ERP migration

Migrate from Decision Builder to Acumatica

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Decision Builder and Acumatica. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Acumatica.

Decision Builder logo

Decision Builder

Source

Acumatica

Destination

Acumatica logo

Compatibility

100%

15 of 15

objects map 1:1 between Decision Builder and Acumatica.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

48–72 hours

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Decision Builder and Acumatica both handle the full ERP spectrum — financials, inventory, orders, and project accounting — but their underlying data models differ enough that a naive import fails. Decision Builder stores customers, vendors, items, and GL accounts as independent entities with flexible relationships. Acumatica enforces referential integrity at the database level: Customers must exist before AR invoices can reference them, and inventory items must exist before stock transactions can post. We sequence the migration to resolve foreign keys in the right order: GL accounts first, then items, then customers and vendors, then open orders and historical transactions. Decision Builder's custom fields migrate as Acumatica custom fields via customization projects (DAC-level extension). Workflows, approval chains, and automated notifications in Decision Builder have no direct Acumatica equivalent and must be rebuilt using Acumatica Business Events and Screen-based workflows. We deliver a field-level diff report before committing the full migration, with a 24–48 hour delta-pickup window capturing any changes made during cutover.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Decision Builder logo

Decision Builder

What's pushing teams away

  • Limited documentation makes it difficult for new team members to learn the platform and for existing users to resolve advanced configuration problems.
  • Poor upgrade path for .NET compatibility creates frustration during version transitions and limits access to newer framework features.
  • Lack of comprehensive documentation means teams spend excessive time experimenting with features rather than applying them directly to business needs.
  • The platform's age means some integrations with modern SaaS tools require custom development that newer ERP platforms provide out of the box.

Choosing

Acumatica logo

Acumatica

What's pulling them in

  • Unlimited user licensing lets companies add staff without per-seat billing shocks, making Acumatica cost-predictable at scale.
  • Flexibility and scalability earn consistent praise — users value a platform that adapts to vertical workflows without forcing a redesign.
  • Real-time visibility across financials, inventory, and projects gives mid-market businesses a consolidated operational view previously available only in enterprise-tier ERPs.
  • Cloud-native architecture with automatic updates removes infrastructure management burden from in-house IT teams.
  • Modular licensing lets companies start with one or two suites (Financials, Distribution) and expand into Manufacturing or CRM incrementally.

Object mapping

How Decision Builder objects map to Acumatica

Each row shows how a Decision Builder object lands in Acumatica, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Decision Builder

Customer

maps to

Acumatica

Customer (AR Customers)

1:1
Fully supported

Decision Builder customer records map to Acumatica's AR Customer entity. Acumatica requires a Customer Class to be assigned at creation — we use the primary industry segment from Decision Builder or a default 'Standard' class. Customer addresses and contacts are stored as sub-entities in Acumatica.

Decision Builder

Vendor

maps to

Acumatica

Vendor (AP Vendors)

1:1
Fully supported

Decision Builder vendors map to Acumatica's AP Vendor entity. Like customers, vendors in Acumatica require a Vendor Class assignment determined by the vendor's primary business type. We pull the primary payment terms and remittance address from Decision Builder's vendor record, translating these to Acumatica's Terms schedule and address sub-entity structure respectively. Vendor balance carryforward uses the most recent Statement as-of date.

Decision Builder

Inventory Item

maps to

Acumatica

Inventory Item

1:1
Fully supported

Decision Builder items migrate as Acumatica Inventory Items with their item type preserved (stock vs non-stock vs service). Stock items require a default warehouse assignment and valuation method mapping — Decision Builder's cost layer configuration (FIFO, Average, or Standard cost) translates directly to Acumatica's ValMethod field. Item class assignments carry forward using name matching against Acumatica's Inventory Item Class list.

Decision Builder

GL Account

maps to

Acumatica

Account (Chart of Accounts)

1:1
Fully supported

Decision Builder GL accounts map to Acumatica Accounts in the Chart of Accounts. Account numbers are preserved as-is for AccountCD continuity. Account type (Asset, Liability, Equity, Revenue, Expense) maps to Acumatica's Account Group structure. Subaccounts in Decision Builder map to Acumatica subaccounts using the subaccount mask defined in your Acumatica Configuration Settings.

Decision Builder

Sales Order

maps to

Acumatica

SOOrder (Sales Order)

1:1
Fully supported

Open sales orders migrate as Acumatica Sales Orders with their current status preserved (Open, On Hold, Pending). Order numbers, line items, quantities, and pricing are all preserved through direct field mapping. Released and invoiced orders migrate as completed documents if historical posting is included in scope, with their original completion dates and invoice references carried forward.

Decision Builder

Purchase Order

maps to

Acumatica

POOrder (Purchase Order)

1:1
Fully supported

Open purchase orders in Decision Builder become Acumatica PO Orders with Open status preserved. The vendor reference, line items with quantities and expected receipt dates, and drop-ship flags are all carried forward. Closed or received purchase orders migrate as history records if the Accounts Payable audit trail is in scope, preserving original receipt dates and assignment details.

Decision Builder

AR Invoice / Credit Memo

maps to

Acumatica

ARInvoice (AR Invoice)

1:1
Fully supported

Open and recently posted AR invoices from Decision Builder map to Acumatica AR Invoice documents. Invoice number, date, customer reference, line amounts, and tax amounts are all preserved through direct field mapping. Fully paid invoices migrate as history records with a Paid status flag set, maintaining the original payment date and reference for audit trail completeness.

Decision Builder

AP Invoice / Credit Memo

maps to

Acumatica

APInvoice (AP Invoice)

1:1
Fully supported

Open AP invoices from Decision Builder migrate as Acumatica AP Invoices. Vendor reference, invoice number, date, line amounts, and tax information are preserved through direct mapping. Decision Builder payment terms are translated to Acumatica's Terms schedule attached to the vendor record, and discounts taken are captured in the discount fields on the migrated invoice.

Decision Builder

Bill of Materials

maps to

Acumatica

BOM (Bill of Materials) / Non-Stock Items

1:1
Fully supported

Decision Builder BOMs with component items map to Acumatica BOM structures maintained in Manufacturing Engineering. Multi-level BOMs are replicated using Acumatica's BOM revision hierarchy with parent and child component relationships preserved. Phantom BOMs and BOMs tied to specific manufacturing orders use Acumatica's BOM versions linked to warehouse-specific configurations.

Decision Builder

Work Order / Production Order

maps to

Acumatica

Production Order (Mfg)

1:1
Fully supported

Decision Builder work orders map to Acumatica Production Orders. The linked BOM and step or operation routing are preserved as Acumatica production specifications. Operation sequences, labor estimates, and machine time requirements map to production Labor codes and Work Center assignments for scheduling accuracy.

Decision Builder

Project

maps to

Acumatica

PMProject (Project)

1:1
Fully supported

Decision Builder projects migrate as Acumatica PM Projects with their associated task hierarchies preserved. Project status, billing rule, and customer link are translated directly. Time and material versus fixed-price billing rules map to Acumatica's billing rules on the project, and cost budgets translate to PM Budget lines with allocation by project task.

Decision Builder

Employee / User

maps to

Acumatica

Employee / User

1:1
Fully supported

Decision Builder users with active login access migrate as Acumatica Employees and Users with corresponding login credentials. Email address serves as the matching key between systems. Unmatched users are flagged in the pre-migration report for Acumatica admin setup before the full migration commits. Branch, department, and cost rate assignments are preserved through direct field mapping.

Decision Builder

Custom Fields on any entity

maps to

Acumatica

Custom Field (DAC extension via Customization Project)

1:1
Fully supported

Decision Builder custom fields on any entity migrate as Acumatica custom fields maintained in a customization project. Fields use the Usr-prefix naming convention and are defined at the DAC level in extension classes. We generate the complete customization package XML so it can be published in Acumatica's Customization Project editor before data loads occur, ensuring the schema is ready to receive the extended data.

Decision Builder

Approval / Workflow Rules

maps to

Acumatica

Business Events + Screen Workflows

1:1
Fully supported

Decision Builder approval chains and workflow logic have no Acumatica equivalent that can be migrated directly. We export Decision Builder workflow definitions as a documented reference including trigger conditions, approval thresholds, escalation paths, and notification actions. Your Acumatica administrator uses this documentation to rebuild equivalent automation using Business Events, screen-level workflow automation, and notification templates in the Acumatica workflow designer.

Decision Builder

Report Definitions / Dashboards

maps to

Acumatica

Generic Inquiry / Report Designer

1:1
Fully supported

Custom report definitions and dashboards from Decision Builder cannot be auto-migrated to Acumatica's reporting tools. We export the complete report metadata including column names, filter definitions, sort order, grouping levels, and calculation formulas as a structured rebuild guide. Your team uses this guide to reconstruct equivalent reports using Acumatica's Generic Inquiry Query Designer and Report Designer tools.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Decision Builder logo

Decision Builder gotchas

High

Complex Data Structures require Project-level export

Medium

Advanced decision table rows are read-only in Excel export

High

No publicly documented migration API or bulk export endpoint

Medium

Data Structure export format creates vendor lock-in

Acumatica logo

Acumatica gotchas

High

API user licenses cap concurrent sessions and request throughput

High

Multi-tenant filtering requires CompanyID awareness

Medium

Custom fields require separate discovery before field mapping

Medium

Notes and attachments use a separate linked table structure

Low

Implementation timelines frequently run 3–9 months end-to-end

Pair-specific challenges

  • Referential integrity enforces load-order sequencing

    Acumatica enforces foreign-key constraints at the database level — an AR invoice cannot be created if its CustomerID does not already exist in the Customer table. Decision Builder is more permissive about entity interdependencies. FlitStack sequences the migration so GL accounts load first, then items, then customers and vendors, then orders and invoices. Skipping or reordering steps results in a bulk insert failure. We surface the exact load order in the pre-migration plan and validate each stage before proceeding to the next.

  • Acumatica Generic Inquiries are not built-in list views

    Decision Builder provides list views and reports as part of its application configuration with minimal setup. Acumatica does not have an equivalent out-of-the-box — replicating a custom Decision Builder list view requires building a Generic Inquiry using Acumatica's Query Designer, which references the underlying DAC fields by name. If a Decision Builder custom field was named 'Zone' on the Customer entity, it becomes UsrZone in Acumatica, and the Generic Inquiry must reference the UsrZone field explicitly. We include a field-name cross-reference document listing every Decision Builder custom field and its Acumatica Usr-prefix equivalent.

  • Approval chains and workflows must be rebuilt with Business Events

    Decision Builder embeds approval routing and email notifications inside its application workflow builder. Acumatica handles this through Business Events (which trigger on document status changes) combined with Screen Workflows and notification templates. These are configuration artifacts that live outside the data layer and cannot be exported from Decision Builder and imported into Acumatica. We provide a Decision Builder workflow audit export — a structured document listing every approval rule, trigger condition, and notification action — which your Acumatica admin uses to rebuild the equivalent logic using Acumatica's automation tools.

  • Multi-entity setups require pre-migration branch and company planning

    If Decision Builder manages multiple legal entities or divisions within a single database, Acumatica's multi-entity architecture requires you to pre-create the company and branch structure before transactional data can be posted. Each Decision Builder entity division needs a corresponding Acumatica Organization node (Company or Branch). Transactional data (AR/AP invoices, sales orders) must be assigned to the correct branch at migration time. We deliver a legal-entity mapping worksheet during the planning phase so Acumatica's organizational hierarchy is in place before any document data moves.

  • Support escalation goes through a VAR partner, not direct Acumatica

    After the migration, any support issues in Acumatica require submitting a ticket through your Value-Added Reseller partner. Unlike Decision Builder's direct vendor support model, Acumatica's VAR ecosystem means that even small issues like a configuration question can incur billable hours ($200–$250 per hour, per Reddit r/Netsuite community reports). We document all configuration decisions made during the migration so your team has a reference for post-go-live questions before engaging your VAR.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Decision Builder to Acumatica data migration

  1. Assess Decision Builder schema and Acumatica environment

    We inventory every entity type in Decision Builder — customers, vendors, items, GL accounts, open orders, historical transactions, and custom fields. Simultaneously, we review your target Acumatica tenant: which modules are licensed (Financial Management, Distribution, Manufacturing, CRM, Project Accounting), what entity and branch structure exists, and whether any customization projects have already been started. This produces a data assessment report that flags foreign-key dependencies, missing Acumatica setup (customer classes, vendor classes, terms schedules), and the estimated load-order sequence.

  2. Create Acumatica schema foundation and load master data

    With the assessment in hand, we set up the Acumatica foundation before any transactional data moves: GL accounts and subaccounts, item classes, customer classes, vendor classes, terms schedules, and warehouse configurations. We then load all master data records (accounts, items, customers, vendors, employees) in the validated dependency order. Any Decision Builder custom fields are captured as a customization project (Usr-prefix DAC extensions) that your Acumatica admin publishes before the transactional migration phase.

  3. Run sample migration with field-level diff

    A representative slice of transactional data — typically 200–500 records covering open sales orders, open purchase orders, recent AR invoices, recent AP invoices, and a sample of inventory transactions — migrates first. We generate a field-level diff comparing every mapped field between the Decision Builder source and the Acumatica destination, flagging any truncation, type mismatch, or value-mapping gap. You review the diff and approve field mappings before the full migration commits. This step catches issues like account codes that don't exist in Acumatica or customer classes that need to be pre-created.

  4. Execute full migration with delta-pickup window

    After sample sign-off, the full migration runs in dependency order: GL batches, inventory adjustments, open purchase orders, open sales orders, open AR invoices, open AP invoices, project records, and historical documents if included in scope. A 24–48 hour delta-pickup window opens simultaneously, capturing any records created or modified in Decision Builder during the cutover period. The audit log records every operation (insert, update, skip) with source system IDs for traceability. If reconciliation finds discrepancies, one-click rollback reverses the Acumatica load so corrections can be made before re-running.

  5. Validate post-migration and deliver rebuild reference package

    We run a reconciliation report comparing record counts and aggregate totals per entity type between Decision Builder's final state and Acumatica's loaded state. Customer balances, vendor balances, inventory on-hand quantities, and open order totals are verified against Decision Builder reports. We then deliver the rebuild reference package: a structured export of Decision Builder workflow definitions, approval chains, and report layouts, with a cross-reference to their Acumatica equivalents (Business Events, Screen Workflows, Generic Inquiries). Your Acumatica admin uses this package to reconstruct the automation layer outside of the data migration.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Decision Builder logo

Decision Builder

Source

Strengths

  • 25+ years of operational history with deep manufacturing and distribution domain expertise
  • Extensive pre-built application library covering industry-specific workflows
  • Flexible architecture supporting extensive customization to match unique business processes
  • Integrated environment combining financials, inventory, and vendor management
  • Project-based export capabilities (.dec.obj format) for complex data structure migrations

Weaknesses

  • Limited and poor documentation creates steep learning curves for new users
  • Poor upgrade path for .NET compatibility causes friction during version transitions
  • Lack of comprehensive technical documentation slows advanced configuration work
  • Modern SaaS integration gaps require custom development compared to newer ERP platforms
  • Excel export for data structures has varying complexity handling across different data types
Acumatica logo

Acumatica

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited named-user licensing eliminates per-seat cost scaling as teams grow.
  • Modular architecture lets companies deploy Financials first and add Distribution, Manufacturing, or CRM incrementally.
  • Cloud-native with automatic updates removes infrastructure patching and version management from IT responsibilities.
  • Flexible customization framework (UDFs, extensions) supports vertical-specific workflows without forking core code.
  • Multi-tenant architecture with CompanyID isolation enables safe data segregation across subsidiaries.

Weaknesses

  • Steep learning curve and complex initial setup create significant onboarding friction.
  • Report Designer is widely cited as unintuitive and difficult to use for non-developers.
  • Feature gaps require customizations or third-party add-ons, adding implementation cost and complexity.
  • Implementation timelines frequently exceed initial estimates, especially for multi-module deployments.
  • API rate limits and concurrent session caps are tied to license tier, creating throughput constraints for bulk data operations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate ERP migration. 5 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Decision Builder and Acumatica.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    5 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Decision Builder: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Decision Builder doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Decision Builder to Acumatica migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Decision Builder to Acumatica data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Decision Builder to Acumatica migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Decision Builder to Acumatica migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Decision Builder to Acumatica migrations complete within 5–10 days of clock time for under 50,000 records. The master-data foundation phase (GL accounts, items, customers, vendors) takes 1–2 days; transactional data loading (orders, invoices, inventory) takes 2–5 days depending on volume. Multi-entity setups with inter-company transactions or historical document loading extend the timeline because Acumatica's branch and company structure must be confirmed before posting. The sample migration and diff step adds 1–2 days but prevents full-run surprises.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Decision Builder.
Land in Acumatica, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day