HRMS migration

Migrate from Webrecruit to Crelate

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Webrecruit and Crelate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Crelate.

Webrecruit logo

Webrecruit

Source

Crelate

Destination

Crelate logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Webrecruit and Crelate.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Webrecruit and Crelate take different structural approaches to recruitment data. Webrecruit organizes around Candidates, Jobs, and Applications with GDPR compliance flags embedded per candidate record; Crelate uses a unified Contact-Company-Opportunity model where candidate applications link to Opportunities as custom field data. We resolve that structural difference during scoping, map Webrecruit's fixed stage pipeline to Crelate's customizable stage values, and carry GDPR consent timestamps into Crelate custom fields so withdrawal requests are honored post-migration. Webrecruit has no public API documentation; we request live credentials and perform schema discovery during the discovery phase, falling back to CSV export with manual field mapping if credentials cannot be provided. Crelate's tiered subscription model limits the number of custom fields and activity types available at lower plans, which we flag during scoping. Approval workflows, hiring requisition workflows, and bespoke stage types like aptitude or competency tests do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Crelate.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Webrecruit logo

Webrecruit

What's pushing teams away

  • Bespoke recruitment stages like aptitude or competency tests cannot be tracked natively, forcing teams to improvise or abandon specific evaluation workflows.
  • Platform lacks flexibility for non-standard hiring processes, pushing organizations with unique requirements toward more configurable ATS alternatives.
  • Integration ecosystem is limited compared to enterprise ATS platforms, restricting connectivity with broader HR tech stacks beyond BreatheHR and CIPHR.
  • API documentation is not publicly available, making custom development and third-party tool connections difficult to architect independently.

Choosing

Crelate logo

Crelate

What's pulling them in

  • Affordable per-seat pricing with transparent tiers makes Crelate accessible for small-to-mid staffing firms evaluating ATS platforms for the first time.
  • Fast implementation reported by customers—some describe getting live in a matter of minutes with support team assistance.
  • Unified ATS + CRM in a single product eliminates the need to buy and synchronize separate recruiting and sales tools.
  • Flexible custom fields across Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities allow recruiting teams to capture firm-specific data without developer involvement.
  • Positive reviews highlight the product's intuitive interface and functional breadth for teams that need recruiting workflows without enterprise overhead.

Object mapping

How Webrecruit objects map to Crelate

Each row shows how a Webrecruit object lands in Crelate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Webrecruit

Candidate

maps to

Crelate

Contact

1:1
Fully supported

Webrecruit Candidate records map to Crelate Contact. We map standard fields (first name, last name, email, phone, address) directly. The Webrecruit GDPR consent flag (boolean with timestamp) migrates to a Crelate custom field gdpr_consent_date__c (date) and gdpr_consent_withdrawn__c (checkbox) on the Contact record. Candidates with withdrawn or expired consent are flagged but not migrated unless the customer explicitly requests otherwise. Application history attaches as a custom multi-line text or related list entry on the Contact.

Webrecruit

Job

maps to

Crelate

Opportunity

1:1
Fully supported

Webrecruit Job records (title, description, department, location, status, posting dates) map to Crelate Opportunity with custom fields capturing the Webrecruit-specific properties. The job title becomes the Opportunity name; department becomes a custom picklist field; location maps to a custom text field. Webrecruit job status (active, paused, closed) maps to Opportunity Stage values that we configure in Crelate before migration.

Webrecruit

Application

maps to

Crelate

Custom field on Opportunity

lossy
Fully supported

Webrecruit Application records (linking a Candidate to a Job with a timestamp and current stage) have no direct Crelate equivalent because Crelate's model uses Opportunity as the candidate placement record. We map Application data as custom fields on the Crelate Opportunity: application_date__c, current_stage__c, rejection_date__c, withdrawal_date__c, and rejection_reason__c. The candidate Contact attaches to the Opportunity via a Contact lookup or Opportunity Contact Role.

Webrecruit

Stage

maps to

Crelate

Opportunity Stage

lossy
Fully supported

Webrecruit's fixed stage pipeline maps to Crelate Opportunity Stage values. We define a Crelate Sales Process with stage values that match or approximate the Webrecruit pipeline. Webrecruit bespoke stages (aptitude tests, competency evaluations) that have no native representation in the system are flagged as custom fields on the Opportunity (e.g., assessment_outcome__c) and we ask the customer to confirm whether these are stored elsewhere and whether they need to be migrated as notes or custom field values.

Webrecruit

Hiring Manager

maps to

Crelate

User

1:1
Fully supported

Webrecruit Hiring Managers assigned to Jobs map to Crelate User records by email match. We resolve the owner relationship at migration time. If a Hiring Manager has no matching Crelate User, they are placed in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Hiring Manager feedback attached to Applications migrates as Activity records on the corresponding Opportunity.

Webrecruit

Workflow

maps to

Crelate

Written inventory only

1:1
Fully supported

Webrecruit approval workflows defining job requisition movement from creation to posting do not migrate as code. We export workflow step definitions and attempt to document them in a written handoff document that maps each Webrecruit workflow step to a recommended Crelate equivalent (manual checklist, email template, or approval flow). The customer's admin rebuilds these in Crelate post-migration. We do not implement Crelate workflow automation inside the migration scope.

Webrecruit

Document

maps to

Crelate

ContentDocument

1:1
Fully supported

CVs, cover letters, and attachments stored per Webrecruit Application migrate as ContentDocument records in Crelate. We export document blobs, upload them to Crelate's document storage, and link them to the corresponding Contact record via ContentDocumentLink. The original filename and any associated notes migrate as the document description. If document storage limits apply at the customer's Crelate tier, we flag this during scoping.

Webrecruit

Custom Field

maps to

Crelate

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Webrecruit custom fields vary by account and do not have a standardized schema. We export field definitions and values, then map them to Crelate custom fields on the equivalent core record (Contact, Company, or Opportunity). Crelate supports custom fields as Text, Number (Integer), Number (Decimal), Number (Money), and other types. We map field types accordingly and flag any fields with no matching Crelate type for manual re-entry. If the customer is on a Crelate tier with a limit on custom field count, we flag this during scoping and prioritize the most critical fields.

Webrecruit

User

maps to

Crelate

User

1:1
Fully supported

Webrecruit User accounts (name, email, role, permissions) map to Crelate User records by email match. We extract all distinct Webrecruit Users referenced on Candidate, Job, and Application records and match them against the Crelate destination org's User table. Any Webrecruit User without a matching Crelate User goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before migration resumes.

Webrecruit

Integration

maps to

Crelate

Written inventory only

1:1
Fully supported

Webrecruit integrations with BreatheHR and CIPHR are connection-level configurations that do not carry over to Crelate. We document which integrations are active, note their purpose, and include re-connection steps in the post-migration checklist. The customer re-authenticates and reconfigures each integration in Crelate. Crelate's broader integration ecosystem (RingCentral, Zapier, Bullhorn, Indeed, Google Workspace, HireEZ, and others) provides replacement connectivity options that we document during scoping.

Webrecruit

Company

maps to

Crelate

Company

1:1
Fully supported

Webrecruit stores organizational data on the Job record (department, hiring team) but does not have a standalone Company object equivalent to Crelate's Company core record. If the customer uses Webrecruit's employer brand or client organization data, we map it to Crelate Company records with the organization name as the Company name. The Webrecruit employer entity (the customer's own organization) is created as a Crelate Company record for reference.

Webrecruit

GDPR Consent

maps to

Crelate

Custom fields on Contact

lossy
Fully supported

Webrecruit GDPR consent flags are stored as a boolean per Candidate with a consent timestamp. We export the consent timestamp and flag alongside each Candidate record and map them to Crelate custom fields on Contact: gdpr_consent_date__c (date), gdpr_consent_withdrawn__c (checkbox), gdpr_consent_source__c (text, capturing the original consent mechanism). UK law requires that consent status is preserved and honored in the destination system. Candidates with withdrawn or expired consent are flagged but not migrated unless the customer explicitly requests otherwise. The customer is responsible for configuring Crelate's suppression list workflow post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Webrecruit logo

Webrecruit gotchas

High

No public API documentation exists for Webrecruit ATS

Medium

Bespoke stage types have no system representation

Medium

Integration connections do not export or migrate

High

GDPR consent flags require explicit handling at migration

Crelate logo

Crelate gotchas

High

120 req/min API rate limit throttles bulk migrations

High

20 custom field per-entity cap forces data model decisions

Medium

15,000-record export ceiling on single operations

Medium

Sequences and automation workflows do not migrate

Low

API key is a querystring parameter, not a header

Pair-specific challenges

  • Webrecruit API has no public documentation

    Webrecruit confirms it has an open API but does not publish documentation publicly. We cannot programmatically verify schema, endpoints, or field names before scoping. We handle this by requesting API access credentials directly from the customer and performing live schema discovery during the discovery phase. If credentials cannot be provided, we fall back to CSV export and manual field mapping, which extends the project timeline by three to five business days. The customer must supply Webrecruit credentials or a data export file before migration begins.

  • GDPR consent flags require explicit handling

    Webrecruit stores candidate GDPR consent as a boolean flag per record with a timestamp. UK law requires that consent status is preserved and honored in Crelate. We export the consent timestamp and flag alongside each Candidate record and map them to Crelate custom fields on Contact. Candidates with withdrawn or expired consent are flagged but not migrated unless the customer explicitly requests otherwise. The customer must configure Crelate's suppression list workflow post-migration to honor withdrawal requests; this is outside the migration scope.

  • Bespoke stage types cannot migrate natively

    Multiple sources confirm that aptitude tests, competency assessments, and other non-standard evaluation stages cannot be added as pipeline stages in Webrecruit. These are tracked outside the system or not at all. We flag this during scoping and ask the customer to confirm whether assessment results are stored elsewhere and whether they need to be migrated into Crelate as custom field values or Activity notes. Crelate's stage pipeline is configurable, but the bespoke assessment data must be captured as structured custom fields on the Opportunity record.

  • Crelate tier limits on custom fields and activity types

    Crelate's subscription tiers limit the number of custom fields, activity types, and pipeline stages available at lower plans. If the customer is on a Crelate tier with restrictions, we prioritize migration of the highest-value custom fields and flag any that cannot be created due to tier constraints. The customer may need to upgrade to a higher Crelate tier or accept manual re-entry of lower-priority custom fields post-migration. We confirm the tier during scoping and document the impact on the field mapping plan.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Webrecruit to Crelate data migration

  1. Discovery and credential acquisition

    We request Webrecruit API access credentials from the customer and perform live schema discovery to identify all active objects, fields, and relationships. If credentials cannot be provided, we request a full CSV export of Candidates, Jobs, Applications, and Users and perform manual field mapping. We also audit the Webrecruit stage pipeline, custom field definitions, GDPR consent status distribution, and active integrations (BreatheHR, CIPHR). We confirm the customer's Crelate subscription tier to determine custom field limits and stage configuration capacity. The discovery output is a written migration scope document and a field mapping spreadsheet for customer review.

  2. GDPR consent and bespoke stage flagging

    We review all candidate records for GDPR consent status and flag any with withdrawn or expired consent for customer confirmation before migration. We identify all Webrecruit bespoke stage types (aptitude tests, competency evaluations) and ask the customer to confirm where these are stored, whether they need to be migrated, and what format (custom field or Activity note) is preferred. We also document the active Webrecruit workflows and hiring manager approval chains for the written inventory handoff. This step produces a signed-off GDPR handling plan and a bespoke stage resolution document.

  3. Crelate schema setup and custom field provisioning

    We configure the Crelate destination environment: creating custom fields on Contact (GDPR consent fields), Company, and Opportunity (department, location, application history fields); defining Opportunity stages to approximate the Webrecruit pipeline; and mapping hiring manager assignments to Crelate User records by email match. We deploy schema changes to a Crelate sandbox or test environment first for validation. If the customer's Crelate tier limits custom field count, we prioritize and document the impact before provisioning.

  4. Test migration and reconciliation

    We run a full test migration into the Crelate test environment using production-like data volume. The customer reconciles record counts (Contacts in, Opportunities in, Companies in, Documents attached), spot-checks 25-50 random records against the Webrecruit source, and reviews the GDPR consent flag distribution. Any mapping corrections, custom field additions, or stage configuration changes happen in this phase before production migration begins. The customer signs off the test migration before production cutover is scheduled.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (provisioned by customer admin, validated), Companies (if any Webrecruit employer or client org data exists), Contacts (with GDPR custom fields populated), Opportunities (with job data and application history as custom fields), Documents (as ContentDocument linked to Contact), and Activity history. GDPR withdrawn or expired consent records are excluded unless the customer explicitly requests inclusion. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Integration re-connection steps are documented for the post-migration checklist.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow handoff

    We freeze Webrecruit writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Crelate as the system of record. We deliver the written inventory of Webrecruit approval workflows, hiring requisition workflows, and bespoke stage types with recommended Crelate equivalents. We do not rebuild Webrecruit workflows as Crelate automation inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task. We support a three-business-day hypercare window where we resolve reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Webrecruit logo

Webrecruit

Source

Strengths

  • Fixed-fee recruitment model provides cost predictability for organizations with consistent hiring volumes.
  • Built-in GDPR compliance tooling simplifies candidate data handling for UK-based operations.
  • Multi-stage approval workflows can be configured per job category to mirror existing requisition processes.
  • Open API enables programmatic candidate profile extraction and third-party connectivity.
  • Award-winning platform with consistent positive reviews citing ease of use and value for money.

Weaknesses

  • API is not publicly documented, limiting developer access and custom integration possibilities.
  • Bespoke stage types like aptitude or competency tests are not natively supported in the stage pipeline.
  • Integration ecosystem is narrow, with known connections limited to BreatheHR and CIPHR.
  • Pricing model is custom-quoted rather than tiered, making cost comparisons difficult during vendor evaluation.
Crelate logo

Crelate

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM in a single platform reduces data synchronization overhead for recruiting teams.
  • Fast setup with guided implementation reported as a significant time saver for small teams.
  • Transparent per-seat pricing without surprise fees at the base tier.
  • Flexible custom field configuration across core objects without developer dependency.
  • Export capability supports up to 15,000 records per operation for Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities.

Weaknesses

  • API rate limit of 120 requests per minute restricts bulk migration throughput.
  • Custom field cap of 20 per entity requires field consolidation for complex recruiting schemas.
  • All advanced features (Activities, Activity Forms, Core Record Field customization) are tier-gated add-ons.
  • Customer service responsiveness receives consistent negative feedback in reviews.
  • Resume parsing quality trails competitors and generates support requests.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Webrecruit and Crelate.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Webrecruit: Not publicly documented..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Webrecruit doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Webrecruit to Crelate migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Webrecruit to Crelate data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Webrecruit to Crelate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Webrecruit to Crelate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts under 10,000 candidates and 500 jobs with straightforward stage pipelines. Migrations with extensive bespoke stages, large application histories, custom field-heavy schemas, or GDPR consent data requiring explicit handling move to six to eight weeks. The Webrecruit API's lack of public documentation means live schema discovery may add two to five business days if credentials are not available at the start of the engagement. Crelate's own professional services documentation cites one to three weeks for standard migrations, which aligns with our shorter-end estimate for clean, well-documented source data.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Webrecruit.
Land in Crelate, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day