Project Management

Migrate your Project Central data

A Microsoft 365-native project management tool with unlimited users, a clean interface, and per-user pricing that serves small to mid-market teams.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Project Central logo

In its favor

Why people choose Project Central

The signal that keeps Project Central on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Project Central requires zero new tool adoption for Microsoft 365 teams — the interface and sign-in are already familiar, which reduces friction and drives daily active usage across non-technical team members.

The clean, uncluttered UI makes project progress and status visible at a glance, which managers cite as the primary reason their teams actually use it consistently rather than abandoning it.

Deep integration with Outlook, Teams, and SharePoint means task updates, due dates, and project context surface where teams already work, rather than requiring a separate application open.

Small businesses and mid-market teams report quick time-to-value because the tool does not require a dedicated project management expert to configure or maintain it effectively.

The platform supports both Agile and Waterfall methodologies with customizable templates and workflows, making it adaptable to diverse team structures without forcing a single project framework.

Organizations without an existing Microsoft 365 license cannot use Project Central at all, making it a non-starter for teams on Google Workspace or other ecosystems without first purchasing a Microsoft subscription.

Per-user pricing scales linearly with headcount, which becomes a budget concern as project portfolios grow and organizations need to expand access to more stakeholders and contractors.

The platform is not designed for enterprise-scale resource management or advanced portfolio analytics, so growing teams often outpace what Project Central can offer in reporting depth.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Project Central

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Project Central. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Project Central fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Tight Microsoft 365 integration means authentication, permissions, and user management are handled by existing Azure AD infrastructure without additional configuration.Unlimited user licensing removes the per-seat friction that discourages expanding access to stakeholders, contractors, or clients.A lightweight, intuitive interface drives high adoption rates among non-project-manager users who resist complex or unfamiliar tooling.Configurable views and status workflows allow teams to model their own processes without requiring custom development or third-party integrations.Dedicated customer success and onboarding support is included across paid tiers, reducing the need for internal IT involvement during initial setup.

Weaknesses

Microsoft 365 account requirement is a hard dependency — organizations on other identity providers cannot evaluate or use the platform at all.The tool is positioned as a lightweight PM solution and lacks the advanced scheduling, resource leveling, and earned-value analysis found in enterprise project management platforms.Document storage is limited to SharePoint links; there is no native file attachment or versioned document management within the product itself.Per-user pricing can become expensive at scale for organizations with large numbers of occasional or read-only users who only need portfolio visibility.The platform does not publish a public REST API or documented data export endpoints, which constrains programmatic access and third-party integration options.

Where it works

Organizations already committed to Microsoft 365, where Azure AD handles authentication and permissions without additional configuration or identity overhead.Small to mid-market teams with non-technical users who resist complex tooling, because the familiar Office interface drives consistent daily adoption.Teams that operate across Outlook and Teams as primary work surfaces, since task updates and project context surface where work already happens.Teams needing to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within the same portfolio, with configurable workflows that adapt without forcing a single framework.Project portfolios managed by individuals without formal project management training, where quick time-to-value takes priority over advanced scheduling features.

Where it struggles

Organizations without existing Microsoft 365 licenses, where the hard dependency on a Microsoft account makes the platform inaccessible without a prior subscription purchase.Large enterprises requiring advanced scheduling, resource leveling, earned-value analysis, or portfolio-level analytics beyond lightweight task tracking.Organizations needing native document management, since the platform stores only SharePoint links and cannot manage attachments or versioned files directly.Growing teams with large numbers of occasional or read-only users, where per-user pricing creates budget friction for stakeholders who need portfolio visibility only.Teams requiring programmatic data access, automated integrations, or custom reporting, given the absence of a published REST API or documented export endpoints.

Pricing tiers

Project Central pricing overview

Project Central uses a per-user, per-month pricing model with a 14-day free trial requiring an active Microsoft 365 license. The platform offers unlimited users across all paid tiers, with dedicated customer success management and onboarding sessions included. Specific tier pricing amounts are not published on the vendor website and require direct inquiry.

Annual

Tier 1 of 2

$49/month (billed annually) — 25% discount vs monthly per projectcentral.com/pricing

What's included

Unlimited projectsUnlimited users (flat fee, not per-seat)All Microsoft 365 integrations included (SSO, Teams, SharePoint, Outlook Calendar)List, board, and Gantt viewsActivity feed, status reports, portfolio dashboardsDedicated customer success manager, onboarding, and training included14-day free trial, no credit card required

Need help selecting your Project Management?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Project Central's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Project Central object support

Object-by-object support for Project Central migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Projects

Fully supported

Projects are the top-level container in Project Central with name, description, status, owner, dates, and assigned team. We export Projects 1:1 to the destination PM tool's project or workspace object.

Tasks

Fully supported

Tasks belong to Projects and carry title, description, status, due date, assignee, checklist items, and comments. We preserve task-to-project linkage and the parent-child structure when subtasks exist.

Subtasks

Mapping required

Project Central uses checklist items inside tasks rather than first-class subtasks. We convert checklist items to subtasks in the destination where possible, or preserve them as checklist data on the parent task.

Assignees

Fully supported

Assignees are Microsoft 365 users from the customer's tenant. We map assignee identities by Azure AD object ID or UPN to the destination user system.

Comments

Fully supported

Comments on tasks export with author, timestamp, and body text. We preserve comment ordering and author attribution on the destination.

Attachments

Mapping required

Project Central does not store native file attachments — files live in SharePoint and Project Central holds URL references. We migrate the SharePoint link as a custom URL field rather than copying file bytes.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom fields on tasks and projects export as name/value pairs. We map each to a compatible destination property; type mismatches (text vs picklist vs date) are reconciled during scoping.

Dependencies

Mapping required

Task dependencies (predecessor/successor) export when the Gantt view is in use. We preserve the dependency graph; circular dependencies are flagged for customer review before import.

Views

Mapping required

Project Central supports list, board, and Gantt views per project. View configurations are platform-specific and rebuilt at the destination; underlying task data carries over.

Activity Feed

Mapping required

Activity feed entries (status changes, assignment changes) are derived audit records. We export the activity stream as a timeline of events linked to the relevant project or task; some destinations cannot ingest these directly.

Status Reports

Mapping required

Status report definitions are configurable per project. We export current status report content but rebuild report templates in the destination since report engines differ across platforms.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Project Central migrations

Issues we've hit on past Project Central migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

Microsoft 365 license is a hard prerequisite

High

Attachments are SharePoint links only — files are not duplicated in Project Central

High

No public API or developer portal — extraction is UI/CSV-driven

Medium

Pricing model is flat $49/month for unlimited users, not per-user as commonly assumed

Medium

Project Online migration timing — Microsoft sunset in September 2026

How a Project Central migration works

Four steps, Project Central-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented into Project Central. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Project Central-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Project Central quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Project Central rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Project Central migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Project Central migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Project Central migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Project Central migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Project Central.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Project Central setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported