CRM migration

Migrate from User.com to Odoo CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between User.com and Odoo CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Odoo CRM.

User.com logo

User.com

Source

Odoo CRM

Destination

Odoo CRM logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between User.com and Odoo CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from User.com to Odoo CRM is a shift from a contact-centric marketing CRM to a modular ERP ecosystem where CRM is one of over fifty integrated applications. User.com treats every record with an email, phone, or chat interaction as a billable Contact; Odoo separates unqualified prospects into crm.lead and qualified relationships into res.partner with an Account counterpart. We resolve that structural split during scoping, map User.com's Companies to Odoo res.partner records with the is_company flag set, and preserve all deal, event, and activity timestamps in Odoo's UTC-converted datetime fields. Automation workflows, email templates, and campaign history do not migrate — User.com's automation sequences are not accessible via documented API and Odoo's automation architecture (Server Actions, Automated Actions, CRM Leads) is fundamentally different. We deliver a written automation inventory and a field-mapping document so the customer's admin rebuilds workflows in Odoo Studio post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

User.com logo

User.com

What's pushing teams away

  • Mid-market teams (50–100+ users) report the platform does not scale to their needs, forcing expensive re-platforming after months of integration work.
  • The pricing model is opaque — the official pricing page returns a 404, and contact-based billing surprises teams who did not account for chat visitors and push subscribers counting toward their bill.
  • Analytics and reporting lag behind competitors, with multiple reviewers noting a need for enhanced insights and data visualization capabilities.
  • The platform's strongest market presence is European, which means US-centric teams may find support availability and integrations less robust than alternatives.
  • Custom field and object limitations frustrate teams with complex data models who find themselves working around platform constraints.

Choosing

Odoo CRM logo

Odoo CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Teams choose Odoo CRM for its modular architecture — one base install with one-click app additions means they can adopt CRM alone and add accounting, inventory, or sales later as the business grows.
  • Small businesses pick Odoo because the Community edition is free and open-source, with no per-user or contact limits, allowing full evaluation before committing to a paid Enterprise tier.
  • The drag-and-drop Kanban pipeline and AI lead scoring are highlighted across G2 reviews as concrete features that make lead management faster and more visual than spreadsheet-based workflows.
  • Odoo's native integration with email, live chat, SMS, VoIP, and WhatsApp means inbound leads from multiple channels feed into a single pipeline without third-party middleware.
  • Companies in retail, supply chain, and construction value that Odoo's CRM module shares the same PostgreSQL database and UI as its ERP modules, eliminating data silos between sales and operations.

Object mapping

How User.com objects map to Odoo CRM

Each row shows how a User.com object lands in Odoo CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

User.com

Contact (User)

maps to

Odoo CRM

crm.lead or res.partner

1:many
Fully supported

User.com Contacts map to Odoo via a split: Contacts with active deal association or company link become Odoo crm.lead records that sales reps convert to crm.opportunity (and ultimately res.partner). Cold prospects with no deal history remain as Odoo crm.lead for follow-up routing. We use the User.com contact's last_heard timestamp and any deal association as the split determinant. Email address becomes crm.lead.email_from or res.partner.email; phone becomes phone; tags map to Odoo tag_ids on crm.lead.

User.com

Company

maps to

Odoo CRM

res.partner (is_company=True)

1:1
Fully supported

User.com Companies map directly to Odoo res.partner with the is_company flag set to True and the company_type field set to company. The company name becomes res.partner.name, domain becomes website, address fields map to street, street2, city, state_id, zip, and country_id. We link the company's associated Contacts as individual res.partner records with parent_id pointing to the company record, preserving the User.com contact-to-company relationship in Odoo's partner hierarchy.

User.com

Deal

maps to

Odoo CRM

crm.opportunity

1:1
Fully supported

User.com Deals map to Odoo crm.opportunity. The dealstage property maps to Odoo's stage_id with the stage name and probability preserved. Deal value maps to Odoo's expected_revenue and planned_revenue fields. We map deal owners to Odoo res.users by email lookup, and preserve custom deal fields as Odoo custom Char, Float, or Selection fields on crm.opportunity before import. User.com's deal-contact and deal-company associations map to crm.opportunity.partner_id and the Odoo lead-contact link respectively.

User.com

Event

maps to

Odoo CRM

calendar.event

1:1
Fully supported

User.com Events (calendar/activity events) map to Odoo calendar.event with name, start_datetime, stop_datetime, duration, and location preserved. We resolve attendee emails against the migrated res.partner and crm.lead records to populate calendar.event.partner_ids. Event-type attributes from User.com map to a custom description field on the calendar event. DateTime values are converted from User.com's ISO 8601 export to UTC for Odoo's datetime storage.

User.com

Activity

maps to

Odoo CRM

mail.activity

1:1
Fully supported

User.com Activities map to Odoo mail.activity records linked to the parent res.partner or crm.lead record. Activity type (call, email, meeting, task, note) maps to Odoo's activity_type_id. We preserve activity date, summary, and note body as mail.activity's date_deadline, summary, and note fields. Email opens, chat sessions, and push notification metadata are mapped to a custom description field because Odoo mail.activity has a richer type taxonomy than User.com's activity export.

User.com

Custom Properties (Contact)

maps to

Odoo CRM

Custom Fields on res.partner

lossy
Fully supported

User.com contact custom properties map to Odoo res.partner custom fields created via Settings > Technical > Database Structure > Custom Fields before migration. Selection and multi-selection properties map to Odoo Selection and Many2many fields respectively; date properties map to Date; text properties to Char or Text depending on length. Choice fields that used {} brackets in User.com's late-2023 export are normalized to plain string values before insert. The customer must pre-create the custom field schema in Odoo or authorize FlitStack AI to create fields via the XML data file import path.

User.com

Custom Properties (Deal)

maps to

Odoo CRM

Custom Fields on crm.opportunity

lossy
Fully supported

User.com deal custom fields map to Odoo crm.opportunity custom fields using the same type-mapped approach as contact custom properties. We detect any JSON-typed custom properties in the User.com export and flatten them into Char fields with the JSON string preserved for downstream parsing. Custom fields that reference User.com contact IDs are flagged for cross-record resolution after the contact migration phase.

User.com

Tag

maps to

Odoo CRM

crm.tag

1:1
Fully supported

User.com Tags on contacts and deals map to Odoo crm.tag records via the tag_ids many2many relationship on crm.lead and crm.opportunity. We extract the distinct tag set from User.com, create matching crm.tag records in Odoo, and build the many2many relation table entries during import. Tags used for segmentation purposes in User.com are preserved as tag assignments even though Odoo's dynamic segment evaluation is a separate feature that must be rebuilt.

User.com

Segment

maps to

Odoo CRM

crm.tag + ir.filters

lossy
Fully supported

User.com Segments are dynamic groups based on contact attributes. We export segment membership (the static list of contact IDs that matched each segment at migration time) and map those IDs to crm.tag records labeled with the segment name. Odoo's ir.filters provides saved filter views that approximate segment behavior; we document the attribute criteria for each User.com segment as Odoo domain expressions for the customer's admin to create as ir.filters post-migration.

User.com

Live Chat / Conversation

maps to

Odoo CRM

mail.message on res.partner

1:1
Fully supported

User.com conversation threads and chat transcripts export as bundled records that we flatten and re-associate to individual res.partner records in Odoo. Each message becomes a mail.message record with message_type = comment, posted to the partner's Odoo chatter (mail.thread) using the partner_id as res_id. Message timestamp, sender, and body content are preserved; attachments in the chat export map to Odoo ir.attachment records linked via the relation field.

User.com

Web Push Subscription

maps to

Odoo CRM

Custom Field (not migrated as native object)

lossy
Fully supported

Web push subscriptions in User.com trigger the contact-based billing count but have no native Odoo equivalent. We export the push subscription attribute as a custom field push_opt_in__c on res.partner and flag it for the customer's admin to configure a marketing integration (Odoo Email Marketing or a third-party push service) if needed. This avoids accidentally re-creating push-active contacts that would inflate the User.com bill during the transition window.

User.com

Owner (User)

maps to

Odoo CRM

res.users

1:1
Fully supported

User.com Owners referenced on Contacts, Companies, Deals, and Activities map to Odoo res.users by email match. We extract the full owner roster from User.com, match each email against the destination Odoo instance's res.users table, and hold any unmatched owners in a reconciliation queue for the customer's Odoo admin to provision before record import resumes. Owner references on deals and activities are resolved at migration time using the validated User-to-res.users map.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

User.com logo

User.com gotchas

High

Contact-based billing catches more records than expected

High

Automation workflows are not exportable

Medium

Bool and DateTime export format changes break naive imports

Medium

Email templates and campaign history are inaccessible

Low

Database size shown in-app updates only every 24 hours

Odoo CRM logo

Odoo CRM gotchas

High

Odoo.sh version gating blocks assisted migrations from trial

High

Enterprise modules fail to install on Community after database restore

Medium

Custom module view inheritance breaks between Odoo major versions

Medium

Custom fields risk losing their application context on Community

Low

API access for Community is gated behind the Custom Plan

Pair-specific challenges

  • Odoo Lead versus Partner split requires upfront design

    User.com's flat contact model has no direct Odoo equivalent. Odoo separates unqualified prospects (crm.lead) from qualified contacts (res.partner attached to an Account). We define the split rule during scoping using User.com's deal association, last_heard timestamp, and company link as the split determinants. Contacts that should convert to crm.lead are separated from those that should become res.partner at migration time. Skipping this design step produces orphaned records — contacts with no Account in Odoo or leads that should have been qualified contacts on day one.

  • User.com Bool and DateTime export format requires normalization

    User.com changed its export format in late 2023: Bool fields use 'f'/'t' instead of 'False'/'True', DateTime switched from RFC 3339 to ISO 8601, Choice fields use {} brackets instead of [], and JSON values use double quotes. Odoo's XML data import expects typed boolean fields and datetime values in specific formats. We detect the export version during the initial data pull and apply normalization transforms — converting 'f'/'t' to True/False, standardizing datetime to UTC ISO 8601 — before loading into Odoo. Records imported with naive parsing produce incorrect boolean values that are hard to detect post-migration.

  • Automation workflows are inaccessible and must be rebuilt

    User.com's automation sequences — triggers, conditions, delays, and multi-channel CRM actions — are not available via documented CSV export or public API. Odoo's automation architecture (Automated Actions, Server Actions, CRM Lead Assignment rules) is structurally different from User.com's drag-and-drop workflow builder. We do not migrate automations as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active User.com automation with its trigger logic, conditions, and action chain, mapped to Odoo's Automated Action domain expression format. The customer's admin rebuilds them in Odoo Studio post-migration.

  • Odoo Community self-hosted requires XML data file migration

    Odoo Cloud (Standard, Custom) accepts data import via CSV and the Odoo interface. Odoo Community (self-hosted) requires data files in XML format following Odoo's noupdate and id conventions, and there is no official CSV-to-Odoo import wizard for Community deployments. If the destination is Odoo Community on a self-managed server, we generate XML data files using the Partner, Lead, Opportunity, and Calendar models with external IDs for cross-record reference resolution. This adds processing time compared to Odoo Cloud import and requires the customer to validate the XML data structure in a staging environment before applying it to production.

  • Contact-based to per-user pricing shift changes the cost model

    User.com bills on contact count — any record with an email, phone, user_id, chat interaction, web push subscription, or FCM key counts toward the bill. Odoo Standard charges per user seat ($31.10/user/month) with no per-contact billing. Teams migrating from User.com may find that Odoo's per-user cost is lower if their User.com contact count was inflated by passive chat visitors and push subscribers. We flag records that carry billing-triggering attributes (email, phone, last_heard, push) during scoping so the customer understands both the legacy billing exposure and the Odoo cost baseline before committing to migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful User.com to Odoo CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and destination environment selection

    We audit the source User.com account across custom properties, deal pipelines, event types, activity types, owner roster, tag set, segment definitions, and contact count profile. We pair this with a destination Odoo environment decision: Odoo Standard ($31.10/user/month on Odoo.sh) for teams wanting managed hosting with support, or Odoo Community (free, self-hosted) for teams with data-residency requirements or existing Odoo infrastructure. The discovery output is a written migration scope, an Odoo environment recommendation, and the preliminary contact-to-Lead/Partner split rule based on deal association and company link patterns.

  2. Schema design and custom field provisioning

    We design the destination schema in the Odoo environment. This includes creating custom fields on res.partner (for contact custom properties), crm.lead (for lead-specific custom fields), and crm.opportunity (for deal custom fields). We map User.com tag names to Odoo crm.tag records and define the tag_ids many2many relationship. We configure crm.lead stage names and probabilities to match the User.com dealstage labels, and set up crm.opportunity stage probabilities for each deal pipeline. If Odoo Community is the destination, we generate the custom field XML definitions for deployment before data import begins.

  3. Data normalization and transform build

    We apply normalization transforms to the User.com export before Odoo import: Bool fields ('f'/'t' → True/False), DateTime values (ISO 8601 → Odoo UTC format), Choice fields ({} bracket removal), and JSON value unwrapping. We apply the Lead-Contact split rule to the contact export, producing two subsets: records destined for crm.lead and records destined for res.partner with the company parent_id resolved. We build the cross-record lookup resolution map (contact-to-company, deal-to-contact, activity-to-contact) in preparation for Odoo's external-id-based XML import or CSV import path.

  4. Owner and user reconciliation

    We extract every distinct User.com owner referenced on Contacts, Companies, Deals, Events, and Activities and match by email against the destination Odoo res.users table. Owners without a matching Odoo User go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's Odoo admin to provision before record import resumes. This step must complete before any record import because OwnerID references are required on crm.lead, crm.opportunity, and calendar.event in Odoo.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: crm.tag records first (tags are referenced by many2many), res.partner records for companies (is_company=True, parent_id=None), res.partner records for individual contacts (linked to company via parent_id), crm.lead records (unqualified prospects), crm.opportunity records (converted from User.com deals with partner_id and user_id resolved), calendar.event records (with partner_ids resolved), mail.activity records (linked to parent res.partner or crm.lead), and mail.message records from chat transcripts (posted to partner chatter). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze User.com writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then set Odoo as the system of record. We validate 25-50 spot-checked records against the User.com source across each object type, confirm deal stage distribution matches, and verify calendar event attendee counts. We deliver the automation inventory document with User.com automation logic mapped to Odoo Automated Action domain expressions. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the customer's sales and marketing teams. We do not rebuild User.com automations as Odoo Automated Actions inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

User.com logo

User.com

Source

Strengths

  • Unified CRM, marketing automation, live chat, and push notifications in a single interconnected platform.
  • GDPR and CCPA compliance with SSL encryption and regular pen testing — specifically designed for European data requirements.
  • Contact-based pricing model means unlimited internal users regardless of plan tier.
  • Drag-and-drop automation builder accessible to non-technical marketing teams.
  • Integrates with hundreds of third-party tools and offers native support for gaming, SaaS, and B2B analytics data.

Weaknesses

  • Official pricing page is inaccessible (returns 404), making procurement and renewal planning difficult.
  • Analytics and reporting are consistently cited as under-developed compared to HubSpot, ActiveCampaign, and EngageBay.
  • Contact-based billing counts chat visitors, push subscribers, and mobile app users — easily doubling or tripling the perceived contact count.
  • Platform has limited enterprise-grade features; scalability for teams above 50–100 users is a documented pain point.
  • US-based support coverage is weaker than European support, leaving international teams with slower response times.
Odoo CRM logo

Odoo CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Modular open-source architecture lets teams start with CRM and add ERP apps as needs grow, all sharing one PostgreSQL database.
  • Free Community edition with no contact limits and full source code access means zero licensing cost for evaluation and small deployments.
  • Drag-and-drop Kanban pipeline with AI lead scoring gives a visual, prioritized view of the sales funnel without requiring custom configuration.
  • Native integrations with email, live chat, SMS, VoIP, WhatsApp, and social media feed all inbound leads into a single unified inbox.
  • Active Odoo Community Association (OCA) maintains dozens of community-maintained modules on GitHub for extended functionality.

Weaknesses

  • Gmail and email integration reliability is a recurring complaint — threads drop and conversations scatter across inboxes, disrupting sales team workflows.
  • Enterprise edition pricing stacks quickly: multiple apps at per-user rates ($25–$50/user/month) plus Odoo.sh hosting costs more than many SMBs anticipate.
  • Setup and configuration complexity increases significantly once custom fields, automation rules, and multiple installed modules are in play.
  • Odoo.sh trial databases run on a version (e.g., 18.3) that is not directly migratable to Odoo.sh, blocking the assisted migration path Odoo advertises.
  • Version upgrades between major Odoo releases (e.g., 17→18) frequently break custom module view definitions and XPath expressions, requiring manual remediation.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard CRM migration. 1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across User.com and Odoo CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    User.com: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    User.com exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your User.com to Odoo CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about User.com to Odoo CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during User.com to Odoo CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your User.com to Odoo CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 20,000 Contacts, 4,000 Companies, and 3,000 Deals with no complex custom property schema land between four and six weeks. Migrations with large activity histories (over 300,000 Events and Activities), complex custom property schemas on multiple objects, or an Odoo Community self-hosted destination requiring XML data file generation move to eight to fourteen weeks because of custom field provisioning, Bool normalization testing, and Odoo Community import tooling complexity.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from User.com.
Land in Odoo CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day