Project Management

Migrate your ProjectFlow data

Project and portfolio management platform from Fortes Nordic with Microsoft 365 and AI integration, supporting both agile and traditional methods across grow, professional, and enterprise tiers.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
ProjectFlow logo

In its favor

Why people choose ProjectFlow

The signal that keeps ProjectFlow on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Lowest visible per-seat cost among Danish PPM tools with enterprise-tier features like multicompany structure and resource planning available on higher tiers.

Native support for both agile and traditional project management methods in a single environment, avoiding the need for multiple tools.

Strong Microsoft 365 integration including Power BI reporting, appealing to organisations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.

Three-tier model lets small teams start with the Grow tier and expand to Professional or Enterprise as project complexity grows without changing platforms.

Positive review themes cite the intuitive interface and ease of use as primary reasons for adoption on G2, with 91% of reviewers rating it above 4 stars.

CSV export is currently the only documented export mechanism, making migrations of large portfolios time-consuming and error-prone without dedicated tooling.

Workflow export produces a zip file rather than a machine-readable format, requiring manual re-creation of complex workflow definitions in the destination system.

No public API documentation was found during research, limiting integration options and preventing automated migration pipelines for customers with real-time data requirements.

Enterprise tier required for multicompany structures and advanced resource planning, pushing smaller teams toward platforms with these features included at lower tiers.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave ProjectFlow

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing ProjectFlow. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where ProjectFlow fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Three-tier pricing model with a clear feature progression from Grow through Professional to Enterprise.Microsoft 365 and Power BI integration for reporting and analytics out of the box.Supports both agile and traditional project management methodologies within a single instance.Construction-industry variant includes native DailyReports and DocumentFolders for site-level tracking.

Weaknesses

No publicly documented REST API limits the ability to build automated integrations or migration pipelines.CSV export is the primary data portability mechanism; bulk structured migrations require manual preparation.Workflow definitions export as zip files rather than structured data, complicating migration of automation rules.Rate limits and API quotas are not publicly documented, creating uncertainty for customers with high-volume data needs.

Where it works

Danish and Nordic mid-sized organisations already invested in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem, particularly those relying on Power BI for portfolio-level reporting and analytics.Project teams within the construction industry where site-level DailyReports, DocumentFolders, and milestone tracking are required for compliance and site management.Growing teams that start on the Grow tier and expand to Professional or Enterprise as project complexity increases, benefiting from the clear tier-based feature progression.Organisations that need to manage both agile sprints and traditional waterfall schedules within a single instance, without maintaining separate tools.Enterprise organisations with multicompany structures that require cross-entity resource planning and project visibility across subsidiaries.

Where it struggles

Organisations requiring real-time data integrations or automated pipelines, since no public REST API is documented and CSV export is the primary portability mechanism.Enterprises with large project portfolios that would face time-consuming manual preparation when migrating due to the absence of bulk structured export tools.Teams outside the Microsoft ecosystem who would lose the primary value proposition of Power BI reporting and Microsoft 365 integration benefits.Small teams on the Grow tier that need multicompany oversight or advanced resource planning, as those features require an Enterprise tier upgrade.Organisations with complex workflow automation rules, since workflow definitions export as zip files rather than structured machine-readable formats.

Pricing tiers

ProjectFlow pricing overview

ProjectFlow uses a per-user per-month model with at least three tiers. The Grow tier is visible at approximately $7.91/user/month. Professional and Enterprise tiers require a sales contact for pricing. All tiers include a 14-day free trial with no payment information required upfront.

Grow

Tier 1 of 3

$7.91/user/month

What's included

Basic features and project planningTime tracking and cost trackingResource managementCustomers and quotesKnowledge portal and reportsIntegrations and services

Need help selecting your Project Management?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on ProjectFlow's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

ProjectFlow object support

Object-by-object support for ProjectFlow migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Projects

Fully supported

Projects are the primary container in ProjectFlow, containing all tasks, documents, and schedules. The standard Project object with dates, status, and metadata migrates cleanly to most destination platforms.

Tasks

Fully supported

Tasks within projects map 1:1 to destination task objects. We preserve assignee, due date, status, and priority. Custom task fields are mapped individually during the scoping phase.

Subtasks

Mapping required

Subtask nesting depth varies by tier. We flag when subtask hierarchies exceed the destination's supported depth and flatten or re-parent records accordingly during migration.

Milestones

Fully supported

Milestones are standalone date-driven markers within a project. We preserve the milestone name, target date, and linked tasks across the migration.

GanttCharts

Mapping required

Gantt structure—task bars, start/end dates, dependencies—is extracted and reconstructed in the destination. Dependencies that do not exist in the target are linked as custom dependency fields.

Documents

Fully supported

Documents are linked to projects and can be nested inside DocumentFolders. We export document metadata and file references; actual file transfer uses the customer's preferred storage path.

DocumentFolders

Fully supported

The folder hierarchy is preserved as a flat list of parent-child relationships and recreated in the destination using the same folder structure conventions.

DailyReports

Mapping required

DailyReports are a construction-industry-specific object recording daily progress notes. We map these to the destination's closest equivalent (notes, journal entries, or comments) and flag any loss of structured fields.

Alerts

Mapping required

Alert thresholds and notification rules are platform-specific. We extract alert configurations and attempt to recreate them in the destination as task reminder settings or automation rules where supported.

ProjectShares

Mapping required

ProjectShares control which users or external parties have access to a project. We map these to the destination's sharing or permission model, noting where role definitions differ.

Assignees

Fully supported

User assignments on tasks and projects map to the destination's assignee field. Enterprise multicompany structures may require disambiguation of duplicate user records.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom fields on Projects and Tasks vary by tier and configuration. We enumerate all custom fields during discovery and map them to equivalent custom fields or note where the destination lacks the field type.

Gotchas

What to watch for in ProjectFlow migrations

Issues we've hit on past ProjectFlow migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

No documented public REST API for automated exports

Medium

DailyReports object is construction-industry specific

Medium

Enterprise multicompany structure complicates user deduplication

How a ProjectFlow migration works

Four steps, ProjectFlow-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented into ProjectFlow. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate ProjectFlow-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate ProjectFlow quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with ProjectFlow rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

ProjectFlow migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ProjectFlow migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ProjectFlow migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most ProjectFlow migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate ProjectFlow.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your ProjectFlow setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported