagement score formulas are not transferable

Low

Bulk API is not publicly documented

Pipedrive logo

Pipedrive gotchas

High

Custom field hash keys differ per account

High

Export access gated by visibility groups

Medium

Token-based API rate limits since December 2024

Medium

Sequences and Automations not exposed via REST API

Low

Cost escalates via workflow caps and add-ons

Pair-specific challenges

  • Act-On Program logic does not export and cannot be migrated

    Act-On Automated Programs define multi-step nurture sequences with conditions, delays, and CRM actions stored server-side. The Program definitions are not accessible via Act-On's API. We export the list of contacts who entered each Program and their path progression as a historical record, but the Program itself must be rebuilt in Pipedrive's automation builder from scratch. We deliver a Program blueprint document listing each Program's name, trigger, step sequence, conditions, and actions for the customer's admin to reference during rebuild.

  • Engagement score formulas are not transferable to Pipedrive

    Act-On calculates engagement scores using proprietary weighting rules across email opens, clicks, page visits, and form submissions. These calculation rules are not exposed via API and cannot be exported. We migrate the current numeric engagement score as a static integer in a custom field on each Person record. Post-migration, the customer must configure a new scoring logic in Pipedrive either manually (rule-based scoring using Pipedrive's custom fields and filters) or via a third-party scoring integration. Score recalculation on historical data is not automated within migration scope.

  • Act-On has no documented bulk API; large migrations require chunking and backoff

    Act-On's API documentation does not describe a dedicated bulk or batch endpoint. For migrations exceeding 5,000 contacts or including large activity histories, we handle extraction by chunking requests using offset and limit parameters and applying exponential backoff to stay within any undocumented throttling. This adds processing time but does not block completion. Activity history volume (email opens, clicks, form submissions) is the primary driver of migration duration on the Act-On side.

  • Act-On List dynamic-filter logic does not transfer as Pipedrive segments

    Act-On Lists can be static (manually assigned) or dynamic (auto-populated by filter rules). We preserve static List membership as Pipedrive Labels on each Person. Dynamic List filter logic (the conditions that define membership) is Act-On configuration, not data, and does not export. We document each dynamic List's filter conditions in the handoff document so the admin can create equivalent Pipedrive filter views or automation triggers.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Act-On to Pipedrive data migration

  1. Discovery and scope definition

    We audit the source Act-On account: custom data schema definitions, active Programs, List counts and membership, engagement score configuration, and activity history volume per event type. We confirm the exact product (Act-On marketing automation, not Act! CRM) and review which fields are standard versus custom. The discovery output is a written migration scope specifying record counts per object, custom field inventory, Program list, and a recommendation on what engagement data to migrate versus document for manual rebuild.

  2. Schema pre-creation in Pipedrive

    We create all required custom fields in Pipedrive before any data import. This includes lifecyclestage__c (picklist), engagement_score__c (numeric), source__c (text), and any custom fields derived from Act-On's Custom Data schemas. Custom field API names are matched to Act-On field names where possible. Pipedrive's field management UI requires Global Admin permissions; we coordinate with the customer's admin to provision these or guide them through field creation.

  3. Data cleaning and deduplication

    We run a pre-migration data quality pass on Act-On exports. Duplicate contacts (identical email addresses) are merged or flagged for the customer's decision. Incomplete records missing email or name are flagged for resolution. Company names are standardised before Organization creation to avoid duplicate Organizations. This step reduces downstream import errors and ensures Pipedrive's dedupe logic activates correctly during insert.

  4. Owner reconciliation

    We extract every distinct Act-On Owner referenced on Contact and Company records and match by email against Pipedrive Users. Any Act-On Owner without a matching Pipedrive User is held in a reconciliation queue. The customer's Pipedrive admin provisions the missing Users (active or inactive depending on whether the Act-On user is still active). Migration cannot proceed past this step because Person.owner_id is a required reference for assignment-based reporting.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Organizations (from Act-On Companies, using domain as dedupe key), Persons (with organization_id resolved via Company name lookup), Labels (created per Act-On List), Person-Label associations (static List membership), custom field values, engagement scores, and Activity history (email sends, opens, clicks, form submissions as timestamped Activity records). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Activity history migrates via chunked API calls with backoff; large sets run in off-peak hours if the customer is actively using Act-On during migration.

  6. Cutover, validation, and Program blueprint handoff

    We freeze Act-On writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of records modified during the migration window, then enable Pipedrive as the system of record. We deliver the Program blueprint document listing each Act-On Program's trigger, steps, conditions, and actions. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team. We do not rebuild Act-On Programs in Pipedrive's automation builder as this requires business-logic decisions outside data-migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Act-On logo

Act-On

Source

Strengths

  • Embedded SMS marketing extends reach beyond email without an additional platform subscription.
  • Native engagement scoring gives a behavioural signal out of the box without third-party analytics.
  • Responsive support team with a reputation for hands-on help during setup and troubleshooting.
  • Segmented audience management via Lists allows targeted campaign execution without complex queries.
  • User-friendly interface lowers the learning curve for marketing teams without dedicated ops resources.

Weaknesses

  • CRM integration capabilities lag behind competitors, often requiring workarounds or third-party middleware.
  • Reporting depth is shallower than HubSpot or Salesforce, making multi-touch attribution difficult.
  • Pricing relative to feature set draws criticism as teams scale and hit tier ceilings.
  • Limited custom object flexibility compared to platforms with a full schema designer.
Pipedrive logo

Pipedrive

Destination

Strengths

  • Intuitive drag-and-drop pipeline that sales reps actually use without resistance or training overhead.
  • Per-seat unlimited-deals model on all tiers — reps cannot be blocked from logging activity.
  • Active marketplace with 400+ integrations and a documented REST API with OpenAPI 3 specs.
  • Mobile apps with offline access, call logging, and calendar sync keep field teams operational.
  • Strong focus on sales activity tracking — next-action reminders and follow-up scheduling are first-class features.

Weaknesses

  • No custom objects — teams needing non-standard data structures must work around the four standard entity types.
  • Workflow automation limits by tier (30, 60, 90 active workflows) force upgrades as processes grow.
  • No free permanent plan — teams evaluating fit must commit to a trial without a freemium option.
  • Limited advanced reporting and custom dashboard capabilities compared to HubSpot or Salesforce.
  • Export permissions are gated by visibility groups, meaning data scoping must account for who can see what before migration.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard CRM migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Act-On and Pipedrive.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Act-On: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Act-On doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Act-On to Pipedrive migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Act-On to Pipedrive data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Act-On to Pipedrive migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Act-On to Pipedrive migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts under 15,000 Contacts with no custom data schemas and no large engagement history migration. Migrations with custom object schemas, multiple Act-On Lists, or engagement histories exceeding 200,000 activity records move to six to ten weeks because of chunking logic, custom field pre-creation, and the activity history extraction process. Act-On's undocumented API throttling also adds variability to large extractions.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Act-On.
Land in Pipedrive, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day