CRM migration

Migrate from MARS to Salesforce Sales Cloud

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between MARS and Salesforce Sales Cloud. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Salesforce Sales Cloud.

MARS logo

MARS

Source

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Destination

Salesforce Sales Cloud logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between MARS and Salesforce Sales Cloud.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

8-12 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from MARS to Salesforce is a structural migration that requires reconstructing MARS's specialized financial-services data model inside Salesforce's standard schema. MARS organizes data around firm-office-rep hierarchies and multiple-owner assignments for advisor teams, while Salesforce uses a single OwnerId per record with Account-Contact hierarchy. We pre-create the destination schema including Custom Objects for advisor team assignments and product performance tracking, resolve multiple MARS owners per record to a primary Salesforce User with secondary owners in a junction object, and preserve activity history through the Bulk API 2.0 with chunking and parent-record lookup. Workflows, automations, and compliance rule configurations do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Salesforce Flow.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

MARS logo

MARS

What's pushing teams away

  • Limited public footprint makes peer validation impossible and slows due diligence.
  • No publicly documented developer API restricts integration into modern BI, marketing, and automation tools.
  • Smaller vendor scale translates to thinner partner ecosystem and integration libraries.
  • Mobile, cloud-native UX, and modern admin tooling typically lag market leaders.
  • Pricing and contract terms are sales-led with no transparency for early-stage evaluation.

Choosing

Salesforce Sales Cloud logo

Salesforce Sales Cloud

What's pulling them in

  • The AppExchange marketplace with 5,000+ prebuilt apps gives enterprises integrations for nearly every business workflow without custom development.
  • Native Einstein AI for lead scoring, opportunity insights, and predictive forecasting adds intelligence without a separate platform purchase.
  • Territory management, multi-currency support, and advanced forecasting satisfy the needs of complex B2B sales organizations with structured revenue teams.
  • Slack, Tableau, and CPQ are deeply integrated into the core platform, keeping the sales stack unified for teams already in the Salesforce ecosystem.
  • Organizations with a large, established Salesforce implementation choose it because switching costs — integrations, custom code, trained admins — are prohibitive.

Object mapping

How MARS objects map to Salesforce Sales Cloud

Each row shows how a MARS object lands in Salesforce Sales Cloud, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

MARS

Contact

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Contact

1:1
Fully supported

MARS Contact records map directly to Salesforce Contact. The primary MARS owner becomes Salesforce OwnerId. Any secondary MARS owner assignments are preserved in a custom junction object (Advisor_Assignment__c) that links the Contact to additional User records with a role field (e.g., primary_advisor, co_advisor, support_staff). We create the junction object during schema design so that relationship history is intact at import time.

MARS

Company

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Account

1:1
Fully supported

MARS Company records map to Salesforce Account. The company type (e.g., Broker-Dealer, RIA, Custodian) maps to a custom picklist field account_type__c. Firm-level and office-level MARS records that represent organizational entities map to Salesforce Account with a parent Account relationship for office-to-firm hierarchy, preserving the original MARS firm-office structure.

MARS

Deal

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Opportunity

1:1
Fully supported

MARS Deal records map to Salesforce Opportunity. The MARS dealstage maps to Salesforce StageName via a configured sales process that whitelists the relevant stage values. Closed-Lost and Closed-Won reason fields from MARS custom properties migrate to Salesforce Loss Reason and custom Win_Reason__c fields. The MARS pipeline assignment maps to a Salesforce Record Type that we configure before migration.

MARS

Pipeline

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Record Type + Sales Process

lossy
Fully supported

Each MARS pipeline becomes a Salesforce Record Type on Opportunity with a corresponding Sales Process that scopes stage values per line of business. If MARS supports multiple deal pipelines for different product types or office structures, each pipeline maps to its own Record Type, Page Layout, and Sales Process so that stage values remain scoped appropriately.

MARS

Activity (Call, Email, Meeting, Task)

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Task + Event + EmailMessage

1:1
Fully supported

MARS activity records (calls, emails, meetings, tasks) migrate to Salesforce Task (for calls and tasks), Event (for meetings), and EmailMessage (for emails) linked to the migrated Contact and Account records via WhoId and WhatId lookups. The Bulk API 2.0 is required because MARS customers with multi-year histories typically carry hundreds of thousands of activity records. ActivityDate is preserved to maintain timeline ordering.

MARS

Owner

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

User

1:1
Fully supported

MARS Owner records map to Salesforce User by email match. Primary owner becomes OwnerId on the record. For MARS records with multiple owner assignments, we provision the primary owner as OwnerId and create Advisor_Assignment__c junction records for each additional User. Owners without a matching Salesforce User go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes.

MARS

Advisor Team

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Custom Object (Advisor_Assignment__c)

lossy
Fully supported

MARS advisor team structures (multiple advisors assigned to a single client or deal) require a custom junction object in Salesforce because Salesforce supports only one OwnerId per standard record. Advisor_Assignment__c is a custom object with lookup fields to Contact, Account, and User, plus a Role__c picklist (primary_advisor, co_advisor, associate, support) and Effective_Date__c to preserve when the assignment began. We pre-create this schema before any data import so that advisor team relationships are intact from day one.

MARS

Product Performance

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Custom Object (Product_Performance__c)

1:1
Fully supported

MARS product performance data (sales by product, AUM by advisor, revenue attribution) that does not map to standard Salesforce Opportunity Line Items becomes a custom Product_Performance__c object. We pre-create this object with fields for Product__c (lookup to Product2), Rep__c (lookup to User), Period__c, Revenue__c, and AUM__c. The customer chooses the granularity of performance metrics to migrate based on their reporting requirements.

MARS

Note / Attachment

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Note + ContentDocument

1:1
Fully supported

MARS notes and attachments migrate to Salesforce Note (for text notes) and ContentDocument via ContentVersion (for files). Notes are linked via ContentDocumentLink to the parent Contact, Account, or Opportunity. File attachments are uploaded via the Salesforce Content API and linked to the parent record to preserve document context.

MARS

Custom Field

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Custom Field (__c)

lossy
Fully supported

Any MARS custom fields that do not map to standard Salesforce fields become custom fields on the equivalent Salesforce object using the __c suffix per Salesforce naming convention. We pre-create the full custom field schema in a Salesforce Sandbox for validation before production migration, including field type mapping (MARS text to Salesforce Text, MARS date to Salesforce Date, MARS picklist to Salesforce Picklist or Multi-Select Picklist), validation rules, and help text.

MARS

Firm / Office Structure

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Account (parent Account hierarchy)

lossy
Fully supported

MARS firm and office hierarchy maps to Salesforce Account with parent Account relationships. The firm-level record becomes the top-level Account; office-level records become child Accounts under the firm Account. This preserves the MARS organizational hierarchy inside Salesforce's standard account structure without requiring custom objects for organizational entities.

MARS

Engagement History

maps to

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Task + Event + EmailMessage

1:1
Fully supported

Historical MARS engagement records (past calls, emails, meetings) are linked to migrated Contact and Account records via WhoId and WhatId resolution. We resolve the MARS contact and company references to their Salesforce IDs using the import mapping table before activity records are inserted. Any MARS engagement record that references a MARS-only entity (not yet migrated) is held in a staging table for a second-pass delta migration after the parent records land.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

MARS logo

MARS gotchas

High

Low public information

High

Vendor-implemented deployments vary widely

Medium

No public API documented

Salesforce Sales Cloud logo

Salesforce Sales Cloud gotchas

High

Workflow Rules and Process Builder are retired

High

Bulk API batch quota exhaustion during large imports

Medium

Storage overage billing is non-obvious

Medium

Account-Contact many-to-many relationship mapping

Low

Territory and team member import ordering dependencies

Pair-specific challenges

  • Multiple owner assignments require a custom junction object

    MARS supports assigning multiple advisors or team members to a single client record, but Salesforce standard objects allow only one OwnerId per record. If your MARS data includes multiple-owner assignments on Contacts, Accounts, or Deals, we design and pre-create an Advisor_Assignment__c custom junction object during schema design that links the record to additional User records with role and effective-date fields. Without this step, secondary owner data is silently dropped during import, which is a compliance risk for financial services firms that need complete advisor assignment history for audit and supervision.

  • Bulk API is required for multi-year activity histories

    Financial services CRM customers with multi-year histories typically carry hundreds of thousands of call, email, meeting, and task records. Salesforce's Data Loader and Data Import Wizard cannot handle this volume without timing out or silently dropping records. We use the Salesforce Bulk API 2.0 with batch chunking (10,000 records per batch), parent-record lookup resolution (WhoId, WhatId, AccountId), and exponential backoff on API limit responses. Without Bulk API, engagement timeline gaps appear post-migration, which is especially problematic for firms that need complete advisor interaction history for compliance reviews.

  • Workflows and automations do not migrate as code

    MARS workflows and automated compliance rules are not transferable to Salesforce Flow because they are platform-specific automation models. We do not migrate them as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active MARS workflow and automation with its trigger conditions, actions, and a recommended Salesforce Flow equivalent, and the customer's admin rebuilds them post-migration. For regulated environments, compliance-oriented automations (such as supervisory review triggers or hold-period enforcement) require explicit reconstruction in Salesforce Flow or a dedicated compliance automation tool because they carry legal and regulatory obligations that cannot be approximated.

  • Field-level security and validation rules can reject migrated records

    Salesforce orgs commonly enforce validation rules (required formats, conditional requireds, picklist whitelists) and field-level security that block importing records with non-compliant legacy data. We coordinate with the customer's Salesforce admin to grant the migration user the Bulk API permission and Modify All Data access for the duration of the migration, and we either temporarily disable blocking validation rules during load or adjust legacy data to comply. Skipping this step results in partial import failures that require re-processing, extending the migration timeline by days.

  • Advisor team and product performance Custom Objects need pre-creation

    MARS data structures for advisor team assignments and product performance do not map to standard Salesforce objects. We pre-create the Advisor_Assignment__c and Product_Performance__c Custom Objects in a Salesforce Sandbox for validation before production migration. If the destination org is on Salesforce Professional tier, custom object limits and storage allocations apply and must be confirmed during scoping. If the customer's compliance requirements demand field-level encryption or audit trail on these custom objects, Salesforce Shield add-ons must be licensed before schema deployment.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful MARS to Salesforce Sales Cloud data migration

  1. Discovery and data audit

    We audit the source MARS instance across custom field inventory, pipeline and stage definitions, advisor team structure (multi-owner assignments), product performance data model, activity volume estimates, and active workflows or compliance rules. We pair this with a Salesforce edition assessment: Professional ($80/user) covers most migrations; Enterprise ($165/user) is required if the customer needs Salesforce Shield, record-triggered Flow at scale, or advanced compliance features; Unlimited ($330/user) only if 24x7 support and unlimited custom apps are required. The discovery output is a written migration scope document and Salesforce edition recommendation.

  2. Schema design and junction object architecture

    We design the destination schema in Salesforce, including standard object fields, custom fields (__c API naming), Record Types (one per MARS pipeline), Sales Processes (stage whitelist per Record Type), Page Layouts, and the Advisor_Assignment__c junction object for multi-owner resolution. If MARS firm-office hierarchy exists, we design the parent Account structure to represent it. Schema is deployed via Salesforce metadata API into a Sandbox org first for validation. We coordinate with the customer's Salesforce admin to confirm custom object limits and Shield licensing if applicable.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Salesforce Sandbox (Full Copy or Partial Copy) using production-like data volume. The customer's RevOps or compliance lead reconciles record counts across all objects, spot-checks 25-50 random records against the MARS source, and validates that advisor team assignments appear correctly in the Advisor_Assignment__c junction object. Any mapping corrections, field type adjustments, or junction object record-type issues are resolved here, not in production.

  4. Owner reconciliation and User provisioning

    We extract every distinct MARS Owner referenced on Contact, Company, Deal, and Activity records and match by email against the Salesforce destination org's User table. Owners without a matching User go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Salesforce admin provisions any missing Users. For multi-owner assignments, we confirm that the Advisor_Assignment__c junction object fields are correctly populated for each secondary owner. Migration cannot proceed past activity records until OwnerId references are resolved on parent objects.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (manual provisioning validated), Accounts (from MARS Companies with parent hierarchy resolved), Contacts (with AccountId and OwnerId resolved), Opportunities (with AccountId, OwnerId, and RecordTypeId resolved), Advisor_Assignment__c junction records (linking secondary owners to primary records), Product_Performance__c custom object records, and Activity history (Tasks, Events, EmailMessages via Bulk API 2.0). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We freeze MARS writes during cutover and run a final delta migration for any records modified during the migration window.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow handoff

    We enable Salesforce as the system of record after confirming record counts match between MARS and Salesforce. We deliver the automation and compliance rule inventory document to the customer's admin team with recommended Salesforce Flow equivalents for each workflow. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve reconciliation issues raised by the customer's sales or compliance team. We do not rebuild MARS workflows or compliance rules as Salesforce Flow inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task, particularly for rules that carry regulatory obligations.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

MARS logo

MARS

Source

Strengths

  • Configurable to domain-specific workflows.
  • Direct vendor relationship for support and customization.
  • On-premise or private-cloud deployment options.
  • Tenant-specific schema flexibility.
  • Responsive support during onboarding (typical of smaller vendors).

Weaknesses

  • Limited public reviewer presence.
  • No publicly documented developer API.
  • Smaller integration ecosystem.
  • Mobile and cloud-native UX lags.
  • Sales-led pricing with limited transparency.
Salesforce Sales Cloud logo

Salesforce Sales Cloud

Destination

Strengths

  • Largest enterprise app ecosystem in CRM with 5,000+ AppExchange integrations covering nearly every vertical workflow.
  • Native Einstein AI delivers lead scoring, opportunity insights, and predictive forecasting without a third-party layer.
  • Advanced territory management, multi-currency, and flexible forecasting satisfy complex B2B revenue structures.
  • Deep platform extensibility: Custom Objects, Apex, Flow, and the Metadata API allow full schema customization.
  • Well-documented REST API, Bulk API, and Composite API with published rate limits for programmatic migration.

Weaknesses

  • Pricing model is layered and opaque in practice: per-seat fees plus storage overages, add-on subscriptions, and annual uplifts compound to 30–40% above sticker price.
  • Workflow Rules and Process Builder are deprecated, forcing all orgs onto Salesforce Flow — a migration task that catches many teams by surprise.
  • Steep administrative complexity: meaningful configuration requires a dedicated Salesforce admin or consultant.
  • API rate limits are edition-gated (100k/day base for Enterprise) and easily exhausted by large historical imports without throttling.
  • Data export is exportable via Data Loader but preserving relationship integrity across 30+ objects requires careful ETL sequencing.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate CRM migration. 8 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across MARS and Salesforce Sales Cloud.

  • Object compatibility

    D

    8 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    MARS: Not publicly documented..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    MARS doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your MARS to Salesforce Sales Cloud migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about MARS to Salesforce Sales Cloud data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during MARS to Salesforce Sales Cloud migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your MARS to Salesforce Sales Cloud migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most MARS migrations land between eight and twelve weeks for accounts under 25,000 Contacts, 5,000 Deals, and one or two Custom Objects. MARS customers with multi-year engagement histories (over 500,000 activity records), complex advisor team structures with many-to-many owner assignments, multiple product performance Custom Objects, or compliance field requirements (Shield, audit trail) move to twelve to twenty weeks because of Bulk API time, junction object design, and compliance field configuration. Smaller datasets under 10,000 records with straightforward mappings can sometimes complete in six to eight weeks.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from MARS.
Land in Salesforce Sales Cloud, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day