CRM

Migrate your InTouch data

Conveyancing-focused legal CRM with strong automation templates and UK-centric workflow design, marketed at small-to-mid-sized property law firms managing high-volume transactions.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
InTouch logo

In its favor

Why people choose InTouch

The signal that keeps InTouch on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Small law firms choose InTouch for its purpose-built conveyancing workflow templates that automate Land Registry tasks and client communication sequences without requiring custom development work.

The per-matter custom field architecture lets firms capture transaction-specific data points that standard CRM objects cannot represent, making the data model a direct fit for property law use cases.

InTouch's dedicated customer champion onboarding model appeals to firms with limited in-house IT resource who want a single named contact during the transition period.

Firms moving from legacy on-premise conveyancing systems cite InTouch's fully managed cloud infrastructure as a reason to migrate, removing hardware maintenance obligations entirely.

The platform's data export capability is built into all tiers including Standard, giving firms confidence they can retrieve their data if they need to leave the platform in future.

Advanced customisation for dashboards, reporting, and workflow branching is limited, causing firms with complex or non-standard transaction types to outgrow the platform's flexibility.

The mobile app receives consistent criticism for poor usability and feature gaps compared to the desktop interface, which frustrates fee-earners who work on-site at properties.

The transition from the legacy flash-based version to the modern platform disrupted established users' workflows, and some firms report the learning curve on the new UI was steeper than expected.

Firms requiring deep third-party integrations with accounting software, Land Registry portals, or practice management suites find InTouch's native integration ecosystem too narrow for their needs.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave InTouch

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing InTouch. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where InTouch fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Purpose-built conveyancing workflow templates with Land Registry task automation built in.Fully managed cloud infrastructure with six file replicas across two regions and real-time database replication.Data export capability included at all pricing tiers, not gated behind Enterprise only.Dedicated customer champion and structured onboarding for firms with limited in-house IT capacity.2FA security enforced for both users and clients accessing the system.

Weaknesses

Advanced customisation for dashboards, reports, and workflow branching is limited compared to general-purpose legal platforms.Mobile app is widely reported as under-featured and difficult to use on-site.Native integration ecosystem with third-party accounting, Land Registry, and practice management tools is narrow.Transition from the legacy flash-based interface created workflow disruption for established users that some firms still reference negatively.

Where it works

UK-based small-to-mid-sized property law firms running high-volume residential conveyancing with standard transaction workflows and limited in-house IT capacity.Solo and small conveyancing teams that need managed cloud infrastructure without hardware maintenance obligations and prefer a single named support contact during onboarding.Firms whose transaction types align closely with InTouch's built-in matter templates, allowing them to use Land Registry automation without custom development work.Property law practices where data portability is a priority and the ability to export matter and contact data at any pricing tier is a non-negotiable requirement.Legal teams that require 2FA enforcement for both internal users and external clients accessing the system for compliance or data security reasons.

Where it struggles

Mid-to-large property law firms with complex, multi-party, or non-standard transaction types that require workflow branching beyond what InTouch's template architecture supports.Firms that depend on deep native integrations with accounting software, practice management suites, or external Land Registry portals, given InTouch's narrow third-party integration ecosystem.Fee-earners who spend significant time on-site at properties and need a fully-featured mobile application, given consistent reports of poor usability and missing functionality in InTouch's mobile app.International property law practices or firms handling cross-border transactions requiring multi-currency, multi-jurisdictional data handling, which falls outside InTouch's UK-centric design scope.Legal teams requiring advanced custom dashboards, bespoke reporting, or granular analytics that go beyond InTouch's limited reporting and visualisation capabilities.

Pricing tiers

InTouch pricing overview

InTouch does not publish pricing on its website. All tiers require a sales conversation. The platform differentiates on export breadth, support tier, and backup options between Standard, Premium, and Enterprise, with New Starter and Platform occupying lower positions in the feature set.

New Starter

Tier 1 of 5

Not publicly listed — contact sales

What's included

Access to core conveyancing workflow templatesStarter pack onboarding supportLimited matter export — not all data accessible via self-service2FA authentication for users and clientsFeature updates and improvements included

Need help selecting your CRM?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on InTouch's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

InTouch object support

Object-by-object support for InTouch migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Matters

Fully supported

Matters are the central work unit in InTouch, representing individual property transactions. We map matters 1:1 preserving the matter status, assigned fee-earner, key dates, and linked contacts. Custom field values are carried over as structured mappings rather than loose text fields.

Clients

Fully supported

Clients are the primary parties on a matter. We migrate client records with full contact details, address history, and matter associations. Where the destination uses a Contact/Party object we split client records to the appropriate schema without losing the relationship to the originating matter.

Contacts

Fully supported

InTouch supports multiple contact types per matter including buyers, sellers, solicitors, and estate agents. We preserve contact type labels as custom properties in the destination so the relationship hierarchy remains legible after migration.

Matter Templates

Mapping required

Matter templates define the stages, custom fields, and workflow tasks for each transaction type. We map template stage names to the destination's pipeline stages and flag any template-level custom fields that have no direct equivalent in the target system.

Custom Fields

Mapping required

Custom fields are data markers tied to matter templates. They capture transaction-specific data throughout a deal. Migration requires a template pre-check to understand which custom fields exist and how they map to the destination schema.

Documents

Mapping required

Documents are linked to matters and stored in InTouch's document management system. We extract document metadata and file references. Document bodies can be migrated as binary file transfers if the destination supports document attachments.

Activities and Tasks

Mapping required

Activities record workflow events and tasks against a matter. We sequence activities chronologically and map task status flags to the destination's equivalent activity or task object.

Users and Fee-Earners

Mapping required

User accounts map to fee-earners and admin roles. We preserve the user-to-matter assignment so that workload history and matter ownership transfer correctly to the destination system.

Gotchas

What to watch for in InTouch migrations

Issues we've hit on past InTouch migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

Custom fields are template-bound and require pre-migration schema review

Medium

Contact export runs asynchronously and can exceed one hour for large rolls

Medium

Legacy flash-era data may have inconsistent field encoding in exports

Low

Matter export is not a self-service feature on all tiers

How a InTouch migration works

Four steps, InTouch-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented for third-party migration use into InTouch. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate InTouch-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate InTouch quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with InTouch rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

InTouch migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during InTouch migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your InTouch migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most InTouch migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate InTouch.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your InTouch setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported