CRM

Migrate your Link app data

A UK-based client communication platform for law firms, replacing email and phone with a secure web and mobile portal for case updates and document exchange.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Link app logo

In its favor

Why people choose Link app

The signal that keeps Link app on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Firm clients can access case updates via a dedicated mobile and web portal without relying on email chains that get lost or buried.

The platform includes built-in document sharing and file storage, replacing ad-hoc Dropbox or email attachments for client-facing work.

Firms with data residency concerns prefer The Link App because it is a UK-hosted service with UK-specific compliance framing for legal work.

Lawyers who find email inbox management overwhelming use the case feed as a cleaner, auditable communication log for each client matter.

Small and mid-size law firms that want a purpose-built client portal without the complexity of full-featured practice management systems.

Firms outgrow the flat data model as they add practice areas, billing, or matter-specific custom fields that The Link App does not support.

Integration gaps with accounting software, document management systems, or court e-filing tools create duplicate entry and workflow friction.

Pricing is per-lawyer or per-seat and becomes expensive as the firm grows, especially if administrative staff also need access.

The platform is UK-focused with limited support for non-UK jurisdictions, making it unsuitable for international or multi-office firms.

When a firm adopts a full practice management system like Clio or LEAP, The Link App becomes redundant and the firm consolidates onto one platform.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Link app

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Link app. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Link app fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Purpose-built for lawyer-client communication with a clean, chronological case feed.Web and mobile app gives clients a dedicated portal without needing to check email.Secure document sharing replaces ad-hoc file transfer methods with an auditable record.UK-hosted infrastructure appeals to firms with UK data sovereignty requirements.Simple onboarding for firms that only need client communication, not full practice management.

Weaknesses

No publicly documented API or bulk data export mechanism, complicating self-service migration.Flat data model does not support custom fields, matter types, or structured billing records.Limited integration ecosystem compared to established legal practice management platforms.UK-centric positioning limits appeal and functionality for non-UK legal practices.Firms needing billing, time tracking, or court e-filing must use the platform alongside separate tools.

Where it works

Small UK-based law firms (2–15 lawyers) operating in a single practice area that need a dedicated client portal without full practice management complexity.Solo practitioners or boutique firms where lawyers manage their own client communication and want an auditable case feed replacing buried email threads.Law firms with existing case management systems (Clio, LEAP) that need a supplementary client-facing communication layer without migrating everything at once.UK-based conveyancing, family law, or private client practices where clients expect portal access but the firm does not need billing or court e-filing features.Firms with data sovereignty requirements that need UK-hosted infrastructure and prefer domestic vendors for compliance documentation.

Where it struggles

Mid-size firms (20+ lawyers) that require practice-area-specific custom fields, matter templates, or structured billing records across cases.Firms operating across multiple jurisdictions or with international clients, where the platform's UK-only framing creates compliance and usability gaps.Legal practices that need integration with accounting software, court e-filing portals, or existing document management systems to avoid duplicate data entry.Growing firms where per-seat pricing scales unfavorably and where administrative staff also need client communication access.Firms handling high-volume or complex litigation matters that require automated workflows, task assignments, or milestone tracking beyond simple message feeds.

Pricing tiers

Link app pricing overview

The Link App does not publish pricing on its website. Sales are conducted via direct quote based on firm size and number of users. There is no free tier or self-service signup, which means migration scoping should include a confirmed per-seat count from the vendor directly.

Starter

Tier 1 of 3

Not publicly listed — contact for quote

What's included

Web and mobile app for law firm and clientCase feed with messaging and document sharingStandard support

Need help selecting your CRM?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Link app's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Link app object support

Object-by-object support for Link app migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Cases

Mapping required

The central object in The Link App. Each Case links a Client to a lawyer and holds a chronological feed of Messages and Document references. We split the feed into separate Activity records and Attachment records in the destination CRM.

Clients

Fully supported

Individual client records with contact details and case associations. Maps 1:1 to a Contact object in most destination CRMs. We preserve the client name, email, phone, and address fields during migration.

Users (Lawyers/Staff)

Mapping required

User accounts assigned as case owners. In multi-user migrations, we map Link App users to Owner/User fields on Cases, noting that role-level permissions may not transfer 1:1 to the destination's permission model.

Messages

Mapping required

Individual communications within a Case feed. We extract these as timestamped Activity records (type: message) linked to the parent Case, preserving sender, recipient, body text, and timestamp.

Documents

Mapping required

Files uploaded to a Case. We export document metadata (name, type, upload date, uploader) and flag binary files for separate file-level migration. Document content is preserved as long as the export includes the actual file attachments.

Case Templates

Not in this platform

If the firm uses reusable Case templates to pre-populate new matters, these are configuration data that do not contain client-specific data. We do not migrate templates as they are not customer data.

Calendar Events / Appointments

Mapping required

If the firm records scheduled calls or meetings within a Case, we map these to Event/Activity objects in the destination. Not all firms use this feature, so coverage varies per migration.

Interaction Tracking

Mapping required

The platform logs read receipts, access timestamps, and client engagement signals on a Case. We surface these as custom fields on the target Matter record so they are available post-migration but do not always map automatically to standard CRM fields.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Link app migrations

Issues we've hit on past Link app migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

No public API for automated bulk export

Medium

Document binaries may require separate file-level extraction

Medium

Case feed chronology does not map directly to standard CRM activity models

How a Link app migration works

Four steps, Link app-specific

Connect

The Link App publishes a modern REST API with SSL/HTTPS-only transport. Per the vendor's integrations page, the private API allows firms to connect existing systems for client registration, secure messaging, and file exchange directly from their case-management environment. into Link app. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Link app-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Link app quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Link app rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Link app migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Link app migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Link app migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Link app migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Link app.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Link app setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported