CRM

Migrate your Jiva data

AI-powered population health management platform for healthcare payers and providers, built around Members, Programs, and clinical workflow automation by ZeOmega.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
Jiva logo

In its favor

Why people choose Jiva

The signal that keeps Jiva on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

End-to-end care management in a single platform reduces the need to coordinate across multiple vendor tools for payer-provider workflows.

Clinical intelligence and AI/ML capabilities are built in rather than requiring third-party add-ons for risk stratification and care gap identification.

Client-configurable rules allow payers to encode their own medical policy logic without requesting vendor-led code changes.

Professional services and implementation support are included, which matters for health plans with limited IT bandwidth.

Gartner recognition in intelligent prior authorization places it in consideration sets for health systems evaluating enterprise care management platforms.

Steep learning curve for non-technical care managers who need to navigate complex rule configuration and workflow setup without dedicated training.

Reporting and analytics require manual effort to surface meaningful population health insights, with limited out-of-the-box dashboards for executives.

Integration with external EHRs and provider portals is inconsistent, requiring custom middleware work that adds implementation cost and time.

Pricing opacity and enterprise-only sales process makes it difficult to evaluate total cost before committing, with quotes referencing hidden license fees.

Performance slowdowns observed in large-member populations where query response times degrade without clear remediation from support.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave Jiva

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Jiva. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where Jiva fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Combines care management, authorization, and grievance tracking in one platform for payer operations.Built-in clinical decision support with configurable rules for medical policy enforcement.AI and machine learning components for population health risk scoring and care gap identification.Mobile solutions extend care manager workflows to field-based staff outside the desktop interface.Recognized by Gartner in intelligent prior authorization market guides for US healthcare organizations.

Weaknesses

Complex enterprise software requiring significant training investment before care managers are productive.Limited published API documentation makes automated migration scripting difficult without vendor engagement.Analytics and reporting capabilities require manual effort to build executive-level dashboards from raw data.EHR integration support is inconsistent, often requiring custom middleware for provider data exchange.Pricing model is opaque and enterprise-only, with total cost of ownership difficult to assess upfront.

Where it works

Mid-to-large US health plans running payer-provider care coordination under value-based contracts that require integrated authorization, grievance tracking, and population health workflows.Healthcare organizations with dedicated IT staff and change management resources to absorb a complex implementation with extensive configuration requirements.Health plans that need to encode proprietary medical policy logic into configurable rules without waiting for vendor-led code changes or third-party add-ons.Payer operations managing care managers in both desktop and field environments, where mobile access to member records and care pathways is required.Health systems already considering enterprise-level population health platforms and needing Gartner-evaluated solutions for prior authorization and care gap identification.

Where it struggles

Small-to-mid-sized healthcare organizations or independent provider groups lacking dedicated IT bandwidth and training resources for enterprise software adoption.Settings where tight, reliable EHR integration is a hard requirement, since Jiva's provider portal connectivity is inconsistent and often needs custom middleware.Environments where care managers are non-technical users who need an intuitive interface, given the steep learning curve without dedicated onboarding support.Large health plans experiencing performance slowdowns when querying large-member populations, with response times degrading without clear remediation paths.

Pricing tiers

Jiva pricing overview

Jiva uses a credit-based starter tier (Ojas) with unlimited users across all plans. Paid tiers require contacting sales with no public per-user pricing; total cost of ownership includes implementation fees, and comparison sites reference hidden license fees not visible in published materials.

Free Starter

Tier 1 of 3

Free

What's included

50 Ojas (credits) includedTop up credits on demandUnlimited users on all plansSubscribe monthly for ongoing access

Need help selecting your CRM?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Jiva's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

Jiva object support

Object-by-object support for Jiva migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Members

Fully supported

Members are the central person record in Jiva, containing demographics, coverage details, and payer assignment. We extract member records with their associated Program enrollments as child rows and map them 1:1 to the destination person object.

Programs

Mapping required

Programs define care management tracks (e.g., chronic condition management, complex case management). Jiva programs include configurable rulesets and clinical pathway content. We export program definitions as structured config and map program names to destination program types, noting that rule logic must be manually rebuilt if the destination lacks a rules engine.

Enrollments

Mapping required

Enrollments link Members to Programs with start dates, statuses, and assigned Care Managers. We preserve enrollment history including closed enrollments to maintain continuity-of-care records. Enrollment statuses vary by Jiva configuration and require value mapping to the destination system.

Authorizations

Mapping required

Prior authorization records in Jiva include service type, request dates, status, and approving/denying clinician. We extract authorization history and flag that status values (approved, denied, pending, suspended) require explicit mapping against the destination system's authorization schema.

Grievances

Mapping required

Grievance records track member complaints and resolution workflows required for regulatory compliance. We export grievance records with status history, response timestamps, and resolution notes as structured rows, noting that regulatory categories may differ between source and destination.

Assessments

Mapping required

Health risk assessments and standardized clinical screening results are stored as assessment records with score values and response data. We preserve assessment responses as structured JSON or tabular rows depending on the destination's intake format, flagging any branching logic that cannot be represented as flat fields.

Care Team Assignments

Mapping required

Care managers, social workers, and other clinical staff are assigned to members and programs. We export Care Team records with role types and assignment dates, mapping role names to the destination system's staff role taxonomy.

Clinical Notes and Attachments

Not in this platform

Free-text clinical notes and binary attachments (PDFs, scanned documents) stored in Jiva's document management layer lack a documented export API in the publicly available schema. We do not migrate unstructured clinical notes. We migrate structured metadata about attachments (filename, type, date) so the customer can re-associate documents post-migration.

Gotchas

What to watch for in Jiva migrations

Issues we've hit on past Jiva migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

No publicly documented REST API for bulk data export

Medium

Client-configurable rules are not portable across platforms

Medium

Clinical note attachments lack a migration path

Low

Program and enrollment status values are customer-defined

How a Jiva migration works

Four steps, Jiva-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented into Jiva. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate Jiva-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Jiva quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with Jiva rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

Jiva migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Jiva migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Jiva migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most Jiva migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate Jiva.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Jiva setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported