HRMS

Migrate your PageUp data

Enterprise talent management platform spanning recruiting, performance, learning, and succession for global organisations with complex hiring needs.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
PageUp logo

In its favor

Why people choose PageUp

The signal that keeps PageUp on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Centres the entire talent lifecycle—recruitment through succession—on a single platform, replacing fragmented HR stacks for global and remote teams

Highly customisable workflows and forms allow enterprises to model hiring processes that match their specific approval chains and compliance requirements

Integrates with 150+ third-party tools including job boards, calendars, and background check providers, reducing friction across the recruiting stack

Multi-region datacentre architecture supports global organisations operating across different geographic compliance zones

Positive customer service reputation (4.3/5 on Capterra) and reasonable ease-of-use scores make it accessible to HR teams without dedicated IT support

Custom enterprise pricing with no public tiers creates budget uncertainty and makes cost-of-ownership comparisons with alternatives difficult

Some UI and feature areas feel dated compared to newer talent management competitors, leading to friction for users expecting modern UX patterns

Platform complexity and custom workflows mean new administrators face a steep learning curve before becoming productive

Integration-heavy environment means migrations involve re-establishing dozens of third-party connections in the destination system

Recruiting process inefficiencies—slow approvals and candidate drop-off—generate hidden operational costs that add up annually

Reasons to switch

Why people leave PageUp

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing PageUp. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where PageUp fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Single platform covering recruiting, performance, learning, and succession reduces data silos across HR functionsMulti-datacentre architecture with OAuth JWT API enables secure programmatic access for integration and migrationHighly customisable workflow builder lets enterprises model complex hiring and approval processesStrong integration ecosystem with 150+ third-party tools including HRIS, calendar, and background check providersEstablished enterprise track record since 1997 with references across global mid-market and large organisations

Weaknesses

No public pricing tiers makes budget planning and competitive comparisons difficult for prospectsCustom workflow complexity creates steep onboarding curve for new administrators and HR teamsSome interface elements and feature areas feel outdated relative to newer talent management competitorsIntegration dependencies mean migrations require rebuilding numerous third-party connections from scratchEnterprise-only positioning limits appeal for small and medium businesses seeking simpler HR solutions

Where it works

Global enterprises with 100+ employees operating across multiple geographic regions and regulatory zones that require a single talent management platform to replace fragmented HR stacksOrganisations with complex, multi-step hiring approval chains and compliance requirements that benefit from deep workflow customisation and configurable approval workflowsCompanies with existing integrations to HRIS, calendar tools, background check providers, and job boards that want to centralise recruiting and talent data rather than manage point-to-point connectionsMid-to-large HR teams in industries such as government administration, higher education, and professional services that need to manage recruitment, performance, and succession within one vendor relationshipTalent acquisition teams managing distributed workforces across different countries that require multi-datacentre architecture and localised hiring workflows aligned with regional compliance

Where it struggles

Small and medium businesses with fewer than 100 employees or simple, linear hiring processes that cannot justify enterprise pricing or the complexity of custom workflow configurationOrganisations that prioritise modern, consumer-grade user interfaces and rapid onboarding for HR administrators who have no dedicated IT support or implementation budgetCompanies with tight annual budgets that need transparent, predictable pricing because custom enterprise quotes make cost-of-ownership comparisons with alternatives impossibleHR teams managing high-volume, time-sensitive hiring where candidate drop-off and slow approval chains create measurable hidden operational costs that add up annuallyMigration scenarios where organisations have deeply embedded third-party integrations and custom fields, because rebuilding dozens of connections in a new system requires significant technical effort and time

Pricing tiers

PageUp pricing overview

PageUp does not publish pricing tiers publicly. Quotes are issued on a custom basis, factoring in selected modules, user count, and implementation complexity. Organisations should expect annual contract terms with pricing tied to the specific combination of talent acquisition, performance, learning, and succession modules deployed.

Custom (sales-led, per-employee + module)

Tier 1 of 2

Custom — third-party sources cite ~$10–$25 per employee per month with separate sources noting starts at ~$50/user/month; no public tier table

What's included

Subscription scaled by employee count plus selected modulesAvailable modules: ATS, Recruitment Marketing, Onboarding, Learning Management, Performance Management, Succession PlanningImplementation and support billed separately from subscriptionNo public free trial or self-service tier — sales-led onlyCustom-quoted per organization (mid-to-large enterprise focus)

Need help selecting your HRMS?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on PageUp's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

PageUp object support

Object-by-object support for PageUp migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Candidates

Fully supported

Candidate records include applicant data, evaluations, hiring process status, and resume files. The Exports API provides structured candidate exports with configurable field selections. We preserve all standard candidate properties and flag any custom candidate fields for explicit mapping.

Positions

Fully supported

Job postings and position records include sourcing channels, candidate metrics, and pipeline analytics. We export active and historical positions, preserving job board associations and posting metadata across the talent acquisition lifecycle.

Workflows

Mapping required

Custom recruiting workflows are tenant-specific configurations defining approval chains, stage progressions, and automation triggers. We export workflow definitions but destination platforms require reimplementation of the routing logic, which we document as a manual handoff item.

Employee Records

Mapping required

Employee data spans performance reviews, compensation history, and organisational structure. PageUp stores effective-dated employment changes. We extract the current state and flag historical records for explicit scoping since not all destination HRMS systems support the same temporal model.

Performance Reviews

Mapping required

Performance review cycles, ratings, goals, and feedback notes are stored per employee. We export review templates and historical review data. Custom review criteria and competency frameworks require field-level mapping to the destination's performance module.

Learning Modules

Mapping required

Courses, training records, and learning paths track employee development. PageUp's LMS stores completion status, scores, and enrollment history. We extract these records and map them to the destination LMS, flagging completion certificates that may need manual reissue.

E-Forms

Mapping required

Electronic forms handle new hire onboarding, compliance acknowledgements, and HR transactions. PageUp stores form templates and submitted responses. Form structure and custom fields require mapping to destination equivalents, and logic-driven forms may need workflow recreation.

Background Checks

Mapping required

Background check results and status data are linked to candidate records. The status and summary data exports cleanly, but supporting documents (PDFs, images) require separate file handling and may involve vendor-specific data that needs explicit consent for transfer.

Succession Plans

Mapping required

Succession planning records map roles to identified successors with readiness ratings. We export plan definitions and current incumbency data. The destination succession module may use different readiness scales or risk classifications requiring value mapping.

Onboarding Records

Mapping required

Onboarding tasks, checklist progress, and new hire document completions are tracked per employee. We export onboarding status and completed tasks. Step sequencing and automated task triggers are tenant-specific and documented for manual recreation in the destination.

Employee Engagement Surveys

Mapping required

Survey results, participation rates, and trend data are stored by cycle. We export aggregate and anonymised results where applicable, flagging individual-level response data for explicit customer consent before transfer.

Documents

Mapping required

Employee documents include contracts, signed forms, and performance records stored within the platform. We extract document metadata and binary files. Document naming conventions and storage hierarchy vary by tenant, requiring pre-migration cataloguing.

Gotchas

What to watch for in PageUp migrations

Issues we've hit on past PageUp migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

Multi-datacentre routing requires correct tenant datacentre identification

Medium

OAuth JWT token scopes gate export access per endpoint

Medium

Custom workflow logic does not export as data and must be manually rebuilt

Low

Background check document files require separate file-level extraction

How a PageUp migration works

Four steps, PageUp-specific

Connect

OAuth 2.0 with JWT bearer token into PageUp. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate PageUp-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate PageUp quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with PageUp rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

PageUp migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during PageUp migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your PageUp migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most PageUp migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate PageUp.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your PageUp setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported