HRMS

Migrate your Candidate Manager data

A web-enabled ATS and talent management system for mid-market staffing teams. Migrating data in or out requires file-based exports due to limited API access.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Candidate Manager logo

In its favor

Why people choose Candidate Manager

The signal that keeps Candidate Manager on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

GDPR compliance is built in — automated candidate consent, automated data retention rules, and privacy policy enforcement matter for UK, Irish, and EU recruiters who would otherwise wire those workflows manually.

Job board reach — branded careers pages can post to over 600 job boards and social media channels from a single posting workflow.

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion reporting with customised Equal Opportunities forms is offered out of the box, supporting public-sector and regulated-industry hiring monitoring.

Bespoke onboarding — Candidate Manager pitches a 'create a bespoke recruitment solution' configuration model alongside its standard product, allowing larger customers to tune the workflow to their process.

Established footprint with offices in Ireland, UK, and USA, with named bank, energy, and recruitment-firm customers giving regional buyers a reference base.

Zero verified review footprint — Capterra shows 0 reviews and TrustRadius gating prevents public sentiment analysis, leaving buyers without independent validation versus high-volume ATSes (BambooHR 3,400+ reviews, ZipRecruiter 10,000+).

Pricing is opaque; one Capterra entry references a €2,000 per user one-time Basic plan, which is unusual versus the subscription model competitors offer and difficult to compare.

No public API or developer documentation means integrations with background-check vendors, assessment tools, or downstream HRIS systems require vendor-mediated work rather than standard plug-and-play.

Up to 5-day account setup with an account manager is slow versus self-serve modern ATSes that go live in hours.

Limited public footprint and review depth makes long-term roadmap and support continuity hard to assess for buyers committing multi-year.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Candidate Manager

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Candidate Manager. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Candidate Manager fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Built-in GDPR consent, data retention, and privacy policy enforcement.600+ job board posting reach from a single workflow.EDI reporting with customised Equal Opportunities forms.Configurable to a bespoke recruitment workflow with vendor support.Multi-region presence (Ireland, UK, USA) with named enterprise references.

Weaknesses

Effectively zero independent review footprint on Capterra and other public review sites.Opaque pricing — one source cites €2,000/user one-time, which is hard to compare to subscription-based competitors.No public API or developer documentation; integrations require vendor mediation.Account setup takes up to 5 days versus self-serve competitors.Limited public product detail makes pre-purchase due diligence difficult.

Where it works

Mid-market staffing teams with 5–50 recruiters managing steady requisition volumes of 20–200 open positions at once.Organizations whose existing reporting infrastructure already relies on file-based exports rather than API-driven integrations.Agencies that need a hiring manager self-service portal alongside a separate staffing firm or agency sub-portal.Recruiters who rely on structured stage progressions—Applied, Under Consideration, Interviewing, Hired—and simple pipeline visualization.Teams that value configurable applicant pre-profiling and ranking scores over real-time candidate engagement automation.

Where it struggles

High-volume recruitment operations processing thousands of applications monthly where API-based automation is required to keep pace.Organizations requiring bidirectional sync between the ATS and an HRIS or CRM—file exports cannot support real-time data consistency.Complex hiring workflows involving conditional logic, automated stage regression, or multi-branch pipeline routing.Enterprises with strict data residency or compliance requirements that mandate documented, auditable API access rather than ad hoc exports.Teams dependent on modern recruitment tech stacks that assume REST API availability for common tools like background check vendors or assessment platforms.

Pricing tiers

Candidate Manager pricing overview

Candidate Manager does not publish pricing on its public-facing pages. Sales-led pricing is typical for this category. Hidden implementation and data migration fees are common in ATS procurement contracts and should be requested explicitly.

Basic (per Capterra listing)

Tier 1 of 2

€2,000 per user (one-time fee, per Capterra)

What's included

Web-enabled applicant trackingOnline job posting and candidate screeningEmployee onboarding workflowsStaffing firm and agency portal accessPricing reflects single Capterra data point; vendor does not publish public tiers

Need help selecting your HRMS?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Candidate Manager's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Candidate Manager object support

Object-by-object support for Candidate Manager migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Candidates

Mapping required

Candidates are the core record type. We map name, contact details, resume, application date, source attribution, and status stage. Ranking and pre-profiling scores transfer as numeric fields, but stage names must be normalized since the platform uses hardcoded labels (Applied, Under Consideration, Interviewing, Hired) that vary across tenants.

Job Orders

Mapping required

Job orders carry requisition metadata, department, location, and open date. We map these as Jobs or Position records in the destination. Custom fields attached to job orders require field-level mapping against the target ATS schema.

Pipeline Stages

Mapping required

Candidate Manager uses fixed stage names that cannot be reconfigured at the workflow level. We preserve the original stage label as a custom property in the destination system and map it to the nearest equivalent stage available in the target ATS pipeline.

Rankings and Pre-Profiling Scores

Mapping required

Numeric ranking and screening scores are stored as candidate properties. We transfer these as-is but note they are not universally supported in all ATS platforms and may land as custom number fields in the destination.

Hiring Manager Self-Service Portal Records

Mapping required

Records created or modified via the hiring manager portal carry an owner attribution field. We preserve this as a user reference but note that hiring managers may not exist as formal user accounts in the platform, requiring a mapping to recruiter owners in the destination.

Staffing Firm and Agency Portal Records

Mapping required

Agencies submitting candidates through the staffing portal are tracked as submission sources. We map agency name and submission ID to the candidate record and flag any agency-specific notes that may need manual review post-migration.

Onboarding Records

Mapping required

Candidate Manager extends into onboarding for hired candidates. We migrate onboarding task completion status and document references but flag any e-signature or form-fill data that may not export cleanly.

Reporting Data

Mapping required

The platform's reporting module generates aggregate data exports. We extract these as supplementary records to preserve historical hiring funnel metrics, noting that the source data reflects Candidate Manager's own stage definitions.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom fields exist at both the candidate and job order level but are not documented in a machine-readable schema. We discover them during the scoping call and map them individually against the destination field structure.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Candidate Manager migrations

Issues we've hit on past Candidate Manager migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

No public API for incremental sync or third-party integrations

Medium

Pipeline stages are fixed and not reconfigurable

Medium

Bespoke configurations vary tenant-to-tenant

High

EDI reporting fields are sensitive personal data with GDPR implications

How a Candidate Manager migration works

Four steps, Candidate Manager-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented into Candidate Manager. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Candidate Manager-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Candidate Manager quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Candidate Manager rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Candidate Manager migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Candidate Manager migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Candidate Manager migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Candidate Manager migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Candidate Manager.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Candidate Manager setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported