Helpdesk

Migrate your Xurrent data

AI-first ITSM platform for enterprise service and incident management, built for organizations running AI in production at scale.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Xurrent logo

In its favor

Why people choose Xurrent

The signal that keeps Xurrent on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Customers choose Xurrent for its Sera AI layer, which classifies and routes 60% of email-based requests automatically without per-token billing

Organizations running managed services or multi-brand ITSM deployments use Xurrent's multi-tenant structure to separate client environments under a single license

Teams adopt Xurrent IMR for its on-call scheduling, escalation policies, and Slack/Teams native responder integration without needing a separate PagerDuty seat

Enterprises with existing Microsoft Teams or Slack workflows select Xurrent to keep incident response inside the comms channel their staff already lives in

Organizations with compliance requirements for audit trails and postmortem documentation choose Xurrent for its built-in Postmortems and Playbooks capabilities

Customers report that Xurrent's AI features and enterprise tier pricing require custom negotiation, making cost predictability difficult before committing

Users find the platform's AI-first positioning creates a feature gap if their team is not ready to operate with automated routing and classification

Organizations with simple ticketing needs report that Xurrent's enterprise ITSM depth introduces unnecessary complexity and cost overhead

Switchers mention that Xurrent's strong on-call and incident management focus means its IT Asset Management capabilities lag behind dedicated CMDB platforms

Multi-brand MSPs that need granular per-client SLA enforcement report friction when scaling beyond the default service catalog structure

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Xurrent

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Xurrent. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Xurrent fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Sera AI is embedded at no per-token cost, providing auto-classification and routing without add-on SKU pricingNative Slack and Microsoft Teams integration allows responders to be added and incidents managed from within the comms channelMulti-tenant service structure supports MSP and multi-brand deployments with per-client service scopingBuilt-in postmortem and playbook automation addresses incident lifecycle documentation requirements out of the boxOn-call scheduling with escalation policies handles multi-step notification chains across email, SMS, voice, and push

Weaknesses

Pricing is not publicly published and requires a sales conversation, making budget validation difficult for SMB teamsAI-first positioning means teams without AI adoption readiness may underutilize the platform's core valueIMR (Incident Management Response) is a distinct product tier from core ITSM — customers need to confirm which modules their contract coversThe platform's enterprise focus means small teams or simple ticket routing use cases will pay for depth they do not useCustom field extensibility exists but requires schema review to ensure type compatibility during migration

Where it works

Enterprise organizations with existing AI in production that want to extend automated classification and routing to their ITSM workflows without per-token billing costsMSPs and multi-brand ITSM deployments needing isolated client environments with separate service catalogs and SLAs under a single licenseIT teams already running Slack or Microsoft Teams who want responders added and incidents managed directly from their existing comms channelRegulated enterprises requiring built-in postmortem documentation, audit trails, and playbook automation to satisfy compliance and governance requirementsLarge organizations with complex multi-service dependencies that need service boundary enforcement and cross-service incident correlation

Where it struggles

Small IT teams or single-department help desks with low ticket volume and straightforward routing needs that cannot justify enterprise pricingOrganizations without AI adoption readiness where staff are not prepared to operate with automated classification and routing workflowsIT Asset Management focused implementations requiring deep CMDB functionality, asset lifecycle tracking, and configuration item management depthMSPs with many clients requiring granular per-customer SLA enforcement beyond the default multi-tenant service catalog structureBudget-sensitive teams needing transparent published pricing to validate costs before committing to a custom sales negotiation process

Pricing tiers

Xurrent pricing overview

Xurrent does not publish pricing on its website. Sales-led enterprise pricing applies, with separate tiers for core ITSM and Xurrent IMR. The platform markets zero token fees and zero AI add-on SKUs as a differentiator, meaning AI capabilities are bundled into the base subscription rather than charged per usage.

Starter

Tier 1 of 3

20 platform users/month (custom, sales-led)

What's included

Targeted at smaller organizations or paid proof-of-concept deploymentsITSM functionality only — no ESMEmail support accessNo templated integrations includedBuilt-in Sera AI and Incident Management & Response

Need help selecting your Helpdesk?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Xurrent's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Xurrent object support

Object-by-object support for Xurrent migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Requests

Fully supported

Requests is the primary ticket object in Xurrent. We migrate Requests 1:1 including all standard fields (subject, description, status, priority, requester, assignee, service). Custom properties are mapped via field-level transformation.

Services

Fully supported

Services define the service catalog and scope for Requests. We preserve the service hierarchy and map parent-child relationships. Services control visibility and SLA assignment at migration time.

Incidents (IMR)

Fully supported

Xurrent IMR incidents support alert routing, escalation policies, and responder assignments. We map incidents with their linked responders, on-call schedules, and timeline events. Slack/Teams responder additions are preserved as notes on the incident record.

Changes

Mapping required

Changes carry risk assessment, approval chains, and implementation plans. The approval workflow configuration must be rebuilt in the target system as workflow rules do not export as data. Change dates and statuses migrate as fields.

Problems

Fully supported

Problems link to their related Incidents and store root cause analysis. We preserve the problem-incident linkage graph and any attached knowledge articles.

Knowledge Articles

Fully supported

Knowledge Articles store structured content with categories and visibility settings tied to Services. We migrate articles as content records and flag which services they are visible to on the destination.

SLA Policies

Mapping required

SLA policies define response and resolution times tied to priority levels and services. The policy definitions are configuration rather than data — we migrate them as structured records and note which priority-to-SLA mappings apply per service.

Escalation Policies

Mapping required

Escalation policies define multi-step notification sequences (who gets notified, via which channel, after how long). We export the policy structure and map step-to-user assignments. Step order and timing thresholds are preserved; channel integrations require reconfiguration on the destination.

Playbooks

Mapping required

Playbooks automate incident response steps and link to knowledge articles. Playbook step definitions and conditional logic are configuration records. We export the playbook structure and flag which IMR plan the playbook belongs to for destination mapping.

On-Call Schedules

Mapping required

On-call schedules define rotation order and coverage windows. We export schedule configurations and rotation sequences. The calendar-layer scheduling logic must be mapped against the destination's scheduling model — schedule conflicts or gaps must be reviewed post-migration.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom fields on Requests, Services, Incidents, and other objects are supported via Xurrent's extensibility. We map custom field definitions and their values. Custom field types (dropdown, text, date, number) are preserved; the destination must have matching field types configured before import.

Attachments

Mapping required

File attachments on Requests, Incidents, and Knowledge Articles are migrated as binary blobs with their association to the parent record preserved. Large attachment volume may require chunked migration and destination storage quota review.

Service Dependencies (IMR)

Fully supported

Service dependency maps define which services or infrastructure components are related to others for impact analysis. We export dependency graph data and reconstruct the relationship map in the target system as a service map or CI relationship.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Xurrent migrations

Issues we've hit on past Xurrent migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

Xurrent IMR is a separately licensed module from core ITSM

High

Multi-tenant service scoping affects record visibility after import

Medium

Playbook and escalation policy logic requires destination-side workflow rebuild

Medium

AI routing classifications do not transfer as training data

How a Xurrent migration works

Four steps, Xurrent-specific

Connect

OAuth 2.0 with Bearer tokens. Tokens are obtained either by generating a Personal Access Token from My Profile, or by creating an OAuth Application from the Settings console. The token is supplied in the Authorization header. into Xurrent. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Xurrent-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Xurrent quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Xurrent rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Xurrent migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Xurrent migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Xurrent migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Xurrent migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Xurrent.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Xurrent setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported